Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Friday, July 18, 2008

 

Three belly laughs at week's end:

The McCain campaign is whining about the media. That is not a misprint. John McCain, of all people, a politician who for years has been treated as a demigod by the Washington press corps - and who, in fact, has enjoyed yet another easy ride during the '08 campaign - is grousing, via his spokeswoman, about all the media attention that Barack Obama will receive during his impending overseas trip.

Jill Hazelbaker said the other day, "It certainly hasn't escaped us that the three network newscasts will originate from stops on Obama's trip." The implication, of course, is that McCain won't get nearly the same attention while Obama is abroad.

Regarding that lament, I will now quote actor Steve Buscemi, who, in the role of Mr. Pink in Reservoir Dogs, rubbed his thumb against his index finger and said, "Do you know what this is? It's the world's smallest violin." It's tough to pluck the strings of sympathy for McCain, since, in the first place, he made such a big issue about Obama's lack of overseas travel. He made that a campaign issue, and banged away at it for weeks. But now that Obama is actually going - and drawing a huge media contingent, for solid newsworthy reasons that I will shortly explain - he doesn't like that, either. The line now is that Obama's trip is merely a "campaign rally" and "photo op." And since the McCain camp is now stuck with the prospect that Obama will draw enormous crowds at many of his stops - thereby telegraphing to many Americans how nice it might be to again have a president who is popular abroad - the pre-buttal strategy is to complain in advance that the media is acting as Obama's enabler.

And that's our first belly laugh today, because few Washington politicians have been coddled by the media as McCain has. I won't recite chapter and verse about why this is so, or catalogue how an ardent career conservative has somehow attained the journalistic shorthand of "maverick," since I have covered that ground before. (OK, just one example: When McCain started flip-flopping in 2006 by pandering to the GOP's right wing, a Washington Post columnist excused his actions by writing, "A successful campaign almost requires some fibbing.")

But, just to give you a flavor of the dominant Washington attitude, consider this recently-published dispatch from a Time magazine correspondent. You might need anti-nausea medicine by the time you finish reading: "Here's one thing you need to know about John McCain. He's always been the coolest kid in school....When he sits in the back of his campaign bus, we reporters gather like kids in the cafeteria huddling around the star quarterback. We ask him tough questions, and we try to make him slip up, but almost inevitably we come around to admiring him....He is, to put it simply, cooler than us."

And lately the kids in the cafeteria have done an effective job protecting the quarterback. For instance, you may remember the incident last week, when McCain declared at an event that the 73-year-old structure of the popular Social Security program, whereby current young workers pay taxes to support the current generation of retirees, is actually, in his words, "an absolute disgrace." Seven newspapers, including The Washington Post, covered the event - and all failed to mention McCain's comment in their reports. The cable and network news shows barely ran the video of the comment. And even though McCain actually repeated his comments, albeit in softer language, in a CNN interview, the Washington press corps caught up with the story by making excuses for him. A Time magazine writer said that McCain had merely been "misspeaking," and a Washington Post reporter insisted in an online chat that McCain had probably  not intended to offer such a sweeping criticism of the program itself.

Nor have I seen heavy mainstream media scrutiny of McCain's repeated foreign affairs stumblings: his multiple confusions of the Sunni and the Shia; his confusion of Somalia and the Sudan; his multiple references to "Czechoslovokia," a country that ceased to exist in 1993; his delusional claim that the U.S. has "drawn down to pre-surge levels" in Iraq; his recent reference to Prime Minister Putin of Russia as "President Putin of Germany." Maybe I missed it, but I don't recall seeing much Washington press corps discussion of whether McCain is perhaps not as sharp on the nuances of foreign affairs as he claims to be - or, at the very least, whether he is not as mentally sharp as a president ideally should be.

Anyway, with respect to the McCain camp's whine about all the press that Obama will generate while abroad: The journalistic judgment is easy to explain. It's Obama's first national security trip as a candidate, his first trip to a war zone. He's new to the national scene. And, more broadly, he's a new kind of candidate, an historic first. He garnered more spring coverage than McCain because his protracted contest with Hillary Clinton was also an historic first. The press does indeed have a bias. It favors what is new, and it favors firsts.

And when a campaign starts grousing about the press, it is a sign of political weakness. In the case of the McCain campaign, it reflects a basic fear that its candidate will lose.

-------

Bathroom humor from C-Span.

Our second belly laugh comes courtesy of Larry Craig, Republican of Idaho. Last time we saw him, he was taking a wide stance in a Minneapolis airport bathroom stall, rubbing against the foot of an undercover cop. His subsequent guilty plea in a sex sting, and his insistence on staying in the U.S. Senate, have embarrassed the party of "family values," but at least he was keeping a low profile...

Until yesterday, apparently, when he showed up on the Senate floor to argue for U.S. energy independence. He did OK for awhile - until he declared that we shouldn't allow Nigeria or Saudi Arabia or Iran to "jerk us around by the gas nozzle."

Sounds to me like he needs a few sessions with Dr. Freud.

-------

And if you can't muster a smile for those two items, try this one. And have a good weekend.

Posted by Dick Polman @ 11:30 AM  Permalink | 85 comments
Comments   
Posted 03:09 PM, 07/23/2008
thelastRepublicaninPhilly
Dick, social security is a disgrace. That and medicare will financially BANKCRUPT America in 30 years. Dick isn't obvious (even to you) that these networks are in the tank for Obama? So one trip sures up his foreign policy inexperience. By that logic, I've written a few blogs, I guess I'm qualified for your job. Djoko, Wright also lives in a gated community. Djoko, the rich actually do pay more in taxes, go look on the IRS website and see the numbers. It's unAmerican to redistribute ones wealth to another, it's unAmerican to charge someone a greater price for the same service just because they can afford it. McCain is NOT a warmonger, Djoko! He knows better then anyone else the horrors of war; and the consequences of losing a war.
Posted 12:42 PM, 07/21/2008
Djoko Pritza
Hey, Tom, I'm taking your comments under advisement.
Posted 10:57 AM, 07/21/2008
yobill626
Don't forget the shakedowns for the Bush Library --- which also gets you face-to-face time with the Head Reader.
Posted 10:51 AM, 07/21/2008
yobill626
You have to admit that Rangel is a piker in abusing public funds compared to some of the Conservative Republican luminaries such as Ted Stevens of Alaska. Fortunately, it looks like the possibility is increasing that Alaskan voters will finally hold him accountable. Oh, & the diet soda is a necessity (only if it is caffeinated) --- we can't have anyone sleeping in the wrong spots during TV's Prime Time.
Posted 09:23 AM, 07/21/2008
tom - wilmington, de
About the movie tickets (as well as tickets to the zoo and a nature museum), I wondered if the owners of the theatres approved of that plan, if popcorn and a coke were included (butter/trans fat free popcorn and diet soda of course...gotta watch those carbs), and if they would be given a choice of what movie to see. What a lame idea...if the Republicans had that idea, this site would be immersed in criticism...but as of yet, nary a word. I was also laughing at Charlie Rangel, who got more than $2.6 million in earmarks for his own personal library at City College of New York, as well as writing letters to corporations who had business before his committee to look favorably at his foundation on Congressional letterhead. I thought Nancy and the Dems were suppposed to end this "culture of corruption"...guess they will do that after passing legislation to lower energy costs.
Posted 12:03 AM, 07/21/2008
JeffA
Bon, I'd like to know more about this "isolationist" vote. Dr. No often takes apparently peculiar stances until you dig a little deeper to hear his rationale for a particular vote. He's no perfect angel and my original post about him was not to promote him, but rather to push for more willingness by candidates and supporters to debate in a context which falls back upon foundational tenets. You seem more comfortable dismissing him over perceived isolationism than talking about the lack of Sound Money, Bankers saving/promoting bankers, Pumping dollars/devaluing the greenback, foreign entanglements and 700 bases around the world. The level of debate he brings questions the status quo. We all should question it. STRONGLY!
Posted 12:36 PM, 07/20/2008
yobill626
tom: As far as your list poking fun at the Dems & Obama, I agree (with one addition). 1] I howled at the TV when Obama unveiled his "seal". If he wins, lets hope this insn't the first indication of his morphing into a pompous blowhard by his second Administration. 2] I really believe that ONE of the reasons the Congress' approval rating is so low, that they have completely failed to rein in Bush & the GOP (both before & after 2006) on the Iraq disaster, the overall incompetent management, the abuses of the Constitution & the perception that too many guys (mostly Republicans) in power from 2002 - 2006 lined their pockets at an outrageous level. Now they are letting stuff go just to get through the GE --- disgraceful! 3] Bush has been so short of troops, that Afghanistan has always gotten the short end of the stick. If we were not in Iraq, do you really think NATO would stop us from doing want we thought was best in Afghanistan?......Lastly, you & the other Conservatives here have really disappointed me --- no one has made fun of the recent report out of Denver that one of the ways the Dems are going to deal with Denver's "homeless problem" during their Convention is by giving them all --- tickets to the movies! Which Democratic genius came up with this winner? Even in a change election, it looks like the Dems are working out of the Republican playbook.
Posted 11:59 AM, 07/20/2008
yobill626
tom: I agree with quite a bit of your comments over your "several" posts (what was up with you anyway?), however, your "media is in the tank for Obama" is a bit worn out. Obama has generated a enormous amount of passion, despite himself being a bit of a stiff with the media. They're just following the crowds. Many members of the Media have shown that they personally l-o-v-e McCain --- heck, even Chris Matthews said that the media is "McCain's real base". One-on-one, he's one of the best at handling them. The media is with Obama now because McCain himself made Obama's need to go to overseas important to the election. Essentially, McCain tried to put Obama in a corner, but the Obama campaign has simply turned it to their advantage. So far, Obama seems to be well on his way to hitting a home run. My question to you is: McCain keeps trying to paint Obama as "the inexperienced rookie", how does McCain continue to get away with being the one who is the one making the bigger mistakes?
Posted 10:22 AM, 07/20/2008
stjohnbs
Excellent article prof. sj
Posted 08:37 AM, 07/20/2008
tom - wilmington, de
And don't forget...go online and get Rosetta Stone software so all your kids can speak Spanish so they can say more than Merci Beaucoup!!!
Posted 08:35 AM, 07/20/2008
tom - wilmington, de
By the way, this post would have been funnier if it had included the fact that Obama made up his own presidential seal (quite arrogant, wouldn't you say), or if it had been written about Al Gore saying if we did not change from fossil fuels for electricity within 10 years we would be doomed (after flying on his private fuel guzzling Gulf Stream jet and driving in his fleet of limos and SUV's) even though he uses enough electricity for a small town in his home (right, he buys carbon credit offsets); or about Nancy Pelosi calling Bush as total failure because of the economy (5.5% Unemployment, low interest rates, low inflation (though creeping up), high energy costs (wasn't the Dem Congress elected to lower energy costs...how has that been working out for them), his stance on the war (lower violence is a bad thing)...such utter disdain voiced by the woman in charge of a Congress with a single digit approval record; so much fodder from the Democrats, yet none ever mentioned here. Oh right, you guys disagree with them, just can't recall on what but hey, you are not looking for perfect leaders anyway.
Posted 08:30 AM, 07/20/2008
tom - wilmington, de
(darn..did it again)...10 of 18 provinces are turned over to Iraqi control, 15 of 18 benchmarks have been met, and all of the surge troops have been sent home...were all omitted from the Inquirer story. How about all 3 network anchors travelling with Obama.....WHY? The media is in the tank for this guy...and if he wins and becomes a total failure (yes, even a bigger failure than Bush is purported to be), how will it be reported? What will Djoko say then...that he always diagreed with Obama?
Posted 08:26 AM, 07/20/2008
tom - wilmington, de
(hit a key by mistake)...in Iraq the troops are under US control, yet in Afghanistan they are under Nato command? Even the Inquirer on Saturday printed an AP story about Iraq that was truncated, since the same article was printed in the Wilmington News Journal, yet anything positive in the News Journal story (such as 10 of 18 provinces being turned over to Iraq
Posted 08:24 AM, 07/20/2008
tom - wilmington, de
WOW. Lots of good stuff over the past two days. It is amazing how many people stay so on point, yet also amazing how so many people who claim to be savvy on politics NEVER say anything about their candidates position, instead choosing to just bash others who post to this site. Someone even had the audacity to say they just knew there were positions with which they disagreed with Obama, just could not name any and besides, they were not looking for a perfect candidate. Seems pretty ignorant to me. Obama has yet to say he was wrong on anything, even saying he always knew the surge would curb violence...as opposed to his earlier statement that it would lead to more violence and bloodshed. He has never really taken a tough stance, voting I believe over 100 times in Illinois "present" so as not to make a difficult vote, and changing his position in the Senate based on how politically expedient it is for him. But amazing that none of his supporters seem to ever admit his position is wrong or that he has flip flopped or even that they question his postion since so many have since changed. They just bash conservatives and Bush....based on media reports of the economy and wars. Is it evern mentioned that the biggest difference between Iraq and Afghanistan is that in Iraq
Posted 08:24 AM, 07/20/2008
tom - wilmington, de
WOW. Lots of good stuff over the past two days. It is amazing how many people stay so on point, yet also amazing how so many people who claim to be savvy on politics NEVER say anything about their candidates position, instead choosing to just bash others who post to this site. Someone even had the audacity to say they just knew there were positions with which they disagreed with Obama, just could not name any and besides, they were not looking for a perfect candidate. Seems pretty ignorant to me. Obama has yet to say he was wrong on anything, even saying he always knew the surge would curb violence...as opposed to his earlier statement that it would lead to more violence and bloodshed. He has never really taken a tough stance, voting I believe over 100 times in Illinois "present" so as not to make a difficult vote, and changing his position in the Senate based on how politically expedient it is for him. But amazing that none of his supporters seem to ever admit his position is wrong or that he has flip flopped or even that they question his postion since so many have since changed. They just bash conservatives and Bush....based on media reports of the economy and wars. Is it evern mentioned that the biggest difference between Iraq and Afghanistan is that in Iraq
Posted 05:14 AM, 07/20/2008
philly3t0
When is Polman's column going to be renamed from American Debate to Obama or Democrat Cheerleader?
Posted 01:32 AM, 07/20/2008
yobill626
We'll see how stable Iraq is once we stop paying some of these guys not to fight with each other. The political system is still a l-o-n-g way from being settled --- so much so, that the White House basically stopped measuring the benchmarks they weren't meeting.
Posted 04:07 PM, 07/19/2008
Djoko Pritza
Hey, bon, you said: "We are going to be able to pull our troops out of Iraq over the next couple of years, and leave behind a stable, democratic ally in the war against terror." Is that a bonian guarantee? There must be a few "ifs" in there somewhere? What are a "couple of years" on the bonian calendar?
Posted 12:25 PM, 07/19/2008
SBVFT Contributor
Yes Dick - as everyone knows - Obama has been getting this utmost scrutiny from the DNC's mainstream media. Right. My God Dick - even those rightwingers at SNL made a joke about the fawning Obama-obsessed media. And now The Onion has chimed in (http://www.theonion.com/content/news/time_publishes_definitive_obama?utm_source=onion_rss_daily). What a joke you are Dick. And so - by extension - is the paper you write for. Hence the continued decline. You'll be out of a job soon enough Dick.
Posted 10:48 AM, 07/19/2008
bon
yobill626: McCain and Gramm are still very close (have been for more than two decades). Gramm stepped down because he was clearly becoming a target and a distraction. I'll leave it at that, since I do not want to get back into Obama associations. ----- Djoko Pritza: We are going to be able to pull our troops out of Iraq over the next couple of years, and leave behind a stable, democratic ally in the war against terror. If Obama has had his druthers, we would have left behind a killing field two years ago. Obama stood in the way of success, but McCain, Bush and a host more serious, thoughtful people championed the surge. We are going to win in Iraq. No thanks to Obama.
Posted 03:01 AM, 07/19/2008
yobill626
bon: So what's up with your boy, John "Stand by his friends" McCain dumping Gramm (after bringing him back two days ago)? Did I misunderstand your contention that McCain will proudly keep Phil by his side? I can only hope Wendy goes with him.
Posted 08:16 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
Hey, McCainiacs, isn't it comforting to see McCain and Bush adopting the inexperienced Obama's positions on moving out of Iraq and stepping up action in Afghanistan? Oh, my, what a tough job we task to our spin-meisters! Time horizons, anyone? Aspirational goals?
Posted 06:51 PM, 07/18/2008
USA#1
The American worker is more productive then the China worker. They get the work cause the have cheap labor, no labor laws, no environmental laws and no worker safety laws. They are a communist country with no rights for anyone. No country has more productive workers then the American worker. Your argument does not address that, it just says they make goods designed from other countries. Just like they always have. They are cheaper, not better. Look it up, you know not what you talk about. Enjoy your weekend.
Posted 06:02 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
Im off to a fun weekend. Do the same. You are all great Americans
Posted 05:54 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
USA #1 - By the way, Charlie Crist, the governor of Florida recently came out in favor of drilling off Florida provided it was done in a safe way. With current technology, this is definitely possible.
Posted 05:43 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
No jobs lost to productivity? You do not know what you are talking about. China manufactures things mostly designed elsewhere with the most advanced components made elsewhere and in at least half cases for companies from the US and Europe. The amount of American debt they own as a percentage of owr economy and net worth is just petty change
Posted 05:37 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
Hey, right-wingers, thanks. This has been a great day of posting, thanks to y’all. My favorite line is from, ta da, DB: “Obama’s flip flops are different from McCain’s.” Maybe that should be the senior senator’s slogan? My favorite talking point (sorry, bon) is that Obama is a fraud because he wants to work within the system. CB scores again with the catchy name, “Backtrack” Obama. jjfalcon wins the sympathy vote by noting he “came from the dirt,” only to be taxed now at 40-42% of his income. jwad takes home the much-sought-after bipartisan prize by noting that “frankly the choice of candidates this year is very poor.” (Should that be "frankly, my dear ...?) But jwad shows he's no softy by recovering with this noble statement that will live beyond this election: “Their faux superiority on moral issues is disgusting.” As they say, we can’t make this stuff up.
Posted 05:11 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
USA#1: The oil industry wanted ANWAR in the 90s and didn't get it. The oil industry is not nearly as powerful as many make it out to be. When half the political world uses you as their go-to boogeyman, it is hard to have all the much real pull. :)
Posted 05:08 PM, 07/18/2008
USA#1
I understand it was a different time. Everyone looks out for what is best for them. Jeb Bush didn’t want it because of what could happen to Florida’s tourist industry if there was a spill, he didn’t care about people in PA. or DE he was looking out for his state. Circumstances change so adjustments need to be made. My main point is that if the oil industry wanted it they would have got it. They didn’t want it back then because the price wasn’t right, know it is.
Posted 04:57 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
USA#1: That was a very different time. When conditions change (like oil prices more than doubling in a year) policies should adjust to new realities. McCain and most of the GOP want to drill today. Obama and the democrats do not. (O’Reilly has been after the oil companies for year and years. He is a populist. He has never been a conservative on economic policies and he, frankly, does not understand the economy very well.)
Posted 04:53 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
USA#1 - Bush's father signed the executive order banning offshore drilling in 1990 when the price of oil was $15 a barrel. I think we can both agree that thing have changed in the last 18 years in that regard. Are you for informed change due to circumstances changing, or just backtracking on campaign promises to get the vote out? I think the Jib - Jab guys had it right when they described Obama as in fantacy land. That's whey they put him in a Disney cartoon.
Posted 04:48 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
JLB: Fair enough. Out of curiosity, what are the numbers for Hillary Clinton in that same period?
Posted 04:46 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
JeffA: I am not talking about Paul's oppositions to the wars in iraq and Afghanistan. I am also not talking about his opposition to having military bases in allied nations or his seeming disinterest in the physical wellbeing of our allies. I am talking about his voting record. Paul was the only congressman to vote against a resolution condemning rocket attacks on Israel, for instance. He is not only unwilling to do anything to protect our allies, he is unwilling to take the position that killing our allies is a bad thing. He is an isolationist. It is just a fact.
Posted 04:43 PM, 07/18/2008
USA#1
I’m not worried about the most basic goods. What worries me are all the military parts that are made in countries that will use the knowledge they gain to create weapons like ours and weapons that can defeat ours. As for productivity, we are the most productive country, we haven’t lost jobs because of productivity just lower wages. I know in what I do it is a 4 to 5 ratio of offshore to one American. I also know I don’t like my prescription drugs being made in a country that can’t even make safe dog food or safe toys for children. Make no mistake about it, China’s long term goal is to own us.
Posted 04:27 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
As far as knowledge and productivity are concerned, America has little to worry in the forseeable future. Jobs have been lost to both productivity and lower paying countries. That will go on. China and India all of a sudden are not going to set up miminum wages similar to Americas. Thats just reality , face it. Our system needs an efficient, flexible process to retrain and create opportunities to reassign displaced workers . I am all for that but turning your back on 21st century economic reality and try to hold on to a past when even the most basic good was made in America is just foolish. I say it again, despite all the things that are not manufactured in the USA anymore , America has never had MORE manufacturing going on than it has in 2008. Fact. Period. The percentage of manufacturing as percentage of GDP, total manufacturing jobs may be lower but output (matters most) has NEVER been higher
Posted 04:25 PM, 07/18/2008
USA#1
CB, Bush’s father is the one who signed the executive order to ban offshore drilling. Jeb Bush was totally opposed to offshore drilling. You can’t say it was all Democratic opposition. No I’m not a leftist, just point out that both parties have gotten us into this position. I’m sure the oil lobby is powerful enough that if they really wanted to have offshore drilling earlier they would have gotten it. Even that left wing loon Bill O’Reilly stated that opinion. Yes I’m being sarcastic
Posted 04:20 PM, 07/18/2008
James TL
Obama's going into a war zone? This is Hilary's last chance at getting the nomination. If an attempt is made on Obama's life, who will we suspect? The terrorists? The republicans? Or could it be Hilary putting out a hit? Hope it doesn't happen but wouldn't Obama's death start an interesting investigation? I'm an Obama supporter and I intend to vote for him. This post is not an advocation of violence towards the presumptive candidate.
Posted 04:14 PM, 07/18/2008
USA#1
jjfalcon35 What do great powers do, not what we have been doing for the last 10 to 15 years. China will evidentially be equal to us, with all of the money they are making by us sending our manufacturing base over there and IT jobs, not as much IT as is going to India. We make very little in this country anymore including manufacturing that is important to our self defense. Bush has already kissed their a#$ by saying it would be an insult to them if he didn’t show up for the Olympics. Our president saying that to a country that has no value for human life (shows how far we have fallen). We have put our country in a bad position since we have outsourced our manufacturing and our IT know how. Our knowledge and productivity has always been our competive advantage and our so called leaders along with their CEO buddies are letting it all slip away. I’m all for fair trade, but what is going on is not fair trade. I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again, how many manufacturing jobs has China sent to the USA. How many IT jobs has India sent to the USA? Our government actually gives tax brakes to lay off American’s and send their jobs over seas. Some of those workers were slackers but many were hard working Americans who have fought in wars and their fathers and grand fathers have fought in wars to keep our way of life. Now because they live here they lose their job because they can’t survive on $5,000.00 to $15,000.00 a year since our standard of living costs more then India and communist China. Great countries need great leaders and we sure haven’t had any for awhile and I’m not sure there are any in our future.
Posted 04:13 PM, 07/18/2008
pagoda
It's called campaigning. Who the heck knows what these men would actually do or say once elected. The election system is all about the flip-flop- on both sides of the aisle. One thing I am sure of though, I can't take another Scalito on the Supreme Court! Vote Obama.
Posted 03:58 PM, 07/18/2008
JLB
Bon - Actually, you are incorrect when you say that Senator McCain's 90% voting record with President Bush is taken "from one year", and that the average is lower. According to Congressional Quarterly, McCain voted for the President's position 91%, 90%, 91%, and 92% during the years 2001-2004, dipped down to 77% in 2005, then came back strong with years of 89% (2006), 95% (2007), and ONE HUNDRED PERCENT this year as of May 15th, for an overall average of 90.625%. So actually you could even round up and call it 91% over the course of President Bush's full presidency.
Posted 03:57 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
Backtrack Obama - If Obama softens his aversion to drilling, it may be the final straw for some of his liberal supporters. Where would they go? Nader is still a possibility. But McCain can attract liberal votes. He doesn’t need to bleed Obama only from the right. His own stands against drilling in Alaska and torture of terror suspects and for immigration reform make him suspect on the right, but quite acceptable to the left. If moderate liberals are disgusted by Obama’s obvious attempts at chicanery and repositioning, they might just cross the aisle.
Posted 03:55 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
Backtrack Obama - Meanwhile, McCain and the Republicans have finally found an issue - oil drilling - exposing how the Democrats oppose drilling virtually anywhere that there might be recoverable oil. Not in Alaska. Not offshore. Not in shale deposits in the West. The Democratic claim that we “cannot drill our way out of the crisis in gas prices” begs the question of whether, had we drilled five years ago, we would be a lot less dependent on foreign market fluctuations. The truth is that the Democrats put the need to mitigate climate change ahead of the imperative of holding down gasoline prices at the pump. If there was ever a fault line between elitist and populist approaches to a problem, this is it. In fact, liberals basically don’t see much wrong with $5 gas. Many have been urging a tax to achieve precisely this level, just like Europe has done for decades.
Posted 03:53 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
Backtrack Obama - Obama’s breathtaking flips and flops are materially different from McCain’s. While McCain had opposed offshore oil drilling and now supports it, the facts have obviously changed. Obama’s shifts have nothing to do with altered circumstances, just a change in the political calendar.
Posted 03:52 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
Backtrack Obama - During the primary, he backed merit pay for teachers - but before the union a few weeks ago, he opposed it.
Posted 03:51 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
Backtrack Obama - Having based his entire campaign on withdrawal from Iraq, he now pledges to consult with the military first.
Posted 03:51 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
Backtrack Obama - From a 100 percent pro-choice position, he now has migrated to expressing doubts about allowing partial-birth abortions
Posted 03:50 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
Backtrack Obama - Formerly, he told the Israeli lobby that he favored an undivided Jerusalem. Now he says he didn’t mean it
Posted 03:49 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
Backtrack Obama - Turning his back on a lifetime of support for gun control, he now recognizes a Second Amendment right to bear arms in the wake of the Supreme Court decision.
Posted 03:48 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
Backtrack Obama - Once he threatened to filibuster a bill to protect telephone companies from liability for their cooperation with national security wiretaps; now he has voted for the legislation.
Posted 03:48 PM, 07/18/2008
CB
Backtrack Obama - • After vowing to eschew private fundraising and take public financing, he has now refused public money.
Posted 03:41 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
We keep military presence every where because we are the most powerful country in the world with all sort of interests around the globe. That is what great powers do. That is what Europe, China and Russia would do in a snap of a finger if they could or if they would see America collapse. As far as I am concerned better be us than them. When Barack Hussein yells on You Tube he would not invest in missile defense or space weaponization??!!! Do you think that pledge is going the stop the kinds of Russia, China, Iran in pursuing those technologies? Dangerously naive or just a militant radical anti military pacifist.
Posted 03:37 PM, 07/18/2008
Rauol Duke
How about incompetent corporate CEO's getting no-bid contracts to pad their bottom lines on your dollar? Now, figure out which is taking more of your money. It is not that welfare cheat or incompetent government worker. We can find $300,000,000 million for JP Morgan Chase to buy out Bear Stearns but we can not find the same money to keep somebody in their home and this same money would save us from bailing out Bear Stearns.
Posted 03:29 PM, 07/18/2008
JeffA
Bon - I am not advocating Paul, but he raises excellent points on some subjects. You seem ill-informed on Paul. Perhaps you should watch a host of YouTube videos on sound money, which I left out of my earlier post. I also take umbrage at the isolationist comment. Being strong on defense does not equate to nation building and maintaining a military presence in Japan, Korea and Germany for God knows what reason.
Posted 03:15 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
The non working slackers tricking the welfare system, bureaucracies, unaccountable emplyees who can be rude, incompetent and unable to be fired ( go to any Phialdelphia government agency and you will see what I am talking about) who eat up a lot of my taxes have nothing to do with the opportunities this country has given me.
Posted 03:10 PM, 07/18/2008
pagoda
Geez, are you sure you don't blog as a paid/unpaid volunteer? Yes, I do understand that "not Bush" is not an official campaign slogan, but it might as well be. But hey, can't wait to see the thirty second prime time television embrace between John and George at the Convention. Oh wait, is it true they will never be in the same state that week?
Posted 03:05 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
pagoda: McCain uses two slogans. They are "Country First" and "Reform. Prosperity. Peace." The former may have replaced the latter. I am not sure. A sentence a supporter writes in a comment on a blog is not a campaign slogan. :)
Posted 02:58 PM, 07/18/2008
pagoda
"McCain is not Bush." What a great campaign slogan. Makes me think back to the last two elections, and all the "conservatives" championing this figure-head Texas Governor (think Benson)- they had every opportunity to choose McCain in 2000- a much younger man with far less baggage than now, and they still went with the fortunate son, AWOL, end-times believing, goofy smirking, pretzel choking, inarticulate frat boy. I think it's Obama's turn.
Posted 02:55 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
Djoko Pritza: A politician who promises to change the system but intends to work within the system is a fraud. I don't think that is a stretch. (If Obama had run a campaign touting his ability and willingness to work within the system he would not be a fraud. He would have lost, obviously, but at least he would have honestly presented his agenda.) ----- JeffA: Ron Paul is way too isolationist to be taken seriously. I am all for a weak central government, but Paul is no defender of liberty. He opposes the federal government so much as passing resolutions condemning genocide and oppression. That is simply not a viable foreign policy.
Posted 02:43 PM, 07/18/2008
JeffA
The Patriot Post is undoubtedly run by a group of loons, but their Founder's Quote Daily is a great source of inspiration and reminder of what this Republic was created to be: "A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." -- James Madison (letter to W.T. Barry, 4 August 1822)
Posted 02:42 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
Bring back Ronald Reagan!
Posted 02:39 PM, 07/18/2008
JeffA
This idea that we are at war and need a war president is a farce. We have an on-going operation in Afghanistan and a re-building operation in Iraq. Both involve our military. But the stakes are not so high as to place Commander-in-Chief on a pedestal and override all other Executive branch responsibilities. WWII, where the world was at risk of falling to fascism, demanded such a dramatic rebalancing - temporarily. Today, our President must manage what will be an endless effort against terrorism and Islamic extremism while enacting good international & domestic stewardship. The concept of endless war is put out there to control citizens, just as the promise to solve all our problems with big government programs is in reality another way to patronize and control the citizens. I'm very weary of the in-fighting while the political class continues to serve anybody but the People. Ron Paul was mistreated by the press. His basic messages of Liberty and a weak Central Government shouldn't be a punchline. Rather they should be the foundation of all political talk.
Posted 02:35 PM, 07/18/2008
Rauol Duke
jjfalcon, stop whining about the taxes you pay and be grateful for the opportunity this country and it liberal ways have provided you. I too pay a great deal of income to the government but I know if this country still operated in who you are not what you can do mode I would not be making the money I am now. A good example of that is this administration, G W is president only because of who he is, not what he has done and a great many members of administration come from the who they are mode, not what have they done.
Posted 02:27 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
Hey, bon, the argument that a politician who wants to work within the system is a fraud is an argument that's a bit strained, don't you think?
Posted 02:10 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
Power corrupts and there is no doubt that the Republicans fell for it. They deserved being kicked out. Democrats are just as corrupt if given the same power. Imagine Obama, Reid, Pelosi running this country. They came in 06 promising lower gas prices, ending the war in Iraq, holding Bush accountable for wiretapping and what they have to show for themselves. Nothing. Then why the democrat brand is any better? The Reagan Republican revolution turned America from near abyss that started from Lyndon Johnsons welfare state all the way to Carter. Reagan deregulated the economy, lowered taxes, boosted research and development and strengthened the military. Clintons Presidency was saved by turning Congress to Republicans who imposed welfare reform on him and forced him to lower spending.
Posted 01:57 PM, 07/18/2008
jwad56
The more the advocates of socialism in the name of "equity" and "fairness" speak out, the more they will drive moderate voters away. I think frankly the choice of candidates this year is very poor. The Democrats are nothing but a coalition of interest groups. If you are for welfare you are with them, If you are for abortion rights you are with them. If you are for universal health care you are with them. If you are for unregulated immigration you are with them. Heaven forbid you should offend any one group! On the other hand there was a time when Republicans stood for something. Not anymore. Their faux superiority on moral issues is disgusting. Their spending in the years they controlled Congress has led this country to the brink of Socialism. People are so sick of them they would gladly elect someone who will WILLINGLY plunge this country into the abyss of higher taxes, higher energy prices and economic disaster. Anyone naive enough to think there are enough $100 million buyouts to pay for what the Democrats propose should attend night classes or something. The only way to finance that is on the backs of the people. ALL the people. There is going to be class warfare one day. The day when people get sick of paying for all this nonsense and rise up against the political class. That day is coming. One thing that Obama is sure to accomplish if nothing else if he is elected is to bring that day closer faster.
Posted 01:56 PM, 07/18/2008
puttinonthefoil
What will the international reception of Obama tell us about ourselves? I think it will be very eye opening and refreshing. I like McCain, but he has aligned himself too much with what in my opinion has become a very distasteful Republican brand. Young people in particular are tired of it. Why was there so much excitement about Ron Paul? I think that explains what people need to know about being "conservative" vs. being "Republican" anymore. As an aside, I would like a job where I can make boatloads of money and troll the Philly.com forums all day long. I assure you, I am qualified.
Posted 01:46 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
Fredclaims: Neither I nor McCain has cited his "coolness" as a rationale for his campaign. It is simply something that reporters note when they are with him. McCain is a cool guy. I only brought it up because Mr. Polman seems to take issue with that fact for no other reason than he dislikes McCain's political views. (Obama's cult of personality is a much, much bigger part of his campaign than McCain's is a part of his. This seems like a losing argument for an Obama supporter.)
Posted 01:39 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
Djoko Pritza: I think you are taking the fraud accusation out of context. I called Obama a fraud not for changing positions, but rather as a hypothetical response to your proposed rationale for his campaign. You said he is a great politician because he would work within the system to get things done. I said that if all he intended to do was work within the system, then he is a fraud, because he spent a year trashing Hillary for being part of the DC system. Obama to this point still claims to be a change agent who will alter the system, but if he starts touting himself as a machine politician, that would make him a fraud. Yes. ----- McCain is still a maverick. If you listen to talk radio you would see how hostile they still are to him. He still bucks his party on immigration, climate change, gitmo, detainee treatment, gay marriage, tobacco legislation and a host of other, smaller issues. This is one of the things I like most about him. You do not have to respect his change on taxes or off-shore drilling, but the rationale for those changes is sound, and McCain does not deny changing. Obama refuses to even acknowledge his changes in positions. (His assertion that he knew the surge would reduce violence all along is the most distasteful to me.) He just calls us cynical for pointing them out and moves along. ----- Thank you for the response. I think we can be hostile to each other's candidates without being hostile to one another. :)
Posted 01:30 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
jwad56: Class warfare is just easier than explaining the complexity of free market capitalism. It is easy to tell someone that they are just as capable as people who are far more successful than them. It is easy to tell someone who is struggling that it is everyone's fault but their own. It is a lot harder to tell them that some people work harder, some people know more and some people deserve more than others. That is not a good political slogan. Better to simply promise everyone the world with no intention on delivering it.
Posted 01:20 PM, 07/18/2008
Fredclaims
I heard Obama will be stopping over in Czechoslovakia, the Soviet Union and Siam. No matter how "cool" someone is, it doesn't qualify one as POTUS. Moreover, the cool guys usually have a high JERK content. Prime examples Bush and McSame.
Posted 01:19 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
America has now the largest GDP , industrial production, manufacturing sector, productivity, competitiveness thats it has ever had if you manage to actually research for facts. More manufacturing jobs have been lost to increases in productivity than to any country or trade agreement. Unemployment is low. Demographics are better than most economic powers including China. The so called crippling debt is a lower percentage of GDP than it has been in many times in our past and lower than most industrialized countries. American fundamentals are very strong. The way Iraq is moving right now, it could end up as a fully functional democracy in the center of the Middle east. That my friens will not be able to be spun in the future as anything other than a history changing legacy for the Texas village idiot. Can you imagine 1-2 decades from now Bill Clinton=Monica,impeachment George W the beginning of freeedom in Mideast. How bout that?
Posted 01:17 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
bon, I owe you a response. I’m sure I disagree with Obama on some issues, but to me that’s not the point. I’m not looking for perfection, I’m looking for change – a change in the party governing this country. If McCain hadn’t shifted on taxes, if he wasn’t such a warmonger, if he had truly remained a maverick, if he wasn’t so old (sorry), I could support him. But he decided that to win he had to flip-flop and embrace the most regressive elements of his party. Which leads me to another point: You call Obama a fraud because he changed positions but excuse it in McCain. That is why I believe you’re just a party apparatchik and not the man of issues you claim.
Posted 01:16 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
Hey, jj, keep your allegedly hard-earned bucks. I’m talking about those billionaire CEOs who get $100-million buyouts after runnin’ their corporations into the ground. I’m talking about the non-bid contracts for the Halliburtons. I’m talking about millionaires whose income tripled while their tax burden only doubled. I’m talking about a corporate state in which taxpayer money is irresponsibly funneled to businesses in return for large campaign contributions. Your argument is so much the stereotypical defense of the privileged that it’s kinda amusing. Your future is to live in a gated community, sittin’ on your pile of money and hoping the guards, who can’t afford to live there, are paid enough to keep the riffraff out. And you can hope the slackers stay comatose enough not to figure out, a la Willie Sutton, where the money is.
Posted 12:56 PM, 07/18/2008
jwad56
Djoko we sure are doing terribly aren't we? We all have phones we carry around in our pocket and GPS in our car to tell us every which way to turn. If we are sick an ambulance comes and takes us to a hospital. We are all getting fat cause there is so much food available and money to buy it with. Our streets are clogged with traffic because EVERYONE owns a car and still seems to be able to afford gas to drive. We have satellite TV, Cable TV, super fast Internet connections, satellite radios, HDTVs, devices that allow us to carry around thousands of songs in our pocket to listen to. I could go on and on and on and on just listing the things we didn't have 10 years ago. Tell me PLEASE where is the damage????? The "poor" people are walking around not starving, not homeless but talking on their cell phones and playing their xbox for entertainment. Even their kids have cell phones! Your point of view is completely ridiculous and disingenuous. Humans have never lived so easily or so luxuriously as they live TODAY in THIS country. And every day things get better. You just want to cut down people that have more than you do. And please, Djoko please define who are the "rich"? Give me a real number that you think makes someone "rich".
Posted 12:46 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the smart, successful,risk taker, hard studier to have more, absolutely nothing. This is America. I came from the dirt and now make enough to be taxed from federal, social security, medicare, city, state a total of close to 40-42% of my income. I do not see any fairness on taking more of my hard earned money away for the government to dump it on entitlements, slackers, irresponsibles and unaccountable bureaucracies as the Democrats intend to do.
Posted 12:37 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
Hey, jjfalcon, I think we need a little class warfare. How else are you gonna rebalance the wealth in this country? If it's not done peacefully, one day there will be an explosion, not to mention the economic harm being done the country by the gross inequities. By warfare, I don't mean fighting in the streets, I mean tossing out those politicians who support tax cuts and other disproportionate financial benefits for the rich (this would include McCain). Trickle down doesn't.
Posted 12:30 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
frankg962: No doubt Obama sounds a lot better than Bush, but they have exactly the same approach. Obama talks to the media about 10% as often as McCain. Obama goes off script about once every two weeks compared to McCain doing nearly daily town halls. In 2000 and 2004 it was all the rage for liberals to bash Bush for living in a bubble. I am shocked (shocked!) that no one seems to mind when Obama campaigns exactly like W. ----- You can throw accusations at me all you like. I am not going to be intimidated or stop posting. Supporting McCain is something I am quite proud of. :)
Posted 12:22 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
I do not care about the media much. It has ever diminishing influence. People know they are for the most part liberal academic types, prisoners of political correctness over harsh uncomfortable realities. They will be biased in favor of the democrats. The actual owners of the media though are more conservative. This is all very cute right now with Obama traveling and all those America haters, "America in decline" people will love him for sure. When the American people really focus on voting the last 2 weeks of October all this will mean little. Obama is just not as qualified as Mccain to be Commander in Chief when we are at War. Even Hillary admits it, the "most solemn responsibility of the President" she said!! If he is honest about his economic plan (big if based on recent shifting positions on everything), he is clearly inferior to MCain. America needs lower taxes for everybody, retraining of people who lose jobs,, lower government spending, expanding trade opportunities, more nuclear power, wind, solar, coal and yes more oil as we make the transition. This will grow the economy strengthen dollar. Barack Hussein wants to increase funding for everything under the sun. The only spending cuts he is on record proposing are in military matters. So we are heading to either 1 trillion dollar deficits or massive tax increases. Class warfare , wealth redistribution, that is what Obama is and Americans will see through it. We will see how the 50% population who owns stock in one way or another is going to like increases in capital gains taxes. Basic: more taxes, less profits, lower stock price, deflating 401ks
Posted 12:17 PM, 07/18/2008
frankg962
Bon, that's rich, comparing Obama to Bush? You must be joking right? I mean Bush, even scripted, sounds like he's the village idiot, Obama is obviously an intelligent, erudite person. Where did you come from? I agree with Djoko, you sound like Pradeep who was a Clinton tool. Just admit you've been assigned to Polman's blog to parrot the McCain campaign's talking points.
Posted 12:05 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
I support gay marriage so I am to the left of Obama and McCain on that. I am an agnostic on abortion, so I don't so much disagree as I don't feel as strongly about it as McCain. I think DADT is a stupid policy. ----- Any issues on which you disagree with Obama? (By way of example, my sister is an Obama supporter but she dislikes his protectionist leanings.)
Posted 12:00 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
So, bon the discusser, what do you disagree with McCain on, that host of social issues?
Comment removed.
Posted 11:57 AM, 07/18/2008
bon
Djoko Pritza: I am a McCain supporter. I want people to vote for McCain and I enjoy political discussion. I don't see what is so insidious about that. ----- McCain is not Bush. They have had endless public battles. You are citing statistics from one year, not the full length of Bush's presidency, for which the number is much smaller. ----- If I believed Obama's move to the center I would be more likely to support him. I do not. I think Obama is a down-the-line liberal. All his shifts prove is that he is also dishonest about his liberalism. ----- Look, I am not a die hard conservative. (Believe it or not, if the GOP nominated a radical like Tancredo I would be on here supporting Obama.) I disagree with McCain on a host of social issues. I just disagree with Obama on more issues, and those issues are also more important to me. ----- Really? The Keating 5? You cite a 20 year old scandal for which McCain was cleared of any wrongdoing by the Democratic investigator as evidence of his weak virtue? That is pretty weak...
Posted 11:47 AM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
Sorry, Mr. Polman, this reply to bon got bumped by the new post: bon, be honest. You work for the McCain campaign and your job, at least as your actions indicate, is to persuade as many as you can to vote for the old guy and against the young guy. If Obama didn’t move to the center, you’d slam him as a radical; if he moves, you’ll slam him for moving. There’s no harm in what you’re doing, but your gun is for hire and that doesn’t make you the best preacher. And your candidate isn’t exactly a man of virtue (Keating 5, etc, etc). Once again, let me encourage you to look at the big picture, for your country’s sake. We can argue all day this Obama point, that McCain point, but the big picture is the right-wing (which is all that is left of what once was a moderate party) has seriously messed up and must be thrown out – your “maverick” man, who voted 90 percent plus with Bush, included. It’s that simple. There must be some responsibility among grown-ups and consequences for harming this country.
Posted 11:42 AM, 07/18/2008
bon
"The Tyndall Report, which monitors news coverage, says that since June the nightly newscasts on the three networks spent a combined 114 minutes covering Obama while devoting just 48 minutes to McCain." This is before Obama's trip. Care to explain? ----- I believe that out of context quotation from Swampland was regarding the GOP primaries. She was comparing the personalities of McCain and Romney. McCain was the cool jock. Romney was the dorky over-achiever. Anyway, reporters who have spent time with McCain, across the political spectrum, have this same reaction. He is a likable, cool guy. Would you rather the media just pretend he is a bumbling jerk, like you do? (If Obama talked to the media maybe they would like him, at least more personally. Like Bush, though, Obama spends most of his time protected and scripted.)
85 comments | View All | Paginate Comments
About Dick Polman

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.