Hither and yon
Following up a quarter of political stories
Hither and yon
Dick Polman, Inquirer National Political Columnist
On numerous fronts:
A few Republicans have finally broken the party's thunderous silence about Arizona's pioneering "papers, please" immigration law, the one that empowers cops to stop anyone who might seem suspicious. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush voiced concerns about the law yesterday, as did Karl Rove and Senator Lindsey Graham. But the most noteworthy critic is Marco Rubio, the imminent Florida GOP Senate nominee and the darling of conservatives everywhere. In a statement released yesterday, Rubio said:
"I do have concerns about this legislation....I think aspects of the law, especially that dealing with 'reasonable suspicion,' are going to put our law enforcement officers in an incredibly difficult position. It could also unreasonably single out people who are here legally, including many American citizens. Throughout American history and throughout this administration, we have seen that when government is given an inch, it takes a mile."
Read that italicized sentence again. Rubio is challenging his fellow conservatives to demonstrate some intellectual consistency and condemn the Arizona law as a fresh example of governmental overreach.
The tea-party people who scream that health care reform is a threat to their personal freedom have been conspicuously silent about the new Arizona law that poses a threat to personal freedom. Gee, I wonder why. Perhaps it's because the virtually all-white tea-party people can't seem to muster outrage about governmental overreach that potentially imperils the freedom of brown people. Apparently not all government "tyranny" is created equal.
Rubio clearly wants the tea-partiers to speak out, and show some consistency of principle. Good luck with that.
-------
Speaking of Rubio, his rival for the GOP nomination will decide by Friday whether to bolt the party and run for the Senate this autumn as an independent. As I mentioned here last week, moderate Gov. Charlie Crist has been virtually shoved out of the Republican race by the right-wing base. This is merely the latest ideological purge staged by conservatives who can't abide the presence of moderates who might be inclined on occasion to work across party lines.
But Crist isn't the only casualty. Check out what's happening these days in Utah, where Bob Bennett, a veteran Republican senator up for re-election, is on the verge of being sacked by the party purists. A new survey of delegates, slated to attend next week's Utah GOP convention, shows that Bennett could finish third in the balloting for the '10 nomination; under Utah party rules, only the top two finishers can proceed to a primary.
It speaks volumes about the conservative purge mentality that Bennett is even in trouble at all. This is a guy who gets 90 percent ratings from the Christian Coalition, 100 percent ratings from the Chamber of Commerce, an 84 percent lifetime rating from the American Conservative Union, 90 percent ratings from Americans for Tax Reform (perhaps the most influential anti-tax group in Washingon), zero percent ratings from Planned Parenthood, zero percent ratings from NARAL Pro-Choice America, and. not long ago, a zero percent rating from ACORN....and yet not even Bennett is deemed by the purists to be sufficiently conservative.
His unpardonable sin? Last year, he co-sponsored a health reform bill with a Democratic colleague, Ron Wyden of Oregon. The bill was designed to prompt greater consumer access to the private insurance market. Emphasis on private. But because the bill required that government play a role in making this happen, the conservative Club for Growth went nuclear with a Utah TV ad claiming that Bennett wanted "massive government control of health care."
The message to all Republican lawmakers: Don't dare work with the other side on anything. No wonder so little gets done in the Senate anymore. In the words of Arlen Specter, quoted this morning in the Allentown newspaper, "Coalition-building has gone out of style in this wing of the building."
-------
As noted here on Monday, President Obama and the Democrats have launched a major push to stoke the '08 young voters in the hopes that they'll return to the polls this November and help the party keep control of both congressional chambers. But a newly released Gallup poll suggests that the effort may well fail.
Only 23 percent of voters aged 18 to 29 say they are "very enthusiastic" about voting in this year's congressional elections - whereas 44 percent of voters aged 50 to 64, and 41 percent of over-65 voters, feel that way.
Gallup points out that "voter turnout typically skews older" in midterm races, and says that "so far, 2010 provides no exception to this traditional pattern." And that's bad news for Obama, because the poll also shows that if young voters did decide to show up, they'd support the Democratic congressional candidates by a 51 to 39 percent margin - whereas voters aged 30 and older generally favor the GOP candidates.
For many young people, the '08 novelty has clearly worn off, but I suspect that the undertow of the economy has also put a damper on their enthusiasm.
-------
Speaking of Democratic undertow, is there a bigger disaster than the Illinois Senate race? It was embarrassing enough when the party coughed up Ted Kennedy's Massachusetts seat; arguably, it would be even worse to cough up Obama's former seat. But that seems likely, given the fact that the Democrats have wound up with a '10 Senate candidate, former Obama basketball buddy Alexi Giannoulias, who made his bones as an executive of a Chicago bank that gave big loans to sleazy and mob-connected characters.
And now, to top things off, the bank has gone belly up. It was padlocked last Friday by the federal regulators at the FDIC.
A political candidate's worst fate, in the middle of a campaign, is to be caught in bed with a live boy or a dead girl. So goes the old joke. But given the prevailing mood in 2010, surely the next worst fate is to be known, from now until election day, as "failed banker Alexis Giannoulias."
Maybe it's already old news that Giannoulias, during his bank tenure, oversaw loans of more than $11 million to a convicted bookmaker and prostitution ring promoter; and loans to corrupt political insider Tony Rezko (the same guy who helped Obama swing a sweet deal on his Chicago house), among others. But the "failed banker" tag is fresh and resonant - a gift to his rival, moderate Republican Mark Kirk. So is the evidence that the bank indulged in risky subprime loans.
Obama aides have reportedly been worried for a long time that Giannoulias would be heavy baggage, and it's clear that Obama would love to see the guy quit the race and clear the way for a better last-ditch candidate. (The latest ringing endorsement from the White House: "The president intends to help Democratic candidates in Illinois up and down the ballot.") But the failed banker, not taking the hint, seems determined to stay. What a farce. The Democrats deserve to lose this race.
-------
Meanwhile, earlier this week, the aforementioned Jeb Bush gave us the best-ever description of James Carville:
"He looks like a fish that swam too close to a nuclear reactor."
If Kirk is indeed an actual moderate Republican, surely he would be a better choice for Illinois (and America) than Giannoulas. Maybe he would even help build coalitions in the Senate in defiance of Dear Leader McConnell. Or maybe Rahm Emanual should just send Alexi a dead fish and hope he gets the message...— yoda- p-did from last. I'm sorry that my response did not measure up to your level of cost analysis sophistication. But how could anybody match your reasoning that it "would cost a lot of money, and that would mean increasing taxes, probably". The brillance of that statement must have blinded me to the need for a tax increase to cover the $2 or $3 billion needed a year to do the project. Thanks to your wisdom and intellect I can now see again.— Mike Welbourn
- p-did As for that I was caually throwing numbers out there. Yes I did but if you did a little reseach you would see my number (miles and cost) were higher than they really are. So it may really cost about $5 or $6 billion or just about same amount GM just paid back.— Mike Welbourn
"Perhaps it's because the virtually all-white tea-party people can't seem to muster outrage about governmental overreach that potentially imperils the freedom of brown people." I remember all the way back to last Thursday when this kind of rhetoric was bad for the country. My, how times change.— jmc- Again, besides stoking anger for political gain what is Obama's immigration solution?— CD75
Comment removed.- After what the Ds, likely with DP's approval, did to Lieberman, they have no standing to talk about "purges."— pj katauskas
- CD75, my guess is that BO is going to give a "major address" soon on immigration reform. That should do it, right?— pj katauskas
- pj katauskas - Lieberman's lot is all his own doing. He burned the Dem's (granted - not hard to do with that bunch) and HIS CONSTITUENTS were going to vote him out, so he ran as an Independent. He did the same thing Specter has done. He took himself out of the party - the party let him stay far too long, imo.— MMorgan83
- CiceroSpuriousDeodatusPompousJack*ssus... the only thing you left out of your "Gimme"crat handbook rant is a charge of racism. Since you folks like to shut down any dialogue with that one, I'm surprised. But I'm sure you'll work it in there somewhere. But you still win this week's "Chris Matthews Tingle Down the Leg" award for your fawning admiration of anything left of center.— Catch22
- Lieberman won because he had broad state-wide support, Ds and Rs. Proved the Ds don't control CT. Further proof is guess who's "retiring" to "spend more time with his family?" Friend of Angelo Chris Dodd. He being in charge of financial reform is the ultimate oxymoron. Kinda like "liberal thought."— pj katauskas
- "Apparently not all government "tyranny" is created equal." Great quote. To those of us who are not mindless ideologues, making someone show proof of citizenship is not really that different than making them show proof of insurance.— barlowjames
Dither and yawn.— georgel- "Lieberman won because he had broad state-wide support" Such a no-nothing comment. Lieberman BARELY got re-elected in a state he held for decades. His anti-party activities almost got him sent to private life. Yet the dismal Dems still let him have power - undeserved power that he still abuses today.— MMorgan83
- But he did get elected, didn't he, and as an independent, which means he had to have D, R and independent support, right Morgan? I'd call that a perfect example of "broad state-wide support" and your comment the true no-nothing one. If winning over those three factions isn't broad state-wide support, what is it and what do you consider broad state-wide support? Honestly, some people just say the silliest things here.— pj katauskas
Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.
ARCHIVES
All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.
- American Spectator
- David Limbaugh
- Free Republic
- Glenn Reynolds
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- John Hawkins
- Matt Lewis
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Opinion Journal
- Power Line
- Red State
- The Brody File
- The Daily Caller
- Town Hall
- Weekly Standard
- Center for American Progress
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos
- David Corn
- Huffington Post
- Media Matters
- Mojoblog (Mother Jones)
- Open Left
- Political Animal
- Salon's War Room
- Talking Points Memo
- Tapped
- The Democratic Strategist
- The Grey Matter
- Unclaimed Territory
- Andrew Sullivan
- Attytood
- Chi Tribune's The Swamp
- CJR's Campaign Desk
- CNN's Political Ticker
- CQ Politics
- FactCheck.org
- Gail Collins
- Howard Kurtz
- Mickey Kaus
- NBC's First Read
- Obit
- Political Wire
- Politico
- Politics Daily
- Pollster.com
- Real Clear Politics
- The Atlantic Wire
- The Fix
- The Moderate Voice
- The Plank
- USA Today On Politics
- Wonkette
