![]()
Have you ever met anyone who tells you that "I'm a big fan of Comcast!" Of course, not. I'm not, either, even though there's no logical alternative where I live than to buy all (sigh) of their services, even something they call "digital voice" and that I stubbornly call "the phone." Nor do I know many fans of big media conglomerates and mergers, generally. So now there's the news that the Philadelphia-based behemoth is buying NBC, a huge breadbasket of cable channels (one or two of which I even watch!) and the Universal Studios -- and while some people around these parts probably enjoy the prestige, most of America doesn't seem to think it's so NBComcastic.
Frankly, there's been a ton of coverage over the last couple of days but none of it really answers the only two things that regular folks here in Philadelphia want to know, which are a) does this mean anything at all for Philadelphia, especially in the way of jobs, because you know we could use some jobs here and b) is there going to be different and hopefully better stuff when I turn on my TV at night?
My sense is that a) the impact on Philadelphia will be next to nothing -- you're not going to suddenly bump into Tina Fey and Lorne Michaels power-lunching at Tony Luke's. It would be nice if Brian Roberts had some thoughts of his neighbors and tried to steal a "Law and Order" or something for a Philly back lot , but it's probably low on his to-do list. As for b), usually the promises of "synergy" and sweeping changes in the way we watch TV or surf the Web never materialize in these things (did the AOL-Time Warner merger change your life?). I'm sure there'll be some things -- it would be good if some fusion between Comcast Sports Net and NBC Sports meant fewer abs infomercials, but I'm not holding my breath.
Meanwhile, people in the left -- yup, my peeps -- are alarmed over what they see as more corporate control over the media. On Daily Kos, for example, some diary writers have convinced themselves that Comcast would be eager to quickly purge Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow from MSNBC, which to these writers would be the end of the world as we know it.
Personally, I'm not thrilled about Comcast owning NBC-Universal but I'm not afraid of it, either. Here's why:
1) When it comes to politics for Comcast, there's no "red states" or "blue states," only the "green state" of its stock price and its balance sheet. The company gives money to and hire lobbyists from both parties -- if anything, you could argue that Comcast's Philly's roots skew the firm slightly Democratic, since its president David L. Cohen rose to prominence as the chief aide and confidant of Gov. Ed Rendell. I don't think they could care less in the board room that Sen. Arlen Specter, switched from (R) to (D) -- as long as he was willing to carry Comcast's water in its jihad against the NFL Network, which he gladly was. To the extent that Brian Roberts & Co. even think about Olbermann or Maddow, it will be what they add to Comcast's bottom line, not the national discourse, and the fact is their shows are killing CNN and compete well with Fox for the 25-49 demographic that advertisers care about. So Keith and Rachel aren't going anywhere.
2) In the perfect world, media conglomeration is pretty awful. Meanwhile, in the real world, Comcast is replacing General Electric -- which is not only one of the largest and most powerful corporations in the world but a major cog in the military industrial complex. GE is a company with a lot more irons in the fire than Comcast had, and frankly these are more important ones, at least if you consider building billion-dollar weapons systems more important than whether you have to pay for Thursday Night Football.
Should you worry about Comcast meddling with editorial decisions at MSNBC, CNBC (where perhaps some meddling is in order) or NBC News? A little, but do you think Comcast will do anything worse than this:
Even more insidious, Gore noted, was the fact that outspoken Republican Jack Welch, then CEO of NBC’s parent company GE, was in the network’s election HQ, hovering over NBC’s chief election analyst Dr. Sheldon Gawiser. According to an investigation by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA.), witnesses at NBC reported that immediately after Fox became the first network to call the election for Bush, Welch "was observed standing behind Dr. Gawiser with a hand on his shoulder, asking why NBC was not also calling the election for Bush.”
Or what Jessica Yellin, who's now at CNN but worked for GE-owned MSNBC during the Iraq War, said happened there:
"The press corps was under enormous pressure from corporate executives, frankly, to make sure that this was a war presented in way that was consistent with the patriotic fever in the nation and the president's high approval ratings," Yellin said.
"And my own experience at the White House was that the higher the president's approval ratings, the more pressure I had from news executives--and I was not at this network at the time--but the more pressure I had from news executives to put on positive stories about the president, I think over time...."
Or what former Gov. Jesse Ventura reported about his ill-fated MSNBC gig during that time:
Ventura, who has been doing the media rounds promoting his new venture on TruTV, told the paper that MSNBC canceled his show "Jesse Ventura's America" in 2003 because he did not support the Iraq War. He said the network "in essence" paid him to be silent, which allowed him to purchase a house in Mexico.
Sadly, I could post links like this all morning -- the cancellation of Phil Donahue, who had the network's highest-rated prime time show back in 2003, because of his liberal perspective; the ongoing association between NBC News and Gen. Barry McCaffery as an analyst despite his ties to a defense contractor and a coordinated Pentagon propaganda effort, the awkward (and thankfully unsuccessful) efforts at a muzzling pact between GE and News Corp. because free speech was threatening their profits.
So when you wonder if you should be afraid of Comcast, maybe the real question is whether they could be any worse masters than General Electric.
Because I don't think they can.
Comment removed.
Comment removed.- An independent who's liberal (on most issues, like the one at hand, media reform). Why do people here keep insisting that "independent" means "centrists." I'm sure there are some conservatives who register "independent" because they they the GOP went all big government during the Bush years. will
- Well, if Comcast wants to rid itself of low rated programs, Olbermann and Maddow have to be on the hit list. And you shhould know, Jesse Ventura see conspiriacies in his morning Cheerios. jmc
I'm more worried about those of us that use other cable providers (Verizon/DirecTV/etc) - are the NBC Universal stations going to disappear behind an additional pay wall? Comcast has in the past been a giant pain about licensing Comcast Sports to other providers - are we in for a similar experience with Bravo, MSNBC, CNBC, etc? shakespeare
}}}--- Why do people here keep insisting that "independent" means "centrists." ---{{{}}}... Because they lack the brain power to understand that the two aren't mutually exclusive? Talking point sleuth
Comment removed.
Actually, that didn't really make sense. Let's try this: Because they lack the brain power to realize that "independent" and "centrist" are not necessarily one and the same? Talking point sleuth
Olbermann and Maddow's shows are "killing CNN and compete well with Fox"......BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Will, sometimes you're priceless. Bud Fox- Bud, FNC's viewership skews very old -- not that there's anything wrong with that, but advertisers prefer young viewers (because old viewers are pretty much set in their buying habits, except for things like prescription drugs, which is what you see advertised on the network nightly news). So Olbermann and Maddow will never get the numbers of Fox, it's true, but they are still a profit center for MSNBC. will
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
So because Fox had called the election for Bush, and NBC big wig wanted to know why NBC hadnt yet, it was a republican conspiracy according to Gore? How about NBC was upset that someone else beat them to "calling" the election. Lets not get into the complexities of that whole mess in 2000. But networks and news are driven by who can get the story out first and have scoop, any network would be mad if they were the first to report something. Even something as stupid as calling such a close election. Greg S
Comment removed.
- Atrios
- Kiko's House
- Suburban Guerilla
- Booman Tribune
- All-Spin Zone
- Philly (Dragonballyee)
- Afro-Netizen
- Rowhouse Logic
- MyDD
- Bad Attitudes
- Billmon
- iFlipFlop
- CorrenteWire
- upyernoz
- Tattered Coat
- Fables of the Reconstruction
- Slacktivist
- Citizen Mom
- The Next Mayor
- Philly Future
- Philadelphia Will Do
- Philebrity
- Young Philly Politics
- Phillyblog
- Welcome to Phillyville
- Phawker
- A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
- Keystone Blog
- Philadelphia - America's Hometown
- BlankBaby
- Above Average Jane
- Phillyist
- Metroblogging Philadelphia
- The Clog
- Josh Marshall
- Daily Kos
- Juan Cole
- Oliver Willis
- Andy Borowitz
- War and Piece
- Wonkette
- BuzzFlash
- Raw Story
- Cursor
- Crooks and Liars
- Swing State Project
- Kevin Drum
- Talk Left
- AmericaBlog
- Hullabaloo
- Mad Kane
- Think Progress
- Jesus' General
- The Carpetbagger Report
- Majikthise
- Echidne of the Snakes
- David Sirota
- Glenn Greenwald
- TBogg
- Fire Dog Lake
- Taylor Marsh
- Matthew Yglesias
- Jon Swift
- Drudge Report
- Beer Leaguer
- The 700 Level
- Dick Polman
- Balls, Sticks and Stuff
- Shallow Center
- Philling Station
- Phillies Nation
- A Citizen's Blog
- The Good Phight
- Romenesko
- Editor and Publisher
- Pressthink
- Buzzmachine
- The Inksniffer
- Media Bloodhound
- Eat the Press
- Mickey Kaus
- Media (Huffington Post)
- Blinq
- The Corner
- Instapundit
- Andrew Sullivan
- Free Republic
- James Taranto
- Blonde Sagacity
- ScrappleFace
- Blogorrhea
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008















