Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Thursday, June 12, 2008

Glenn Greenwald has a great post up today steering his readers to an article by Dwight Jaynes in the Portland (Ore.) Tribune -- the gist is how he quit worrying (about alienating his sources) and learned to love the blog, specifically about the Portland Trail Blazers. He says a career change took him out of the Blazers' locker room, where he had lots of friendly sources, and into a situation where he blogged about the team from a distance. The conventional wisdom of journalism is that his writing would suffer from the lack of access, but instead he found it improved. Here's why:

Over time, you realize that in spite of all your attempts to know athletes and public figures, what you usually end up writing about them is the cover story -- the half-true piece of semifiction that those people want the public to see. You begin to realize you're usually getting played. And you sold your soul to get it.

Oh, when you get close to sources, you get access. You get inside information. At least you think you do. You get close enough to players and coaches that it's a fan's dream. Sources become something very close to friends, and, I confess, I've been down that road.

But I also know that when that happens, you're probably not going to do your job as well as you should. Yes, I'm old school, and I think it's the job of a columnist or a beat reporter to always tell the truth and be critical when merited, even about the revered home team.

How true. I've seen this here with my own beloved Phillies, where what you read about a struggling player like a pitcher Adam Eaton on a blog is more acerbic and often more insightful than what comes from the locker room beat writers who have to be around Adam Eaton every day. Locker room access journalism is the main reason, in my opinion, why baseball's steroids scandal wasn't exposed when it started taking place in the 1990s.

Unfortunately, it's not just an issue in sports. City Hall, the police headquarters, the White House -- many beats place a high priority on access to the powerful and the famous, and they suffer as a result. So what's the solution? Make everyone a blogger, and have them rant non-stop about Andy Reid or President Bush without ever talking to them or their underlings? Of course not.

The problem for existing news organizations is that you'd want two layers covering, say, City Hall -- the insiders with access and the outsiders who can feel comfortable taking potshots when necessary. But you know what? -- today's news org can't afford both layers. And too often, we err on the side of access, keeping the friendly beats and ditching the hard-nosed investigative reporters.

The next best thing would be news orgs with access -- and independent, non-affiliated curmudgeonly blogger types to call their bluffs. In other words, the near-perfect world may look a lot like...the world we actually have now. Funny how that works. I do think, however, that editors and publishers should read what Portland's Jaynes has to say -- and try to assign a few rugged camels outside the tent.

Posted by Will Bunch @ 10:51 PM  Permalink | 33 comments
Comments   
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Posted 12:43 AM, 06/13/2008
Some Boca Dude
Conservatives--heads stuck in the sand, close minded simpletons who only see black and white. They don't have the brain power to discern shades of grey. Plus, it seems like a lot of them like little girls, little boys, and big boys.
Posted 12:44 AM, 06/13/2008
shoeshineboy
When was the last time Bunch "reported" as opposed to "blogged"? Perhaps Obama can fix this too.
Posted 08:32 AM, 06/13/2008
E Plebnista
"He says a career change took him out of the Blazers' locker room, where he had lots of friendly sources, and into a situation where he blogged about the team from a distance."...When will you be leaving the U.S., to improve your "blogging"?
Posted 09:05 AM, 06/13/2008
MiddleNameHussein
Liberals--noses stuck up high, smarter than everyone else, who see everything as gray because they have no spine. Want government to take care of them because they can't take care of themselves. Worry about everyone else's money and business rather than keeping their own house in order. Think the terrorists will love us if we just love them back.
Posted 09:10 AM, 06/13/2008
RG
Conservatives-too dense to understand nuance, too cowardly to do anything but cheerlead a war, want government to leave them alone, except when it comes to gays, abortion, surveillance, flag burning, etc. Think the terrorists can be defeated by deficit spending on unnecessary wars, and establishing color coded threat levels.
Comment removed.
Posted 09:48 AM, 06/13/2008
RG
Really? Tell that to Faux News: "NEW YORK - Fox News Channel referred to Michelle Obama as “Obama’s baby mama” in a graphic on Wednesday, the latest in a trio of references to the Democratic presidential campaign that have given fuel to network critics." Is this fair and balanced?
Comment removed.
Posted 09:58 AM, 06/13/2008
RG
Maybe we can get more straight talk from McCain on gas prices. He did introduce that gas tax holiday bill he keeps touting, didn't he?
Comment removed.
Posted 10:02 AM, 06/13/2008
Captain Awesome
Speaking of the beloved Phillies, Jamie Moyer is very quietly having an awesome first half of a season. I'm a little concerned about the number of innings he is pitching, but his performance is helping balance out the rough start that Myers has been off to.
Posted 10:03 AM, 06/13/2008
RG
Really? Here's his comment, sounds rational to me. HARWOOD: As difficult as this is for consumers right now, is, in fact, high gas prices what we need to let the market work, a line incentive so that we do shift to alternative means of energy? Sen. OBAMA: Well, I think that we have been slow to move in a better direction when it comes to energy usage. And the president, frankly, hasn't had an energy policy. And as a consequence, we've been consuming energy as if it's infinite. We now know that our demand is badly outstripping supply with China and India growing as rapidly as they are. So...
Posted 10:28 AM, 06/13/2008
legatus
"...as a consequence, we've been consuming energy as if it's infinite. We now know that our demand is badly outstripping supply with China and India growing as rapidly as they are. So..." It's a bit disingenuous to omit the conclusion to his remarks. He went on to say, "I think that I would have preferred a gradual adjustment. The fact that this is such a shock to American pocketbooks is not a good thing. But if we take some steps right now to help people make the adjustment, first of all by putting more money into their pockets, but also by encouraging the market to adapt to these new circumstances more quickly, particularly US automakers, then I think ultimately, we can come out of this stronger and have a more efficient energy policy than we do right now." So, b.atkinson was essentially right...Obama wants gas prices higher, but he'd rather have seen it done gradually.
Posted 10:34 AM, 06/13/2008
RG
Wasn't disingenous, I did submit it and it went striaght to held for approvalland. As for the gradual adjustment, he's acknowledging the basic market forces of supply and demand that he mentioned in his first response. Really quite a twist to say he WANTS higher gas prices, don't you think? Do you really disagree with his assessment of our energy policy?
Posted 10:45 AM, 06/13/2008
excaliber
lol, genius: surely a legend in your own mind. So often conservatives think nothing about shamelessly selling their integrity (can you say Lieberman?)for political expediency, and too may self-described conservatives are little more than crooks and killers (can you say Cheney?).
Posted 11:13 AM, 06/13/2008
legatus
"Do you really disagree with his assessment of our energy policy?" I disagree only to the extent that the statements which we've quoted do not address the key cause of the recent price run-up....namely speculation in the commodity futures market.
Posted 11:17 AM, 06/13/2008
shoeshineboy
How about the link to the blog from Eaton being a little old and NOT timely. I guess Bunch too busy to find a better example. Eaton has pitched better than expected. Must be his new uniform number
Posted 11:21 AM, 06/13/2008
montani semper liberi
"I saw him walk on water at a rally last month."............You ain't seen nothing yet. Just wait until he walks into the WH next January. That should really make you a believer.
Posted 11:28 AM, 06/13/2008
montani semper liberi
Legatus, commodity speculation doesn't exist in a vacuum. What are the factors causing speculators to bet on high prices? I submit that one of them is the perception that the American political system is incapable of implementing any effective energy policy that would address the issue either from the supply or demand side. What would your policy be?
Posted 11:35 AM, 06/13/2008
Captain Awesome
Saying that he "wants" higher gas prices makes it sound like he cheers every time he sees the price increase. He wants us to have a defined energy policy that will get us off of our foreign oil dependency...but he thinks the only way to do that is by having gas prices go through the roof first.
Comment removed.
Posted 11:59 AM, 06/13/2008
montani semper liberi
"He WANTS high gas prices, just like a good extremist liberal." . . . . . . Wow. His answer to the question was higher prices aren't helping. We need to be able to minimize the shock, and force the rise in gas prices to slow down. Why can't you read English, the national language?
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Posted 01:03 PM, 06/13/2008
RG
"He didn't say how or when. Tax cuts?" Actually he did: HARWOOD: As you know, gas prices now have hit a national average of over $4 a gallon. You have criticized the idea that John McCain has floated of a gas tax holiday as a gimmick. Is the reality of the situation for American consumers that there's nothing that you could do as president or anybody could do as president in the short term to relieve that pain? Sen. OBAMA: What is true is that given the global price of oil right now, that we can't artificially lower gas prices. What we can do is provide people immediate relief through our tax code. And so I've proposed accelerating a second stimulus rebate to put hundreds of dollars into the pockets of families to offset some of these rising costs during the summer and into the fall. When I'm president next year, what I'd like to do is pass a middle class tax cut, $1,000 per family per year to offset higher prices in gas, food, medical care. Long-term, though, the only way we're going to deal with these high gas prices is if we change how we consume oil. And that means investing in alternative fuels, it means that we are raising fuel efficiency standards on cars, that we're helping the automakers retool.
Posted 01:05 PM, 06/13/2008
RG
I'll keep "spinning" as long as you keep deluding yourself that McCain has any edge here. Doesn't even have an energy section on his website. His only solution is a gas tax holiday that he knows is a loser, and thats why he won't introduce the bill.
Posted 01:07 PM, 06/13/2008
RG
Well, we're in agreement there, lehatus. Speculation that has come about due to lax regulation of the commodities market. Neither candidate is talking about that. HOWEVER, supply and demand forces will continue to increase gas prices. Its time to kick (or modify) the habit, not enable it by offering cheaper gas via a holiday.
Posted 01:14 PM, 06/13/2008
RG
BTW, its hilarious listening to the free marketers spin, spin, spin on how Obama should have the govt intervene to lower gas prices. You guys are sinking like a stone.
Posted 01:28 PM, 06/13/2008
Talking point sleuth
Also interesting is reading how upset "conservatives" are about the fallout from the Bush administration eviscerating government regulatory agencies. The CFTC has its lowest staff levels in the agency's 33 year history, despite the unprecedented explosion in commodity futures trading recently.
Posted 02:28 PM, 06/13/2008
montani semper liberi
The best answer Republicans seem willing to offer is some vague concept that we need to produce more oil. So they'll bring up ANWAR, knowing full well that the environmental cost would be huge while the impact on prices would at best be a penny or two on the gallon, and even that impact won't be felt for at least ten years. Most Americans realize that oil is becoming scarcer and harder to produce outside of the middle east, and that alternative energy is the future, but they see a government unwilling to lead the way. Gas tax holidays seem meaningless in terms of insuring energy security and price stability in the future, and people know a discount store gimmick when they see one.
Posted 03:15 PM, 06/13/2008
Captain Awesome
b.atkinson, I think the point he was trying to make about the gas prices was that people would be more prone to taking a price increase in stride if it happened gradually. Take cable television for an example. Concast raises your cable bill a couple of bucks ever year. Say instead they raised the rates $20 per month in one shot? Which will draw more ire from people?
About Will Bunch
Will's book: Learn about it here and purchase it here.

Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.

E-mail Will by clicking here.

PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...

...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.

Thanks.

Blog Roll
Philly/National
 
Atrios
 
Kiko's House
 
Suburban Guerilla
 
Booman Tribune
 
All-Spin Zone
 
Philly (Dragonballyee)
 
Afro-Netizen
 
Rowhouse Logic
 
MyDD
 
Bad Attitudes
 
Billmon
 
iFlipFlop
 
CorrenteWire
 
upyernoz
 
Tattered Coat
 
Fables of the Reconstruction
 
Slacktivist
Philly
 
Citizen Mom
 
The Next Mayor
 
Philly Future
 
Philadelphia Will Do
 
Philebrity
 
Young Philly Politics
 
Phillyblog
 
Welcome to Phillyville
 
Phawker
 
A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
 
Keystone Blog
 
Philadelphia - America's Hometown
 
BlankBaby
 
Above Average Jane
 
Phillyist
 
Metroblogging Philadelphia
 
The Clog
Politics
 
Josh Marshall
 
Daily Kos
 
Juan Cole
 
Oliver Willis
 
Andy Borowitz
 
War and Piece
 
Wonkette
 
BuzzFlash
 
Raw Story
 
Cursor
 
Crooks and Liars
 
Swing State Project
 
Kevin Drum
 
Talk Left
 
AmericaBlog
 
Hullabaloo
 
Mad Kane
 
Think Progress
 
Jesus' General
 
The Carpetbagger Report
 
Majikthise
 
Echidne of the Snakes
 
David Sirota
 
Glenn Greenwald
 
TBogg
 
Fire Dog Lake
 
Taylor Marsh
 
Matthew Yglesias
 
Jon Swift
 
Drudge Report
Sports
 
Beer Leaguer
 
The 700 Level
 
Dick Polman
 
Balls, Sticks and Stuff
 
Shallow Center
 
Philling Station
 
Phillies Nation
 
A Citizen's Blog
 
The Good Phight
Media
 
Romenesko
 
Editor and Publisher
 
Pressthink
 
Buzzmachine
 
The Inksniffer
 
Media Bloodhound
 
Eat the Press
 
Mickey Kaus
 
Media (Huffington Post)
If you must
 
Blinq
 
The Corner
 
Instapundit
 
Andrew Sullivan
 
Free Republic
 
James Taranto
 
Blonde Sagacity
 
ScrappleFace
 
Blogorrhea