PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
comments
12
options
 
Monday, January 12, 2009

A lot of folks -- and not just in Philly -- are talking today about my friend Jim MacMillan, the Pulitzer Prize-winning ex-Daily News photographer. A profile in Philadelphia Weekly points to two basic paradoxes about the MacMillan phenominon (more on what exactly that is in a minute) that to me are really the basic paradoxes of the modern news business. How is that by leaving the Daily News, and by not currently working for any news organization, MacMillan has raised his profile as a journalist higher than it's ever been? And yet how come he had hardly has a dime to show for all his newfound fans.

The article explains:

What will their profession look like in the future? And how will it make money?

MacMillan left the Daily News in September, after 17 years there, intending to answer the first question. ”I’m catching on that there’s no future in newspapers,” he said. ”The game is over. And it breaks my heart. I love newspapers. But it’s over.”

So MacMillan transformed himself into a one–man band of Philadelphia journalism. He kept shooting photos and videos of fires, parades, protests and other happenings around town and posting them to his website,
jimmacmillan.net. And he started aggressively promoting his work through roughly 30 ”social networking” sites like Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter, where his stream of posts — often around 10 or more per day — built an audience of more than 4,000 followers. (The Inquirer, by comparison, has about 1,500 followers.) Various ranking services place him as either the first– or second–most influential Twitterer in Philadelphia.

As someone who's new to Twitter with (deservedly) a fraction of the followers, I'm blown away by his viral success. But can online popularity easily be, to use that dreaded word, "monetized"? Uh, no -- not yet, certainly:

”There is this disconnect,” he said. ”I’m enjoying this little flash of celebrity and attention, but I’m not paying the rent from it. I’m making lunch money.”

What to do? Who knows? Another story getting a lot of buzz today was written by David Carr in the New York Times, who argues that the music industry was in a similar bind as journalism just a few years ago from free file-sharing but is gaining a second life from iPods and iTunes, and that news providers could use the iTunes model (including a coming version of the iPod with a larger screen) to once again get readers to pony up for the news.

Most of the media reform crowd thinks Carr missed the mark, and I pretty much agree. The main reason is obvious, which is that newspapers are mostly ad-supported, while music is not. (Also, file sharing was never as ubiquitous as free news over the Internet is.) Nice try, David, but the model still doesn't exist, and I'm beginning to think that when it finally arrives, it won't make anybody rich, just help a few folks subsist. I really hope that Jim MacMillan is one of those people.

One last word: The media also won't survive if we don't do our job better. My friend Jay Rosen has an excellent new blog post up that diagrams the warped way in which big-time journalists decide what is newsworthy, and what isn't. Check it out.

Posted by Will Bunch @ 11:16 PM  Permalink | 12 comments
Comments   
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:20 AM, 01/13/2009
    "What is newsworthy?" . . . Gee, let's ask Joe the Plumber.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:31 AM, 01/13/2009
    Were about to go through 4 years of "Obama can do no wrong" journalism. 8 years of the same monotonous drumbeat of administration opposition has dragged newspapers down to their lowest level ever in both circulation and public opinion. I suspect 4, or possibly 8 years of cheerleading won't help the situation much.
    jmc
  • Comment removed.
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:55 AM, 01/13/2009
    LJL, people don't trust the papers because they have "reporters" who are supposed to report the news injecting their opinions into their stories, rather than giving us facts to make up our own minds. These elites think they are smarter than everyone else, with a "customer is always wrong" attitude if you question them. They get into journalism not to record and report the news, but with an agenda (mostly liberal) to "change the world". And that has led most people to not trust the news media any longer, and that's why it's dying. Yes, there are many sources of news, but you have this Democrat-Media Complex of the NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN which artificially give each other more credibility than other alternative sources, and have established a symbiotic relationship with the Democrat party.
    fafafooey
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:57 AM, 01/13/2009
    Newspapers aren't being marginalized because of the way they cover news or the stories they choose to feature; it's all about the Internet and cost structures....and I for one dread the future without a vibrant, kick-ass newspaper presence in every city. After all, once the papers are gone, where are all those TV and radio stations going to steal their news from?
    piltdownman
  • Comment removed.
  • Comment removed.
  • Comment removed.
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:27 PM, 01/13/2009
    "How is that by leaving the Daily News, and by not currently working for any news organization, MacMillan has raised his profile as a journalist higher than it's ever been?" Can it be because the Daily News is viewed as a rag about one step above the National Enquirer?? Bunch, did you ever think of raising your profile? Maybe leaving this sinking ship will increase book sales? You could head back out to the back streets and and soon to be RED again highways in search of news.
    bird11


12 comments
About Will Bunch
Will's new book: Learn about it here and purchase it here.


Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.

E-mail Will by clicking here.

PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...

...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.

Thanks.

Blog Roll
Philly/National
 
Atrios
 
Kiko's House
 
Suburban Guerilla
 
Booman Tribune
 
All-Spin Zone
 
Philly (Dragonballyee)
 
Afro-Netizen
 
Rowhouse Logic
 
MyDD
 
Bad Attitudes
 
Billmon
 
iFlipFlop
 
CorrenteWire
 
upyernoz
 
Tattered Coat
 
Fables of the Reconstruction
 
Slacktivist
Philly
 
Citizen Mom
 
The Next Mayor
 
Philly Future
 
Philadelphia Will Do
 
Philebrity
 
Young Philly Politics
 
Phillyblog
 
Welcome to Phillyville
 
Phawker
 
A List of Things Thrown Five Minutes Ago
 
Keystone Blog
 
Philadelphia - America's Hometown
 
BlankBaby
 
Above Average Jane
 
Phillyist
 
Metroblogging Philadelphia
 
The Clog
Politics
 
Josh Marshall
 
Daily Kos
 
Juan Cole
 
Oliver Willis
 
Andy Borowitz
 
War and Piece
 
Wonkette
 
BuzzFlash
 
Raw Story
 
Cursor
 
Crooks and Liars
 
Swing State Project
 
Kevin Drum
 
Talk Left
 
AmericaBlog
 
Hullabaloo
 
Mad Kane
 
Think Progress
 
Jesus' General
 
The Carpetbagger Report
 
Majikthise
 
Echidne of the Snakes
 
David Sirota
 
Glenn Greenwald
 
TBogg
 
Fire Dog Lake
 
Taylor Marsh
 
Matthew Yglesias
 
Jon Swift
 
Drudge Report
Sports
 
Beer Leaguer
 
The 700 Level
 
Dick Polman
 
Balls, Sticks and Stuff
 
Shallow Center
 
Philling Station
 
Phillies Nation
 
A Citizen's Blog
 
The Good Phight
Media
 
Romenesko
 
Editor and Publisher
 
Pressthink
 
Buzzmachine
 
The Inksniffer
 
Media Bloodhound
 
Eat the Press
 
Mickey Kaus
 
Media (Huffington Post)
If you must
 
Blinq
 
The Corner
 
Instapundit
 
Andrew Sullivan
 
Free Republic
 
James Taranto
 
Blonde Sagacity
 
ScrappleFace
 
Blogorrhea