Let us briefly escape these shores and touch down in France. The novelist L. P. Hartley once said about foreign countries, "they do things differently there," and what follows is certainly a worthy illustration.
Perhaps you've heard about this one. The French culture minister - Frederic Mitterrand, nephew of the late President Francois Mitterrand - has repeatedly 'fessed up to having sex with young male prostitutes while traveling as a tourist in Southeast Asia. As he put it in a TV interview last week, "Yes, I had relations with boys."
Mitterrand, a member of President Nicolas Sarkozy's cabinet, has been trying to explain certain passages that appear in his published memoir, entitled The Bad Life. Referring to his sex adventures in Thailand, he wrote: "We could say that such a spectacle is abominable from a certain moral point of view, but it pleased me beyond reason. The profusion of attractive young boys who are immediately available puts me in a state of desire and I do not need to restrain or hide myself."
Asked about this in the TV interview, the culture minister replied: "In no way is it an apology of sex tourism...even if one of the chapters is a journey through that hell, with the fascination that hell can provoke." He was a tad vague about whether his paid partners were actually minors; although he used the French word for "boys," the French often use that word as a general synonym for gay men.
Anyway, you probably see where I'm going with this. Ask yourself how long an American cabinet member would last in office if he had penned that book passage. We bounce good family people from office for not paying full taxes on their nannies.
The memoir was actually published four years ago, and it barely caused a ripple at the time. Mitterrand's political critics have dredged it up now, for two reasons: Not long ago, before he took the job as France's guardian of culture, Mitterrand offered to provide character references to a couple fellas who were accused of raping a 16-year-old girl (he's godfather to one of those fellas); and, more publicly, Mitterrand has voiced an energetic defense of Roman Polanski, who faces extradition for his '77 sex with a 13-year-old girl. To quote Mitterrand, Polanski's arrest was "absolutely dreadful," because he should not be "thrown to the lions for an ancient story."
On these shores, this kind of guy would have been frog-marched out of Washington already. He'd be hunkered down at home, with his shades drawn and the TV trucks camped at his curb. Yet in France, he is a sensation. The latest national poll reports that 67 percent of the citizenry wants Mitterrand to stay on the job; only 20 percent want him to quit. He'd probably reverse those numbers only if he declared his hatred for foie gras.
I happen to like France, based on many excursions there for both work and play (far more often the former than the latter); among other things, the French eat better than us, live longer than us, and have better health care than us. During the '90s, they even got around to prosecuting some French war criminals, finally facing up to their wartime complicity with the Nazi occupiers. (Well, sort of.) But one must ask whether they go too far with their traditional respect for the private lives of politicians.
The French justice minister said of Mitterrand the other day, "In each person's life, there are doubtlessly difficult periods, and shadows." But should all "shadows" be deemed equal? I would question whether it's wise to employ, as the official arbiter of national culture, a person who pronounces himself "pleased beyond reason" by the abundance of young male prostitutes. But maybe I'm just being too American.
What a pig. SteveMG
Who cares? From the previous blog ******Corzine's Health Care Spin: In his tight New Jersey gubernatorial race, John Corzine is running one attack ad that is particularly dishonest, and destructive. “Christie would cut health coverage,” the ad announces. “Including mammograms.” Corzine refers to his opponent's opposition to foolish state laws that force New Jersey insurance companies to cover 45 different treatments -- from mammograms and prosthetic limbs to autism support and contraceptives. Getting rid of those requirements would lower the cost of insurance, which means more people could afford it. It would also give people choice. It would stop forcing everyone who buys health insurance to get a plan that covers mammograms, and other things they might not want. In today’s WSJ Merrill Matthews discusses the results of NJ’s mandates and community rating system: There were repeated warnings that such legislation would drive up health insurance premiums. But New Jersey legislators ignored those warnings. Today, New Jersey residents have relatively few health insurance options, and coverage is significantly more expensive than in most other states. Just across the state line in Pennsylvania, for instance, a family can buy a comparable insurance policy for a quarter to half the price. I just wish Christie had a few other good ideas. Insurance mandates ripped off people in New Jersey. Now Congress wants to do something similar to all Americans.*** http://stossel.blogs.foxbusiness.com/2009/10/15/corzines-health-care-spin/ NEPhilly- Mitterrand might have some fun at one of those ACORN houses here in the states, unless they just stick to underage girls. jmc
One last one; ***still, I didn't miss it & don't get me wrong I believe Fox News opinion columnists are conservative, but their straight newscasts, such as Shepard Smith, Bret Baier and Greta are not. And Chris Wallace is a fine journalist so lets not lump them all with O'Reilly (who is pretty fair) and Hannity (less so) and Beck (anacharist:). I would like to see them compare ABC, NBC and CBS against each other, now that would be interesting. One question, do you think Obama got treated poorly or fairly or nicely by the media during his election and in the months after? My argument is, he was treated more than fairly ('I have tingles'.., etc.) when SNL is busting the MSM's chops over it during a skit. I think it has led to 'thin skin' at the White House, what do you think?*** NEPhilly
How on earth can anyone anywhere justify sexually exploiting children? Maybe they weren't minors, but then maybe they were. On another topic, Mr. Polman, I'm disappointed with your grammar. And you a graduate of Columbia J-school. "... among other things, the French eat better than us" (no, it's we, as in we do), and so on for the rest of the sentence. The J-school professors at Northwestern banged that stuff into our heads. But then, I'm older than you are, and things have certainly evolved. I'm sounding like an old coot, I know, but I really appreciate good grammar. I hear it so seldom these days. NigeltheMastiff
lib, when you say "What I don't understand is that if there's a government program that the public so wants and needs.." that is the problem with this legislation. The majority of the people do not want it, if they did our spendthrift, do nothing but harm congress would have passed this 'pig in lipstick' legislation back in August without anyone reading it, instead of in late December without anyone reading it:) Also, you would admit the congress is using acctg. tricks to line it up with the Presidents lines in the sand & it is one govt. health program that will be funded by the waste and fraud in another govt. health program. When the GOP proposed to just slow the growth of Medicare the dems jumped all over them for cheap political points, so it serves them right:) It spends $800 Bil in 5 years using 10 years worth of revenue to save money on healthcare? Come again? Doesn't insure everyone and just because the President is a likeable fellow, I don't trust the govt. to run it efficiently & I don't trust the congress to write the bill behind closed doors without shenanigans going on. Other than that, I'm fine with it:) NEPhilly
Comment removed.- What in the world is the point of Polman's article?
NEPhilly, I don't know if this is still done in journalism schools around the country, but when I went in the dark ages, students were made to compare print coverage from major papers around the country to see if there was noticeable bias. Time after time, major newspapers gave candidates pretty equal coverage. I don't know about TV, but I'm betting that print still is fairly equal. Of course, journalism and media have changed dramatically since my college days. And that is one of the print business's problems. But I think major dailies are fairly balanced in the amount of coverage they give candidates during election season. (I'm speaking of the news section, not the op/ed section.) NigeltheMastiff
Sorry dickie what do you expect ? its the bloody frogs PAEnglish
A lost post from during DPs blog change-- swede--the republicans are using the rhetorical technique of the "straw man" to deal with charges of racism among republicans. They say that liberals are asserting that any criticism of Obama is racist, which of course is ridiculous and easily refuted. But the actual liberal criticism is that republicans are ignoring evidence of racism within their ranks. Since this is credible (with the Southern Strategy racists have been somewhat welcomed in the republican party and for that matter there are probably racists in every party including the democrats) why not simply say, no indeed liberals, we republicans decry racism in every party and we distance ourselves from anybody who makes racist statements. That would take care of it, wouldn't it? Why bring up the straw man? liberal- Liberal- I guess this is just how the game is played. It does get frustrating to be for low taxes, fiscal responsibilty, national defense, and small government then be called a racist. But that is and will evidently be page one in the DNC playbook for as long as possible.
My reply to swedesboro mike from the last blog: SMike, I heard it from two different people at different times. Each attended this event. I'm not race baiting. If you deny that racism still exists in this country, you're burying your head in the sand. I know how evil it was in the 50s and 60s here because I grew up among it. You always do this -- completely misconstrue what I'm saying. It's not just Republicans who are racist here, but I can't help it if almost all politicians in Georgia are Republicans. They are the ones people vote in. And Saxby Chambliss did say this. I don't use talking points. And I'm not dimwitted (one of your favorite expressions). The fact that you use that term to describe all liberals tells me how illogical your thinking is. Just because someone disagrees with you, that person is stupid? What does that say about your own intellectual capacity? NigeltheMastiff
Comment removed.
Let's see, the French are loony and have no guts, but Sarkozy has more guts than Obama. What does that say about Obama? Obama makes even the French look normal. CD75
- American Spectator
- David Limbaugh
- Free Republic
- Glenn Reynolds
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- John Hawkins
- Matt Lewis
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Opinion Journal
- Power Line
- Red State
- The Brody File
- The Daily Caller
- Town Hall
- Weekly Standard
- Center for American Progress
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos
- David Corn
- Huffington Post
- Media Matters
- Mojoblog (Mother Jones)
- Open Left
- Political Animal
- Salon's War Room
- Talking Points Memo
- Tapped
- The Democratic Strategist
- The Grey Matter
- Unclaimed Territory
- Andrew Sullivan
- Attytood
- Chi Tribune's The Swamp
- CJR's Campaign Desk
- CNN's Political Ticker
- CQ Politics
- FactCheck.org
- Gail Collins
- Howard Kurtz
- Mickey Kaus
- NBC's First Read
- Obit
- Political Wire
- Politico
- Politics Daily
- Pollster.com
- Real Clear Politics
- The Atlantic Wire
- The Fix
- The Moderate Voice
- The Plank
- USA Today On Politics
- Wonkette
- December 2011
- August 2010
- August
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008







