Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Friday, August 29, 2008

I don't know a lot about a reporter for the Associated Press named Charles Babington who also spent a lot of time at the Washington Post -- it seems like he's written things over the years that have annoyed the left and and annoyed the right, which means either he's a "balanced" journalist or maybe a lot of his articles are just bad. I'm suspecting the latter after reading his analysis of Obama's speech tonight, a speech he conceivably may not have even watched as he filed his analysis just about 26 minutes after it ended.

One interesting thing about Babington is he doesn't seem to care about an informed electorate. This is what he said earlier this year on PBS with Gwen Ifill:

Sometimes we like to think, oh, they get a spreadsheet out of all the issues. Most voters don't get that. Most voters probably don't even know why they vote for someone and there's nothing wrong with that.

Tonight, he did his part to keep the electorate uninformed. Check out Babington's punditty and tell me if this sounds like the speech that you saw tonight:

DENVER (AP) -- Barack Obama, whose campaign theme is "change we can believe in," promised Thursday to "spell out exactly what that change would mean."

But instead of dwelling on specifics, he laced the crowning speech of his long campaign with the type of rhetorical flourishes that Republicans mock and the attacks on John McCain that Democrats cheer.

He later added:

Obama's aides have long complained that he gets too little credit for including detailed proposals in his stump speeches, because listeners seem to remember only his stage presence and lofty rhetoric. Obama, who earlier had promised a "workmanlike" speech in Denver, seemed to acknowledge the problem, saying he would fill in the blanks.

Mostly, however, he touched on major issues quickly and lightly. It's an approach that may intrigue and satisfy millions of viewers just starting to tune in to the campaign seriously. The crowd at Invesco Field cheered deliriously, but Republicans almost surely will decry the lack of specifics.

Like I said above, that doesn't sound like anything that happened at Invesco Field. In well under an hour, Obama's mission was to spell out in clear terms for millions of Americans, some paying attention for the first time all year, how he differs from John McCain while giving -- in that short timeframe and that stadium setting -- a broad overview of where he stands on taxes, foreign policy, energy, education, etc. Greater detail on things like his tax plan already exists (here, for example), and they'll be other venues that are better suited to the nitty gritty, especially the coming debates. If you didn't know where Obama stands on the key issues after watching that speech, then you must have been also watching the Phillies' bullpen implode on a split screen.

Babington's story comes as the AP's Washington bureau is trying to be more opinionated and "edgy" under its new leader Ron Fournier, who once told Karl Rove (yes, that Karl Rove) to "keep up the fight." This is a tricky issue for me because I've argued recently that newsrooms across America should give journalists more leeway to be opinionated and edgy -- but I'm talking about saving struggling hometown newsrooms, and creating local personalities and discussions. Those local journalists need to riff on news accounts from more of a just-the-facts initial source, which is supposed to be the Associated Press. Instead, these AP efforts to be edgy and "contrarian" -- and maybe to please their new boss Fournier with his seemingly conservative viewpoint -- don't come off as "contrarian" as much as contrary to reality. It's a shame because more and more newsrooms, thanks to staff cuts, are relying more and more on the AP just as the AP is becoming more unreliable

UPDATE: More from Greg Mitchell.

Posted by Will Bunch @ 1:03 AM  Permalink | 41 comments
Comments   
Posted 01:12 AM, 08/29/2008
Calvin Jones & the 13th Apostle
Will: Did you see Keith Olbermann tonight call out Babington? Speaking of KO, he thinks the AP is dying a slow(albeit quickening) death.
Posted 01:21 AM, 08/29/2008
Tatts
Thank you! I hope your bosses are reading this. The AP has been a ghost of its former self and has produced a lot of biased, hack reporting lately (as many of the better bloggers have noted). I wish I saw less of it in our Philadelphia newspapers (or at least I wish it was edited more heavily for its bias).
Posted 02:05 AM, 08/29/2008
peterwarne
You know, I found this article through Google because I read Babington's story (linked off Drudge's site). I thought at first this was some conservative commentary, then it slowly dawned on me that Babington was intending to write a straight news story. I'm an independent, neither Republican nor Democrat (hey, I read Drudge), but I agree with your analysis of Babington's coverage. This was actually a pretty good speech, and as far as I could tell it offered some new policies. I had a hard time believing the AP was covering the same speech I was watching. So thanks for showing me I'm not going crazy. By the way, this story is the fourth result when you Google "Charles Babington."
Posted 03:40 AM, 08/29/2008
shoeshineboy
Sounds like Bunch ONCE AGAIN is part of TeamObama, fending off the non-believers.
Posted 05:17 AM, 08/29/2008
Bozzy54
MOST IMPORTANT is the realization of HOW limited OUR NEWS SOURCES have actually become !! The MSM has dwindled to be in the hands of but 5 or so corporations and folks, they AIN't any too liberal if one bothers to check them out. Few noticed when the "wire services" got cut to just ONE, have none paid attention that even if they flicked their channels or pages that SAME story or phot or vid clips and but PERHAPS a different talking head or "reporter" name with sometimes NOT even a rewrite, just verbatim regurgitation ? It's been going on for some time and newsrooms be they print or on air have cut back THEIR staffs , have few INDEPENDENT reporters "reporting" so is quite DOUBTFUL that there would be DIVERSE input as their OUTPUT !! Troubling too when it gets noted that such as the NEW head of AP is a Karl Rove munchkin who has no qualms about FILTERING or LEANINGS and rather encourages such. ) As for the wrapup of the Dem convention and O's speech this eve..It was a great speech and appropriate for the occasion and for those SERIOUS about wanting nitty-gritty details, some effort at checking out straight from the source available on line or perhaps trying out C-Span for their coverage would assist them. Today, prior to direct convention coverage, such as the Gary Hart gathering with Obama's Foreign Policy teammates discussing issues and positons would enlighten more than the garble /blather found endlessly on MSM cabled convergence of talking heads who YET were more concerned to yap about the "stage" at Mile HIgh as if THAT was THE most important item to assess. Seems too many REALLY figure the general public are TRULY dumbed down and incapable of and lacking desire for "reports that actually give INFORMATION regarding issues that DO concern us and figure we want JUST the garbagey gossipings.
Posted 07:14 AM, 08/29/2008
CB
Calvin Jones & the 13th Apostle - Speaking of Olbermann, he too is dying a slow death. Even the recent Olympics and DNC has only served to stretch out his existence until he returns to the venue that made him his money (sports). My prediction is next year this time, his political show is gone.
Posted 08:08 AM, 08/29/2008
rudytbone
Hey Bunch, did Kos give you your marching orders to write this? Do you get paid by him too?
Posted 08:14 AM, 08/29/2008
Bender
This guy is an idiot. I really doubt he watched the speech.
Posted 08:17 AM, 08/29/2008
SBVFT Contributor
"Media Cheers Obama Speech" @ 11:00 pm by Andy Barr Several members of the media were seen cheering and clapping for Barack Obama as the Illinois senator accepted the Democratic nomination Thursday. Standing on the periphery of the football field serving as the Democratic convention floor, dozens of men and women wearing green media floor passes chanted along with the crowd. briefingroom.thehill.com/2008/08/28/media-cheers-obama-speech/ WHAT MEDIA BIAS?
Posted 08:18 AM, 08/29/2008
bon
The problem is Obama ran as something new and different, but all his ideas are quite old. When Obama gets into specifics he suddenly sounds like every other Democrat over the last 30 years. He is a much less powerful candidate when he gets specific.
Posted 08:30 AM, 08/29/2008
Politburo
So that's all you guys have? A couple of media people were cheering, and Obama's ideas are "quite old"? I guess Rush doesn't come on until noon..
Posted 08:34 AM, 08/29/2008
Politburo
Don't Will, the NYT, and the GOP really look like fools now? All that blather about the stage..
Posted 08:45 AM, 08/29/2008
bon
Politburo: What do you want us to say? Jimmy Carter could have given the same speech in '76. Obama's ideas (and his new-found populism) are nothing new.
Posted 08:46 AM, 08/29/2008
chrissmith
I guess it's all a matter of perspective. Perhaps this is why conservatives complain about media bias so much, whereas liberals just don't see it. When I read those passages, it comes across as very fair, balanced, and non-partisan. Others see bias. Very interesting.
Posted 08:48 AM, 08/29/2008
Politburo
It would be ideal if you didn't say anything :)
About Will Bunch
Will's book: Learn about it here and purchase it here.

Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.

E-mail Will by clicking here.

PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...

...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.

Thanks.

Blog Roll
Philly/National
 
Atrios
 
Kiko's House
 
Suburban Guerilla
 
Booman Tribune
 
All-Spin Zone
 
Philly (Dragonballyee)
 
Afro-Netizen
 
Rowhouse Logic
 
MyDD
 
Bad Attitudes
 
Billmon
 
iFlipFlop
 
CorrenteWire
 
upyernoz
 
Tattered Coat
 
Fables of the Reconstruction
 
Slacktivist
Philly
 
Citizen Mom
 
The Next Mayor
 
Philly Future
 
Philadelphia Will Do
 
Philebrity
 
Young Philly Politics
 
Phillyblog
 
Welcome to Phillyville
 
Phawker
 
A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
 
Keystone Blog
 
Philadelphia - America's Hometown
 
BlankBaby
 
Above Average Jane
 
Phillyist
 
Metroblogging Philadelphia
 
The Clog
Politics
 
Josh Marshall
 
Daily Kos
 
Juan Cole
 
Oliver Willis
 
Andy Borowitz
 
War and Piece
 
Wonkette
 
BuzzFlash
 
Raw Story
 
Cursor
 
Crooks and Liars
 
Swing State Project
 
Kevin Drum
 
Talk Left
 
AmericaBlog
 
Hullabaloo
 
Mad Kane
 
Think Progress
 
Jesus' General
 
The Carpetbagger Report
 
Majikthise
 
Echidne of the Snakes
 
David Sirota
 
Glenn Greenwald
 
TBogg
 
Fire Dog Lake
 
Taylor Marsh
 
Matthew Yglesias
 
Jon Swift
 
Drudge Report
Sports
 
Beer Leaguer
 
The 700 Level
 
Dick Polman
 
Balls, Sticks and Stuff
 
Shallow Center
 
Philling Station
 
Phillies Nation
 
A Citizen's Blog
 
The Good Phight
Media
 
Romenesko
 
Editor and Publisher
 
Pressthink
 
Buzzmachine
 
The Inksniffer
 
Media Bloodhound
 
Eat the Press
 
Mickey Kaus
 
Media (Huffington Post)
If you must
 
Blinq
 
The Corner
 
Instapundit
 
Andrew Sullivan
 
Free Republic
 
James Taranto
 
Blonde Sagacity
 
ScrappleFace
 
Blogorrhea