Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
share
email
font size
options
 
Sunday, October 19, 2008

 

 

Now that the most prominent military figure of our era - also a lifelong Republican, also George W. Bush's first Secretary of State, also a friend of John McCain's for 25 years - has publicly endorsed Barack Obama, it will be fascinating to behold the McCain surrogates and under-the-radar whisperers as they try to spin this one away. Maybe we'll get variations of these:

1. Colin Powell has no credibility anymore, ever since he lied at the United Nations.

2. Colin Powell, a longtime moderate and supporter of abortion, has never been a real Republican anyway.

3. Colin Powell lives in McLean, Virginia, and we all know that Northern Virginia is not the "real" Virginia.

4. ACORN put him up to it.

5. Black people always stick together.

6. We've still got Joe the Plumber.

But seriously folks...when I saw the Powell endorsement this morning, on Meet the Press, I was reminded of something that Indiana Republican Sen. Dick Lugar said about Powell way back in 1995, when it appeared that the retired general might seek the '96 GOP presidential nomination. Lugar said that if Powell ran, it would be akin to "the displacement of water that comes if you drop a skyscraper into the harbor." Obviously, no endorsement can be considered that weighty - but, as endorsements go, Powell's formal vetting of Obama ("the president that we need now") is potentially quite consequential. The symbolism alone makes it so.

First, Powell is one of the most popular public figures in America - viewed favorably by 76 percent of voters, according to an August poll by Fox News, so his opinion matters. Second, his military and foreign views command wide respect; indeed, the "Powell doctrine" (America should go to war only when it can fight with overwhelming force, with strong popular support, and with an exit strategy) is viewed as the antithesis of the Bush-Cheney cowboy credo. Third, Powell is particularly popular among military retirees - who also happen to be particularly populous in three red states where Obama is strongly competitive (Florida, Virginia, North Carolina.

Powell essentially signaled that Obama, despite his inexperience, trumps McCain on judgment. He signaled that Obama has a better take on how America should conduct its foreign policy, and that McCain's approach is too closely tied to the Bush administration (despite McCain's insistence these days that he is not Bush redux). Powell also signaled that, as a career military man, he is nevertheless more comfortable with Obama at the helm of national security policy - because McCain would "continue, basically, the policies we have been following in recent years."

Powell did not personally assail McCain today, except by implication. By lauding Obama's "steadiness...intellectual curiousity...depth of knowledge...intellectual vigor," he strongly suggested that McCain lacks those crucial attributes. But he minced no words while talking about the McCain campaign, and the Republican party itself. He said that, while Obama is busy reaching out, the GOP and the McCain campaign have become "narrower and narrower." He said that Obama is "crossing ethnic lines, racial lines, generational lines. He's thinking about, 'all villages have values, all towns have values' - not just 'small towns have values'."

That latter reference was one of several swipes at Sarah Palin, whom he deems unqualified for higher office - and whose presence on the ticket "raised some question, in my mind, as to the judgment that Sen. McCain made." He twice assailed the GOP's obsession with ex-'60s bomber Bill Ayres ("why do we have these robocalls going out around the country?...it's demagoguery"), and he denounced the lies being spread "by members of the party" about how Obama is supposedly a Muslim. All told, Powell said that "we've got to stop polarizing ourselves in this way."

Moreover, he contended that the party's "further rightward shift" - which is best epitomized by McCain's choice of Palin - could adversely impact the future of American jurisprudence. Or, as he put it, "I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointees to the Supreme Court, but that's what we'd be looking at in a McCain administration." Powell, the longtime defender of abortion rights, appeared to be aiming that message at suburban white women, notably the moderates and Republicans who might still be on the fence, and who perhaps need to be reminded about the perilous status of Roe v. Wade.

This endorsement will dominate the news cycle for a day or two, and there are precious few days remaining. I instinctively recoil from uttering certitudes, so I won't make the case that the Powell validation constitutes game, set, and match for Obama. On the other hand, McCain has virtually no spin options on this one. All he can do is go forth in denial and again tell his audiences, "My friends, we've got them where we want them."

  

 

Posted by Dick Polman @ 1:19 PM  Permalink | 87 comments
Comments   
Posted 01:44 PM, 10/19/2008
p-diddy
Obamahater: You think Powell supports Obama only because they are both black. Powell says that he finds McCain's campaign tactics to be tinged with racism (your comment is a perfect example). He also thinks the choice of Palin as a running mate was a bad one.
Posted 02:13 PM, 10/19/2008
liberal
There's a case to be made against Obama, but the Republican campaign strategists apparently aren't interested in making it. I think in retrospect a lot of republicans are going to be ashamed at the strategy used on behalf of McCain; after the passions have cooled they will realize that this strategy was clearly intended to cater to bigotry and prejudice, if they don't know this already.
Posted 02:28 PM, 10/19/2008
liberal
To the extent that Powell's endorsement was based on his being African-American, I think that the heart of it is his disgust with the nature of the campaign. There's nothing unique to black people about this; imagine who Joe Lieberman would endorse if one of the candidates exploited latent anti-semitic bigotry. It's pointless for republicans to deny what's going on, because it is so easy to imagine a McCain campaign strategy against Obama that doesn't exploit cultural prejudices. For example, the TV ad several months ago using Obama's crowds in Berlin to suggest that Obama is just an empty celebrity figure--there's a lot of meat there but instead the republicans turned to the sure fire old southern strategy.
Posted 02:30 PM, 10/19/2008
Djoko Pritza
obamahater is one of those posters it's better to just ignore. Eventually he'll go away.
Posted 02:42 PM, 10/19/2008
joeyjojo
the southern strategy is finally being exposed for what it is and the rite's reply is that black folks stick together? talk about a hollow argument. personally i give tina fey the credit for telling the media to "grow a pair". seems like they finally have.
Posted 02:54 PM, 10/19/2008
ObamaHATER
DJ, you once told me you do not engage in debate, because you cannot be influenced by facts that disprove your theories. 1.that proves that you have no idea what you're talking about, and you're repeating whatever someone who you agree with might say 2.facts are unimportant to your argument, especially when they are used against your position, conclusion: you are a liar 3.this really explains why you contribute very little with your posts, so why bother?
Posted 03:06 PM, 10/19/2008
ObamaHATER
Liberal, I think because of Obama's "skin color" (not race because clearly he is arab-american), liberals are going to use that as an excuse to explain the criticisms of the many character flaws in Obama. Attacking one's character has been used in every presidential race since Abraham Lincoln, and not exclusive to Obama. Unfortunately, Obama has character many flaws and seriously questionable past associations. If any of these issues come up in President Obama's administration, the republican party and even the media will blame McCain if this was never addressed in the election. Also, you have to be blind to think that McCain isn't attacking Obama on policy related issues.
Comment removed.
Posted 03:24 PM, 10/19/2008
HandNik
When Republicans run out of bad talking points, they turn to racial attacks.
Posted 03:33 PM, 10/19/2008
Kathryn
Powell was used by the Bush administration now he is being used by the UN. They are itching to divy up Obama's $845 Billion UN Global Poverty Act which is making it's way to the senate. Not only will it move what's left of our money to the upstanding UN, the tax increases will finish off the US economy for good. A two-fer!
Posted 03:34 PM, 10/19/2008
frankg962
ObamaHater, CD75, Bon - Will we see any of these posters after the election? I hope not, I hope these trolls for the McCain campaign climb back under their rocks at the end of the election.
Posted 04:19 PM, 10/19/2008
liberal
Arab-American? Where did that come from? Anyway, I'm not using Obama's skin color to defend him or explain his flaws or anything of the kind. I'm simply pointing out what anybody can see--that the republican campaign has gradually descended to one primarily intended to exploit bigotry and prejudice. What makes it clear that they are purely exploitive in this manner is the lack of substance in the republican campaign; there's no information that is actually helpful or informative to the prospective voter. Give us an example of a substantive criticism that's been in any McCain TV ad in the last month! And please don't tell us that his tax program is socialistic or some such==well, I was going to say nonsense, but let's just call it pure opinion as opposed to information. I can't imagine that you republican guys are actually dumb enough to believe that Ayers is a friend and advisor to Obama, or that Obama is a Muslim, or a terrorist, or whatever.
Posted 04:33 PM, 10/19/2008
ET
Powell should have kept his mouth shut. The racial implications are obvious and far out weigh his influence on undecided voters. Symbolism is not a reason to vote for someone and that is his major reason for backing Obama. It was Colin Powell who convinced me it was right to go to war in Iraq. I will not make that mistake again.
Posted 04:56 PM, 10/19/2008
rbpeeple
Polman, you hack, Powell also said: ""We've got two individuals — either one of them could be a good president." You're one of the most biased reporters I've ever read.
Posted 05:02 PM, 10/19/2008
Djoko Pritza
The rightwing nutcakes here don't get it, just like McCain doesn't. No one cares what you morons think about Powell's endorsement -- you're not the target. Rather, his announcment is yet another shovel of dirt on the McCain campaign and will persuade some undecideds to go with Obama. Even r*cists should be able to understand that fact.
Posted 05:37 PM, 10/19/2008
robo
It is true that Powell allowed himself to be used by Bush at the start of the Iraq war. I think this time he is saying......I will not make that mistake again and hope that I might be able to influence another inept leadership to do the right thing. That is why he went with Obama this time!
Posted 05:42 PM, 10/19/2008
Djoko Pritza
Obama has Colin Powell; McCain has Joe the Plumber.
Posted 05:57 PM, 10/19/2008
johnpolomano
Whether you support Senator Obama or not I think you need to agree that Colin Powell has lost all credibility. How can such an intelligent man been fooled by the Bush administration. He either lied like the rest or had no useful knowledge. Either way, his endorsement is meaningless because he has become irrelevant. There was a time when he was respected and admired...not anymore.
Posted 06:23 PM, 10/19/2008
No Ids
The haters are in full bloom here. Unfortunately Colin Powell is absolutely correct in his assertions. Only the true racists and the ideologically blind will see any racial intent in Gen. Powell's decision. All these trolls on here shrieking all their nonsense are afraid that America is set to repudiate their flawed, dead ideology.
Posted 06:31 PM, 10/19/2008
rms
I've always felt close to Colin Powell. He grew up in the South Bronx, I on the Lower East Side, and we are alums of CCNY. I think, when he sees a soldier, he can also see the mother he has to explain that soldier's death to. So do I. He has long done alumni appeal ads for CCNY, posing with current students, many of them Black, Hispanic, and immigrants from all over the world, reminding the largely white alum that "these kids are just like us." Which is true. I am disturbed by the role he played in the Bush administration's march up to Iraq. But I respect his knowledge of the military and of foreign policy, and am glad he is supporting Obama. Was race an issue? I'm sure he feels some pride. But Colin Powell gives good, rational reasons for supporting Obama. I think they're enough.
Posted 06:39 PM, 10/19/2008
fed up
Do those who say that Colin Powell's endorsement is based primarily on race, think that Lieberman was moved to support John McCain because they're both white? Do they think that Colin Powell would have endorsed any candidate on the basis of race - say Jesse Jackson? Powell was very explicit about why he will vote for Obama. He cited his understanding of the issues, his maturity, the selection of Sarah Palin and the use of robocalls in which Obama is accused of supporting terrorism. Whether on agrees or not, these considerations stand on their own and are not affected by ad hominem arguments
Posted 06:53 PM, 10/19/2008
Djoko Pritza
For those idiots who argue that Powell has lost all credibility because he was duped by the Bush administration, it is a short step to admit the Bush admin has lost all credibility because of the polices that fooled Powell and that McCain, who boasted he supported Bush 90 percent of the time, has lost all credibility. However you add it up, it adds up to Obama!
Posted 06:58 PM, 10/19/2008
p-diddy
General Powell thought the evidence of WMD's presented to him by the Pentagon was flimsy. Mr Powell's team removed dozens of pages of alleged evidence about Iraq's banned weapons and ties to terrorists from a draft of his speech, according to the US News and World Report. At one point, he became so angry at the lack of adequate sourcing to intelligence claims that he declared: "I'm not reading this. This is b*llsh*t," according to the US News and World Report. Presented with a script for his speech, Mr Powell suspected that Washington hawks were "cherry picking", Newsweek also reported.
Posted 07:02 PM, 10/19/2008
tom - wilmington, de
Who cares. This endorsement, like any endorsement, means little. Polman has countless times noted how little endorsements matter, now all of a sudden Powell's endorsement is the election tilter. Doubt it.
Posted 07:03 PM, 10/19/2008
tom - wilmington, de
Obama supposedly raised $150 million in September....doesn't it bother anybody from who and where this money is coming from?
Posted 07:23 PM, 10/19/2008
JonKap
Close you mouths, open your ears....and LISTEN to what Powell said. Listen to the words. What he said was 100% accurate. McCain-Palin supporters have ceased to be Americans and are simply rooting for their favorite team. The Republican party is quickly rendering itself irrelevant. By 2012 there will be 2 political parties, the Democrats and a new collection of 'Republicans' who are moderate to slightly right wing people. There will be an epic battle within the Republican party after this election and the extreme 20% will be kicked to the curb.
Posted 07:26 PM, 10/19/2008
JonKap
Well tom, $500 came from me, $500 from my sister, $1000 from my father, $1000 from my grandfather, $200 from my one cousin, $100 from other cousins....I don't have the exact figure but our extended family contributed around $12000. And most Obama supporters I know have similar stories. Frankly, I thought it would total more like $250 mil instead of $150 million.
Posted 07:56 PM, 10/19/2008
CD75
Colin Powell is a good guy and a good pick up for Obama. He was unfairly left out to dry by the Bush admin. What Polman and all the sheep who are gloating over all of this is that the last person who ran for the democratic vice president position, Joe Lieberman, is supporting McCain and is on the trail with McCain and actually spoke at the RNC convention for him. His support of McCain has really helped McCain's camp. I did not see any commentary from Polman discussing that. Of course not.
Posted 08:01 PM, 10/19/2008
CD75
I again would like to point out that despite the "diaster" that Polman views the McCain camp as, then how come Obama only leads nationally by 4% in today's tracking poll? Obama needs to put this race away, but has not? Why?
Posted 08:05 PM, 10/19/2008
CD75
I also think that the repubs and Rummy and of course Bush must have really hurt Powell behind the scenes. Being a good American and a soilder, Powell does not believe in airing dirty laundry in public or trashing the boss in public. Today's endorsement may have been payback for past mistreatment of him by Bush.
Posted 08:16 PM, 10/19/2008
CD75
I spoke to 4 retried military people today and 2 on active duty. All of them are voting for McCain. Powell's endorsment of Obama meant nothing to them. I know alot of people on both active duty and retired military and Obama is not well liked in military circles. While Powell's endorsment is important, I strongly do not think it is going to affect the miltary vote. Only elitists and those who never served think that it will affect the military.
Posted 08:20 PM, 10/19/2008
mousikos
Based on some of the posts I've read here, for example those by "ObamaHATER", as an impartial observer, I would have to assume that if a black American endorses a black American for President it can ONLY because of race: there is NO other possible explanation for it. If, on the other hand, a white American decides to endorse a white American for President, it has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with race. Is this true or false? If it is true, why is it true? If it's false, why is it false? The obvious conclusion one would draw is that blacks are fundamentally racist, and any decision on the part of a black person to support another black person is an expression of black racism, while whites, on the other hand, are simply incapable of being racist and making political decisions based on race. Isn't that correct, ObamaHATER? And, while we're at it, ObamaHATER, or anyone else who would care to respond, why is it that blacks, even people like General Colin Powell, are racist and whites aren't? I just can't figure it out! I hope someone here can enlighten me.
Posted 08:24 PM, 10/19/2008
mousikos
I neglected to include a few more questions in my previous post. Are Arab-Americans, African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Jewish-Americans Americans or not? If so, why, and if not, why not? What is it, ObamaHATER, that determines who is and who is not an American?
Posted 08:32 PM, 10/19/2008
Djoko Pritza
Half-truth Tom is wrong as usual. The endorsement means a couple of days of coverage unflattering to McCain in a race that has only a little more than two weeks to go.
Posted 08:33 PM, 10/19/2008
ET
Powell's endorsement is not important. It's the media's reaction to the endorsement that matters..... We are a country led by the likes of Poleman and other left wing reporters who have their own agenda. Like it or not these type of people try to influence your opinions by using their columns for their own goals not yours.
Posted 08:34 PM, 10/19/2008
Djoko Pritza
"Obama supposedly raised $150 million in September....doesn't it bother anybody from who and where this money is coming from?" No.
Posted 08:40 PM, 10/19/2008
Djoko Pritza
CD, how much has Lieberman helped the McCain camp? He's down by double digits. And haven't you figured Polman out yet? He's not a rightwing stooge.
Posted 08:44 PM, 10/19/2008
Djoko Pritza
CD says: "Obama only leads nationally by 4% in today's tracking poll? Obama needs to put this race away, but has not? Why?" R*c*ism. Also, you're cherry-picking your polls. Get a grip.
Posted 09:16 PM, 10/19/2008
knwmn
McCain is looking for his integrity. Powell found his. And Don't give me that BS that Blacks stick together. You obviously don't know many Blacks. Mccain has put anything and everything before country in this race. He seems as Presidential as Don Rickles.
Posted 09:25 PM, 10/19/2008
ET
Polaman is not a right wing stooge, he is a left wing propagandist.
Posted 09:36 PM, 10/19/2008
JimR
The Powell endorsement isn't going to change minds now. ( Although it certainly has more substance than Oprah) The real impact it has is to create a negative for McCain. Powell was a good soldier and when he realized he was doing the administration's dirty work, he left without raising any dust. Someday he'll write a book and tell what he saw behinds the scenes. The guy has smarts and wants to maintain what creds he still has after being hung out to dry by the White House.
Posted 09:46 PM, 10/19/2008
Talvenada
This is the proof that Powell is a traitor, terrorist, Muslim, and Arab, like that one.
Posted 10:00 PM, 10/19/2008
ET
Powell sat in front of the United Nations and showed the whole world why it was necessessary to attack Iraq. If he was a white man he would have been vilified into eternity.
Posted 10:05 PM, 10/19/2008
Djoko Pritza
ET, if you weren't a r*c8ist, what would you be?
Posted 10:14 PM, 10/19/2008
ET
Why do I have to be accused of being a racist in order to tell the truth.
Posted 10:26 PM, 10/19/2008
Talvenada
ET is right, just like comedian Rush Limbaugh.
Posted 10:38 PM, 10/19/2008
ET
Blacks are not interested in hearing how one of their own convinced the American population to go to war. Nobody blamed him for this whole debacle, but the truth is, it was Powell's report to the UN that put the whole thing in motion.
Posted 10:41 PM, 10/19/2008
sully64
ET says: "Symbolism is not a reason to vote for someone and that is his major reason for backing Obama." Symbolism was not pointed to by Powell when he gave the endorsement. Do you have evidence he was lying about his motive for the endorsement?
Posted 10:50 PM, 10/19/2008
sully64
ObamaHATER said - "Black people always stick together.-yup" TRUE! This is why William F Buckley Jr ALSO endorsed Barac ... oh ... wait ...
Posted 10:53 PM, 10/19/2008
still_independent
ET: Powell is still respected because he admitted that the intelligence behind his presentation to the U.N. was incorrect, and that he to this day regrets it. Americans tend to be very forgiving of political figures that can actually admit mistakes. HATER: besides wondering where the --- Arab-American came from, I was NOT trashing "Joe the Plumber". I was trashing McCain for not doing any research before deciding to make Joe the plumber the centerpiece of his debate. Is finding out if he is a plumber too much to ask? Or even if his name was Joe?
Posted 01:40 AM, 10/20/2008
Talvenada
ET is right abot that bum Powell: the war and ALL its problems are on ONLY one man of color, like Obama Bin Lyin. Not McCain, Bush, Chaney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Rove and the rest of the clean hands gang.
Posted 09:32 AM, 10/20/2008
pagoda
goJ0E v2.0- You are a horse's butt. You are the number one reason why I will laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh the second McCain loses. Heck I'm laughing already.
Posted 11:01 AM, 10/20/2008
yobill626
jmc: I don't think anyone doesn't expect the results to tighten. The bigger problem your boy is having is which STATES can he turn. His electoral counts don't look good at all.
Posted 11:07 AM, 10/20/2008
Beauty
Gen. Colin Powell is NOT a racist. Even if he was orange he would still have endorsed Obama. If republicans thought they had a substantial information against Obama -then they would stick to the issues instead of pulling the race card cop out. It's so lame- even for republicans.
Posted 11:08 AM, 10/20/2008
p-diddy
Tom: The ability to communicate IS important. Honesty is separate issue. But good communication skills are a sign of intelligence. Just listen to Bush and Palin for a few minutes.
Posted 12:21 PM, 10/20/2008
Bella316
Big surprise thiere
Comment removed.
Posted 01:11 PM, 10/20/2008
vc bear
The sad thing about Powell is he didn't have the chops to run for President when he could have. He would have been a far better President then either Obama or McCain. Today way after the fact we should question how influencial he is. As you know in a recent survey one of the new orgaizations asked three questions of American to see what they knew about the political landscape. The questions were easy. 2 our of 3 couldn't get all three right. Powell's half life would show in a survey like this. His vote for Obama dosn't mean much more then my vote.
Posted 01:12 PM, 10/20/2008
vc bear
The sad thing about Powell is he didn't have the chops to run for President when he could have. He would have been a far better President then either Obama or McCain. Today way after the fact we should question how influencial he is. As you know in a recent survey one of the new orgaizations asked three questions of American to see what they knew about the political landscape. The questions were easy. 2 our of 3 couldn't get all three right. Powell's half life would show in a survey like this. His vote for Obama dosn't mean much more then my vote.
Posted 01:30 PM, 10/20/2008
Djoko Pritza
NJA is another racist out of the closet. The closer we get, the more the hoods are coming off.
Posted 02:47 PM, 10/20/2008
Blues Dude
If Obama wins they are going to have to triple the size of the White House to handle all these advisers. Adviser(noun): a highly paid position promised to someone in return for an endorsement
Comment removed.
Posted 03:34 PM, 10/20/2008
JimR
NJA ..AA voters control neither Phila or the country. The numbers aren't there.
Posted 04:34 PM, 10/20/2008
UnionMilkmen
The biggest influence on Gen Powell's choices seems to be his wife.
Comment removed.
Posted 04:58 PM, 10/20/2008
ncatty
"The most prominent military figure of our era..." is David Petraeus.
Posted 05:16 PM, 10/20/2008
goJ0E v2.0
Blacks do stick together. That's not a racial attack. That's fact based on observation.
Posted 05:29 PM, 10/20/2008
naaman7
The Law of Relativity instructs men to consider the source from whence they come,least they find themselves in opposition to their true selves and thereby cause their own destruction.Truth has the inherent power to produce the promised effect(s).
Posted 05:43 PM, 10/20/2008
mnolan
Colin Powell lied about Iraq having WMDs. It's not racist to think he might be lying about his reasons for choosing B.O. Why isn't Polman questioning the racist motives of a man (Obama),whose greatest claim to fame was his superior judgment about the Iraq war, in accepting the endorsement of the person whose lie about WMDs resulted in Americans dying? Why isn't Polman questioning the ageism of Powell who says he likes McCain and thinks he'd be a good president but thinks Barack's better because he's, among other things, younger? Why isn't Polman questioning the sexism of Powell (who isn't polling at 70% in all polls....a lot of people, including Democrats, are furious at Powell and his lies on wmd's) when he attacks Sarah Pallin, a person who has accomplished many things? If the Republicans have moved too far right, the Democrats have moved too far left. And if Powell were as "objective" and truthful and respected as Polman suggests, he would have made that point. Colin Powell has fooled...nor swayed... no one!
Posted 05:43 PM, 10/20/2008
mnolan
Colin Powell lied about Iraq having WMDs. It's not racist to think he might be lying about his reasons for choosing B.O. Why isn't Polman questioning the racist motives of a man (Obama),whose greatest claim to fame was his superior judgment about the Iraq war, in accepting the endorsement of the person whose lie about WMDs resulted in Americans dying? Why isn't Polman questioning the ageism of Powell who says he likes McCain and thinks he'd be a good president but thinks Barack's better because he's, among other things, younger? Why isn't Polman questioning the sexism of Powell (who isn't polling at 70% in all polls....a lot of people, including Democrats, are furious at Powell and his lies on wmd's) when he attacks Sarah Pallin, a person who has accomplished many things? If the Republicans have moved too far right, the Democrats have moved too far left. And if Powell were as "objective" and truthful and respected as Polman suggests, he would have made that point. Colin Powell has fooled...nor swayed... no one!
Posted 05:50 PM, 10/20/2008
Walt Culver
goJ0E v2.0 - At 05:16 PM you posted "Blacks do stick together. That's not a racial attack. That's fact based on observation." Well, yes, socially they stick together. But the demographics I've seen is that blacks are hardly a homogeneous group politically. In fact during the early part of the primaries, more blacks supported Hillary than supported Obama. Then, partly because they heard his positions and the eloquence with which he delivered them, and partly because they saw he would be a real candidate after his Iowa win, they flocked to him in great numbers. Regarding Powell's endorsement, you had but to see him on Meet the Press yesterday to see that he had wrestled mightily with keeping to his political roots and supporting McCain, or just remaining silent, but felt it was time someone stood up to the increasingly detached Republican establishment, in order to start the healthy process of taking the party back from the ruthless. Just consider what happened here in Northern Virginia, where Obama is very strong: Joe McCain (JOhn's brother) calls us "Communists" in a fund raiser where he did not realize the press was in the back of the room, and a McCain aide this weekend said we're not the "real Virginia," compared to the more conservative rest of the state. Fits right in with Michelle Backman (R, Minn) saying on TV this weekend that there may be anti-Americans in Congress and they ought to be investigated. So, I have to say Powell's rationale is one I have held for a while, and though decidedly Republican in the past, I'm for Obama.
Posted 05:53 PM, 10/20/2008
rozz62
Colin Powells endorsement is nothing more than another Black politician being pressured by Black community to join the racism this election, just like John Lewis. It’s sad to see these once well respected men throwing all that away to support a candidate based solely on skin color. Let’s not forget POWELL is the one who advised the American People to go to war!!!! Isn’t it funny how Obama has run on the bases he did not vote for the war (because he couldn’t) but has surrounded himself with those who voted for and supported the war like his VP choice???? Obama is too too unstable to be leader of the free world... DO NOT RISK OUR COUNTRY ON OBAMA American VOTERS are mad as HELL at MSM Obama cronies! Like CNN & MSNBC! causing the outrage against Obama. they are openly in the bag for Obama, MSM, CNN have jeopardized the security of the American people by deliberating hiding serious facts and associations of Obama. Let me get this straight. A couple of agitated yahoos in a rally of thousands yell something offensive and incendiary, and John McCain and Sarah Palin are not just guilty by association -- with total strangers, mind you -- but worse: guilty according to The New York Times of "race-baiting and xenophobia." So lets ask the New York Times to bring up Barack Obama's real associations -- 20 years with Jeremiah Wright, working on two foundations and distributing money with William Ayers, citing the raving Michael Pfleger as one who helps him keep his moral compass (Chicago Sun-Times, April 2004) and the long-standing relationship with the left-wing vote-fraud specialist ACORN -- you have crossed the line into illegitimate guilt by association. Moreover, it is tinged with racism.
Posted 06:00 PM, 10/20/2008
Walt Culver
I very much disagree with those have expressed here honest sentiments to keep the White House white. WHY? I'm a white Roman Catholic Republican who couldn't care less about white over black or yellow or brown. I was the wrong age to serve in any war, but I ran companies or parts of companies that served our military and our intelligence agencies with some distinction, so I'm neither a Commie, nor terrorist-leaning. But after thinking about it hard, I'm for Obama, for all the reasons Powell gave yesterday -- all in the name of a greater America. Afraid of the black as president? Hell, 40 years ago I was told to be afraid of the Catholic (Kennedy). And most of the 20th century before that, be afraid of the Jew, Italian (I'm 1st generation American on my mother's side), and Irishman for one thing or another. What distinguishes us in our national greatness, is the gradual assimilation of the individual greatnesses (think Einstein) brought to us from diverse cultures. Let it be!
Posted 06:01 PM, 10/20/2008
naaman7
There is a revolution coming. It will not be like revolutoins of the past. It will originate with the individual and with culture,and it will change the political structure only as its final act. It will not require violence to succeed,and it cannot be successfully resisted by violence. This is the revolution of the new generation. This land is your land this land is my land from california to new york island. Come on people now smile on your brother everybody get together, try to love one another right now.Tell me is there not any haunt of prophecy. Sen. Obama nor Gen. Powell wrote this. These words are from prominent middle class american citizens who believed in the american dream.
Posted 06:01 PM, 10/20/2008
happygolucky
Seeking to destroy the United States from within "the belly of the beast," Ayers and Dohrn convened a "War Council" in Flint, Mich., in 1969. From the stage, Dohrn, holding her fingers in what became the Weatherman "fork salute," praised Charles Manson and the recently committed bloody murders by Manson's crazed followers of actress Sharon Tate, coffee heiress Abigail Folger, and six others -- all deemed too "rich" to be allowed to live. "Dig it," shouted Dohrn, thrilled about the "Tate Eight" murders, to the assembled horde of America-haters. "First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them. They even shoved a fork into the victim's stomach! Wild!" Sharon Tate, pregnant at the time, was stabbed in the womb. Her baby, one assumes in the minds of the murdering levelers, would have been born with too many advantages, too much of a head start. In October 1969, Richard Elrod, a Chicago district attorney, was seriously injured in the Weatherman riot that erupted during Chicago's "Days of Rage." Elrod was paralyzed for life as a result. Dohrn, a key leader of the compassionate left, later led a celebration of Elrod's paralysis by leading her comrades in a parody of a Bob Dylan song " "Lay, Elrod, Lay." Nice woman! Not exactly the type I'd pick to host my coming out party and pass around the hors d'oeuvres. I'd be afraid to trust her with anything more than a plastic fork!
Posted 06:11 PM, 10/20/2008
Michael_in_Atl
It's pretty well accepted that for the most part people decide emotionally what they want to do about something before they justify their decision intellectually. Whether or not you accept Gen. Powell's stated reasoning backed up by his many years of experience at the highest level, the indisputable bottom line is that Gen. Powell gave his endorsement to Sen. Obama. Similarly, what voters will make of this endorsement depends more on their emotional point of view and their opinions about the General than on a dispassionate assessment of the facts.
Posted 06:20 PM, 10/20/2008
Walt Culver
My last posting of the day. From the Poll of Polls as of 20 Oct -- http://usaelectionpolls.com -- we may be seeing the first impact of (1) the Michelle Backman (R, Minn) interview where she demands an investigation the "anti-Americans in Congress," and (2) Powell's well-reasoned endorsement of Obama: "Just when it seemed like there MIGHT be some movement in McCain's direction, the polls shut down that prospect... According to the 7-day average in Ohio, McCain was down only 2% yesterday... But today's Suffolk University poll has him down 9%." If this presages the outcome in Ohio, where historically the auto and steel workers have not voted for blacks, then a landslide for Obama, which I and some others believe is quite possible, may be far bigger than anyone could have imagined.
Posted 06:39 PM, 10/20/2008
mnolan
This is for Walt Culver: Hey Walt! God wants you to to use your brain and vote for the person with the track record and experience to guide us through some dark times. God wants you to give your fellow man a break and realize that people don't have a problem with Obama's color. People have a problem with his ideas, ideals, friends, associations, and attitudes...on top of his lack of experience. It seems to me Walt, that you are basing this imporatnt decision on the fact that people were reluctant to vote for Kennedy over 40 years ago. That is a very emotional reaction, Walt. No one is trying to keep the White House white. Shame on you! They are just trying to keep it free and honest. To quote JFK: "God's work on earth must truly be our own"! Think before you vote Walt, and quit calling people who are honestly searching out the truth bigots!
Posted 07:08 PM, 10/20/2008
americangirl
Colin Powell endorses Obama-so what? I took a close look at Obama's background, his associations, his agenda for Socialism. I took a close look at Mc Cain's background, his associations his agenda for free enterprise. What does Colin Powell have to do with my vote?
Posted 08:32 PM, 10/20/2008
CRACKerZ
Gen. powell has always beenn an admirable man with a set of morlas which are to be valued. I believe he was duped by the Bush administration into lying to the U.N. Pres. Bush used him like a pawn. I like, trust and would floow Gen. Powell into battle without a second thought or any reservation. He has told the truth about McCain, Palin, as well as Obama. I see the clear choice. I will vote for the best man/woman who's capable of doing the job. That person on one hand isn't Palin. What a disgrace....
Posted 08:45 PM, 10/20/2008
Elixabeth
Sarah Palin is not qualified to be president period putting Colin Powell in the political mainstream. His strength is that he is a smart enough to understand the mainstream which is why he is popular. Moderation is how the country goes forward and vets policy ideals- it provides more competition to both sides of every debate. I think Powell has good judgment, he was one of the first officials to bail ship out of the Bush administration when it was clearly sinking. McCain should have tossed Sarah off the ticket when it was clear that she was tanking so badly with the professionals in foreign and domestic politics and that she didn't understand the questions that were given to her on national tv. Anyone with a degree in journalism should be able to memorize answers and parrot them back, but the presidency is not a midterm and she should not be caught cramming as if she was a college student. She is not a young woman she is middle aged and those habits are more common in people her daughter's age.
Posted 08:57 PM, 10/20/2008
Luther
This is not a good match, Powell who committed perjury in front of the world at the UN Council and Obama who likes to obfuscate facts about who he is and what he actually represents. As Secretary of State Powell helped influence public opinion and the country's leaders regarding Iraq. As principal adviser to the President he helped influenced the President of the United States to put America's finest sons and daughters in harms way based on what he admits was fabricated evidence. What a travesty.
Posted 09:08 PM, 10/20/2008
michaelskristen
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/20/biden-obamas-inexperience-will-prompt-nations-to-test-us/ Looks like Joe the dope disagrees with you Colin
Posted 09:31 PM, 10/20/2008
erstwhiler
Colin Powell is a great man. He is accomplished and brings a wide range of experience to his decision about whom to vote for. His statement was eloquent and I appreciate him taking the time to share his assessment. Ony a fool would refuse to give Colin Powell's thoughts careful, respectful consideration as they come to their own decision.
Posted 10:05 PM, 10/20/2008
Mal
I am not surprised that Powell has come out backink Obama. It's a racial matter. Blacks suppost blacks more than Whites support whites. Not many blacks buy CDs or attend concerts of white performers, but white people do patronise black performers. Oprah did not support a woman - Hillary - because Obama was a candidate. Powell, a Republican, does not support his partman but Obama. Why? it's a racial thing? This is why Obama will win the election. Blacks (from both parties), many Asians and Democrats will vote Obama.
Posted 11:01 PM, 10/20/2008
eanders24
To respond to your comment, ObamaHATER: So Obama's flawed character is due to his Arab-American heritage? I don't think you even have the facts correct, which is ironic because you criticized someone else for not knowing their facts... However, the larger point is that IT SHOULDN'T MATTER whether Obama's ethnic background is Caucasian, African-American, Middle-Eastern or whatever. People, no matter what their nationality/ethnicity, are not perfect. I can sure as hell attest to the fact that I'm not, and I'm white. So implying that Senator Obama's character is flawed because of his ethnic background is just outright absurd. Si se puede!
Posted 11:39 PM, 10/20/2008
samantha97
I would think you regarded Colin Powell as an Uncle Tom six or seven years ago. Now, he is the end all be all. Hypocrite; he aligns with your side, and now he speaks the truth. Get a grip.
About Dick Polman

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.