Pressed for time today, I intend only to update a topic. This week, some readers got angry when I observed in my Sunday print column that Fox News "has fanned so many false rumors." How dare I suggest such a thing, they said. They challenged me to name even one example.
Most of these readers appear to hail from the great state of Montana (thank you, Billings Gazette), so perhaps there is something in the local water that makes them oblivious to the obvious. Their challenge was not exactly a brain-teaser, being roughly equivalent to the addition of two plus two.
There was the false rumor that President Obama was foreign-born, the false rumor that health reform would create "death panels," the false rumor that Obama would create internment camps run by FEMA, the false rumor that he is trying to conduct Mao-style indoctrination of schoolchildren, the false rumor that he was Muslim and/or perhaps a terrorist fellow traveler (remember the "terrorist fist jab?"), the false rumor that the symbol on the back of the dime was a fascist plot hatched by Democrats in 1916...that sort of thing.
And then, just yesterday, another false rumor surfaced.
Along the faux information pipeline (conservative blogs, websites, video aggregates, the usual) word quickly spread that Obama had refused to watch the Tuesday night election returns, preferring instead to switch on HBO and behold himself in the new HBO documentary depicting his '08 campaign.
And naturally the story was hatched on Fox News, starting at 10:15 a.m. With just the right tone of insouciant mockery, Fox host Martha MacCallum reported the following:
"Robert Gibbs, the (Obama) press secretary, has been speaking with some reporters and he was asked, ‘So why didn’t the president watch (the returns) last night?’ And Robert Gibbs said, ‘Well, he was actually watching, you know, the HBO special about his year-long campaign and how it all went.’ So he was watching that last night....We know that Michelle and the girls went to the Miley Cyrus concert last night....So he’s all alone in that big house, right? Nothing to do but sit back and watch – reminisce about the long campaign and watch HBO."
It was a dream Fox story, because it fit the enduring conservative narrative about a self-absorbed dreamer smitten with his own image, preferring to hold a mirror to himself rather than face bad news. Newsbusters, the conservative watchdog group, quickly posted the MacCallum video; so did Townhall.com, the right-wing site, which also passed along the video to YouTube. The usual anonymous bloggers fell into line, one of them titling his (or her) post, "The Narcissist in Chief." Lucianne Goldberg naturally weighed in with her echo. And Rush Limbaugh took the Fox piece and spewed accordingly: "If a documentary could get anal poisoning, this one could. I mean, it's just kiss butt, kiss butt, kiss butt - and here he's watching it!"
Only problem was, the Fox story was dead wrong. Obama watching HBO on election night? Never happened.
Turns out, the actual Robert Gibbs transcript reads as follows: "One thing I should contextualize – the President obviously got updates about the election last night. He did not watch – as I told some of you – did not watch election returns. I wouldn’t read a ton into that, since he didn’t actually watch election returns when he was running (for president). If you did watch the movie on HBO – we called him and told him he won Iowa. He did not watch election returns."
It's clear what Gibbs was talking about: Obama didn't even watch the TV returns when he broke through in Iowa - as evidenced by the HBO documentary footage. Period.
To Fox News' credit, it did retract its false rumor late yesterday afternoon, once the Gibbs transcript was circulated. White House correspondent Major Garrett went on the air and said he had "misheard Robert Gibbs...My mistake." (Townhall.com never bothered to post a correction.)
But how is it possible that Garrett could have "misheard" so badly? Gibbs' remarks, and the remarks aired in the original Fox report, aren't even close. It all boils down to this: Garrett (who is widely considered one of the responsible Fox sleuths) thought he heard a frank admission of Obama's narcissim, but clearly didn't take good notes or hoist a digital recorder or ask a press colleague for verification; instead, he rushed the report onto the air, filtered through MacCallum's sarcasm.
The bottom line is, some falsities are simply too good to check. As with so many others, Fox will surely offer us more.
"many members of Congress did serve in the military, and many have children currently serving." From USA Today in 2007........... "nine members of Congress have sons or daughters who have served in Iraq, according to the U.S. Senate Library. A tenth, Sen. John McCain, faces the possibility that his youngest son, Jimmy, will go there this year." Yep, that's 10 out of 535 - or what some call "many". OUCH...... IT'S BURNING!!! ACORN! the stupid does burn
Dick, you are still obsessed on this issue? Tempest in a teapot, especially the day after the elections and with health care bill being rushed to the House floor on Saturday (and before the CBO reviews it)? Wow. Your hate froth has got into your eyes. CD75
I don't think Garrett gets a lot of points for correcting a mistake he pretty much made on purpose, and only after the official transcript highlighted his false reporting (aka lying). Yersinia Pestis
I would like to thank the Septa TWU for supressing all the democratic vote in Philadelphia by calling a strike on election day. The repubs took 6 of 7 statewide races. Thanks liberal union thugs, you are brillant. CD75
It's probably Bush's fault. WWTDD
Comment removed.
Mr. Polman is this the best you have & people in Montana are only oblivious to liberal nonsense it seems. Fox News reporting a story wrong and then retracting it later. OMG, that has never happened before on TV, sheesh. You must be really hurting over the election results yesterday to put out this worn out story. I do not think and I see no attribution of Fox News fanning the flames of any of those rumors other than their opinion commentators (Beck/Hannity especially). It really is disingenuous to put them in with the whole of Fox News and you know it. You keep fact checking Fox News in the future and we will keep fact checking you:) NEPhilly
CD75, I think Dick is more "obsessed" with the fact that FOX fans are bombarding his inbox with obsessive commentary about his supposed obsession with FOX's lies. It is interesting that you don't comment on the substance of his post either. anonymous
A Fox News bias didn't play out in the numbers during the campaign. ***MSNBC during the campaign on Obama good/bad 43/14 on McCain good/bad, 10/73. Fox during campaign on McCain good/bad 22/40 and Obama good/bad 25/40. Any way you spin it, Fox had even number of negative stories about each candidate and played it almost down the middle, 22/40 to 25/40.*** http://www.journalism.org/node/13437 NEPhilly
Comment removed.
still_independent...from the prior post. The actual quote was "The next president WILL inherit a military in decline." Bush made the comment as part of a speech to military veterans in Milwaukee while candidate for president. From freelibrary.com ""The current administration inherited a military ready for the dangers and challenges facing our nation," the Republican presidential candidate said in a critique of American defense readiness. "The next president will inherit a military in decline."" The speech was in August, 2000 and the original story was in the Seattle Times. This is not the same as a president blaming a former president, wouldn't you say? tom - wilmington, de
Here is Polman's rotation of his blogs from week to week: Monday - Blame Bush, Tuesday - smear conservatives, Wednesday - plagerize what Maureen Dowd wrote on Sunday, Thursday - smear Fox News, Friday - do all of the above. CD75
Comment removed.
it is relevent in that it is proof that Fox is more concerned about broadcasting what fits with their agenda, then doing due dilligence and verifying their story. because they know,. by retracting their story, the CYA, and ntohign will happen to them, but the important part of continuing their barrage and keeping the snowball rolling is achieved, because many many people never see the retraction for one reason or another. it's the reason Fox is accurately identified as the PR arm of the RNC. gee1971
- American Spectator
- David Limbaugh
- Free Republic
- Glenn Reynolds
- Hugh Hewitt
- Human Events
- John Hawkins
- Matt Lewis
- Michelle Malkin
- National Review
- Opinion Journal
- Power Line
- Red State
- The Brody File
- The Daily Caller
- Town Hall
- Weekly Standard
- Center for American Progress
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos
- David Corn
- Huffington Post
- Media Matters
- Mojoblog (Mother Jones)
- Open Left
- Political Animal
- Salon's War Room
- Talking Points Memo
- Tapped
- The Democratic Strategist
- The Grey Matter
- Unclaimed Territory
- Andrew Sullivan
- Attytood
- Chi Tribune's The Swamp
- CJR's Campaign Desk
- CNN's Political Ticker
- CQ Politics
- FactCheck.org
- Gail Collins
- Howard Kurtz
- Mickey Kaus
- NBC's First Read
- Obit
- Political Wire
- Politico
- Politics Daily
- Pollster.com
- Real Clear Politics
- The Atlantic Wire
- The Fix
- The Moderate Voice
- The Plank
- USA Today On Politics
- Wonkette
- December 2011
- August 2010
- August
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008







