PhillyTablet Inquirer Daily News
philly.com
email
font size
comments
128
options
 
Friday, October 9, 2009

 


When the news broke on my phone this morning that President Obama had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, my first thought was that the satirists at The Onion must have hacked into ATT just to make mischief.

My second thought was, "He won the whaaaaat?"

My third thought was that Glenn Beck must be spontaneously combusting.

My fourth and arguably most coherent thought was that this peace prize seems a tad premature, roughly akin to the Oscars crowd giving Dakota Fanning a lifetime achievement award.

Actually, the Nobel committee seems to have adopted the philosophy of Little League Baseball, where every kid on the team gets a trophy, regardless of whether he or she hits .500 or zip. The trophy is awarded not for actual achievement, but for the mere act of trying.

Obama is clearly aspiring to usher in an era of peace, but he hasn't achieved anything yet; it's fair to say that no president at the nine-month mark ever will. It's way too early to know whether his initial outreach efforts will bring peace (or, more realistically, a modicum of peace) to the Middle East, Iran, or Afghanistan. Indeed, Obama has yet to indicate how he even wants to proceed in Afghanistan. It's way too early to know whether he can bond the West and the Muslim world, or reduce the nuclear arsenals of major powers. Heck, he ordered the closure of Guantanamo, and the place is still open.

The Nobel rules stipulate that the peace prize should go "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations and the abolition or reduction of standing armies and the formation and spreading of peace congresses." The language appears to require that a recipient do something concrete ("shall have done the most or the best work"), but clearly the Norwegians have opted to honor Obama for his silver tongue and conciliatory tone - as if words are synonymous with achievement.

I assume that the Fox News talking heads will be exploding all weekend (Norway has a public option for health care!). And perhaps conservatives will demand that all Americans boycott Norwegian furniture; who knows, maybe they'll even demand that the Beatles' song title "Norwegian Wood" be changed to "Freedom Wood."

The rest of us can simply shake our heads and wonder, what's next? Dan Brown winning the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction?

 

Posted by Dick Polman @ 10:48 AM  Permalink | 128 comments
Comments   
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:53 AM, 10/09/2009
    This seems to me to be more about symbolism and a direct rebuke of the previous administration than anything President Obama has accomplished. If so I think the Nobel committee may have cheapened the prize.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:53 AM, 10/09/2009
    From the AP: “Rather than recognizing concrete achievement, the 2009 prize appeared intended to support initiatives that have yet to bear fruit." That pretty much tells you all you need to know, right there.
    jmc
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:55 AM, 10/09/2009
    From the last blog:) Congratulations to President Obama for winning the Nobel Peace prize after 8 months in office. I look forward to his 3rd autobiography to come out early next year tentatively titled, "The Audacity of my Ego".
    NEPhilly
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 10:55 AM, 10/09/2009
    And this; I wonder what US charity the President is going to donate the prize money too:) ***There were a record 205 nominations for this year's peace prize. Zimbabwean Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and Chinese dissident Hu Jia had been among the favourites. The laureate - chosen by a five-member committee - wins a gold medal, a diploma and 10m Swedish kronor ($1.4m).*** http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8298580.stm
    NEPhilly
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:03 AM, 10/09/2009
    If it makes Glenn Beck's head explode it will have been worth it!
    Yersinia Pestis
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:05 AM, 10/09/2009
    It is fun though to watch those who said the Olympic decision showed Obama's influence is waning attempt to spin the Nobel decision as inconsequential.
    anonymous
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:09 AM, 10/09/2009
    Who nominated him, I wonder? I read that the deadline for the nominations was early last February, so he had only been in office a few weeks at most. This is just strange.
    NigeltheMastiff
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:12 AM, 10/09/2009
    We live in a silly leftist world that rewards bald talk from a teleprompter (anybody could have done that) rather than courageous deeds forged with bravery, blood and sweat (and sometimes life itself). What an insult to people like MLK, Lech Walesa, Gahndi, and Nelson Mendela.
    CD75
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:19 AM, 10/09/2009
    Mr. Polman, you are right on the mark with this, "...clearly the Norwegians have opted to honor Obama for his silver tongue and conciliatory tone - as if words are synonymous with achievement." Let's not make the same mistake as the Nobel committee & remember that words do not equal actions. Words are easy, achievements are hard. Can this President achieve something, anything before we cannonize him and measure Mt. Rushmore for 1 more face? When Mr. Polman can't believe it or support it, something is amiss, mmm, mmm, mmm:)
    NEPhilly
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:23 AM, 10/09/2009
    The Obama's must be happy. They won 1.4 million dollars and roughly 40% of that will go to various sectors of the government. 36% directly to the IRS, 6% to social security etc etc etc
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:28 AM, 10/09/2009
    In recent years this award has become a political award and not an award for peace. Obama's policies of appeasement and coddling could well lead to less peace. The credibility of this award began deteriorating in 1994 when Yassar Arafat won the award.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 11:28 AM, 10/09/2009
    we shall see the results of the iniatives in the years to come. We have hope !!! Surely we have a better chance than when the US Foreign policy had a unilateralist tone !!! thankfully there is an adult in the Oval Office !!!
    ModerateMarge
  • Comment removed.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 12:05 PM, 10/09/2009
    Actually, by cancelling the ridiculous Cold War throwback missle system in Eastern Europe and working out a detente with Russia, Obama has accomplished far more for peace in 8 months than Bush did....er....ever. Remember, these are Europeans with a greater interest in European peace than far off wars. They greatly respect the difference between Bush, who actively fomented wars on Russia's border and threateningly attempted to put missle systems on its border (under the ridiculous excuse that missles aimed at Russia were to defend Poland from Iran) and Obama, who realizes that we have far more interests in common with Russia than in opposition to them and we should work for peace and cooperation. And is there anything more ironic than seeing neocon apologists like CD75 trumpet the accomplishments of MLK, Mandela and Ghandi? All of those guys would have considered Bush's foreign policy to be abhorrent.
    Palestra Jon


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  | 
About Dick Polman

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.