In brief, at week's end...
The winner of this week's Homer Simpson Award is our old friend Karl Rove, the architect of George W. Bush's stellar career. In a guest appearance the other morning on ABC, Rove insisted that President Obama should march in lockstep with his Afghanistan commander, General Stanley McChrystal, and promptly approve McChrystal's plea for 40,000 new troops - because, after all, the commander in the field knows best. But host Diane Sawyer pointed out that top military people have complained that the Afghanistan troop hike is needed now precisely because the Bush administration under-resourced the war. Rove didn't like that at all. His response: "I don’t believe that at the time, the military was saying we need significantly more (troops). If there had been that cry, I suspect the previous administration would have been very responsive to it...The United States had what, at the time, the military felt was an appropriate level of resources."
Wow. Even now, the Bush team can't stop lying.
Two months ago, McChrystal's predecessor, Gen. David McKiernan, complained to The Washington Post that he could not get what he needed from the Bush team, with respect to troop levels, because the White House was so focused on Iraq. McKiernan said, "There was a saying when I got (to Afghanistan): 'If you’re in Iraq and you need something, you ask for it. If you’re in Afghanistan and you need it, you figure out how to do without it.'" He then recounted that, during the late summer of 2008, he had asked Bush for 30,000 more troops - because, after all, the commander in the field knows best...but his request was refused.
Homer's message to Rove: "D'Oh!"
-------
Maybe we should have a moratorium on all polls that seek to measure public sentiment on health care reform, given the new evidence which suggests that a lot people have no idea what's going on. The nonpartisan Pew Research Center this week released some stats showing an alarmingly high rate of public cluelessness. For instance, only 56 percent of Americans know that the "public option" is part of the health reform debate - and 44 percent don't even know what the term refers to. Meanwhile, only 18 percent know that the Senate Finance Committee chairman is Max Baucus; another seven percent think that the chairman is John McCain - a particularly noteworthy finding, not because McCain has rarely shown the slightest interest in the health care issue, but because McCain is a Republican and therefore ineligible to run any committee in a Democratic chamber. And even though most Americans seem to have strong opinions about the health care issues put to them by pollsters, 66 percent nevertheless say that the reform effort is "hard to understand." So the next time you hear the reformers or the naysayers claim to be speaking for "the American people," take it with a chunk of rock salt.
-------
My favorite Fox News factoid of the week: During a report about the Dow clearing 10,000, host Neil Cavuto suggested that this event could be correctly viewed as evidence of a "Bush recovery." (Subliminal message: When the market goes down, blame Obama; when it goes up, credit Bush.) As Cavuto spoke, the on-screen messageboard flashed the word to all credulous couch-potatoes: "Is This The 'Bush Recovery?'" I'll pose a different question: Is it any mystery why the Obama team refuses to play ball with Fox?
-------
Political history junkies got a treat this week. A new book apparently solves the mystery of "Debategate," the 1980 theft of President Jimmy Carter's debate preparation materials, and the secret delivery of those materials to Carter's challenger, Ronald Reagan, on the autumn eve of their only debate. According to Craig Shirley, author of Rendezvous With Destiny: Ronald Reagan and The Campaign That Changed America, the culprit was a disgruntled Carter aide named Paul Corbin. Corbin, a Kennedy family loyalist, was ticked off that Carter had beaten Kennedy for the Democratic nomination, and sought to screw Carter in return. So he slipped the Carter debate plan to the Reagan people. Which was a tad ironic, because Corbin had formerly been a card-carrying communist, yet the anti-communist Reagan hardliners had no problems conspiring with him. But, as the saying goes, politics makes strange bedfellows. Carter reportedly still blames his '80 defeat on the theft of his debate prep materials ("I don't think there's any doubt that it made some difference"), but he's deluding himself. He was the sole Democratic incumbent to lose a re-election race during the 20th century not because Reagan had his debate book, but because he was stymied by the Iranian hostage crisis, double-digit inflation, and a disgruntled liberal base. Corbin was a symptom of his failures, not the cause.
-------
And finally, following up on Rush Limbaugh, his NFL dreams are apparently toast. League officials and potential Rams investors decided late this week that he would merely foul the air. Sure enough, shortly before he was cut loose, he went on the air and spewed verbiage eerily similar in tone to what I satirized here a few days ago: "This is not about the NFL, it's not about the St. Louis Rams, it's not about me, this is about the ongoing effort by the left in this country, wherever you find them, in the media, the Democrat Party, or wherever, to destroy conservatism, to prevent the mainstreaming of anyone who is prominent as a conservative. Therefore, this is about the future of the United States of America and what kind of country we're going to have."
An "ongoing effort by the left"? On the contrary, he got the boot because he was deemed to be bad for business by the business-minded operatives of the National Football League (which, after all, has never been a haven for "the left"). One of Rush's erstwhile investment partners said this week that Rush had to go, because it was "clear that his involvement in our group has become a complication and a distraction." It's simple, really: Rush, and his rhetorical track record, was high risk - whereas good businessmen seek to minimize risk. That's free enterprise and the American way. Rush, of all people, should have goosebumps about that.
- I love Polmans quote "The nonpartisan Pew Research Center this week released some stats showing an alarmingly high rate of public cluelessness." This isn't exactly shocking considering the electorate voted in a redistributionist as President. Most people are not informed and are easily duped by state run media.
- Wow. Bush, Rove, the general public, Reagan, Fox News, and Rush Limbaugh. The "six pack" of leftist contempt all neatly placed in just one column. DP's anger must have really been pent up. jmc
- Heh. "Kennedy Family Loyalist". Oxy. Moron. Mr. Smith
Start the weekend off with a shot at GWB via Karl Rove & I think GWB career was stellar:) I know you would like to stop the polling on healthcare because it is less than 50 % and falling. Yeah 10,000 Dow. Finally a nugget of truth, "He was the sole Democratic incumbent to lose a re-election race during the 20th century not because Reagan had his debate book, but because he was stymied by the Iranian hostage crisis, double-digit inflation, and a disgruntled liberal base.". I heard on a radio station (wfan, i think) that George Soros was in the same ownership group as Rush trying to buy the Rams. I wonder if his politics will stop his bid as well? Just sayin' :) NEPhilly- Classic Polman when he writes "When the market goes down, blame Obama; when it goes up, credit Bush.)" Or when unemploymen is 9.8% blame Bush, but when the market goes up credit Obama. We could play this game all day.
- I don't disagree with Polman on Rush. It played out exactly the way I thought it would. It's hard enough to sell things let alone adding controversy to the mix. Just as long as the NFL doesn't turn around and turn a blind eye to a outspoken liberal who wants to buy the Rams. But as we can see by Vick's reinstatement by the league they do have some double standards.
On Afghanistan, from the WSJ on Sept 9, 2008.."President George W. Bush will announce Tuesday a gradual redeployment of U.S. military personnel from Iraq to increasingly violent Afghanistan, with as many as 4,500 new troops slated to deploy to Afghanistan by January...Senior U.S. commanders in Afghanistan have said they need at least three additional combat brigades, or 10,500 to 12,000 more troops. The plan being announced by Mr. Bush would meet less than half of that request....Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Mr. Bush's decision was an endorsement of a recommendation late last week from Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff..." ABC News also reported the same thing. Nowhere could I find a source that McKiernan asked for 30,000 troops. Obama is also listening to Gates, Mullen et al. I guess DP will chastise Obama if he makes a decision based on other than the commander in the field as well, right? As for Limbaugh, NAH, it had nothing to do with liberals or politics. That is why Jackson and Sharpton got involved. Liberal media was all over the phone quotes, which are now being retracted (sort of). Also, the head of the NFLPA who spoke out against Rush and got Jackson/Sharpton was a member of Obama's transition team and served as a counsel to Eric Holder (a fact omitted from the ESPN stories written about Limbaugh). I am certain Polman was correct though. tom - wilmington, de
I am not an economist, so let me ask some questions. We had a recession, which started before Obama was elected, right? During and after a recession, unemployment goes up, right? As the market improves, and companies start making money again, they start hiring again, right? Many conservatives who post here were blaming Obama in March, because the Dow was at 6500, right? So if it was Obama's fault in March, who's "fault" is it today, when the Dow is near 10000? And whose "fault" will it be when unemployment starts going down? Just askin' :) one_eyed_jack
***But under reconciliation, typically used in the budget process, no filibusters are permitted and a bill can pass with just a simple majority. Structuring the health care bill in this way allows it to be scooped up in the reconciliation process, which could torpedo the Republicans' trump card. "The secret of the week is that Democrats pulled the trigger on the nucl ear option," warned Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., top Republican on the House budget committee and a senior member of the Ways and Means Committee. "They built their vehicle today." But Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.(yes he is still writing legislation), said the committee's maneuver "is strictly procedural." He noted, however, that the "action was necessary because there is a possibility that a handful of Senate Republicans (and over 50% of the American people) could choose to engage in partisan tactics to stall this important health reform bill." Rangel added that this move was to "simply preserve the option of advancing health reform legislation (with less than 50% support)." *** The (....) are mine. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/15/house-panel-paves-way-nucl ear-option-health-care-reform/ NEPhilly
There is a special place in Hell for Karl Rove and Rush Limbaugh, right next door to the Reagan compound over looking the future Hades River estate of GWB. hejira33312
"The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it." Yep, just your typical outspoken conservative - I can't believe players wouldn't want to play for this guy. Or maybe he should've just tried to buy the Redskins: "Holocaust? Ninety million Indians, only 4 million left? They all have casinos... what's to complain about?" the stupid does burn- One eyed jack- See that just depends. If it's bad economic news then it's all Bush's fault. If it's good economic news then it's Obama's credit. Don't worry dude, the news media is so far up Obama's back side it's become pathetic. There's only one news station that plays it straight and they get roundly disparaged by this Regime and our leftists.
hej, is there room in your 'hell' for the terrorists who killed your fellow citizens on 9/11? Or for Roman Polanski or Teddy Kennedy or William Ayers or Jeremiah Wright? Just wondering who goes to your hell and what they have to do to get there? Is this the new way forward the president always talks about? Just wondering:) NEPhilly
"Americans, don't look at the mess we are making behind the curtain - let's talk about those stupid irrelevant republicans and George Bush and what they did 5 years ago." Dick, Americans are not as dumb as you think. CD75
- American Spectator
- David Limbaugh
- Free Republic
- Glenn Reynolds
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- John Hawkins
- Matt Lewis
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Opinion Journal
- Power Line
- Red State
- The Brody File
- The Daily Caller
- Town Hall
- Weekly Standard
- Center for American Progress
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos
- David Corn
- Huffington Post
- Media Matters
- Mojoblog (Mother Jones)
- Open Left
- Political Animal
- Salon's War Room
- Talking Points Memo
- Tapped
- The Democratic Strategist
- The Grey Matter
- Unclaimed Territory
- Andrew Sullivan
- Attytood
- Chi Tribune's The Swamp
- CJR's Campaign Desk
- CNN's Political Ticker
- CQ Politics
- FactCheck.org
- Gail Collins
- Howard Kurtz
- Mickey Kaus
- NBC's First Read
- Obit
- Political Wire
- Politico
- Politics Daily
- Pollster.com
- Real Clear Politics
- The Atlantic Wire
- The Fix
- The Moderate Voice
- The Plank
- USA Today On Politics
- Wonkette
- December 2011
- August 2010
- August
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008







