Republicans clearly are not satisfied. Despite the fact that they have been driven from power and condemned to suffer the indignities of a shrunken minority, they apparently have an abiding desire to sink even lower. Accordingly, and with renewed determination to alienate a greater number of Americans, this week they boldly took the following steps:
1. They have signaled their distaste for helping the jobless citizens in eight states. GOP governors in Alabama, Alaska, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas don't want to take the billions in federal stimulus money that would be targeted to the people (especially in the GOP-dominated South) who have been hammered most by the recession. To receive this money, these governors would have to expand the jobless benefit eligibility rules. They don't want to. It's doubtful that all those newly laid-off marketing assistants and data specialists are so eager to strike a blow against big government. They'd probably prefer to get that money and spend it on badly needed necessities; indeed, Mark Zandi, the former McCain campaign economic adviser, has said that, for every buck invested in jobless benefits aid, $1.64 in economic activity is generated. But Republicans seem more focused on deepening their downward trajectory. Ticking off the newly jobless is a cinch way to do that.
2. They tapped Bobby Jindal to deliver the party's rebuttal to President Obama. Much has already been said about the sorry performance of the GOP's great minority hope; any citizens who expected to hear fresh policy alternatives must have been aghast, assuming that they bothered to watch. It should be noted, however, that Jindal did his best to fulfill the party's apparent desire to deepen its plight. At one point he declared, "Today in Washington, some are promising that government will rescue us from the economic storms raging all around us. Those of us who lived through Hurricane Katrina, we have our doubts." Now there was a persuasive strategy - reminding Americans of President Bush's signature domestic failure, the episode that helped convince voters that the GOP regime was not fit to run the government. For Jindal, bringing up Katrina was the equivalent of tying his shoelaces together and taking a step.
3. At a time when the polls indicate strong majority support for activist government, and for the priorities in the stimulus plan, the Republicans have rightly calculated that they can alienate more people if they stand in the middle of the road and yell stop. This enlightened strategy was boldly articulated yesterday in Bill Kristol's monthly Washington Post column; as the conservative commentator sees it, Republicans need to "find reasons to obstruct and delay." That should aid the GOP's determined march to the margins. After all, it did the trick for the party during the 1930s.
4. And if all else fails to drive more people away, there's always that durable old standby: sordid invective. Indeed, there was a smorgasbord of that stuff yesterday in Washington, at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference. John Bolton, the ex-Bush ambassador to the U.N., suggested to the CPAC audience that the Iranians might opt to nuke an American city, and then came his punch line: "Pick one at random. Chicago." Whereupon his listeners, mindful of Obama's home city, erupted in cheering and applause. At another point, conservative activist Cliff Kincaid suggested that Obama is a communist, and that got the audience chuckling. But when Kincaid subsequently assailed Obama as an illegitimate president, by invoking the old canard that Obama was "not born in the United States"...well, much giddy bedlam ensued. It was a brilliant masterstroke; what better way to turn off the electorate than to dredge up a nutcase accusation that most Americans rightly view as phony?
There are surely tens of millions of voters whom the Republicans have yet to alienate, but, as evidenced this week, the project appears to be all systems go. CPAC will hear tomorrow from its closing speaker, Rush Limbaugh. That should help the project immensely.
And there's arguably no better way for CPAC to signal the paucity of thought on the right, and thus alienate more voters, than to free up some time at the podium for...Joe the Plumber. Which is what happened yesterday, I kid you not. Need we say more?
I think that within 2 years the people are going to be so disgusted with the way things are going that it won't matter what the Republicans have done sort of like the last cycle. People didn't turn to the Democrats because they think they have good ideas but because they were so disgusted with Bush. It's tougher to lead than to complain about everything which the Democrats are finding out now. jwad56
No jwad, it's much tougher to complain. The spending! The spending! p-diddy
Great piece, Mr. Polman, succinctly laying out the case for hope for those of us who want to see a revived but moderate and sane GOP, thus again giving the country a productive two-party system. Afterall, many people and groups don't reform themselves until they've hit rock bottom. One more election just might find the Repubs there. Is the no intelligence on the right? Djoko Pritza
Comment removed.- I predict Mr. Obama (and thus, to a large extent, his party) will continue to be popular with the people as long as he appears to be trying his best. I really think it's that simple. When really large numbers of people started to think Mr. Bush *wasn't* trying his best, during the Katrina debacle, Republicans started hemorrhaging support. Also, Democrats running against Republican incumbents in 2010 will be pounding their opponents with "he/she voted *against* your tax cuts* ads -- except in the case of Arlen Specter, who might get bounced because Republican moderates (or, in his case, "moderates") have been getting bounced a lot lately. Basically, I see another bloodbath for Republicans in 2010, except in the Deep South and the Idaho/Utah/Nebraska belt. In 2012 or 2014, Republicans may start to recover, at least in Congress. I don't see them turning leftward, though -- I see them disguising their rightward lurches more effectively.
Great move by Jindal reminding everyone how incompetent the Federal Government was under Bush. And Steele's plans an “off the hook” public relations offensive to attract younger voters, especially blacks and Hispanics, by applying the party's principles to “urban-suburban hip-hop settings” is laughable at best. With this incompetent leadership, they have cemeted a Democratic majority for years to come. lol chasing history
Richard, I have noticed you are stepping up the b.s and smears. I fegured it out. When the Inky sinks, you need to land a job somewhere. You are trying to impress MSNBC, NPR and PBS. I have to give you credit, you know how to protect numero uno at the expense of integrity! CD75
Yes, chasing history, and woe to us. philly2flag
Kudos, Richard. In one mere blog entry you bashed Bush, Palin, Jindal, your pal Kistol (strange obsession you have), Rush, Fox News, Joe the Plumber (you forgot Cheyney). Let know one every say you do not have an agenda and you are not afraid to bend reality to promote it. There is a reason that Fox News' ratings have skyrocketed lately. People want fair and balanced news. All the biased liberal rags are going under. CD75
Isn't the changes proposed to the eligibility reqs for unemployment benefits permanent but the fed government will only pay for 2-3 years of that. So who's going to pay for it after that? The governors are right that they don't to raise taxes to pay for this. Short-term, it's a good idea...long term, it's just going to be a bad idea. palmyra21
CD75, allow me to help. Cheney's an idiot. There. p-diddy
Excellent column and so on the mark. It is astounding to me that Republicans cannot see how far their party has fallen and how out of touch with the majority of Americans their leaders are. They keep saying/hoping that the electorate will be dissatisfied with Obama enough to put them in power again - a sure sign that they do not understand why they were ousted , so emphatically, in the last 2 national elections - a trend that continues to shrink their base. It's the disconnect from Mainstream American's views, stupid. Only a clueless Republican could somehow twist the mess we're in as Obama's fault. A large majority of American’s are willing to give Obama and the Dems the time and resources need to fix the country after 8 horrible years of Republican failure. NO ONE wants the Repubs at the helm again for a very, very long time. Buzzy81
Excellent column and so on the mark. It is astounding to me that Republicans cannot see how far their party has fallen and how out of touch with the majority of Americans their leaders are. They keep saying/hoping that the electorate will be dissatisfied with Obama enough to put them in power again - a sure sign that they do not understand why they were ousted , so emphatically, in the last 2 national elections - a trend that continues to shrink their base. It's the disconnect from Mainstream American's views, stupid. Only a clueless Republican could somehow twist the mess we're in as Obama's fault. A large majority of American’s are willing to give Obama and the Dems the time and resources need to fix the country after 8 horrible years of Republican failure. NO ONE wants the Repubs at the helm again for a very, very long time. Buzzy81- If the Democrats are so interested in helping the people, why are there strings attached to the stimulus money? Why should the Feds dictate to the states regarding their unemployment programs? It won't stop there either, once that money is accepted by the states, the Feds will think they have carte blanche to dictate state policy going forward, as they are doing with the banks. Federal government aid is federal government control. Ask some of those bank CEO's if their glad they took the money. If states are interested in protecting what's left of their sovereingty, they shouldn't take the money. Finally, who gives a sh*t whether the majority wants an activist government? The Constitution forbids it, plain and simple. Democrats are using this crisis to usher in an authoritarian regime where full power resides with the federal government, the Constitution is nothing more than a museum piece, and the states and people are just a means to an end. jmc
OMG. jmc - you just described, to a T, what was the state of the US after the 8 destructive, failed years of Bush/Cheney. I would have laughed at your post, but the absurdity is just beyond real. Where do you get this stuff? NipTip
- American Spectator
- David Limbaugh
- Free Republic
- Glenn Reynolds
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- John Hawkins
- Matt Lewis
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Opinion Journal
- Power Line
- Red State
- The Brody File
- The Daily Caller
- Town Hall
- Weekly Standard
- Center for American Progress
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos
- David Corn
- Huffington Post
- Media Matters
- Mojoblog (Mother Jones)
- Open Left
- Political Animal
- Salon's War Room
- Talking Points Memo
- Tapped
- The Democratic Strategist
- The Grey Matter
- Unclaimed Territory
- Andrew Sullivan
- Attytood
- Chi Tribune's The Swamp
- CJR's Campaign Desk
- CNN's Political Ticker
- CQ Politics
- FactCheck.org
- Gail Collins
- Howard Kurtz
- Mickey Kaus
- NBC's First Read
- Obit
- Political Wire
- Politico
- Politics Daily
- Pollster.com
- Real Clear Politics
- The Atlantic Wire
- The Fix
- The Moderate Voice
- The Plank
- USA Today On Politics
- Wonkette
- December 2011
- August 2010
- August
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008







