Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Monday, October 13, 2008




There once was a time when the McCain campaign and its Republican allies insisted on a daily basis that the greatest danger to this nation was al Qaeda. But now, apparently, they think it’s ACORN.

My email in-box runneth over. Here’s a weekend sampling of the message headlines from the McCain and Republican camps: “Conference call on Barack Obama’s Ties to ACORN.” “ACORN Dropped Thousands of Bad Registrations.” “State GOP Leaders Accuse ACORN of Vote Fraud” “State of Indiana Seeks Voter Fraud Probe” “FBI Looking Into Suspect New Mexico Voter Registrations” “On Obama, ACORN, and Voter Registrations” “ACORN Vote Fraud Witness in Ohio”...

…And any second, I was expecting to receive a statement from John McCain, vowing to pursue ACORN to the gates of hell.

Two thoughts: (1) It is absolutely beyond dispute that some canvassers employed by ACORN – that’s the left-leaning Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now – have filed phony voter registration cards in key states such as Nevada and Missouri, and that ACORN at times has suffered from a lack of quality control, and (2) It is absolutely preposterous to think that McCain, in his growing desperation, can gain any serious traction in this presidential campaign by linking Obama to ACORN, or by painting ACORN as a clear and present danger to the republic.

Indeed, the sudden focus on ACORN is proof that the Republicans are running low on effective weaponry. They have lost control of the overarching campaign narrative; as the newly-released ABC News-Washington Post poll again demonstrates, Obama is widely viewed as more credible on the number-one issue, the economic crisis. That’s no surprise, given the McCain camp’s mixed messages. Yesterday, McCain insider Lindsey Graham told CBS News that McCain this week would unveil “a very comprehensive approach to jump start the economy” – only to be contradicted later by a McCain spokesman who said, “We do not have any immediate plans to announce any policy proposals.” Meanwhile, the McCain camp isn’t even in sync with its allies; on ABC News yesterday, McCain’s proposal to have the U.S. Treasury buy up troubled mortgages was assailed as an unfair burden on taxpayers…by Roy Blunt, the number-two House Republican leader.

So McCain, increasingly bereft of effective weaponry, is apparently reduced to throwing sticks, stones, and tufts of grass. On the potency scale, ACORN ranks somewhere between sticks and tufts.

ACORN, during its 38-year history, has long rankled the Republicans, and no doubt the base voters are still sufficiently inflamed to denounce the group at McCain-Palin rallies. But to prevail on election day, McCain needs to capture most of the undecided voters, along with a healthy share of those now leaning towards Obama. Demonizing ACORN - and seeking to link Obama to a group that relatively few people have even heard of - simply won’t do the trick.

For starters – and I know this will shock you – the McCain people can’t even get their facts straight. In a Friday conference call, McCain campaign manager Rick Davis said that Obama, as an attorney, once represented ACORN in a lawsuit “against the state of Illinois and the federal government.” (Thereby implying, of course, that Obama was in cahoots with anti-government law-breakers.) But Davis’ dark fantasies collide with factual reality. Obama did indeed represent ACORN in a lawsuit, back in 1995 – working on the same side as the federal government. ACORN and the feds, along with radical plaintiffs such as the League of Women Voters, went to court to compel the state of Illinois to implement a new “motor voter” law that was designed to make it easier for citizens to enroll as voters.  They won.

Davis also noted that the Obama camp paid $800,000 last February to a consulting firm affiliated with ACORN, and that the Obama camp didn’t tell the Federal Election Commission, until it filed an amended report in August, that the money was intended for get-out-the-vote drives. But the FEC says that amended filings happen all the time, and ACORN says that only 10 percent of the Obama payment wound up in the ACORN coffers. Meanwhile, the McCain camp, still working the Obama link, pointed out that Obama had once done training sessions for ACORN workers. It turned out that his total time as a trainer was two hours.

ACORN is hardly pure as the driven snow. Canvassers in some locales have been kicked out for filing phony voter registration cards; some have been prosecuted. ACORN says it has fired 80 New Mexico canvassers since last December, for submitting potentially fraudulent registrations. ACORN humorists in Nevada reportedly have been caught filing multiple voter registration cards carrying the names of football stars Terrell Owens and Tony Romo. ACORN has acknowledged those incidents; the Nevada chapter says in a statement, “While the vast majority of our voter registration canvassers do a great job, there have been several times over the past 10 months that our Las Vegas Quality Control program has identified a canvasser who appears to have knowingly submitted a fake or duplicate application in order to pad his or her hours.”

The problem for the McCain people, however, is that they have oversold their case. What they are calling “voter fraud” is actually “voter registration fraud,” which is very different. The latter is much easier to accomplish than the former. Even if state election officials fail to screen out all the phony voter registrants (and apparently their screening processes are quite good), people typically don’t show up at the polls with phony identification, seeking to cast bogus ballots. Are we to believe that thousands of Nevadans will show up claiming that they are Terrell Owens? As election-law specialist Rick Hasen of Loyola University reportedly said the other day, “these claims of voter impersonation fraud are just not credible.” Indeed, in a 2005 study of recent Ohio elections co-sponsored by the League of Women Voters, a grand total of four fradulent ballots were unearthed...out of nine million ballots cast in 2002 and 2004.
 
Savvy Republicans recognize that, as a campaign strategy, the ACORN story will get them nowhere. But something else is going on here. By targeting ACORN (and, by implication, all the Obama-friendly voter registration drives), the McCain camp is trying to pre-spin a November defeat, by framing in advance the argument that an Obama victory would be illegitimate. It’s like that famous scene in Citizen Kane, when the headline writers at Kane’s sycophantic newspaper prepared two announcements for election day. If the boss won his gubernatorial race, the headline would be, “Kane Elected!” If he lost, the headline would be, “Fraud at Polls!”

Which is why Obama can ill afford to win narrowly. Only a decisive victory would render the “fraud” argument moot, and send McCain’s assembled team of litigators back to their law firms.

And one last observation: ACORN is involved in all kinds of issues, including immigration reform. For instance, ACORN sponsored a big community meeting on immigration reform back on Feb. 20, 2006, at a college in Miami. Care to guess who validated ACORN by showing up to speak at its event?

John McCain.

Posted by Dick Polman @ 12:08 PM  Permalink | 133 comments
Comments   
Posted 12:40 PM, 10/13/2008
Djoko Pritza
Also, McCain has unveiled today yet another campaign speech, designed to be more upbeat and less fear-mongering. Which leads one to ask: "Who is the real John McCain anyway?"
Comment removed.
Posted 01:03 PM, 10/13/2008
CleanupPhilly
I don't think it's overselling the case at all to say that ACORN was involved in voter fraud. It's voter registration fraud, so it's fraud related to voting. The ACORN in Philly is active in trying to prevent all property tax collection, and it's proving to be an impediment to collecting property taxes even on vacant lots and vacant buildings, or taxes from properties that are not primary residences, like investment properties. It's prevents the city school system from being adequately funded, so it hurts kids, who don't vote, at the expense of creating a stable voting bloc that keeps electing suspect pols.
Posted 01:04 PM, 10/13/2008
jmc
Yeah, why would voter fraud be a danger to the Republic? When, as in 2000 and 2004, there is no evidence of fraud, liberals decry the system from the highest rooftops. Now that the fraud it is "beyond dispute", they discover the system works fine and will filter out all the phony voters anyway. Why the change in attitude, I wonder?
Posted 01:05 PM, 10/13/2008
jwad56
It's all fair since Obama has already put in place the race factor in case he loses.
Posted 01:05 PM, 10/13/2008
CleanupPhilly
It's not false that ACORN is involved in trying to create a voting bloc that can be easily managed at the expense of little things like law, fairness, or ethics.
Comment removed.
Comment removed.
Posted 01:26 PM, 10/13/2008
Ender
McCain is really getting desperate. Watching his campaign reminds me of the Wizard of Oz. I can visualize McCain as the Wicked Witch of the West; "I'm melting, I'm melting..." 22 days and there will be nothing left.
Posted 01:28 PM, 10/13/2008
HandNik
I had to work for the Republican party of Philadelphia for community service. (Highly illegal in the first place) I was sent to West Philly to tell the registered Republicans who to vote for in the primaries. Oddly enough, most of the addresses were vacant lots and abandoned buildings. So, you right-wingers can stop trying to blame the liverals for all the voter fraud, especially after the last two presidential elections.
Posted 01:31 PM, 10/13/2008
tom - wilmington, de
And ACORN does all this with your tax dollars. Nice to see out tax dollars at work. The fact they are also tied to the Democrats, and in an interview their executive director endorsed Obama (contrary to their tax exempt status) means nothing. You can be if this was the NRA Polman would have had a completely different spin.
Posted 01:34 PM, 10/13/2008
NigeltheMastiff
Funny, down here in the deep -- and horrifyingly bigoted South -- we have a different problem. Georgia and Alabama were just cited for other unsavory practices, like dumping thousands of newly registered voters from the rolls after the deadline to do so. Or sending the Social Security Administration an inordinate number (compared to other states) of names to crosscheck. The relatively new law on the books requiring every voter to have a photo I.D. has been challenged a couple of times because it can so easily disenfranchise the elderly and poor. There is no requirement to prove who you are if you are voting by absentee ballot -- an option much easier to defraud the system. Sigh. I frankly get tired of dishonesty on both sides.
Comment removed.
Posted 01:41 PM, 10/13/2008
Waiting4U
Xi Jah didn't even read the column or he wouldn't have posted those ridiculously stupid posts. Typical. The McCain supporters here have their panties in a wad because the MSM refuses to create a story where there isn't one. It's the same with Ayers. Imagine that.
Posted 01:42 PM, 10/13/2008
HandNik
Interesting that most people I talk to don't find it refuted anyway. If investigations are always true, shouldn't Palin resign because she abused her power?
About Dick Polman

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.