Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
print
font size
options
 
Monday, November 17, 2008

 

The overwhelmingly Democratic Congress and that new guy in the White House means that a bunch of stuff that didn't have a snowball's chance in hell of becoming law over the last 14 years has a decent chance of actually happening in 2009. I guess as a card-carrying liberal I should be fairly pleased, but there's one item that everybody's talking about that I simply don't get, even though as a union member, not to mention a left-leaning dude, I'm "supposed" to be a slam-dunk supporter.

It's called the Employee Free Choice Act (and who could oppose something with a name like that?), and it's a measure that supporters say could reinvigorate the labor movement in America. I don't have a problem with the end --not as much as some of you reading this probably do -- but what worries me is the means. There's no doubt the labor movement is at a low ebb in this country -- membership is about half what it was when Ronald Reagan fired the striking air-traffic controllers in 1981 -- and vital workplace protections have suffered as a result.

Indeed, when you read what the advocates say about the current proposal, it tends to focus on the outcome rather than the proposed change in the process, which makes it easier to certify a new union by would-be members simply signing a card, as opposed to the longstanding tradition of a secret ballot. Here's the AFL-CIO's position:

People call the current National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election system a secret ballot election—but in fact it's not like any democratic election held anywhere else in our society. It's really a management-controlled election process because corporations have all the power. They control the information workers can receive and routinely poison the process by intimidating, harassing, coercing and even firing people who try to organize unions. No employee has free choice after being browbeaten by a supervisor to oppose the union or being told they may lose their job and livelihood if workers vote for the union.

Much of that is no doubt true, but I believe that a democratic process should be the goal in any decision process like this, and the gold standard for democracy has always been the secret ballot. God knows that in our broader political system, there are all sorts of problems with American elections, from too much big-money influence to issues with voting machines, and the solution was always to try and make the election system better -- not to scrap it for something else. Without the secret ballot, everybody -- both the employer and the union organizers -- knows where employee stands, and strips them of basic right to privacy.

Of all people, George McGovern, who should be enjoying a well-deserved retirement these days, had to step up to the plate with the conscience of a liberal to explain why the Employee Free Choice Act is a bad idea:

 To my friends supporting EFCA I say this: We cannot be a party that strips working Americans of the right to a secret-ballot election. We are the party that has always defended the rights of the working class. To fail to ensure the right to vote free of intimidation and coercion from all sides would be a betrayal of what we have always championed.

Some of the most respected Democratic members of Congress -- including Reps. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio, George Miller and Pete Stark of California, and Barney Frank of Massachusetts -- have advised that workers in developing countries such as Mexico insist on the secret ballot when voting as to whether or not their workplaces should have a union. We should have no less for employees in our country.

I worry that there has been too little discussion about EFCA's true ramifications, and I think much of the congressional support is based on a desire to give our friends among union leaders what they want. But part of being a good steward of democracy means telling our friends "no" when they press for a course that in the long run may weaken labor and disrupt a tried and trusted method for conducting honest elections.

McGovern was right about Vietnam and the war in Iraq, and he's sold me on this, too. If union elections are unfairly rigged toward the employer -- and I agree that they most certainly are -- then let's come up with legislative solutions that will make the secret ballot process a more fair one. But the solution to a flawed democratic process should never be to make it less democratic.

Posted by Will Bunch @ 10:21 AM  Permalink | 36 comments
Comments   
Comment removed.
Posted 10:32 AM, 11/17/2008
Talking point sleuth
I'm pro-labor, and I gotta agree with you on this one, Will. I'd rather see government focus on the widespread intimidation that corporations use to prevent unions from taking hold than look to this initiative as a means to counteract it.
Posted 10:38 AM, 11/17/2008
CharlieDontSurf
Isnt there also less chance of rigging the election if names are attached to ballots? The need for transparency here outweighs the fear of, the "boss".
Posted 10:52 AM, 11/17/2008
SteveMG
I could care less about the act. My employees know that I don't own the company, so I am free to walk away if they unionize, and that's the end of that.
Posted 10:53 AM, 11/17/2008
E Plebnista
"I'm pro-labor, and I gotta agree with you on this one,.."Yea, the teachers union has done wonders for public education in this country.
Posted 10:53 AM, 11/17/2008
SBVFT Contributor
I haven't read the full post, but it appears you are in agreement with McGovern. Well done Will. Now just apolgize for posting the piece from the Cambodian genocide denier a while back, and I'll promise not to pick on you the rest of the morning.
Posted 11:03 AM, 11/17/2008
AHiredGun
Swifty, your promises are worth about as much as our outgoing president's (known in GOP circles as he who shall not be named).
Posted 11:07 AM, 11/17/2008
jfar86
Will, you mention that management may intimidate workers. But nobody ever mentions the pressure that unions put on workers to join. The teachers union is a great example. I know many teachers that want no parts of joining the union, but feel compelled to do so for fear that they will be blackballed. If the EFCA passses, I think there is a real concern about unions intimidating those employees who don't vote in favor of the union. Workers should have access to the pros and cons of unionizing, and should be entitled to a private vote.
Posted 11:17 AM, 11/17/2008
excaliber
Hey Atkinson, drop the Nazis references. You and your pathetic right wing ilk have tried to find one insult after another, no matter how inappropriate, ever sicne the majority of Americans realized that all your kind has been generating for the last two decades is fear, hate and an astounding veneration of any excess corporate America could generate. You are so pathetic you are laughable. Zeig Heil, baby
Posted 11:29 AM, 11/17/2008
Talking point sleuth
""I'm pro-labor, and I gotta agree with you on this one,.."Yea, the teachers union has done wonders for public education in this country."...---}}} Not a member of any union, fake Pleby. Just an exploited non-union worker like many other Americans. But I did used to be a member of a teacher's union - and your characterization of American teachers really is pathetic. Most teacher are extremely hard-working and dedicated. They do a very tough job for relatively little pay. Still, public schools were the backbone of what made this us preeminent among the world's countries. And America's teachers were the backbone of America's public schools. But don't let that get in the way of your simple-minded bashing teachers and their unions for the current problems with schools. Hey, I know, why don't we make teaching even harder and provide less money for teachers and our schools. That'll help.
Posted 11:31 AM, 11/17/2008
LJL
It's no coincidence that the obscene gap between CEO and hourly worker pay is a direct result of the impotence of the worker in this country's form of "capitalism"...The low level of worker protection was readily apparent in the news last Friday that Merck and CVS somehow (?) got ahold of medical information regarding diabetes prescriptions and targeted union workers and their doctors who were using a low-cost generic drug with mailings for a new proprietary drug at 25X the cost. Now, the wackos on the right whine about the high cost of union health benefits, and here we have a case where the union brought suit because of greedy corporate attempts to switch effective, low cost generics with high-cost new drugs, even though with a little research you find that the "...cost-effectiveness and long-term benefits and risks" of this drug "has not been determined".
Posted 11:57 AM, 11/17/2008
jmc
Do you see where the almost total domination of unions got the American auto industry? Those union members are a hair away from being out on the street.
Posted 12:04 PM, 11/17/2008
RG
jmc, thats a bad combo of greedy union members and stupid management.
Posted 12:09 PM, 11/17/2008
Fisher
A boarder and critical question for unions and unionization given the current economic crisis, how does a union workforce better the company’s performance? If manufacturing can be performed globally with little to no human interaction, then how does a union worker enrich America over someone, somewhere else? To date, we find the world making higher quality items at a lower cost. Therefore, unions have not helped companies compete. Ford and GM cannot compete for two reasons: union labor cost and bureaucratic delivery methods. Both have cars with JD Powers state good cars. Labor to build a car at GM is nearly 85%, while less than 50% Honda in Alabama (Bloomberg-Center for Automotive Research. The Honda version of the union works to better the plant and plant efficiency. Agility to deliver suitable goods to the market place hampers them from remaining competitive. Unions need to stop thinking they deliver labor and think they deliver solutions for growth. Else, membership will continue to decline and balloting matters even less.
Posted 12:32 PM, 11/17/2008
philly2flag
RG: that's greedy union members, stupid management that agrees to union demands, powerful representation in congress and strong lobbying that refuses to force the American auto industry to produce the fuel-efficient cars that many buyers want. I'm going to be very dissapointed if congress doesn't let these companies go bankrupt so they can start over with new management and a productive, cost effective labor system
About Will Bunch
Will's book: Learn about it here and purchase it here.

Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.

E-mail Will by clicking here.

PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...

...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.

Thanks.

Blog Roll
Philly/National
 
Atrios
 
Kiko's House
 
Suburban Guerilla
 
Booman Tribune
 
All-Spin Zone
 
Philly (Dragonballyee)
 
Afro-Netizen
 
Rowhouse Logic
 
MyDD
 
Bad Attitudes
 
Billmon
 
iFlipFlop
 
CorrenteWire
 
upyernoz
 
Tattered Coat
 
Fables of the Reconstruction
 
Slacktivist
Philly
 
Citizen Mom
 
The Next Mayor
 
Philly Future
 
Philadelphia Will Do
 
Philebrity
 
Young Philly Politics
 
Phillyblog
 
Welcome to Phillyville
 
Phawker
 
A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
 
Keystone Blog
 
Philadelphia - America's Hometown
 
BlankBaby
 
Above Average Jane
 
Phillyist
 
Metroblogging Philadelphia
 
The Clog
Politics
 
Josh Marshall
 
Daily Kos
 
Juan Cole
 
Oliver Willis
 
Andy Borowitz
 
War and Piece
 
Wonkette
 
BuzzFlash
 
Raw Story
 
Cursor
 
Crooks and Liars
 
Swing State Project
 
Kevin Drum
 
Talk Left
 
AmericaBlog
 
Hullabaloo
 
Mad Kane
 
Think Progress
 
Jesus' General
 
The Carpetbagger Report
 
Majikthise
 
Echidne of the Snakes
 
David Sirota
 
Glenn Greenwald
 
TBogg
 
Fire Dog Lake
 
Taylor Marsh
 
Matthew Yglesias
 
Jon Swift
 
Drudge Report
Sports
 
Beer Leaguer
 
The 700 Level
 
Dick Polman
 
Balls, Sticks and Stuff
 
Shallow Center
 
Philling Station
 
Phillies Nation
 
A Citizen's Blog
 
The Good Phight
Media
 
Romenesko
 
Editor and Publisher
 
Pressthink
 
Buzzmachine
 
The Inksniffer
 
Media Bloodhound
 
Eat the Press
 
Mickey Kaus
 
Media (Huffington Post)
If you must
 
Blinq
 
The Corner
 
Instapundit
 
Andrew Sullivan
 
Free Republic
 
James Taranto
 
Blonde Sagacity
 
ScrappleFace
 
Blogorrhea