PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
comments
89
options
 
Friday, March 27, 2009

 


As a public service to those of you who favor a healthy two-party system, let's check in on the Republicans and determine whether they have yet found anyone in the ranks who might be deemed leader-worthy - a person who can not only command the broad respect of party regulars, and who can quell the intraparty food fights, but who can also connect with the mainstream electorate that has slapped the party silly in two straight elections.

Could it be...Rush Limbaugh? Fat chance. In the national polls, he sits at roughly 25 percent approval, which is about what Richard Nixon got at the end of Watergate, and what George W. Bush got at the end of his infamous tenure. That's also basically where Newt Gingrich sits today, and I question whether Newt is now poised to boost his numbers, after having just declared on Fox News that President Obama is potentially creating "the equivalent of a dictatorship."

How about...Michael Steele? Dream on. The new party chairman is still getting dissed by the right for his recent dissing of Limbaugh. (Conservative commentator Thomas Sowell tells us that Steele's attack on Rush was "a sop to the liberal intellectuals," as well as patently unfair, because Rush actually provides "factual information and in-depth analysis.") Steele is currently trying to mend fences with the base by playing the God card, declaring to CNN this week that he might run for president some day if that's "where God wants me to be. God has a way of revealing stuff to you...And if that's part of the plan, it'll be the plan." It's questionable whether independent swing voters can be charmed by yet another Republican who claims to be touched by the divinity.

Or maybe the leader is...Sarah Palin? Nah, too divisive. In fact, she's too divisive within her own party. Last week, in an address to the Alaska GOP, she dissed the McCain campaign, complaining that, back in the fall of 2008, she couldn't find any McCain staffers who were touched by the divinity: "So I'm looking around for somebody to pray with, I just need maybe a little help, maybe a little extra, and the McCain campaign, love 'em, you know, they're a lot of people around me, but nobody I could find that I wanted to hold hands with and pray." (A former McCain staffer retaliated by telling CNN that her remarks will prompt people to question "her judgment as a leader.") Meanwhile, let's not forget that Palin, like Steele, is pondering a future presidential bid if God deems it so; as she put it last November, "I'm like, 'OK God, if there's an open door for me somewhere,' this is what I always pray, I'm like, 'don't let me miss the open door.'" Perhaps it'd be a good idea, for the sake of party unity, if Palin and Steele sat down with the celestial power broker and got Him to render an early endorsement.

Or maybe the next leader is...Bobby Jindal, the great minority hope from Louisiana? Hard to see that happening, especially after his latest embarrassment. You might recall that he delivered the party's official response to President Obama back on Feb. 24; that night, he ridiculed the "wasteful spending" in the stimulus package, including "$140 million for something called 'volcano monitoring.'" Was Jindal actually mocking the notion of spending money on advanced early-warning technology that could help protect Americans who live near active volcanoes, such as Alaska'a Mount Redoubt? He was. And sure enough, earlier this week Mount Redoubt erupted for the first time in 20 years, spewing ash 50,000 feet in the air and forcing 19 airline cancellations. Nobody was hurt this time, but the government geologists are using that stimulus money to shore up their monitoring of other active volcanoes, including Mount St. Helens, which killed 57 people in 1980. To put Jindal's definition of "wasteful spending" in perspective: That $140 million "for something called 'volcano monitoring'" is literally less money than we spend in Iraq during the span of a single day.

Or perhaps the next leader is...Dick Cheney? I'm not kidding; the ex-veep has been volunteering himself lately, warning darkly in interviews that Obama is putting America at risk for another terrorist attack. But no, he won't be the face of the party - because not even Republicans want him out there. Jack Duncan, a Republican congressman from Tennessee, said the other day, "He's become so unpopular while he was in the White House that it would probably be better for us politically if he wouldn't be so public." A Duncan colleague, Zach Wamp, added: "With all due respect to former Vice President Cheney, he represents what's behind us, not what's ahead of us." Translation: Cheney, do us all a favor and go back to your secret undisclosed location.

Or maybe it's an ensemble deal, starring all the House GOP leaders? Hard to imagine that, after yesterday's comedy act. With great fanfare, they unveiled a 19-page document entitled "Road to Recovery" - their alternative budget manifesto, which was presumably designed to demonstrate that they actually do have specific ideas. But the problem was that their budget document contained....no budget numbers, no budget estimates, no budget specifics. Instead, it was simply a recap of GOP principles; you will be shocked to learn that the document called for bigger tax cuts and more deregulation. But that's only half the story. It turns out that, within the minority House ranks, prospective GOP leader Eric Cantor was ticked off at prospective GOP leader Mike Pence for putting out this vague document in the first place. Cantor let it be known that he was "embarrassed," and a Cantor ally dissed Pence for "his egocentric rush to get on camera." Is there a party leader in the bunch? These guys are like alley cats fighting for scraps.

Or, what the heck, perhaps the GOP could take a risk and anoint...Meghan McCain. The daughter of John has kicked up a lot of dust lately. She wrote on her blog that young voters will never flock to the GOP as long as the party is championed by the likes of Ann Coulter (McCain on Ann: "I find her offensive, radical, insulting"). But maybe young McCain is too raw and feisty to lead. After she dissed Coulter, she got dissed in return by radio host Laura Ingraham, who mimicked McCain's Valley Girl voice and mocked McCain's weight by calling her "plus-sized." McCain then retaliated by sending a pungent message to Ingraham: "I'm like, 'Kiss my fat ass!'" Is America craving for a Republican leader who emerges victorious from a middle school food fight? You go, girl!

Maybe the Republicans are simply hoping that somewhere, in a secret lab that refuses federal stimulus money, Ronald Reagan has been cloned. As if.

-------

Permit me to correct something in yesterday's post: Contrary to what I wrote, the newspaper in Des Moines, Iowa still does have a reporter based in Washington. Yo, Iowans, keep hope alive.

 

 

Posted by Dick Polman @ 10:38 AM  Permalink | 89 comments
Comments   
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:06 AM, 03/27/2009
    Oh come on. 5 years or so ago they talked about the "permanent Republican majority." Now the question is "is the GOP dead?" Every 10 years or so a party looks dead, and then comes back to life based on new strategies combined with hubris on the part of the other party. Look at Johnson's wipe out of Goldwater in 64, followed by Nixon 4 years later. Or Nixon's blowout win, followed by Carter. The problem with the party out of office is they have no natural leader. The party in power has the White House. In 2003, who was the leader of the Dems - no one. In 2009, who is the leader of the Reps - no one. But over time, someone will emerge.
    Lynx
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:11 AM, 03/27/2009
    I don't know of anyone in Congress now who is capable of leading the Republican party. I think they will have to look to governors for leadership, but the only ones I know of - Palin, Jindal, Sanford of SC - are, as Polman notes, idiots. If they want anyone to pay attention to their principles and have a voice in making policy, they need to find some grown-ups in a hurry. Good luck with that!
    Yersinia Pestis
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:27 AM, 03/27/2009
    Mr. Polman you should worry more about the vacuum at the helm in your own party! Why the infatuation with the 'permanent, minority status, conse 'pubs? I guess there is nothing more important to write about in these troubling times than the 'in dissaray Republicans', when the next important election isn't for 2 years! Why is it important for the Repubs to pick a national leader now?
    NEPhilly
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:31 AM, 03/27/2009
    NEPhilly, if the Reps want to be competitive in 2010, they need to start building their campaign organization NOW. Michael Steele is clearly not up to the task. That's why this is a relevant topic, along with the fact that the permanent Obama campaign organization is locked, loaded, and ready to roll like it did last November.
    Yersinia Pestis
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:36 AM, 03/27/2009
    Does the 'hard right' or 'christian right' not deserve a voice in our govt. & lawmaking bodies? Do they have less rights for their opinion to be heard than the 'hard left' or atheists or gays, etc.? I think the constitution protects their points of view (freedom of speech and all:) and allows them to organize and try to get their message out! If you disagree with them, don't listen:)
    NEPhilly
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:50 AM, 03/27/2009
    Jindal's point was that it was supposed to be a stimulus bill, not a pork specific bill. He wasn't repudiating the importance of volcano monitoring. And the Iraq war costs more than $140 million per day, that $140 million is still a lot of money, and if it is to be paid for by our taxes and included in a stimulus package, it should be put to use to actually try to stimulate the economy, not be used to try to curry favor with groups and get votes in future elections. His point is that with this bill, its wasteful and irresponsible. Liberals sound terrified of Jindal and try to attack on every little issue. He is just like Obama, only with some real knowledge and substance (i.e. he will not be dependent on a teleprompter for everything he says).
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:54 AM, 03/27/2009
    yersinia, right you are, but I think Steele and the house and senate committees are capable of getting the campaign apparatus up and running! You are also right about the permanent Obama campaign, but sooner or later he will have to stop campaigning, stop going on TV and actually lead the country! It is my belief that the Dems in congress will overreach (which it appears they did on the very 1st bill) their build up of the govt. and people will be sick of it by 2010 and look back to the repubs:) I think the American may be getting sick of the spending already! I believe America is a center-right country and as soon as the 'best and the brightest of liberalism' prove that the govt. is too inept, corrupt and inefficient to run their own cafeteria let alone huge chunks of the economy, the country will swing back to the GOP:) I predict the GOP will gain seats(usually the party out of power does), not lose them in 2010! We will see:)
    NEPhilly
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:01 PM, 03/27/2009
    pete, the President could have had one of his priorities passed already, if he had used the 'stimulus/porkulus' money ($787 Bil) to pay for one it! Instead he chose to let Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid write a bill that did nothing but payoff the democratic/liberal base! Usually Presidents get one crack at a priority program, Bush chose to use his political capital to pass tax cuts for all Americans, Pres. Obama chose use his political capital to pass a $787 Bil bill full of pork and goodies for his buddies in congress!
    NEPhilly
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:07 PM, 03/27/2009
    I hope you're enjoying reveling in the lack of leadership in the GOP. All of the above claims about the lack of GOP leadership are fair, although snide. Our country is in crisis on the verge of irreparable disaster, and it seems like coherent leadership somewhere is necessary. There must be some coherently stated opposition to the profligate spending platform, but the GOP has lost the bully pulpit on that. We're not seeing any restraint from the Obama administration. We get daily vacillations from a disorganized and ethics-tainted administration. (Inevitably, someone will argue "we got that from Bush too," so preemptively I must say "but America voted for CHANGE from that" and we're not getting it- we're not getting the centrist that was portrayed by the media, we're getting far-left ideology!). We went from bumbling President to one who needs teleprompting to state his positions or else he stumbles! Meanwhile, you guys in the FAILing media continue to paint this masturbatory portrait of Obama as a walking, talking motivational poster. Guess what! Leaders in other countries (some with hostile intentions, some opportunists) see the man residing at 1600 Pennsylvania ave who can't manage the helm of the existing govt, let alone the one he wants to increase vastly. The world is moving on from the dollar-we're just a sideshow. Even the communist and socialist countries think our govt is growing out of control. The USA, despite our failings, has stood as a roadblock for some bad folks in the world, and they're waiting for the right time to make their move. But hey, don't let that stop you from getting a "Rush is fat" line in (original). Bobby Jindal picked a bad example in the stimulus, but that doesn't mean there's not enormous wasteful spending that we're putting on a line-of-credit from our grandchildren. Your blog used to seem left-leaning with a thoughtful resonance, but now it seems like any other lefty blog with the same old talking points. Please wake up!
  • Comment removed.
  • Comment removed.
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:14 PM, 03/27/2009
    "let's check in on the Republicans" Why, so you can divert attention from a new administration that, putting it kindly, hasn't had an auspicious start. You sound like the typical braggart who's in for a fall. I'll be here to mark that occasion, if the DN is still in business.
    jmc
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:15 PM, 03/27/2009
    After Richard's spanking by the WSJ yesterday, of course he comes back with an angry, Olbermann-esqe, childish and irrelevant rant. That is how children respond. This piece of work by Richard today is Exhibit 1 on why the Inky is dying. Gotta love it.
    CD75


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
About Dick Polman

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.