The year 1979 was not one of our best. I remember it well. The inflation rate was 11 percent, the interest rate was 15 percent, a nuke plant went haywire at Three Mile Island, the Iranians seized 53 American hostages, 11 rock 'n' roll fans were trampled to death at a Who concert, and during the spring we motorists had to queue up at the gas station for as long as an hour for the privilege of filling the tank. Oh, and one other thing: We had a Democratic president who was widely perceived as being incapable of locating his own rear end with his own two hands. The guy couldn't even go fishing without being attacked by a swamp rabbit.
Which brings me to the 30th anniversary of Jimmy Carter's "malaise" speech - 30 years ago last evening, in fact. His TV address is likely to live on in presidential annals as one of the most boneheaded of all time. He certainly meant well. But I watched it at the time, and I simply assumed that, by lecturing Americans in the manner of an Old Testament prophet, he had dug himself a hole too deep to escape. He did enjoy a post-address poll bounce, but of course it didn't last. Any future president who wishes to commit political suicide need only consult this speech for guidance.
It should be noted that, contrary to conventional wisdom, Carter never once used the word "malaise" to describe the American mood of 1979 (just as Humphrey Bogart in Casablanca never actually said to the piano player, "Play it again, Sam"). But the gist of Carter's message was indeed that a malaise (specifically, "a crisis of confidence") had settled upon the land, and that Americans themselves were partly responsible for it.
The biggest lesson of all: Generally speaking, Americans don't like to be told they are doing anything wrong. Carter did. That night 30 years ago, he told TV viewers that they were selfish people living empty lives.
This passage, in particular, made me wince: "In a nation that was proud of hard work, strong families, close-knit communities, and our faith in God, too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption. Human identity is no longer defined by what one does, but by what one owns. But we've discovered that owning things and consuming things does not satisfy our longing for meaning. We've learned that piling up material goods cannot fill the emptiness of lives which have no confidence or purpose."
There was surely some truth in that passage. But Carter was a tad tin-eared. Politically, it's kind of tough to upbraid Americans for worshiping self-indulgence at a time when they have to spend an hour in a gas line.
A few minutes later, Carter sought to diagnose one of the big reasons for the crisis of confidence: "Looking for a way out of this crisis, our people have turned to the federal government and found it isolated from the mainstream of our nation's life. Washington, D.C., has become an island. The gap between our citizens and our government has never been so wide. The people are looking for honest answers, not easy answers; clear leadership, not false claims and evasiveness and politics as usual."
He continued, "What you see too often in Washington and elsewhere around the country is a system of government that seems incapable of action. You see a Congress twisted and pulled in every direction by hundreds of well financed and powerful special interests. You see every extreme position defended to the last vote, almost to the last breath by one unyielding group or another. You often see a balanced and a fair approach that demands sacrifice, a little sacrifice from everyone, abandoned like an orphan without support and without friends. Often you see paralysis and stagnation and drift. You don't like, and neither do I."
Sadly, his diagnosis of Washington could easily be voiced today, and most of the speech dealt with an energy crisis that persists today. But let's stick with the political context of 1979: the long passage quoted above was dumb politics to the max.
By the summer of '79, Carter already had been president for two and a half years. He was working (or, more accurately, not working) with Democratic majorities in both congressional chambers. By reciting the failures of '79 Washington, he was virtually inviting his fellow Americans to say, "Hey, pal, don't try to blame us for the nation's crisis. You're the guy who's supposed to be in charge. You're the one who owns these problems, so what are you gonna do about it?"
But Carter didn't come off as a guy in charge. At one early point in the address, he said: "I realize more than ever that as president I need your help." Given the woes afflicting America at the time, and Carter's fragile political status that summer, his cry for help was akin to saying that he was not up to the job. Such was the perception that sunk in, after the initial poll bounce fell away. Americans generally don't warm to presidents who appear to be pleading for a life preserver.
And within days of the speech, he left a fresh impression of being overwhelmed by the job. He sacked half his Cabinet, an act that came off looking more desperate than decisive.
All told, the "crisis of confidence" speech cleared the path for Ronald Reagan, who defeated Carter 16 months later. Reagan didn't tell Americans that they were materialistic creatures leading spiritually barren lives; instead, he dispensed flattery, telling Americans that they were great. Carter's TV address was gloomy; Reagan was sunny. Americans want their presidents to be sunny. Indeed, Reagan twisted the knife in his remarks on election eve, 1980: "I find no national malaise, I find nothing wrong with the American people. Oh, they are frustrated, even angry at what has been done to this blessed land. But more than anything, they are sturdy and robust, as they have always been.”
Carter was probably on to something; after all, materialistic greed and self-indulgence obviously fueled the financial abuses that helped trigger the current economic crisis. But a president's tone and timing matter greatly, and Carter was not gifted in either department. Which is probably why, 30 years later, he is generally viewed by younger Americans as merely some old guy with big teeth who builds houses.
-------
On the freelance front, I wrote this new piece about the current crisis in California, and the potential death of the California dream. It's worth it just for the Mamas and the Papas video.
Nice revisionist hitory, comrade. Under your logic Carter was a failure ONLY because of his communication skills. Get real. CD75
NOTHING is worth a Mama and Papas video. SteveMG
How about this for political suicide: In 6 months, grow the debt by 4x, tell the world that America stinks, take over 5 of the largest companies in the USA, raise unemployment to nearly 10% when you said you could stop it at 8%, and let 2 nations develop nuclear weapons that can be sold to terrorists. So much for hope and change. CD75
A quick funny Mamas and Papas story. At Monterey Pop, they made the mistake of going on last, right after the Who and Jimi Hendrix. I guess before Youtube, they had no idea what they had gotten themselves into. On a documentary, Pete Townsend admitted that even he didn't have the guts to go on after Jimi, and Michelle Phillips's eyes go wide as saucers when she reminisces that this man is effing his guitar on the stage, and we have to go on next. SteveMG
So, the message I take from this is, any elected leader who tells the truth to Americans is toast. And people wonder why all the politicians lie...Carter's problem, indeed, was that he WASN'T a professional politician, which led him to incautiously emit truth (compounded by poor phrasing and timing, one must agree). Yersinia Pestis
Comment removed.- "All told, the "crisis of confidence" speech cleared the path for Ronald Reagan." I hadn't looked at it that way before. Jimmy Carter is a Conservative hero. jmc
Comment removed.
Nice twisting of words, CD. Dick gives one glaring example (possibly the most glaring I've seen) of Carter's inadequacies as president. Not once does Dick say this speech is the only reason for his failure. But hey, at least there were no Fox News talking points in your post. Oh, wait, those came two posts later. eaglehoo
Carter was partially right. We live in a free society, and government intervention should be be used to change behaviour. The prblem is that as a society was have lost whatever virtue we once had. It isn't government's responsabiloity to change that, it is ours, if we desire to remain free. sleepy
Jimmy Carter was too honest and intelligent to be President. Everything he said was true. Had we listened to him, imposed a foreign oil tax, drastically increased fleet gas mileage requirements and imposed limitations on corporate lobbying, we would have energy independence, our auto industry would be strong and we wouldn't have transferred our national wealth to the Arabs and Chinese. Instead, like idiots who invested with Madoff, we went for that moron Reagan and Voodoo Economics (quoting GHW Bush) and financed 6 years of prosperity with debt and cheap foreign oil. We still are paying for that, as well as the influence of corporate interests that bought GW Bush and took us into war after war. What Carter was telling us is that we sometimes need to sacrifice. What Reagan and Bush II told us is to go shop and drive and the hell with everything else. Didn't work out too well, did it? Palestra Jon
"CBO director Douglas Elmendorf said bills crafted by House leaders and the Senate health committee do not propose "the sort of fundamental changes that would be necessary to reduce the trajectory of federal health spending by a signficant amount." Cost is also a major issue in the Senate, where some moderate Democrats have joined Republicans in calling on Obama to drop his demand that both chambers approve a bill before the August recess." The USA is not a country ready for healthcare. Again the comes back to why and when we go to the doctors or the hospital. The American culture uses health and medicine incorrectly for the consumer culture we have. Our healthcare infrastructure measures cost with usage. Doctors are allowed to experiement, develop (drugs & technics), and provide care. We have the freedoms about switching, referrals, do nothing or take as prescribed. Hospitals cater to this and charge us for it. When urgent care, real or demaned, occurs, we and doctors use our collected cultural views. we pay for these, but we recieve the care we are concede not fully happy, but fills our cultural sense of having input to what we disire. The cost mounts and so much so it would dampered the economy further. Fisher
Because a man is a Democrat some people that comment on this bard will immediately be against that person, that being said President Carter was ahead of the curve , he understood the monster in Iran all to well ( and with the backdoor deals the Republicans were playing he had no chance to resolve that situation) he understood the gas crisis and was blamed for the oil embargo but still with this speach and the way he handled himself we all knew he was right but to lazy to act. President Carter embodies all the ideals the Republicans hold on high, he built a small business to amazing success, he ran for local office than state and won, he was a drak horse in the presidential election and won, so someone who did all that, raised a family and served honarbly in the military will get the scorn of the right wing establishment because he is from another party. President Carter has also won the Nobel Peace prize ( name one former Republican that has done that) and started Habitat for Humanity which helps thousand of people own their first homes. He was no Roosevelt in office but the legacy of this man out weights all the past presidents in my book. hejira33312
Carter hit the nail right on the head with that speech and the ineffectiveness of the national government. It's not a surprise, with so much of a rightist bent to this country. It's easy to claim that Americans were always robust and sturdy, when the truth is that Americans were usually socially behind the times. They've been slaveholders and xenophobes and fought progress every step of the way. If it weren't for a few individuals destroying the lives of groups of minorities, this country would have failed long ago. HandNik
CD75- Why do you keep posting the "Obama is a failure because.." stats every day? I think anybody who reads this blog has seen them many times over, and if you haven't changed any minds yet, you probably won't from this point on. Besides, what would YOU do differently? Don't say "I wouldn't have taken over GM" unless you have a better answer for the situation; that would be a cop-out. Hope to hear something insightful from you! Eric_in_CA
- American Spectator
- David Limbaugh
- Free Republic
- Glenn Reynolds
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- John Hawkins
- Matt Lewis
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Opinion Journal
- Power Line
- Red State
- The Brody File
- The Daily Caller
- Town Hall
- Weekly Standard
- Center for American Progress
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos
- David Corn
- Huffington Post
- Media Matters
- Mojoblog (Mother Jones)
- Open Left
- Political Animal
- Salon's War Room
- Talking Points Memo
- Tapped
- The Democratic Strategist
- The Grey Matter
- Unclaimed Territory
- Andrew Sullivan
- Attytood
- Chi Tribune's The Swamp
- CJR's Campaign Desk
- CNN's Political Ticker
- CQ Politics
- FactCheck.org
- Gail Collins
- Howard Kurtz
- Mickey Kaus
- NBC's First Read
- Obit
- Political Wire
- Politico
- Politics Daily
- Pollster.com
- Real Clear Politics
- The Atlantic Wire
- The Fix
- The Moderate Voice
- The Plank
- USA Today On Politics
- Wonkette
- December 2011
- August 2010
- August
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008







