PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
comments
272
options
 
Friday, February 27, 2009

 


Republicans clearly are not satisfied. Despite the fact that they have been driven from power and condemned to suffer the indignities of a shrunken minority, they apparently have an abiding desire to sink even lower. Accordingly, and with renewed determination to alienate a greater number of Americans, this week they boldly took the following steps:

1. They have signaled their distaste for helping the jobless citizens in eight states. GOP governors in Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas don't want to take the billions in federal stimulus money that would be targeted to the people (especially in the GOP-dominated South) who have been hammered most by the recession. To receive this money, these governors would have to expand the jobless benefit eligibility rules. They don't want to. It's doubtful that all those newly laid-off marketing assistants and data specialists are so eager to strike a blow against big government. They'd probably prefer to get that money and spend it on badly needed necessities; indeed, Mark Zandi, the former McCain campaign economic adviser, has said that, for every buck invested in jobless benefits aid, $1.64 in economic activity is generated. But Republicans seem more focused on deepening their downward trajectory. Ticking off the newly jobless is a cinch way to do that.

2. They tapped Bobby Jindal to deliver the party's rebuttal to President Obama. Much has already been said about the sorry performance of the GOP's great minority hope; any citizens who expected to hear fresh policy alternatives must have been aghast, assuming that they bothered to watch. It should be noted, however, that Jindal did his best to fulfill the party's apparent desire to deepen its plight. At one point he declared, "Today in Washington, some are promising that government will rescue us from the economic storms raging all around us. Those of us who lived through Hurricane Katrina, we have our doubts." Now there was a persuasive strategy - reminding Americans of President Bush's signature domestic failure, the episode that helped convince voters that the GOP regime was not fit to run the government. For Jindal, bringing up Katrina was the equivalent of tying his shoelaces together and taking a step.

3. At a time when the polls indicate strong majority support for activist government, and for the priorities in the stimulus plan, the Republicans have rightly calculated that they can alienate more people if they stand in the middle of the road and yell stop. This enlightened strategy was boldly articulated yesterday in Bill Kristol's monthly Washington Post column; as the conservative commentator sees it, Republicans need to "find reasons to obstruct and delay." That should aid the GOP's determined march to the margins. After all, it did the trick for the party during the 1930s.

4. And if all else fails to drive more people away, there's always that durable old standby: sordid invective. Indeed, there was a smorgasbord of that stuff yesterday in Washington, at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference. John Bolton, the ex-Bush ambassador to the U.N., suggested to the CPAC audience that the Iranians might opt to nuke an American city, and then came his punch line: "Pick one at random. Chicago." Whereupon his listeners, mindful of Obama's home city, erupted in cheering and applause. At another point, conservative activist Cliff Kincaid suggested that Obama is a communist, and that got the audience chuckling. But when Kincaid subsequently assailed Obama as an illegitimate president, by invoking the old canard that Obama was "not born in the United States"...well, much giddy bedlam ensued. It was a brilliant masterstroke; what better way to turn off the electorate than to dredge up a nutcase accusation that most Americans rightly view as phony?

There are surely tens of millions of voters whom the Republicans have yet to alienate, but, as evidenced this week, the project appears to be all systems go. CPAC will hear tomorrow from its closing speaker, Rush Limbaugh. That should help the project immensely.

And there's arguably no better way for CPAC to signal the paucity of thought on the right, and thus alienate more voters, than to free up some time at the podium for...Joe the Plumber. Which is what happened yesterday, I kid you not. Need we say more?

 

 

Posted by Dick Polman @ 11:19 AM  Permalink | 272 comments
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:33 AM, 02/27/2009
    I think that within 2 years the people are going to be so disgusted with the way things are going that it won't matter what the Republicans have done sort of like the last cycle. People didn't turn to the Democrats because they think they have good ideas but because they were so disgusted with Bush. It's tougher to lead than to complain about everything which the Democrats are finding out now.
    jwad56
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:48 AM, 02/27/2009
    No jwad, it's much tougher to complain. The spending! The spending!
    p-diddy
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:52 AM, 02/27/2009
    Great piece, Mr. Polman, succinctly laying out the case for hope for those of us who want to see a revived but moderate and sane GOP, thus again giving the country a productive two-party system. Afterall, many people and groups don't reform themselves until they've hit rock bottom. One more election just might find the Repubs there. Is the no intelligence on the right?
    Djoko Pritza
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:06 PM, 02/27/2009
    I predict Mr. Obama (and thus, to a large extent, his party) will continue to be popular with the people as long as he appears to be trying his best. I really think it's that simple. When really large numbers of people started to think Mr. Bush *wasn't* trying his best, during the Katrina debacle, Republicans started hemorrhaging support. Also, Democrats running against Republican incumbents in 2010 will be pounding their opponents with "he/she voted *against* your tax cuts* ads -- except in the case of Arlen Specter, who might get bounced because Republican moderates (or, in his case, "moderates") have been getting bounced a lot lately. Basically, I see another bloodbath for Republicans in 2010, except in the Deep South and the Idaho/Utah/Nebraska belt. In 2012 or 2014, Republicans may start to recover, at least in Congress. I don't see them turning leftward, though -- I see them disguising their rightward lurches more effectively.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:07 PM, 02/27/2009
    Great move by Jindal reminding everyone how incompetent the Federal Government was under Bush. And Steele's plans an “off the hook” public relations offensive to attract younger voters, especially blacks and Hispanics, by applying the party's principles to “urban-suburban hip-hop settings” is laughable at best. With this incompetent leadership, they have cemeted a Democratic majority for years to come. lol
    chasing history
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:12 PM, 02/27/2009
    Richard, I have noticed you are stepping up the b.s and smears. I fegured it out. When the Inky sinks, you need to land a job somewhere. You are trying to impress MSNBC, NPR and PBS. I have to give you credit, you know how to protect numero uno at the expense of integrity!
    CD75
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:15 PM, 02/27/2009
    Yes, chasing history, and woe to us.
    philly2flag
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:20 PM, 02/27/2009
    Kudos, Richard. In one mere blog entry you bashed Bush, Palin, Jindal, your pal Kistol (strange obsession you have), Rush, Fox News, Joe the Plumber (you forgot Cheyney). Let know one every say you do not have an agenda and you are not afraid to bend reality to promote it. There is a reason that Fox News' ratings have skyrocketed lately. People want fair and balanced news. All the biased liberal rags are going under.
    CD75
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:23 PM, 02/27/2009
    Isn't the changes proposed to the eligibility reqs for unemployment benefits permanent but the fed government will only pay for 2-3 years of that. So who's going to pay for it after that? The governors are right that they don't to raise taxes to pay for this. Short-term, it's a good idea...long term, it's just going to be a bad idea.
    palmyra21
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:25 PM, 02/27/2009
    CD75, allow me to help. Cheney's an idiot. There.
    p-diddy
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:30 PM, 02/27/2009
    Excellent column and so on the mark. It is astounding to me that Republicans cannot see how far their party has fallen and how out of touch with the majority of Americans their leaders are. They keep saying/hoping that the electorate will be dissatisfied with Obama enough to put them in power again - a sure sign that they do not understand why they were ousted , so emphatically, in the last 2 national elections - a trend that continues to shrink their base. It's the disconnect from Mainstream American's views, stupid. Only a clueless Republican could somehow twist the mess we're in as Obama's fault. A large majority of American’s are willing to give Obama and the Dems the time and resources need to fix the country after 8 horrible years of Republican failure. NO ONE wants the Repubs at the helm again for a very, very long time.
    Buzzy81
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:30 PM, 02/27/2009
    Excellent column and so on the mark. It is astounding to me that Republicans cannot see how far their party has fallen and how out of touch with the majority of Americans their leaders are. They keep saying/hoping that the electorate will be dissatisfied with Obama enough to put them in power again - a sure sign that they do not understand why they were ousted , so emphatically, in the last 2 national elections - a trend that continues to shrink their base. It's the disconnect from Mainstream American's views, stupid. Only a clueless Republican could somehow twist the mess we're in as Obama's fault. A large majority of American’s are willing to give Obama and the Dems the time and resources need to fix the country after 8 horrible years of Republican failure. NO ONE wants the Repubs at the helm again for a very, very long time.
    Buzzy81
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:35 PM, 02/27/2009
    If the Democrats are so interested in helping the people, why are there strings attached to the stimulus money? Why should the Feds dictate to the states regarding their unemployment programs? It won't stop there either, once that money is accepted by the states, the Feds will think they have carte blanche to dictate state policy going forward, as they are doing with the banks. Federal government aid is federal government control. Ask some of those bank CEO's if their glad they took the money. If states are interested in protecting what's left of their sovereingty, they shouldn't take the money. Finally, who gives a sh*t whether the majority wants an activist government? The Constitution forbids it, plain and simple. Democrats are using this crisis to usher in an authoritarian regime where full power resides with the federal government, the Constitution is nothing more than a museum piece, and the states and people are just a means to an end.
    jmc
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:42 PM, 02/27/2009
    OMG. jmc - you just described, to a T, what was the state of the US after the 8 destructive, failed years of Bush/Cheney. I would have laughed at your post, but the absurdity is just beyond real. Where do you get this stuff?
    NipTip


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 

Total pages: 19 | Jump to:
About Dick Polman

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.