Is McCain really this clueless?
It's always worth taking a break from vacation to behold the spectacle of a politician blowing off his own foot.
John McCain this week has uttered a couple whoppers that are so egregious, it prompts one to wonder whether he
Is McCain really this clueless?
Dick Polman, Inquirer National Political Columnist
It's always worth taking a break from vacation to behold the spectacle of a politician blowing off his own foot.
John McCain this week has uttered a couple whoppers that are so egregious, it prompts one to wonder whether he is subconsciously trying to sabotage his own campaign, or whether he is as verbally inept as the president he seeks to replace, or whether he simply lacks the most fundamental knowledge that is required of any Oval Office denizen.
The topic was Social Security. During a Monday town hall event (and bear in mind that he thinks he excels best in town hall events), the presumptive Republican nominee stated: "Americans have got to understand that we are paying present-day retirees with the taxes paid by young workers in America today. And that's a disgrace. It's an absolute disgrace..."
One day later, on CNN, McCain said virtually the thing while railing against the Social Security program: "Let's describe it for what it is. (Today's workers) pay their taxes, and right now their taxes are going to pay the retirement of present-day retirees. That's why it's broken..."
We all know that McCain would prefer to spend his time talking about national security and about how Iraq is the central front in the war on terror. We're all aware by now of his public admission that he is a tad knowledge-challenged about the biggest domestic issue of all, the economy. But we might arguably expect that the presidential nominee of a major party would at least have a working knowledge of the most popular domestic program since the New Deal.
Because here's the thing: What McCain describes as "an absolute disgrace" and "broken" are the rules that have governed the Social Security program since its inception 73 years ago. Current workers are always taxed, via the payroll levy, to support the retirement security of current seniors. That's how the pay-as-you-go policy has always worked. That's not a "disgrace," that's the law.
There are several possible ways to interpret McCain's remarks, none of them very flattering:
1. He's truly ignorant of how Social Security works, which, among other things, is not the best way to attract senior voters, or any voters who'd like to believe that a guy auditioning to run the country is at least minimally in touch with reality.
2. He does know how Social Security works (it's hard to imagine he doesn't, not after two decades in Washington), but somehow failed to articulate whatever he really intended to say - just as he has done on other recent occasions, such as when he twice confused the Sunnis and the Shiites (which Brit Hume of Fox News defended as a possible "senior moment").
3. He actually does believe that the fundamental precepts of Social Security are an "absolute disgrace," and wants to overhaul them.
It has long been an axiom that any Republican seeking to overhaul Social Security is doomed to suffer political damage; witness President Bush, who drained his '05 capital while stumping in vain for partial privatization. And it has long been an axiom that any Republican who verbally disses the program (inadvertently or intentionally) is doomed to suffer political damage; witness Barry Goldwater, the 1964 presidential nominee who was slaughtered on election day in part because he was on record as having stated, "I think Social Security ought to be voluntary. This is the only definite position I have on it."
Yesterday, a McCain spokesman tried to cover the candidate's tracks (they've been mopping up a lot lately) by stating after the fact what McCain might have been intending to convey: "The disgrace is our failure to fix the long-run imbalance in Social Security - a failure of leadership evidenced by our willingness to kick the problem to the next generation of leaders. He's also describing the looming and increasing demographic pressures confronting the Social Security system and Washington's utter failure to address it."
But that's not what McCain described as a "disgrace." Instead, he targeted the underlying premise of the program itself. Either he did this because he is inarticulate; or because he really doesn't know how it works; or because he's an idealogue who wants to undo the best of the New Deal. Whatever the reason, the Demcrats and the senior groups now have him on video. As Barry Goldwater discovered, while trying unsuccessfully to distance himself from his own words, that kind of talk can kill a presidential candidacy.
This week is turning out to be a campaign Christmas for Obama. First, if you're looking for votes from white Rust Belt Democrats, having Jesse Jackson make crude remarks about you is a great first step. Second, people overwhelmingly do not look kindly to the idea of scrapping SS. The system has worked for almost 70 years & the confidence that most folks have to the government making big changes to it & then screwing it up is pretty high. This issue is a stone loser for the GOP. Third, Phil "Santa" Gramm's ham handed "whiner" comments clearly surpasses Obama's "bitter" comments in pure political stupidity. With Gramm being both the King of financial deregulation (which has worked out SO well) & attached to McCain's hip on the economy, Obama & the Dems will beat McCain like a drum with these remarks through the rest of the GE. Hey, I've made my own comments about McCain not being the "sharpest tool in the shed", but he sure was smart enough to set a land-speed record in tossing Gramm under the bus.— yobill626
Comment removed.
That Barack Obama is truly ignorant of the American way of life. The United States of America is the greatest nation on Earth, and has been for over 200 years. Obama's campaign promises to CHANGE that. No thank you, I'd rather not change -- I'd like us to remain the greatest nation on Earth.— Mr. Smith- Removing the cap from the wage tax makes Social Security Solvent but allowing the rich to pay in at the same percentage as the rest of us seems abhorent to both party's.— Ed_Tilton
- First, you just have to think/believe that this is a social tax, not a personal retirement account. Second, the government has used your money for items not related to its intended purpose, so social security money is underfunded. Third, Obama is talking about removing/raising the income cap in order to increase the funding. Forth, it just may be that McCain is ignorant like a fox and wants to generate sympathy against removing/raising the income cap.— vcsmith
Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.
ARCHIVES
All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.
- American Spectator
- David Limbaugh
- Free Republic
- Glenn Reynolds
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- John Hawkins
- Matt Lewis
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Opinion Journal
- Power Line
- Red State
- The Brody File
- The Daily Caller
- Town Hall
- Weekly Standard
- Center for American Progress
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos
- David Corn
- Huffington Post
- Media Matters
- Mojoblog (Mother Jones)
- Open Left
- Political Animal
- Salon's War Room
- Talking Points Memo
- Tapped
- The Democratic Strategist
- The Grey Matter
- Unclaimed Territory
- Andrew Sullivan
- Attytood
- Chi Tribune's The Swamp
- CJR's Campaign Desk
- CNN's Political Ticker
- CQ Politics
- FactCheck.org
- Gail Collins
- Howard Kurtz
- Mickey Kaus
- NBC's First Read
- Obit
- Political Wire
- Politico
- Politics Daily
- Pollster.com
- Real Clear Politics
- The Atlantic Wire
- The Fix
- The Moderate Voice
- The Plank
- USA Today On Politics
- Wonkette
