Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Friday, September 19, 2008
McCain denies inventing this.

 

 

Did John McCain have a bad week, or what? Take this guy out of his comfort zone (playing second banana to his ill-qualified running mate; talking about the war on terror) and, as evidenced by the latest economic turbulence, he promptly gets blown all over the sky like a prop plane in high winds.

He started his week by insisting that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong," which not only seemed politically ill-timed, given the Wall Street meltdown, but seemed to conjur the worst memories of Republican President Herbert Hoover, who had declared, at the onset of the Great Depression in 1929, that "the fundamental business of the country, that is, production and distribution of commodities, is on a sound and prosperous basis." McCain was therefore compelled within hours to amend his remarks and insist that, by "fundamentals," he was only talking about America's workers - which was hogwash anyway, because McCain has been using that "fundamentals" sound bite all year without ever claiming that he was referring only to the workers.

Barack Obama jumped all over McCain's instant revision, whereupon Sarah Palin tried to rush to the rescue by condemning Obama for his "unfair attack on the verbage...an unfair attack based on verbage." (At the risk of my being labeled an "elitist," for having the temerity to defend the English language, I'd like to point out that the correct pronunciation of the word is "verbiage").

Meanwhile, on Tuesday, McCain surrogate Carly Fiorina zapped her own candidate by telling MSNBC that "I don't think John McCain could run a major corporation," shortly after she told a St. Louis radio station that Palin couldn't run one either. These remarks didn't do much to build a case for the GOP ticket's executive expertise. I also seem to recall that, during the GOP convention, Rudy Giuliani mocked Obama because he had "never run a business," so it was at least refreshing to see Fiorina take note of the same hole in McCain's resume - giving equal time, as it were. Fiornia's mouth has since been secured with duct tape.

But McCain economic advisor Douglas Holtz-Eakin has apparently escaped the duct-tape fate, even though he insisted Tuesday that McCain, as a supposedly tech-savvy Senate chairman, helped invent the Blackberry. Seriously. Holtz-Eakin held up his Blackberry to reporters and said that "you're looking at the miracle John McCain helped create, and that's what he did." The McCain camp had to spend much of Tuesday knocking that one down.

Also on Tuesday, McCain declared that he opposed any federal bailout of the American International Group, the insurance behemoth known as AIG. He was applauded for that stance on Tuesday night by surrogate Mike Huckabee, who dutifully went on TV and said: "John McCain has a long history of being against an overreaching government, regulatory environment...The marketplace will correct itself."

The very next day, McCain came out in support of a federal bailout of AIG, apparently deciding that, contrary to his long-held convictions, he didn't think that the marketplace would "correct itself."

Elsewhere on the flip-flop front, McCain declared on Tuesday that he favored creation of a "9/11-type commission" to study the Wall Street situation and recommend future solutions (at least, by invoking 9/11, he got to spend a few seconds inside his comfort zone). But after it became apparent that this idea was a dog - it made him look like a ditherer, as opposed to a take-charge leader - he reversed himself and, within 48 hours, he was suddenly a pro-government activist, proposing the creation of a brand new federal agency. But he was also anxious to kick some butt, any butt, thus declaring yesterday that the president should fire Chris Cox, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. This idea died as soon as it left McCain's mouth. Apparently our seasoned, experienced Republican candidate didn't know that presidents can't fire the chairmen of independent regulatory commissions; this prohibition was first decreed by the U.S. Supreme Court 73 years ago.

There were other embarrassments this week - such as the moment when Palin, on the stump and apparently drunk on her own celebrity, took top billing by referring to the next four years as "a Palin and McCain administration" - but perhaps the weirdest was not about the economy at all. It was about Spain.

I won't recycle all the details, which have been covered extensively elsewhere. In essence, earlier this week, when a Latino radio reporter in Miami asked McCain, repeatedly, whether he'd be willing next year to meet with the president of Spain, McCain wouldn't give a straight answer. Instead, he kept talking about our allies in Latin America and "this hemisphere." The incident has touched off considerable debate over whether McCain was having a senior moment, whether he didn't understand the questions and was somehow confusing Spanish president Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero with someone on this side of the pond.

But let's assume he was not temporarily addled by age. Let's assume instead that his campaign was giving out straight talk when it insisted yesterday that McCain had done exactly what he had intended to do - signal his refusal to take any meeting with Zapatero. If true, that stance puts McCain right in sync with President Bush and the neoconservatives - which, politically, is not necessarily the best place to be.

Zapatero has been on the outs with the Bush regime ever since he had the audacity to pull Spanish troops out of Iraq. McCain is therefore signaling - if we can believe yesterday's spin - that he would refuse to meet with a western democratic NATO ally, apparently because this ally had the smarts to separate itself from the disastrous war that McCain has always supported. The McCain position is thus a perpetuation of the Bush "you're either with us, or against us" credo, and fits squarely with the perception - already embraced by a landslide majority of Americans - that McCain as president would either advance Bush's priorities, or govern even more conservatively.

And that's the kindest interpretation of this incident; indeed, that's the interpretation in Spain, where our ally is unsurprisingly upset with McCain. All told, when McCain suffers turbulence even inside his comfort zone, you know it's been a really bad week.

 

Click here for Philly.com's politics page.

 

 

 

Posted by Dick Polman @ 1:14 PM  Permalink | 89 comments
Comments   
Posted 01:46 PM, 09/19/2008
prudential2
Mr. Polman: Please note that Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapataro is the prime minister of Spain, not president. His last name is Rodriguez, not Zapatero. As for the erst of your commentary, cool down dude!
Posted 01:57 PM, 09/19/2008
John Brumfield
McCain's nounage was just as wrong as his verbage, Sarah. Also, given Palin's propensity of usurping her political mentors once she has some power, yesterday in her deceitfully repetitive, "I told Congress, Thanks but no thanks to that bridge to nowhere" speech, she referred to the "Palin-McCain" ticket. That's some pretty good verbage right there.
Posted 02:05 PM, 09/19/2008
p-diddy
The Wall Street Journal published a scathing editorial about McCain the other day - not good news for the GOP. The avalanche of BS has become too much for any sane person to process. Now McCain is a populist who wants more government oversight. Hideous.
Posted 02:26 PM, 09/19/2008
Gibba Mang
Most intelligent folks understand that McCain is way in over his head and will say antyhing, including new regulations, to get elected. A chimp could do that and already has. I'm looking at you Bush!
Posted 02:37 PM, 09/19/2008
djoseph
It concerns me greatly that McCain has spent 25 years in Washington fighting against the very Wall Street regulation and oversight he says he now favors (at least some days) and it concerns me greatly that he admitted he doesn't really know much about the complexities of economic issues nor has had anything substantial posted on his website about his fiscal policy ideas. And I am concerned that a McCain administration will be dominated and influenced by the very people who dominate and influence his campaign: lobbyists. Obama, while certainly not perfect, at least seems consistent in the proposals he put on his website months and months ago and what he is saying now. He also has run a lobbyist-free campaign. McCain, on the otherhand, seems like he's in a house of mirrors. And needless to say the Big League issue of a world financial crisis is so obviously above the head of Gov. Palin.
Posted 02:42 PM, 09/19/2008
yoda
Gibba, you are right, but the difference is that now people understand what happens when you appoint/elect a chimp to the White House, and they are not about to do it again!
Posted 02:46 PM, 09/19/2008
sleepy
oh Barack has al the answers, can't wait till the former head of Fannnie Mae is Treas Sec.
Posted 02:50 PM, 09/19/2008
tom - wilmington, de
djoseph, lobbyists who either are or have worked on Obama's campaign include Teal Baker, who worked from Jan 1 to June 30, 2007 for the Podesta Group (a K Street lobbying firm) and billed over $2 million for that period; Emmett Beliveau, who worked for lobbying firm Patton Boggs and represented Oshkosh Truck and Pinkerton Consulting; Brandon Hurlbut, who represented the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, among other clients. Those are just three, and there are others, but Obama refuses to release a full list of his economic and policy advisors (I wonder why that is). So, your assertion that Obama has run a lobbyist-free campaign would seem to be inconsistent with the facts. Oh, and by the way Polman, Fiorina also said neither Obama nor Biden could also run a corporation...you left that out. As for verbage/verbiage, according to dictionaries, it can be pronounced either way...check your phonics before you give your elitist opinion.
Posted 02:52 PM, 09/19/2008
bon
Obama took days to take a position on the AIG bailout. (I am still not sure he has.) Obama has been exposed for having two ex-chairmen of Fannie Mae having worked for him and advising him. Biden said that high taxes were a matter of patriotism and religion. Both candidate have made mistakes this week, Mr. Polman, but if you really cannot see the gravity of Obama's mistakes, you are wearing blinders. (Zapateros is a jerk. I wouldn't want to meet with him in person either. If we have something important to discuss with the guy send the secretary of state to deal with him.)
Posted 02:58 PM, 09/19/2008
bon
Tom: Don't forget that David Axelrod's lobbying by another name: "When Illinois utility Commonwealth Edison wanted state lawmakers to back a hefty rate hike two years ago, it took a creative lobbying approach, concocting a new outfit that seemed devoted to the public interest: Consumers Organized for Reliable Electricity, or CORE. CORE ran TV ads warning of a "California-style energy crisis" if the rate increase wasn't approved—but without disclosing the commercials were funded by Commonwealth Edison. The ad campaign provoked a brief uproar when its ties to the utility, which is owned by Exelon Corp., became known. "It's corporate money trying to hoodwink the public," the state's Democratic Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn said. What got scant notice then—but may soon get more scrutiny—is that CORE was the brainchild of ASK Public Strategies, a consulting firm whose senior partner is David Axelrod, now chief strategist for Barack Obama. ... ASK last year proposed a similar "political campaign style approach" to help Illinois hospitals block a state proposal that would have forced them to provide more medical care to the indigent. One part of its plan: create a "grassroots" group of medical experts "capable of contacting policymakers to advocate for our position," according to a copy of the proposal." This is the guy in charge of Obama's "lobbyists free" campaign.
Posted 03:08 PM, 09/19/2008
herheineystinkhole
Ewww. Nothing but moose-mounting repug trolls here today ... LATER!
Comment removed.
Posted 03:17 PM, 09/19/2008
bon
BOHICA: Haha. Teleprompter as a presidential magic 8-ball. I like it. :)
Posted 03:17 PM, 09/19/2008
ModerateMarge
The massive Federal Bailouts of AIG and Wall Street are the result of the GOP's government regulations are the enemy bs. It's been nothing short of amazing watching McCain be against the bailouts then being for them. Time to get the other team in - to have sane regulations and protect the public not fleece them as per usual with this regime.
Posted 03:19 PM, 09/19/2008
Gibba Mang
As a voter you must ask yourself why McCain who has been an anti regulatory guy for 26 years conviently flip flops on adding more regulations at this time? Believe me, if he was not running for POTUS, he would oppose the bailout. I just don't like him insulting my intelligence by saying he's for the working man. He isn't, he's for the rich, wealthy and well connected. Why do you think he was Big Oil lobbyists on his staff. McCain is too old skool to take America to peace and properity. Obama/Biden can!
About Dick Polman

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.