Bill Clinton on memory lane
The impeachment anniversary
Bill Clinton on memory lane
Dick Polman, Inquirer National Political Columnist
I'm stuck with a competing work deadline today, so, rather than simply fall silent here, I invite you to stroll with me down memory lane. On this date 10 years ago - Dec. 19, 1998 - President Bill Clinton was impeached. What follows is the newspaper article that I wrote in the immediate wake of that historic event.
I was not yet an opinion columnist, but that day I was permitted to stretch the boundaries of "news analysis" commentary. Given all that has transpired these past 10 years, Clinton's predicament reads like ancient history, and one can argue that his character flaws are trivial, when matched against the manifest policy flaws of the Bush era. On the other hand, if Clinton hadn't behaved so badly, and hadn't lied under oath about it, and hadn't therefore alienated so many culturally conservative Democratic voters, then it's likely that Al Gore would have won the 2000 election. And Bush would have never gotten the chance to screw things up.
So, 10 years ago, my analysis:
If character is destiny, Bill Clinton is Exhibit A.
On the day that the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke, he phoned his ex-pollster, Dick Morris. As Morris later told the grand jury, Clinton said: "You know, I didn't do what they said I did, but I did do something, and maybe I did so much that I can't prove my innocence."
I did do something....Right there, it was clear that Clinton had to make a choice: Come clean with the public, or repeat the denial that he had voiced under oath in the Paula Jones deposition a few days earlier. But Clinton didn't want to make that choice on his own; he wanted Morris to conduct a poll.
Morris complied, and late that night he told the President that most people would require a few months to absorb and accept an admission of perjury. So Clinton made his choice - stonewall. He told Morris, "We'll just have to win, won't we?" And a week later, with help from a friendly Hollywood producer, Clinton scripted his famous finger-wagging falsehood.
At so many critical junctures, Clinton, whether by instinct or calculation, chose deception and recklessness over candor and restraint - in his deposition and grand jury testimony; in his semantic legalese; in his frontal attacks on independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr; in his early refusal to settle the Jones case; and in his willingness to conduct secret trysts with Lewinsky while a sexual-harassment lawsuit was hanging over his head and while Starr and other hostile players were watching his every move.
And so today he finds himself impeached by his political enemies, who control the U.S. House.
Twenty years ago, Richard Nixon looked back on Watergate, during his interviews with British host David Frost, and concluded that while he did have enemies bent on destroying him, "I gave them the sword." Clinton has now done the same. He may still survive as a tarnished president, but it is clear that in the absence of his character flaws, the Impeachment Express never would have picked up speed.
"In essence, he is the author of his own destruction as an effective leader," said presidential historian Robert Dallek, a recent biographer of Lyndon Johnson. "He is an extreme combination of narcissist, politician and lawyer - all in the service of saving his own ass, rather than serving some larger public purpose. This is a pattern of manipulation, obfuscation, self-protectiveness and defensiveness. And now it has trapped him."
Brian Lunde, a Democratic strategist who worked for Clinton in Arkansas during the gubernatorial era, said: "It's all coming home to roost now, his whole way of life and his way of dealing deceptively with people. Before, he got away with his character flaws because he didn't have any legal eagles [prosecutors] watching him. He has finally met his match, and all his old formulas - denying, hoping things will go away - don't apply anymore."
And he cannot extricate himself with the help of his favorite weapon - his golden gift of gab. He has become trapped by his own deceptions, and can no longer talk his way out of trouble. For the moment at least, as Morris said the other day, Clinton is stuck "with the damage of Saturday Night Bill...His character defects are beginning to overtake him."
Those traits, by themselves, are not remotely impeachable. What has put him in the conservatives' crosshairs are the other flaws that analysts view as crucial components of his narcissism - arrogance, a sense of victimhood, and a belief (as his former press secretary Dee Dee Myers said the other night) "that the rules don't apply to him."
These flaws have poisoned his dealings with the courts and Congress. In his persistent attempts to dodge his pursuers on the Lewinsky scandal, he now seems committed to a legal defense grounded on the notion that truth is what he says it is. He never had sex with Lewinsky - as he defines it "in his own mind," according to his lawyers, who also argue that he did not commit perjury because in his own mind he did not believe he was lying.
"This is just an extension of his old habits," said political analyst Larry Sabato, who spent considerable time in Arkansas researching one of his books on political scandal. "He has always been a salesman who believes whatever he says while he is saying it, in order to win over whoever is listening."
A classic example appears in the final pages of the Starr report. When the sex scandal broke, he insisted on his innocence while conversing with aide Sid Blumenthal. As Blumenthal later told the grand jury, Clinton said that Lewinsky was a stalker, that she "came on to me, and made a sexual demand on me," but that he had rebuffed her. And then, painting himself as a victim, he added: "I feel like somebody who is surrounded by an oppressive force that is creating a lie about me, and I can't get the truth out. I feel like the [imprisoned Soviet] character in the novel Darkness at Noon."
His flaws are writ large in those remarks: his reluctance to take responsibility, his willingness to deceive, his tendency to see himself as a victim, and his eagerness to please the audience at hand - in this case, Blumenthal, who might have been expected to appreciate the pointed reference to Darkness at Noon, given his known affinity for political conspiracy theories.
Former national security aide Roger Morris, who has written biographies of Nixon and Clinton, said that the President's bad habits could be traced to his upbringing in Hot Springs, an Arkansas town "where scandal and impropriety was routinely tolerated. People went to church on Sunday and gambled illegally in the clubs on Monday night...
"And Clinton's problem, going back to the Jones deposition last January, is that he still believes this is just a game he can win. All his life he has been a virtuoso at playing with words to mask the whole truth. It's a technique. It's not coming from the heart, it's coming from the head." (Witness his remark to prosecutors, "It depends on what the meaning of the word is is.")
The wordplay in his sworn testimony seems entirely in character if one remembers 1992, and his refusal to answer yes or no to the question of whether he had smoked marijuana. He insisted that he had never broken the laws of his country. It sounded like a no, but it wasn't. Only when later asked about other countries did he admit to having tried it in England - but without inhaling.
Similarly, Clinton-watchers view his behavior in the Lewinsky case, and see discomfiting echoes of previous scandals. His suggestion to Lewinsky about the gifts - that the prosecutors cannot get them if she no longer has them in her possession - sparks memories of what he told Gennifer Flowers in their taped conversations, that his enemies cannot prove anything as long as both lovers deny the truth.
Another key facet of Clinton's character is his tendency to avoid unpleasant truths. It is a trait that he shared with his mother, one that biographers say took root while growing up in an alcoholic home. It is also a trait that has not served him well during this year.
"It is very painful for a narcissistic politician to be self-critical," Dallek said. "And any outside criticism is particularly wounding, so it's often easier to lash out at the critic" - as occurred last Aug. 17, when Clinton was afforded the opportunity to lower the heat on this scandal. Instead, he attacked Starr in his TV address. It was a turning point.
"He bared his arrogance," said biographer Morris, "and that was a big mistake. When someone like him lets the real animal out of the cage, everything can fall apart. Politics is theater, and a smart politician cannot afford to stop acting."
And if character is destiny, Clinton will fight to keep his job. He will not bow to any demands for resignation, said pollster Dick Morris; rather, "they'll carry him out feet first, and [Hillary] will be hanging onto the drapes."
"If his history is any guide," Lunde said, "he could get right back into campaign mode and behave like a rabid dog, as if it's just a matter of gritting his teeth and hanging on in the Senate. But he would still need the Democratic senators to survive. Others can save him, but he can no longer save himself.
"For the first time ever, he is truly trapped. It will be a real test of character to see how he handles it."
-------
Meanwhile, here in 2008, I was a guest today on Philadelphia National Public Radio (90.9 FM), talking for an hour about the latest national political developments. That "Radio Times" broadcast is archived here.
Mike I- Abus Abaas found in Iraq, $25,000 to the families of suicide bombers in Isreal, 17 un resolutions violated, invasion of Kuwait, gassing 5000 kurds, using chemical weapons in war, 300,000 dead in mass graves, 500 tons of yellowcake in a warehouse 12 miles south of baghdad, launching scud missles into civilian areas of Isreal. Do we need to go on. sheesh. no amount will ever be proof enough for you.- liberal- 25 years ago. That is when they told us grade schoolers that the next ice age was upon us. And we believed it! Cause in 1979 the Mechanicsburg Pa area had snow up to our shoulders. sorry dude. It is all nonsense. Winter is cold, summer is warm, nights are dark and days are light. I wish the weather people would just try to get the weather right for the next 3 days let alone make long range predictions.
- s/mike--please don't embarrass yourself by talking science. The CO2 hypothesis for the earth's temperature has been established since about 1900 and there hasn't been any significant dispute. This meintze about a new ice age comes from popular magazines, not from science. I could go on about the disastrous results of the mass scientific ignorance in this country, but what's the point.— liberal
- CD, the abortion issue is not a science one. It is a privacy issue. So, no matter what you think you know about when life begins (interesting that you know; but, scads of scientists are still debating it) it is a non-issue. Furthermore, it is ok that you believe life begins at conception. My question to you, since that belief is based on your religion, is why do I have to abide by your religious belief? I know you haven't brought religion into the equation; but, if you believe life begins at conception, then you are espousing a religious belief, since science cannot agree with you. Remember, this is a privacy issue -- how far do you want the Government in your bedroom? If you are a true Republican, the answer should be "very little". And, to you guys defending Bush attacking Iraq, you are unbelievable. There were no WMD's period, end of story. To say you would go in and do the same thing again because of Saddam, would be to say you would agree to a country attacking us because Bush is such an A-hole. And, yes, Bush and Saddam belong in the same sentence in my personal belief because of their total disregard for human life.— Master Dreamz
- Swedes -- 10 of the warmest years ever have occurred in the last 20 years. Global warming is a fact. The only question is how long we have until it becomes irreversible. Name one credible scientist that supports your POV, please, just one non-oil backed scientist. On the flip side, Noble Prize winners and about 600 other scientists support the fact of global warming.— Master Dreamz
- Liberal- Penn professor Bob Giegenback says global warming isn't even in the top 10 even of enviromental problems we face. Dr. Giegenback contends that Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth is " replete with innaccuries and misrepresentations,and appeals to public fear as shamlessley as any other political statements that hope to unite the public behind a particular ideology " Core samples from the Antarctic reveal that Co2 levels were much higher thousands of years ago. Giegenbach contends that as temperatures rise so does Co2 levels. Not the other way around. So this is the part where you will tell me that Giegenbach, a professor for more than 40 years in geo-enviromental studies at the University of Pennsylvania, is paid by the evil oil companies. Truth is that Giegenbach is a Democrat. He is one of many world renown scientists who do not suscribe to man made global warming. do a google search and you can read the 7 page article from Philly magazine.
- I spelled the profs name wrong. It is Giegengack. Sorry
- Again, he doesnt deny the facts put forth, he just gives his opinion of the facts. The earth is warming and the seas are rising. What if his analysis is wrong? CO2 warms, is it any stretch to believe that the more we create, the faster the warming process will happen? you go ahead and take the chance; but remember the consequences if you are wrong. Oh wait, you dont care about consequences, only the end results. Thousands die; but, hey we got Saddam, right?— Master Dreamz
- SW MIKE: Then why was it necessary to censor scientific papers on global warming, to pressure scientists who disagreed w/ career threats, and to put an anti-environmentalist in charge of The EPA after forcing out Whitman?— Talvenada
- Boy, that Bill Clinton sure had an ego on him back in 1998.— Phrossty
- Tavenada- I gave you just one example. There are thousands of scientists who do not suscribe to man made global warming theories. None of which are connected to any entity with an agenda
- SW MIKE: I didn't ask for an example, but I did ask 3 questions. Of which, you answered ZERO.— Talvenada
- Master Dreamz- I hope you realize that the " Day after Tommorow " was a hollywood movie. Please don't tell me you have a greater fear of high seas than dying in car accident or a terrorist attack. The Earth has changed since the beginning of time. Always did and always will. It all happens very slowly. So just relex. It was ten years ago where that dopey actor from Cheers ( Ted Danson) told us that in ten years the seas would be dead. Trust me when I tell you the seas are not dead. I had a hammerhead hooked just off of Pine Island sound ( near Sanibel Is.) a few weeks ago.
- MASTER D: Trust SW MIKE??? If THOUSANDS of scientists w/no agenda say global warming is nothing, wouldn't that be 70% of them? And that 30% is making most of the noise? Why doesn't Bush bring out these thousands to debunk all these other countries who have it so wrong? Why did Bush and McCain say global warming is real recently?— Talvenada
- MASTER D: However, there is that top scientist Rush Limbaugh, and his 20 million scientific followers, like SW MIKE.— Talvenada
Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.
ARCHIVES
All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.
- American Spectator
- David Limbaugh
- Free Republic
- Glenn Reynolds
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- John Hawkins
- Matt Lewis
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Opinion Journal
- Power Line
- Red State
- The Brody File
- The Daily Caller
- Town Hall
- Weekly Standard
- Center for American Progress
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos
- David Corn
- Huffington Post
- Media Matters
- Mojoblog (Mother Jones)
- Open Left
- Political Animal
- Salon's War Room
- Talking Points Memo
- Tapped
- The Democratic Strategist
- The Grey Matter
- Unclaimed Territory
- Andrew Sullivan
- Attytood
- Chi Tribune's The Swamp
- CJR's Campaign Desk
- CNN's Political Ticker
- CQ Politics
- FactCheck.org
- Gail Collins
- Howard Kurtz
- Mickey Kaus
- NBC's First Read
- Obit
- Political Wire
- Politico
- Politics Daily
- Pollster.com
- Real Clear Politics
- The Atlantic Wire
- The Fix
- The Moderate Voice
- The Plank
- USA Today On Politics
- Wonkette
