And the winners are...
Some awards for another weird week in politics
And the winners are...
Dick Polman, Inquirer National Political Columnist
It was another offbeat week in politics, so let's do a few shout-outs.
Toy of the Week: The RomneyDoll. Wind him up and watch him writhe. He's still trying to defend his Massachusetts universal health care law (which mandates that people must buy insurance), while somehow insisting that it's very different from Barack Obama's universal health care law (which mandates that people must buy insurance).
On Monday, Mitt twisted to and fro during an interview with Newsweek. The interviewer pointed out, "Back in February 2007, you said you hoped the Massachusetts plan would 'become a model for the nation.' Would you agree that it has?"
Romney replied, "I don't...You're going to have to get that quote. That's not exactly accurate, I don't believe."
Newsweek followed up, "I can tell you exactly what it says. 'I'm proud of what we've done. If Massachusetts succeeds in implementing it, then that will be a model for the nation.'"
Romney replied, "It is a model for the states to be able to learn from. During the campaign, I was asked if I was proposing that what I did in Massachusetts I would do for the nation. And the answer was absolutely not. Our plan is a state plan. It is a model for other states — if you will, the nation — it is a model for them to look at what we've accomplished and to better it or to create their own plans."
Oh. So let's see if I've got this right. Since all 50 states constitute "the nation," apparently it would be OK with Romney if all 50 states enacted 50 different laws requiring all their citizens to purchase health insurance - whereas it's not OK with Romney if a federal mandate does the same thing, albeit in a more streamlined fashion.
But has he always been opposed to a federal mandate? During a 2008 debate, ABC News' Charles Gibson told him, "You seem to have backed away from mandates on a national basis." Romney replied, "No, no, I like mandates. The mandates work." He sounded like he was fine with the idea of a federal "national basis" mandate. But now he tells Newsweek, "I do not favor the federal mandates."
Glad that's all straightened out. The problem, however, is that conservative GOP primary voters dislike the mandate concept, whether it be state or federal. Soon enough, the RomneyDoll will writhe again.
-------
Smear of the Week: Snarlin' Arlen Specter's TV hit job. Specter, the incumbent Pennsylvania senator, has a double-digit poll lead over Joe Sestak in the runup to the May 18 Democratic primary, but nevertheless the old bird has felt compelled to sink his claws into his rival's neck with a Swift Boatian flourish.
I hold no particular brief for either candidate, but there's something a tad disturbing about a TV ad that slimes Sestak's 30-year military career in a mere six seconds. The narrator intones, "Joe Sestak - relieved of duty in the Navy, for creating a poor command climate." Which makes it sound like Sestak was some kind of Captain Queeg, forcibly shoved into the brig during a sea battle with America's enemies.
Somehow, Specter left out the part about how Sestak was a three-star Navy admiral and winner of the Defense Distinguished Service Medal, the Defense Superior Service Medal, two Legion of Merit awards, two Meritorious Service Medals, the Joint Service Commendation Medal, three Navy Commendation Medals, and the Navy Achievement Medal; and about how he was basically removed from a key Pentagon post because he was a hardass who (in the words of his mentor, Admiral Vernon Clark) "challenged people who did not want to be challenged. The guy is courageous, a patriot's patriot."
Politics ain't beanbag, as the saying goes. And 30-second attack ads have long been infamous for their, um, factual selectivity. And survivors like Specter will always do what it takes to win - in this case, preemptively whacking his rival's character. If the large pool of undecided voters wind up with the phrase "relieved of duty" implanted in their subconscious, Specter will have achieved his objective. But that doesn't mean we have to admire his outsized cajones.
-------
John McCain Pander of the Week: Granted, it's hard to track the former "maverick" in all his craven recalibrations, but his new take on illegal immigrants wins the award this time around.
Aiming to placate the right-wingers in Arizona, and thus hoping to survive the upcoming Republican primary, McCain is currently hot for the pending state legislation that would give local cops the power to question anyone who might appear to be illegal (the wrong shoes, shifty eyes, whatever). On Fox News the other night, when Bill O'Reilly asked McCain whether this policy would prompt a lot of racial profiling, the senator said, "I would be very sorry if some of that happens. And I regret it," but he's more concerned about "the drivers of cars with illegals in it that are intentionally causing accidents on the freeway."
Be very afraid, people! Check your AAA advisories! "Cars with illegals in it" are intentionally causing accidents on the freeway! (Evidence, please?) The new McCain says that illegals are potential perpetrators of vehicular homicide. The old McCain, the one that existed only a few years ago, said that illegals were courageous people who should be treated with affection. From a Senate floor statement, in March 2006: "These people will risk their lives to cross our borders - no matter how formidable the barriers - and most will be successful. Our reforms need to reflect that reality." From a debate in November 2007: "They need some protection under the law; they need some of our love and compassion."
Presumably, McCain will cease his slide on the rightward slippery slope long enough to oppose the Arizona "birther" bill requiring all presidential candidates to produce birth certificates. But we're still a long way from the August primary, time enough for McCain to mortgage off the rest of his soul.
-------
Pauper of the Week: John Ensign, the Nevada "family values" senator best known for having boffed his top aide's wife, then buying off the aggrieved family with the help of $100,000 obtained from his casino mogul daddy. Ensign is having a lot of problems raising campaign money of his own, however. During the first quarter of 2010, according to the Federal Election Commission, Senator Ensign raised a grand total of...
Fifty dollars. Seriously.
The entire Nevada Republican establishment stayed away, apparently mindful that the Justice Department is investigating whether Ensign broke any laws or rules when he tried to kick start the cuckolded husband's lobbying career. It would appear that the donors back home are trying to send Ensign a message. Only one person - a vegas retiree named Robert Doland - opted to pony up for Ensign. He wrote two checks, 25 bucks apiece. He reportedly said this week that he had no problems with Ensign, because "all men are dogs."
What an insult to dogs. If you hung a tin cup around a dog's neck, and leashed him to a light pole at a street corner, he'd probably top John Ensign's $50 haul inside of an hour.
-------
Whine of the Week: Skip Coryell's lament about curbs on his freedom.
You may not know about Skip. He was a protester who stood up for the Second Amendment earlier this week in Washington. He wound up on Hardball, and when host Chris Matthews asked him to detail his complaints about the socialist governmental tyrants, he replied:
"They've gotten in the way right now as I speak. I'm standing in Washington D.C., next to the National Monument, Washington Monument, and I am unarmed. Normally, I'd carry a pistol for self-defense. Right now, I am defenseless...I am being infringed upon, right now, as we speak, sir...I want a pistol...I don't feel the need for a bazooka right now, but I would like to have a 40-caliber Smith and Wesson. Maybe a 9 millimeter."
Skip, you're a wimp. If you don't feel the need to tote a bazooka, clearly you hate freedom.
-------
Policy Wonk of the Week: Sue Lowden, a Senate candidate in Nevada. She has an interesting health reform idea, one that we had yet to hear from any of her fellow Republicans. She's encouraging voters to "barter" - just like in "the olden days" when patients "would bring a chicken to the doctor." And a Lowden spokesman later assured everybody that the candidate was not joking: "We must explore all options available to drive costs down. Bartering with your doctor is not a new concept." (True enough. The medical practice of leeching is not a new concept, either.)
A chicken for every doc....I had never thought of that one. That could be a new GOP slogan, replacing Herbert Hoover's "a chicken in every pot." I do fear, however, that chicken pricing might be difficult. I'm open to suggestions, but I'm thinking that a few giblets (neck, liver, gizzard) are sufficient payment for an annual check-up. But you know how these doctors are, they might insist on an organic, free-range bird from Whole Foods. I'd try to bargain them down to a dark-meat drumstick, but maybe the best compromise would be a breast from Perdue.
Although if I'm stuck in that waiting room for an hour, they're only getting the Swanson TV dinner.
The Inky is to be sold next week at auction. Here is to "hope and change" that the new owners believe in fair and balanced journalism and purge it from just being nothing more than the communication and propaganda wing of the democratic party.— CD75- How about this for a reform agenda: no more bailouts for any bankers. Instead, Obama wants perptetual bailouts for his wall street contributers administered by him.— CD75
Now that Arlen Specter is a Democrat, we have to replace the descriptor "sleazebag" with "survivor".— jmc
CD75, do you really believe the bill contains a bailout? If so, you are a fool. A person must try to read through the political static and see the situation for themselves. You should not take face value any news report, even those at FOX.- I would like a subscription to the Inquirer. I would like to pay in aquarium gravel, if that is all right. I understand that publishers are very sympathetic people.— schnail
Comment removed.- As for 'perpetual bailouts', Mitch McConnell is aping Frank Luntz's factually challenged talking point very well on that one. Too bad the actual bill would in fact do the EXACT OPPOSITE, by forcing banks to set up their own insurance fund so any 'bailouts' will come from their own funds. The banks would in fact have to bail themselves out.— schnail
- Not really--he's a survivor because he's a sleazebag. But being a former Republican, that to be expected. If I still lived in PA (glad I don't!) I'd be voting for Sestak.— CutterMcCool
- TPM has a chicken for healthcare payment calculation, or maybe it's The Daily Beast. In any case, they determined there are not enough chickens on the planet to cover our health care costs.— furiousj
- Anybody tries to pay my wife with a chicken is gonna get chicken soup instead of Lidocaine.— SteveMG
- CD75 - For once and forever, the previous administration bailed out the banks. Remember Hank Paulson? So what about today's blog is not "fair and balanced"? The fact that Arlen is referred to as survivir not sleazebag? Don't remember DP ever referring to him as a sleazebag - but if he did, shame on DP. So what about Mitt, Sue, slick Johnny ensign and Skip or Jumpin' John McCain (my personal favorite since I reside in AZ)? What is fair unfair and unbalanced about the reports about them? If you really find DPs writing that distasteful, go away! Why do you put yourself through so much angst and heartburn everyday? DP supplies a whole string of neocon, repub sites on his blog that might be more to your liking. Go cavort with Michelle Malkin and her ilk, your blood pressure won't be so far out of range. I mean, if a little bit of what you have to say here was coherent, it would be worth reading it. But your contributions are so non-sensical and might I say, stupid, as to be irrelivent by the 5th word. Please do yourself a favor and take it easy on yourself - go away. It's like someone who hates going to the dentist making an appointment to go to the dentist every week. If you are going to stay around, write something intelligent once in a while! Surprise us!— jti
- I really feel for poor Skip Coryell. If I had a prosthetic weenie, I wouldn't go anywhere without it either.— yoda
- What? Ask a doctor how much something costs is just plain crazy? Leave it to Dick to take the bartering metaphor literally.
- First, it was the Democrat controlled House and Senate that bailed out the banks. Recall they had to vote to approve the TARP LEGISLATION. Only Congress can spend money, as stated in the Constitution. And Hank Paulson is a Democrat as well. Second, exactly for what service, SteveMG, would I be paying your wife?— tom - wilmington, de
- What a shame Polman did not see the NYT story about the New York healthcare bill, which disallows refusing to provide coverage for pre-existing conditions and is bankrupting the healthcare industry. Too bad also he did not mention how the Massachusetts plan, which he continually states was the model for Obamacare, has not controlled costs, the mandates have not worked, the insurance companies (most of which are "not for profit" organizations, are going broke and cannot sustain coverage to the point they have stopped selling plans. All of that does not make Romney look any better, but it also shows the flaws and costs of Obamacare. Polman, to fit his ideological agenda, does not mention these facts, but then why should he, for his is just an opinion piece, right?— tom - wilmington, de
Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.
ARCHIVES
All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.
- American Spectator
- David Limbaugh
- Free Republic
- Glenn Reynolds
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- John Hawkins
- Matt Lewis
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Opinion Journal
- Power Line
- Red State
- The Brody File
- The Daily Caller
- Town Hall
- Weekly Standard
- Center for American Progress
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos
- David Corn
- Huffington Post
- Media Matters
- Mojoblog (Mother Jones)
- Open Left
- Political Animal
- Salon's War Room
- Talking Points Memo
- Tapped
- The Democratic Strategist
- The Grey Matter
- Unclaimed Territory
- Andrew Sullivan
- Attytood
- Chi Tribune's The Swamp
- CJR's Campaign Desk
- CNN's Political Ticker
- CQ Politics
- FactCheck.org
- Gail Collins
- Howard Kurtz
- Mickey Kaus
- NBC's First Read
- Obit
- Political Wire
- Politico
- Politics Daily
- Pollster.com
- Real Clear Politics
- The Atlantic Wire
- The Fix
- The Moderate Voice
- The Plank
- USA Today On Politics
- Wonkette
