PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
comments
87
options
 
Sunday, October 19, 2008

 

 

Now that the most prominent military figure of our era - also a lifelong Republican, also George W. Bush's first Secretary of State, also a friend of John McCain's for 25 years - has publicly endorsed Barack Obama, it will be fascinating to behold the McCain surrogates and under-the-radar whisperers as they try to spin this one away. Maybe we'll get variations of these:

1. Colin Powell has no credibility anymore, ever since he lied at the United Nations.

2. Colin Powell, a longtime moderate and supporter of abortion, has never been a real Republican anyway.

3. Colin Powell lives in McLean, Virginia, and we all know that Northern Virginia is not the "real" Virginia.

4. ACORN put him up to it.

5. Black people always stick together.

6. We've still got Joe the Plumber.

But seriously folks...when I saw the Powell endorsement this morning, on Meet the Press, I was reminded of something that Indiana Republican Sen. Dick Lugar said about Powell way back in 1995, when it appeared that the retired general might seek the '96 GOP presidential nomination. Lugar said that if Powell ran, it would be akin to "the displacement of water that comes if you drop a skyscraper into the harbor." Obviously, no endorsement can be considered that weighty - but, as endorsements go, Powell's formal vetting of Obama ("the president that we need now") is potentially quite consequential. The symbolism alone makes it so.

First, Powell is one of the most popular public figures in America - viewed favorably by 76 percent of voters, according to an August poll by Fox News, so his opinion matters. Second, his military and foreign views command wide respect; indeed, the "Powell doctrine" (America should go to war only when it can fight with overwhelming force, with strong popular support, and with an exit strategy) is viewed as the antithesis of the Bush-Cheney cowboy credo. Third, Powell is particularly popular among military retirees - who also happen to be particularly populous in three red states where Obama is strongly competitive (Florida, Virginia, North Carolina.

Powell essentially signaled that Obama, despite his inexperience, trumps McCain on judgment. He signaled that Obama has a better take on how America should conduct its foreign policy, and that McCain's approach is too closely tied to the Bush administration (despite McCain's insistence these days that he is not Bush redux). Powell also signaled that, as a career military man, he is nevertheless more comfortable with Obama at the helm of national security policy - because McCain would "continue, basically, the policies we have been following in recent years."

Powell did not personally assail McCain today, except by implication. By lauding Obama's "steadiness...intellectual curiousity...depth of knowledge...intellectual vigor," he strongly suggested that McCain lacks those crucial attributes. But he minced no words while talking about the McCain campaign, and the Republican party itself. He said that, while Obama is busy reaching out, the GOP and the McCain campaign have become "narrower and narrower." He said that Obama is "crossing ethnic lines, racial lines, generational lines. He's thinking about, 'all villages have values, all towns have values' - not just 'small towns have values'."

That latter reference was one of several swipes at Sarah Palin, whom he deems unqualified for higher office - and whose presence on the ticket "raised some question, in my mind, as to the judgment that Sen. McCain made." He twice assailed the GOP's obsession with ex-'60s bomber Bill Ayres ("why do we have these robocalls going out around the country?...it's demagoguery"), and he denounced the lies being spread "by members of the party" about how Obama is supposedly a Muslim. All told, Powell said that "we've got to stop polarizing ourselves in this way."

Moreover, he contended that the party's "further rightward shift" - which is best epitomized by McCain's choice of Palin - could adversely impact the future of American jurisprudence. Or, as he put it, "I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointees to the Supreme Court, but that's what we'd be looking at in a McCain administration." Powell, the longtime defender of abortion rights, appeared to be aiming that message at suburban white women, notably the moderates and Republicans who might still be on the fence, and who perhaps need to be reminded about the perilous status of Roe v. Wade.

This endorsement will dominate the news cycle for a day or two, and there are precious few days remaining. I instinctively recoil from uttering certitudes, so I won't make the case that the Powell validation constitutes game, set, and match for Obama. On the other hand, McCain has virtually no spin options on this one. All he can do is go forth in denial and again tell his audiences, "My friends, we've got them where we want them."

  

 

Posted by Dick Polman @ 1:19 PM  Permalink | 87 comments
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 1:44 PM, 10/19/2008
    Obamahater: You think Powell supports Obama only because they are both black. Powell says that he finds McCain's campaign tactics to be tinged with racism (your comment is a perfect example). He also thinks the choice of Palin as a running mate was a bad one.
    p-diddy
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:13 PM, 10/19/2008
    There's a case to be made against Obama, but the Republican campaign strategists apparently aren't interested in making it. I think in retrospect a lot of republicans are going to be ashamed at the strategy used on behalf of McCain; after the passions have cooled they will realize that this strategy was clearly intended to cater to bigotry and prejudice, if they don't know this already.
    liberal
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:28 PM, 10/19/2008
    To the extent that Powell's endorsement was based on his being African-American, I think that the heart of it is his disgust with the nature of the campaign. There's nothing unique to black people about this; imagine who Joe Lieberman would endorse if one of the candidates exploited latent anti-semitic bigotry. It's pointless for republicans to deny what's going on, because it is so easy to imagine a McCain campaign strategy against Obama that doesn't exploit cultural prejudices. For example, the TV ad several months ago using Obama's crowds in Berlin to suggest that Obama is just an empty celebrity figure--there's a lot of meat there but instead the republicans turned to the sure fire old southern strategy.
    liberal
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:30 PM, 10/19/2008
    obamahater is one of those posters it's better to just ignore. Eventually he'll go away.
    Djoko Pritza
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:42 PM, 10/19/2008
    the southern strategy is finally being exposed for what it is and the rite's reply is that black folks stick together? talk about a hollow argument. personally i give tina fey the credit for telling the media to "grow a pair". seems like they finally have.
    joeyjojo
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 2:54 PM, 10/19/2008
    DJ, you once told me you do not engage in debate, because you cannot be influenced by facts that disprove your theories. 1.that proves that you have no idea what you're talking about, and you're repeating whatever someone who you agree with might say 2.facts are unimportant to your argument, especially when they are used against your position, conclusion: you are a liar 3.this really explains why you contribute very little with your posts, so why bother?
    ObamaHATER
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:06 PM, 10/19/2008
    Liberal, I think because of Obama's "skin color" (not race because clearly he is arab-american), liberals are going to use that as an excuse to explain the criticisms of the many character flaws in Obama. Attacking one's character has been used in every presidential race since Abraham Lincoln, and not exclusive to Obama. Unfortunately, Obama has character many flaws and seriously questionable past associations. If any of these issues come up in President Obama's administration, the republican party and even the media will blame McCain if this was never addressed in the election. Also, you have to be blind to think that McCain isn't attacking Obama on policy related issues.
    ObamaHATER
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:24 PM, 10/19/2008
    When Republicans run out of bad talking points, they turn to racial attacks.
    HandNik
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:33 PM, 10/19/2008
    Powell was used by the Bush administration now he is being used by the UN. They are itching to divy up Obama's $845 Billion UN Global Poverty Act which is making it's way to the senate. Not only will it move what's left of our money to the upstanding UN, the tax increases will finish off the US economy for good. A two-fer!
    Kathryn
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 3:34 PM, 10/19/2008
    ObamaHater, CD75, Bon - Will we see any of these posters after the election? I hope not, I hope these trolls for the McCain campaign climb back under their rocks at the end of the election.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:19 PM, 10/19/2008
    Arab-American? Where did that come from? Anyway, I'm not using Obama's skin color to defend him or explain his flaws or anything of the kind. I'm simply pointing out what anybody can see--that the republican campaign has gradually descended to one primarily intended to exploit bigotry and prejudice. What makes it clear that they are purely exploitive in this manner is the lack of substance in the republican campaign; there's no information that is actually helpful or informative to the prospective voter. Give us an example of a substantive criticism that's been in any McCain TV ad in the last month! And please don't tell us that his tax program is socialistic or some such==well, I was going to say nonsense, but let's just call it pure opinion as opposed to information. I can't imagine that you republican guys are actually dumb enough to believe that Ayers is a friend and advisor to Obama, or that Obama is a Muslim, or a terrorist, or whatever.
    liberal
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 4:56 PM, 10/19/2008
    Polman, you hack, Powell also said: ""We've got two individuals — either one of them could be a good president." You're one of the most biased reporters I've ever read.
    rbpeeple
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 5:02 PM, 10/19/2008
    The rightwing nutcakes here don't get it, just like McCain doesn't. No one cares what you morons think about Powell's endorsement -- you're not the target. Rather, his announcment is yet another shovel of dirt on the McCain campaign and will persuade some undecideds to go with Obama. Even r*cists should be able to understand that fact.
    Djoko Pritza


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
About Dick Polman

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.