PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
options
 
Thursday, August 12, 2010

 

 

Before time keeps slipping, slipping, slipping into the future (apologies to the Steve Miller Band), let us collectively bow our heads and mourn the sudden passing of one of Washington's most successful socialists.

That would be former Alaska Senator Ted Stevens, the longest-serving Republican in Senate history, whose legendary deeds will forever demonstrate the flaw at the core of the GOP's "small government" credo, the chasm separating the party's rhetoric and actions.

After Stevens perished this week in a plane crash at age 86, national party chairman Michael Steele praised the 40-year senator "for his unparalleled effectiveness at fighting for his home state interests." In other words, Stevens vaccumed every last possible federal cent and sent it off to Alaska, thereby practicing socialism on a scale unmatched by any of his senatorial brethren.

Naturally, no Republican has been eager to point out the fact that Stevens, over a recent span of 13 years, bestowed $3.4 billion in federal taxpayer money on his home state, for a plethora of projects ranging from the scandalous ($29 million to a fisheries marketing board chaired by his son) to the hilarious ($300 million for the infamous "bridge to nowhere" that would've served 50 people, the bridge that Gov. Palin ultimately opposed after she was for it).

Stevens honed his art for decades, without virtually any Republicans ever acknowledging that their stump talk about the evils of federal money was always fundamentally at odds with Stevens' behavior - and with their desire to maximize their own share of the money. Given the fact that he had his hands on all the money thanks to his long tenure on the Appropriations Committee, they were probably too terrified to take him on.

Stevens left office in January 2009, but the party's hypocrisy persists today, of course - as evidenced by the fact that so many of the Republicans who assail the Obama economic stimulus money have done so while lining up to collect the money. At last count, more than 100 Republicans have talked tough but taken the money. One of the Utah senators voted against the stimulus - then, two days later, he wrote a letter to the federal Agriculture Department, begging for the money ("I believe the addition of federal funds to these projects would maximize the stimulative effect of these projects on the local economy"). And, earlier this week, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford - who in '09 likened the stimulus money to "a thing called slavery" - formally accepted stimulus money in order to pay jobless benefits back home.

Those are worthy expenditures, at least. Ted Stevens basically ran amok, and turned the fundamental GOP contradiction into caricature - as I detailed in a freelance piece on Stevens that was posted today.
 

 

Posted by Dick Polman @ 1:41 PM  Permalink | 95 comments
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:48 PM, 08/12/2010
    Smear a dead guy. Real cool.
    CD75
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:49 PM, 08/12/2010
    Hey, a dead dirtbag is still a dirtbag.
    yoda
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:54 PM, 08/12/2010
    God rest his socialist soul and here's to hoping the rest of them follow.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:59 PM, 08/12/2010
    Dick is lower than low. Not only does he make needless partisan smears of a recently deceased man, he reserves his lack of humanity exclusively for Republicans. No mention in Dick's blog about the ultimate Chicago Democratic politician Dan Rostenkowski.
    Comrade Noodlehead
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:59 PM, 08/12/2010
    Hack, hack, hack and chop, chop, chop. The man isn't even in the ground yet and Polman the partisan hack is grinding away. No expression of sympathy for his family and friends, not even a single kind word - just hacking and chopping away. Polman may not actually be a dirtbag, but this column sure leaves one with that impression.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:06 PM, 08/12/2010
    Sounds like a guy a good liberal like yourself could embrace Mr. Polman:) You never waste a chance to try and make your point though. Bravo. Pick out one person in a group (usually the GOP), show how that person has done something bad and then apply that to the rest of the group to make your point. It is getting old I must say:)
    NEPhilly
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:07 PM, 08/12/2010
    I didn't know that when you passed away, everything you did in life automatically smells like roses. For example, I suppose now that Helms passed away, he no longer was someone who exploited racial fears for his own gain. These aren't smears, everything in this article is public record. He did what he did, for better or worse. Rest in peace.
    jtocz
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:09 PM, 08/12/2010
    At least the obit he links to has a few token kinds words before the attacks start. While I agree with the contents of this post, I do find it generally tasteless. That being said, he doesn't actually attack Stevens in this posting. His attacks are towards the Republican party (unlike the obit, that more attacks Stevens himself). Polman calls the party hypocritical, not Stevens - nowhere do I rememeber Stevens espousing the "small government" mantra.
    still_independent
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:13 PM, 08/12/2010
    jtocz - Stevens was a second-rate piker in comparison to Sen. Kennedy when it came to bringing home the pork. I don't recall Polman going after Kennedy in this fashion, do you? Polman is a partisan hack, a hypocrite and in all probability a lowlife dirtbag who takes pleasure in the passing of his perceived foes. Again, no expression of sympathy to the man's family and friends, just a hatchet job.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:14 PM, 08/12/2010
    Oh, everybody, quit the bleating. Stevens was a crook, a legal crook, just like Bobby Byrd and every other member of Congress who brings home extra money to his or her district or state. And they're REALLY bad crooks if they're not your senator or representative. Your guys? They must be OK because you keep voting them back in, right?
    HeywoodEm
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:15 PM, 08/12/2010
    Philly, he's not just one person in a group. Polman even gives you other examples in the post. Not that you care to read the whole thing of course. We're fighting two wars, and neither side has done anything to try to pay for them. Medicare Part d? Huge giveaway, and a Republican idea. Cut taxes by hndreds of billions that have to be repaid by our kids? Another Republican idea. Sarah Palin herself took millions in federal dollars for Wasilla. So it 'snot just Ted Stevens.
    SteveMG
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:19 PM, 08/12/2010
    Hey, I'm not a democrat OR a republican. I'm not sticking up for any of these guys. i just get annoyed in general when bad people (not that Stevens was necessarily a bad person)get deified simply because they passed away. At the same time, I don't think Polman is "taking pleasure" in a former senator's passing. That seems like a childish statement, to me.
    jtocz
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:26 PM, 08/12/2010
    While I normally agree with (or at least appreciate) Mr Polman's style and insights, his invitation that we "collectively bow our heads and mourn the sudden passing of one of Washington's most successful socialists" crosses the line from biting commentary to just plain mean-spirited urination on the dead (not to mention mockery of a religious practice many of us take seriously). Give it break. Have you no respect for a man who served his state tirelessly, whose career ended due to the machinations of an overly zealous prosecutor, and whose life ended in tragedy? Please, Mr. Polman, highlight the problem of pork-barrel republicanism, but do so with a bit more tact and respect for the dead and the bereaved.
    chris duckworth
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:28 PM, 08/12/2010
    Republicans like Stevens are the reason I sometimes vote Libertarian.
    PhillyTru
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:30 PM, 08/12/2010
    Lord.Humongous: have any numbers to back that up? You may be correct, I have no idea.
    still_independent


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
About Dick Polman

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.