Friday, May 24, 2013
Friday, May 24, 2013

UPDATED: "What's wrong with Pennsylvania?"

News blogs, sports blogs, entertainment blogs, and more from Philly.com, The Philadelphia Inquirer and the Philadelphia Daily News.

278 comments

UPDATED: "What's wrong with Pennsylvania?"

POSTED: Monday, September 24, 2012, 3:53 PM

The question blaring out from an online headline of the New York Times is a jarring one: “What’s Wrong With Pennsylvania?”

And no, despite your first reaction, it’s not an in-depth analysis of the Eagles, the Phillies and the NHL lockout.

In fact, it turns out there’s nothing the matter with the Keystone State — unless you’re the ad manager of a local TV station…or Mitt Romney.

The lengthy Times piece by veteran political journalist Thomas B. Edsall, now a journalism professor at Columbia University, is actually a look at why months of predictions that Pennsylvania would be a key battleground state in the 2012 presidential race – that Romney and President Obama would be criss-crossing the state and flooding our airways with attack ads – have not come to pass.

The “what” of the question is actually clear. The majority of a recent slew of Pennsylvania polls – except for two outliers performed by a Republican-oriented firm, Susquehanna Polling and Research – show the Democratic incumbent with a lead at least in the high single digits, perhaps 10 points or more. Obama’s lead is expanding since the party conventions wrapped up three weeks ago.

And the political big money seems to agree. The Romney campaign yanked its Pennsylvania TV commercials right after the Democratic National Convention earlier this month, as did pro-Republican “Super PACs.” The Obama campaign followed suit, making your TV set safe for Bud Light and Samsung.

But the question that Edsall – and others-- is really asking is not so much “what,” but “why.” Seeking answers, the journalist focused on Allentown and the Lehigh Valley, where blue-collar malaise mourned in the song by Billy Joel a generation ago has continued, even as other groups – from real-estate seeking New Yorkers to Latinos – enter the picture.

He writes that the newcomers are more prone to vote Democratic, quoting a former Republican mayor of Allentown who failed in a bid to win back his office in 2005, claiming without proof that he was defeated by busloads of black and Latino voters who showed up “by the busload, pulled the D lever, and had no idea who they were voting for.” The piece also argues that blue-collar whites – who had once moved into the GOP column as so-called “Reagan Democrats” – are put off by Romney’s wealth and his ties to the venture capital firm Bain Capital.

All those things are probably true, but there’s a couple of other points that the Times piece missed or downplayed.

First, I've long thought before 2012 that it was time to cross Pennsylvania off the list of battleground states. Remember, the last time that a GOP presidential candidate carried the state was in 1988, when Buddy Ryan was in his heyday as coach of the Eagles and W. Wilson Goode was just starting his second term as mayor. The blue-collar “Deer Hunter” vote in western Pa. has been pretty much split between the two parties ever since the Bill Clinton era.

The biggest change I’ve observed over two decades isn’t Latinos, or New Yorkers, or New York Latinos. It’s actually folks who didn't move at all: White white-collar households, and especially women in those households, in the Philadelphia suburbs or similar upscale neighborhoods.

They had no problem with center-right George H.W. Bush but now they're affluent enough to vote less on the economy and more on things like green energy or not naming anti-choice justices to the Supreme Court. And the Bush 43/Palin/Paul Ryan GOP's that does such boffo box office in Texas and Mississippi has got nothing to offer these moderates on the north side of the Mason-Dixon Line.

The tipping point in Pennsylvania came in the 1990s, when three suburban Philadelphia counties – Montgomery, Delaware and Bucks, joined more recently by exurban Chester – flipped from R to D, at least in presidential races.

Since that happened, the real question is not “What’s Wrong With Pennsylvania?” but “What’s Wrong With Campaign Officials and Pundits Who Ever Thought Pennsylvania Would Be a Battleground State In the First Place?”

Blogger's note: Expanded and updated from original post, to run in Tuesday's Daily News.


Will Bunch @ 3:53 PM  Permalink | 278 comments
278 comments
Comments  (281)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:57 PM, 09/24/2012
    I'll be floored if Obama loses PA.
    General Turgidson
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:12 AM, 09/25/2012
    Obama may take PA, but he is starting to lose FL and OH and has no chance (despite what the liberal media thinks) of taking WS.

    PA = Irrelevent in the national election.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:17 AM, 09/25/2012
    BTW, Does everyone feel better with over 4 yrs of Democratic control of Government?

    I mean with the Dodd Frank Act, Volker Rules, Basil Rules, the new Consumer Protection Bureau and of course Obamacare Tax, aren't we all doing much better driving nicer cars, have better stable jobs, making more money and otherwise shaking off the Great Recession???

    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:23 AM, 09/25/2012
    Yes! Bought a new Harley last month, and a new boat last year. How about you?
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:32 AM, 09/25/2012
    Actually, yeah. Surpringly I'm a suburban Philly dweller and I'm doing really well - and downtown Philly is just booming these days. Never seen so many cranes. And visiting to upstate NY? Why, there's so much road construction these days on 95N - it takes forever. And all those people on the Thruway using their money on vacations and getaways. I've never seen it like this.
    phillyPeteZ
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:20 PM, 09/25/2012
    @ Montani, Snarky and Philly Pete:

    I wouldn't expect less from selfish "me me me" liberals.

    Now that you are done feeling good about YOURSELVES, and what YOU have and what YOU can get...(all while you cower in SOMEONE ELSES company)...why don't you try looking around to the less fortunate whom are victims of Bankers Greed and the Government that is enabling it.

    Nothing is more selfish than a liberal whom views their position as "what's in it for me".

    Glad our Founding Fathers didn't feel they way you do. I mean what if Washington and Jefferson said "you know I own lots of land and money...I am just going to sit here and suckle from the British teet.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:30 PM, 09/25/2012
    You're not envious, are you Professor?
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:43 PM, 09/25/2012
    Professor, you asked a question, were people better off financially. people responded they were and you chastised them for being selfish for being better off.
    are you the professor of illogic? are you the professor of clean up in aisle 6?

    "the pursuit of happiness" means the acquisition of property.

    you are a stupid person indeed.
    the lopez!
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:49 PM, 09/25/2012
    You asked a question, I responded. Apparently you didn't like the answer.
    phillyPeteZ
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:26 PM, 09/25/2012
    Dolt.
    Everyone is better off. If you have a 401k, go look at the balance when the last republican was in office vs today.
    Or perhaps you are the beneficiary of a government fixed benefit pension and therefore get to take with no eye on investment? Are you one of Ryan's "Takers"?
    If not tell us how your portfolio is doing? losing money?
    Dolt.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:45 PM, 09/25/2012
    What are you a professor of, Professor1982? I'm pretty sure it's not politcal science because this if the first time that I've ever heard someone say that it is typical of liberals to be selfish and into the "me me me" mentality. I'm positive that it's not english because you have no idea when to use whom. You used it incorrectly twice when trying to sound intelligent. Whom is used when it is the object of a sentence or a prepositional phrase.
    lurge
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:09 PM, 09/24/2012
    Obama probably wins Pennsylvania. If Romney wins PA, he wins the entire election in a mandate-inducing landslide.
    Could happen.
    But not likely.
    Mr. Smith
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:03 AM, 09/25/2012
    Mandate my rear. If Romney wins it will be because his lies and voter suppression worked. Even honest republicans are having a hard time holding their noses and voting for this con job artist.


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 

Total pages: 19 | Jump to:
About this blog
Will Bunch, a senior writer at the Philadelphia Daily News, blogs about his obsessions, including national and local politics and world affairs, the media, pop music, the Philadelphia Phillies, soccer and other sports, not necessarily in that order.

PLEASE COMMENT WITH PASSION...

...but not with racial slurs, potentially libelous allegations, obscenities or other juvenile noise. Such comments will, at our discretion, be deleted in their entirety, and repeat offenders will be blocked from commenting. ALSO: Any commenter advocating killing any government official will be immediately banned.

Reach Will at bunchw@phillynews.com.

Will Bunch
Blog archives:
Past Archives:
Blog Roll