Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Friday, July 18, 2008

 

Three belly laughs at week's end:

The McCain campaign is whining about the media. That is not a misprint. John McCain, of all people, a politician who for years has been treated as a demigod by the Washington press corps - and who, in fact, has enjoyed yet another easy ride during the '08 campaign - is grousing, via his spokeswoman, about all the media attention that Barack Obama will receive during his impending overseas trip.

Jill Hazelbaker said the other day, "It certainly hasn't escaped us that the three network newscasts will originate from stops on Obama's trip." The implication, of course, is that McCain won't get nearly the same attention while Obama is abroad.

Regarding that lament, I will now quote actor Steve Buscemi, who, in the role of Mr. Pink in Reservoir Dogs, rubbed his thumb against his index finger and said, "Do you know what this is? It's the world's smallest violin." It's tough to pluck the strings of sympathy for McCain, since, in the first place, he made such a big issue about Obama's lack of overseas travel. He made that a campaign issue, and banged away at it for weeks. But now that Obama is actually going - and drawing a huge media contingent, for solid newsworthy reasons that I will shortly explain - he doesn't like that, either. The line now is that Obama's trip is merely a "campaign rally" and "photo op." And since the McCain camp is now stuck with the prospect that Obama will draw enormous crowds at many of his stops - thereby telegraphing to many Americans how nice it might be to again have a president who is popular abroad - the pre-buttal strategy is to complain in advance that the media is acting as Obama's enabler.

And that's our first belly laugh today, because few Washington politicians have been coddled by the media as McCain has. I won't recite chapter and verse about why this is so, or catalogue how an ardent career conservative has somehow attained the journalistic shorthand of "maverick," since I have covered that ground before. (OK, just one example: When McCain started flip-flopping in 2006 by pandering to the GOP's right wing, a Washington Post columnist excused his actions by writing, "A successful campaign almost requires some fibbing.")

But, just to give you a flavor of the dominant Washington attitude, consider this recently-published dispatch from a Time magazine correspondent. You might need anti-nausea medicine by the time you finish reading: "Here's one thing you need to know about John McCain. He's always been the coolest kid in school....When he sits in the back of his campaign bus, we reporters gather like kids in the cafeteria huddling around the star quarterback. We ask him tough questions, and we try to make him slip up, but almost inevitably we come around to admiring him....He is, to put it simply, cooler than us."

And lately the kids in the cafeteria have done an effective job protecting the quarterback. For instance, you may remember the incident last week, when McCain declared at an event that the 73-year-old structure of the popular Social Security program, whereby current young workers pay taxes to support the current generation of retirees, is actually, in his words, "an absolute disgrace." Seven newspapers, including The Washington Post, covered the event - and all failed to mention McCain's comment in their reports. The cable and network news shows barely ran the video of the comment. And even though McCain actually repeated his comments, albeit in softer language, in a CNN interview, the Washington press corps caught up with the story by making excuses for him. A Time magazine writer said that McCain had merely been "misspeaking," and a Washington Post reporter insisted in an online chat that McCain had probably  not intended to offer such a sweeping criticism of the program itself.

Nor have I seen heavy mainstream media scrutiny of McCain's repeated foreign affairs stumblings: his multiple confusions of the Sunni and the Shia; his confusion of Somalia and the Sudan; his multiple references to "Czechoslovokia," a country that ceased to exist in 1993; his delusional claim that the U.S. has "drawn down to pre-surge levels" in Iraq; his recent reference to Prime Minister Putin of Russia as "President Putin of Germany." Maybe I missed it, but I don't recall seeing much Washington press corps discussion of whether McCain is perhaps not as sharp on the nuances of foreign affairs as he claims to be - or, at the very least, whether he is not as mentally sharp as a president ideally should be.

Anyway, with respect to the McCain camp's whine about all the press that Obama will generate while abroad: The journalistic judgment is easy to explain. It's Obama's first national security trip as a candidate, his first trip to a war zone. He's new to the national scene. And, more broadly, he's a new kind of candidate, an historic first. He garnered more spring coverage than McCain because his protracted contest with Hillary Clinton was also an historic first. The press does indeed have a bias. It favors what is new, and it favors firsts.

And when a campaign starts grousing about the press, it is a sign of political weakness. In the case of the McCain campaign, it reflects a basic fear that its candidate will lose.

-------

Bathroom humor from C-Span.

Our second belly laugh comes courtesy of Larry Craig, Republican of Idaho. Last time we saw him, he was taking a wide stance in a Minneapolis airport bathroom stall, rubbing against the foot of an undercover cop. His subsequent guilty plea in a sex sting, and his insistence on staying in the U.S. Senate, have embarrassed the party of "family values," but at least he was keeping a low profile...

Until yesterday, apparently, when he showed up on the Senate floor to argue for U.S. energy independence. He did OK for awhile - until he declared that we shouldn't allow Nigeria or Saudi Arabia or Iran to "jerk us around by the gas nozzle."

Sounds to me like he needs a few sessions with Dr. Freud.

-------

And if you can't muster a smile for those two items, try this one. And have a good weekend.

Posted by Dick Polman @ 11:30 AM  Permalink | 85 comments
Comments   
Posted 11:42 AM, 07/18/2008
bon
"The Tyndall Report, which monitors news coverage, says that since June the nightly newscasts on the three networks spent a combined 114 minutes covering Obama while devoting just 48 minutes to McCain." This is before Obama's trip. Care to explain? ----- I believe that out of context quotation from Swampland was regarding the GOP primaries. She was comparing the personalities of McCain and Romney. McCain was the cool jock. Romney was the dorky over-achiever. Anyway, reporters who have spent time with McCain, across the political spectrum, have this same reaction. He is a likable, cool guy. Would you rather the media just pretend he is a bumbling jerk, like you do? (If Obama talked to the media maybe they would like him, at least more personally. Like Bush, though, Obama spends most of his time protected and scripted.)
Posted 11:47 AM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
Sorry, Mr. Polman, this reply to bon got bumped by the new post: bon, be honest. You work for the McCain campaign and your job, at least as your actions indicate, is to persuade as many as you can to vote for the old guy and against the young guy. If Obama didn’t move to the center, you’d slam him as a radical; if he moves, you’ll slam him for moving. There’s no harm in what you’re doing, but your gun is for hire and that doesn’t make you the best preacher. And your candidate isn’t exactly a man of virtue (Keating 5, etc, etc). Once again, let me encourage you to look at the big picture, for your country’s sake. We can argue all day this Obama point, that McCain point, but the big picture is the right-wing (which is all that is left of what once was a moderate party) has seriously messed up and must be thrown out – your “maverick” man, who voted 90 percent plus with Bush, included. It’s that simple. There must be some responsibility among grown-ups and consequences for harming this country.
Posted 11:57 AM, 07/18/2008
bon
Djoko Pritza: I am a McCain supporter. I want people to vote for McCain and I enjoy political discussion. I don't see what is so insidious about that. ----- McCain is not Bush. They have had endless public battles. You are citing statistics from one year, not the full length of Bush's presidency, for which the number is much smaller. ----- If I believed Obama's move to the center I would be more likely to support him. I do not. I think Obama is a down-the-line liberal. All his shifts prove is that he is also dishonest about his liberalism. ----- Look, I am not a die hard conservative. (Believe it or not, if the GOP nominated a radical like Tancredo I would be on here supporting Obama.) I disagree with McCain on a host of social issues. I just disagree with Obama on more issues, and those issues are also more important to me. ----- Really? The Keating 5? You cite a 20 year old scandal for which McCain was cleared of any wrongdoing by the Democratic investigator as evidence of his weak virtue? That is pretty weak...
Comment removed.
Posted 12:00 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
So, bon the discusser, what do you disagree with McCain on, that host of social issues?
Posted 12:05 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
I support gay marriage so I am to the left of Obama and McCain on that. I am an agnostic on abortion, so I don't so much disagree as I don't feel as strongly about it as McCain. I think DADT is a stupid policy. ----- Any issues on which you disagree with Obama? (By way of example, my sister is an Obama supporter but she dislikes his protectionist leanings.)
Posted 12:17 PM, 07/18/2008
frankg962
Bon, that's rich, comparing Obama to Bush? You must be joking right? I mean Bush, even scripted, sounds like he's the village idiot, Obama is obviously an intelligent, erudite person. Where did you come from? I agree with Djoko, you sound like Pradeep who was a Clinton tool. Just admit you've been assigned to Polman's blog to parrot the McCain campaign's talking points.
Posted 12:22 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
I do not care about the media much. It has ever diminishing influence. People know they are for the most part liberal academic types, prisoners of political correctness over harsh uncomfortable realities. They will be biased in favor of the democrats. The actual owners of the media though are more conservative. This is all very cute right now with Obama traveling and all those America haters, "America in decline" people will love him for sure. When the American people really focus on voting the last 2 weeks of October all this will mean little. Obama is just not as qualified as Mccain to be Commander in Chief when we are at War. Even Hillary admits it, the "most solemn responsibility of the President" she said!! If he is honest about his economic plan (big if based on recent shifting positions on everything), he is clearly inferior to MCain. America needs lower taxes for everybody, retraining of people who lose jobs,, lower government spending, expanding trade opportunities, more nuclear power, wind, solar, coal and yes more oil as we make the transition. This will grow the economy strengthen dollar. Barack Hussein wants to increase funding for everything under the sun. The only spending cuts he is on record proposing are in military matters. So we are heading to either 1 trillion dollar deficits or massive tax increases. Class warfare , wealth redistribution, that is what Obama is and Americans will see through it. We will see how the 50% population who owns stock in one way or another is going to like increases in capital gains taxes. Basic: more taxes, less profits, lower stock price, deflating 401ks
Posted 12:30 PM, 07/18/2008
bon
frankg962: No doubt Obama sounds a lot better than Bush, but they have exactly the same approach. Obama talks to the media about 10% as often as McCain. Obama goes off script about once every two weeks compared to McCain doing nearly daily town halls. In 2000 and 2004 it was all the rage for liberals to bash Bush for living in a bubble. I am shocked (shocked!) that no one seems to mind when Obama campaigns exactly like W. ----- You can throw accusations at me all you like. I am not going to be intimidated or stop posting. Supporting McCain is something I am quite proud of. :)
Posted 12:37 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
Hey, jjfalcon, I think we need a little class warfare. How else are you gonna rebalance the wealth in this country? If it's not done peacefully, one day there will be an explosion, not to mention the economic harm being done the country by the gross inequities. By warfare, I don't mean fighting in the streets, I mean tossing out those politicians who support tax cuts and other disproportionate financial benefits for the rich (this would include McCain). Trickle down doesn't.
Posted 12:46 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the smart, successful,risk taker, hard studier to have more, absolutely nothing. This is America. I came from the dirt and now make enough to be taxed from federal, social security, medicare, city, state a total of close to 40-42% of my income. I do not see any fairness on taking more of my hard earned money away for the government to dump it on entitlements, slackers, irresponsibles and unaccountable bureaucracies as the Democrats intend to do.
Posted 12:56 PM, 07/18/2008
jwad56
Djoko we sure are doing terribly aren't we? We all have phones we carry around in our pocket and GPS in our car to tell us every which way to turn. If we are sick an ambulance comes and takes us to a hospital. We are all getting fat cause there is so much food available and money to buy it with. Our streets are clogged with traffic because EVERYONE owns a car and still seems to be able to afford gas to drive. We have satellite TV, Cable TV, super fast Internet connections, satellite radios, HDTVs, devices that allow us to carry around thousands of songs in our pocket to listen to. I could go on and on and on and on just listing the things we didn't have 10 years ago. Tell me PLEASE where is the damage????? The "poor" people are walking around not starving, not homeless but talking on their cell phones and playing their xbox for entertainment. Even their kids have cell phones! Your point of view is completely ridiculous and disingenuous. Humans have never lived so easily or so luxuriously as they live TODAY in THIS country. And every day things get better. You just want to cut down people that have more than you do. And please, Djoko please define who are the "rich"? Give me a real number that you think makes someone "rich".
Posted 01:16 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
Hey, jj, keep your allegedly hard-earned bucks. I’m talking about those billionaire CEOs who get $100-million buyouts after runnin’ their corporations into the ground. I’m talking about the non-bid contracts for the Halliburtons. I’m talking about millionaires whose income tripled while their tax burden only doubled. I’m talking about a corporate state in which taxpayer money is irresponsibly funneled to businesses in return for large campaign contributions. Your argument is so much the stereotypical defense of the privileged that it’s kinda amusing. Your future is to live in a gated community, sittin’ on your pile of money and hoping the guards, who can’t afford to live there, are paid enough to keep the riffraff out. And you can hope the slackers stay comatose enough not to figure out, a la Willie Sutton, where the money is.
Posted 01:17 PM, 07/18/2008
Djoko Pritza
bon, I owe you a response. I’m sure I disagree with Obama on some issues, but to me that’s not the point. I’m not looking for perfection, I’m looking for change – a change in the party governing this country. If McCain hadn’t shifted on taxes, if he wasn’t such a warmonger, if he had truly remained a maverick, if he wasn’t so old (sorry), I could support him. But he decided that to win he had to flip-flop and embrace the most regressive elements of his party. Which leads me to another point: You call Obama a fraud because he changed positions but excuse it in McCain. That is why I believe you’re just a party apparatchik and not the man of issues you claim.
Posted 01:19 PM, 07/18/2008
jjfalcon35
America has now the largest GDP , industrial production, manufacturing sector, productivity, competitiveness thats it has ever had if you manage to actually research for facts. More manufacturing jobs have been lost to increases in productivity than to any country or trade agreement. Unemployment is low. Demographics are better than most economic powers including China. The so called crippling debt is a lower percentage of GDP than it has been in many times in our past and lower than most industrialized countries. American fundamentals are very strong. The way Iraq is moving right now, it could end up as a fully functional democracy in the center of the Middle east. That my friens will not be able to be spun in the future as anything other than a history changing legacy for the Texas village idiot. Can you imagine 1-2 decades from now Bill Clinton=Monica,impeachment George W the beginning of freeedom in Mideast. How bout that?
About Dick Polman

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.