Saturday, May 18, 2013
Saturday, May 18, 2013

Gunning for more

The insatiable gun lobby. Imagine the possibilities.

146 comments

Gunning for more

POSTED: Friday, July 9, 2010, 8:03 AM

It has been a splendid season for gun lovers. The U.S. Supreme Court has decreed that the Second Amendment right to bear arms can't be undermined by state and local restrictions, Georgia has enacted a law that allows licensees to carry concealed firearms in airports and other public places, Virginia has enacted a law that allows licensees to bring loaded guns into bars, Louisiana has enacted a law that allows concealed weapons in houses of worship...is this nirvana for the NRA, or what?

Actually, the NRA is probably far from sated. What good are gun rights unless they are enjoyed to the fullest? Think of the possibilities. Think of the arguments that NRA lobbyists might dream up next.

A bill to permit the cleaning of guns during Sunday worship: "The right to clean a gun in church is an inherent extension of the Second Amendment. The right to bear arms is meaningless unless all arms are kept in good working order at all times, and nothing in the Second Amendment bars such ritual maintenance on Sunday mornings. We are a nation of multi-taskers, and Americans clearly have the constitutional right - not to mention the ability - to work with solvents and lubicrants while reading the Bible. A well-armed militia requires 24/7 vigilance, and we at the NRA will work with the churches to ensure that the pew-workshops are sufficiently ventilated."

A bill to permit the carrying of unconcealed weapons in coffee shops and similar beverage-based emporiums: "In the new economy, more Americans than ever before work in these environments, and empty tables are increasingly at a premium. On occasion, disputes may occur between patrons who covet the same table. Guns have been used to settle disputes ever since the Old West, and in no way are we suggesting that they be discharged in coffee shops. Rather, we at the NRA believe that the Founding Fathers recognized the deterrent value of guns. We believe that the Second Amendment implies the right to expose one's gun, as a way to defuse confrontation. Therefore, if an armed American prudently places his weapon on a table at Starbucks, thereby establishing ownership of said table, the act would duly inform the unarmed loser with the ear buds and the mocha frappuccino to go find another saloon."

A bill to permit unconcealed assault weapons at drive-through establishments: "We at the NRA believe that motorists should be allowed to drive to these outdoor windows, for the purposes of effectuating bank transactions or paying for Big Macs, without the clear and present danger of other motorists cutting into line. The constitutional right to bear arms does not cease when an American is behind the wheel; indeed, this is when he or she might be most exposed to external threat. We believe, for example, that your basic XM8 Lightweight Assault Weapon, or perhaps the Heckler-Koch G36, if pointed out the car window by a licensed driver or family member, and purely for defensive purposes, would duly deter those in rival vehicles who believe that their inherent right to speedily purchase a McDonald's Triple Thick Shake is greater than your inherent right. An armed militia ensures that all Americans have equal opportunities in the pursuit of happiness."

A bill that would allow gun-toting bar patrons to drink alcohol. The new Virginia law, signed by the governor in April, states that it's fine to bring a gun to a bar, but that those who do so cannot drink. Gun lobbyists are now complaining that this law treats the gun owners as second-class citizens, denying them the equal right to drink like everyone else. The gun lobbyists are pushing for a Virginia law that (in the words of one gun-rights activist) would allow gun licensees to tote their concealed weapons and drink as much as they wish - "as long as they are not drunk."

Well, guess what, folks. That latter item - the Virginia guns-and-booze proposal - is very real. So is the quote.

Yes, when it comes to the gun-rights lobby, satire is probably superfluous. As the great sportswriter Red Smith wrote 59 years ago, while beholding a fantastical event, "Reality has strangled invention."

-------

I was live for an hour on Philadelphia NPR this morning, talking national politics with David Mark, senior editor at Politico, and Scott Huffmon, political science professor from Winthrop University in South Carolina. The program is archived here.

  

146 comments
Comments  (146)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:25 AM, 07/09/2010
    You were probably pretty happy when anti-gun people were on the winning end,back in '93 when Clinton was shoving his anti gun bills through.Now you're on the other side,what goes around,comes around.
    oakster
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:40 AM, 07/09/2010
    You were arguing earlier this week about Arizona and how state and local law takes a back seat to federal law, but now you argue that state and local law should trump the Constitution. Which is it?
    jmc
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:45 AM, 07/09/2010
    I think we should amend our constitution to require every able-bodied adult without a criminal record to own a gun. After all, if we can require the purchasing of health insurance then why not guns? A conscientious objector clause could be invoked by those like DP, who are more frightened of a gun then they are of cancer, car wrecks and the hundreds of other more likely causes of their own demise.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:53 AM, 07/09/2010
    jmc - That's an easy one for DP: Whatever gets the job done and makes the world more like he wants it to be. Deep down inside all lefties are authoritarian dictators who'd like to rule the world by diktat.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:56 AM, 07/09/2010
    2nd Amendment; “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” What is so hard to figure out Mr. Polman? The American people and the Founding Fathers have spoken on this issue.
    NEPhilly
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:58 AM, 07/09/2010
    Those who would deny people their 2nd Amendment rights, if successful, would move on to deny the rest. Most tyrants are enabled when the citizens are disarmed. This right has nothing to do with hunting, and everything to do with maintaining freedom.
    Mark Glaeser
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:16 AM, 07/09/2010
    Yea, state/laws laws are superceded by the fed law...you didn't hear DP cry when the sanctuary cities like VA Beach thumbed their noses at Fed law.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:28 AM, 07/09/2010
    I'm all for DP. Let's eliminate the 2nd ammendment...and while we're at it, let's get rid of the 1st as well. Maybe we can end useless, opinionated blogger drivel that way.
    cb54
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:39 AM, 07/09/2010
    While we're getting rid of the 1st and 2nd amendments we might as well do away with the due process clause of the 14th. That way we can simply string up the fat cats and robber barons that are plundering our society and distribute the spoils more appropriately. What say we start with journalists that can afford to take month long vacations.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 9:54 AM, 07/09/2010
    This editorial is a classic example of an angry tantrum, full of impotent rage. Keep it up!!!!
    K-Romulus
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:01 AM, 07/09/2010
    I'd like to sit in JFK Plaza with my .12 Gage, and shoot pidgins.
    JZimmerman
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:03 AM, 07/09/2010
    I like how you structured this post--the sham blurbs leading up to the real one. The NRA was claiming that Obama's election would result in tightening of gun control laws, but as your post makes clear, the opposite has happened.
    Nalaka
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:19 AM, 07/09/2010
    Meanwhile back on Earth, 16.5% of Americans are unemployed in July 2010. This is despite that fact that Obama promised in February 2009 that if his stimulus passed it would never exceed 8%.
    CD75


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
About this blog

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.

Dick Polman Inquirer National Political Columnist