Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
TEXT SIZE: A A A A
Email this post | Back to Blog home
Friday, July 11, 2008

 

Three gifts this week for Barack Obama:

Jesse and the genitalia. The folks at Obama headquarters should be turning cartwheels. Jesse Jackson, by running his mouth on Fox News, has done Obama a tremendous political service.

Fairly or not, there are millions of white voters who need to feel more comfortable with Obama before they can commit to supporting him. If they somehow perceive that Obama is in thrall to Jesse and the old-guard civil rights leaders, they will not support him. They have never been comfortable with Jesse's style, or his victimhood ethos. And they weren't fans of Jesse when he ran for president; back in the 1988 primaries, Jesse drew only 12 percent of all the white voters.

This is why Jesse's off-camera outburst ("See, Barack's been talking down to black people...I wanna cut his nuts off") is such a gift to Obama. It's vivid evidence that Jesse has been politically marginalized, that time has passed him by, that his large and tender ego has been bruised, and that all he can do is lash out from the sidelines. Heck, even his own son publicly repudiated him. And wary white voters can now say to themselves, "If Jesse is this ticked off at Obama, that's a big compliment to Obama."

McCain without a clue (again). The other day, McCain surrogate Carly Fiorina tried to rally women voters to the Republican candidate by assailing the health insurance companies that cover Viagra for men but refuse to cover birth control for women. But when reporters caught up with McCain on his magic bus, and asked him whether he agreed with Fiorina's remarks, he didn't have the faintest idea what to say. (Don't take my word for it. Just watch.) Amidst all the writhing and grimacing, he also had no idea how he had voted on the issue in the past. But he did come up with this: "I certainly do not want to discuss that issue...I don't know enough about it to give you an informed answer."

To refresh McCain's memory: In the Senate he has twice opposed measures that would have required insurance companies to cover birth control prescriptions. These votes occurred in 2003 and 2005. (Granted, McCain has cast thousands of votes, and cannot be expected to remember them all. But I bet he has far less trouble recounting his votes on obscure defense appropriation measures. Because that's the stuff that most interests him.)

Hence, another gift to Obama. His Republican opponent just demonstrated that he is out of touch with many of the female voters he badly needs to woo. He twice voted against their interests, he can't remember doing it, and he'd prefer not to discuss the subject at all. Apparently, joking about bombing Iran is so much easier.

And lastly: McCain and his headshrinker. Did you know that the sharp economic downturn, the loss of jobs, the housing foreclosure crisis, and $4-a-gallon gasoline, are all mere figments of your imagination? So says John McCain's chief economic adviser.

Can there be a more effective way for a Republican campaign to convey the impression that it is out of touch with the lives of average Americans, than to have Phil Gramm (the ex-conservative senator, currently vice president of the giant Swiss bank UBS) declare in a newspaper interview that we are "a nation of whiners" suffering from "a mental recession?"

McCain naturally felt compelled yesterday to distance himself from his own economic guru, and insist that he disagreed with Gramm about the current state of affairs. But that merely prompts a new question, to wit:

If McCain doesn't buy Gramm's fundamental diagnosis of our (supposedly alleged) economic ills, then why is Gramm still serving as his chief economic adviser? 

The Obama people surely hope that Phil Gramm stays on the job.

 

Posted by Dick Polman @ 8:41 AM  Permalink | 45 comments
SAVE AND SHARE
Comments
Posted by jmc 09:56 AM, 07/11/2008
Gramm's presentation was poorly thought out, but his point is partially valid. Much of the upward and downward turn of the economy is based on perception. People may see problems with a segment of the economy as a problem with the entire economy and act accordingly. This may serve to weaken the economy as a whole when it's only certain things that require attention. Now some may not like it, but I gonna say it. The constant media drumbeat of negativity regarding the economy does not help either. I'm not advocating not reporting economic problems mind you, but as we all know the media like to make everything into and end of the world scenario, especially when those scenarios serve their political ends. So I think this is what Gramm was trying to say, but most people won't look at it like that, and that makes it a bad political move.
Posted by bon 11:05 AM, 07/11/2008
McCain was asked about a bill he voted against 5 years ago. He has voted on hundreds and hundreds of bills in that time period. To expect him to be able to recall his vote on such an obscure issue, and then explain his position on the spot, is the most dishonest kind of gotcha politics. (Ultimately, it seems McCain and Fiorina disagree on an issue. What is wrong with that, exactly?)
Posted by Gibba Mang 11:26 AM, 07/11/2008
Graham is exactely the type of politician McSame with surround himself with if he is elected President. And it's also interesting how the neococnuts are fine with his comments but blasted barak on his "bitter" comments. If the Republican party can ever stop being hypocrites, I would consider voting for them. But not this year!
Posted by birdsfaninnc 11:33 AM, 07/11/2008
really jmc? seriously stop with the "liberal media" garbage. gas prices are killing people. we're losing jobs. but we're a nation of whiners. none of this is actually happening. but at least the economy is growing so i guess it really is all in our heads. thank god. i just need to think positive and the economy is going to get better. i guess since mccain admits he doesn't know much about the economy that is the best solution he can offer to improve it. imagine if obama called the country a bunch of whiners. you would've gone off about how much of an "elitist" he is. I don't care about him not remembering his vote. but the fact of the matter is he still cast the vote. that should speak to his values.
Posted by yobill626 11:47 AM, 07/11/2008
Bad political move!?! Way to go, Phil --- blame it on the voters. Gramm's comments were among the stupidest I can remember. In fact, I laughed out loud when I heard them --- and this coming from an experienced former top politician? Did anyone else notice how pi$$ed off McCain was when he was making his "Gramm might be the Ambassador to Belarus" remark --- & could you blame him? Gramm's comments were much worse than McCain's own "100 years in Iraq" & Obama's "bitter" remarks, because quite frankly, both of those were taken out of the context they were made. Its not even going to help McCain that today is Friday --- these will be thrown in his face for many weeks to come.
Posted by bon 12:14 PM, 07/11/2008
birdsfaninnc: McCain did not say this, an adviser of his did. If McCain had said this it would be a big deal, just as if Obama had. But again, we are not talking about a candidate saying something politically stupid. We are talking about a candidate's adviser saying something politically stupid. It is not indicative of anything except for the fact that Phil Gramm is not a very good politician. (If you think 5.5% unemployment and 1% GDP growth is this bad you have a very short memory. In the real recessions of the early 80s we had double this unemployment and a GDP shrinking at 4 or 5%. Gramm is right when he says the economy is not so bad. He is just communicated it terribly.)
Posted by p-diddy 01:19 PM, 07/11/2008
Whining? We have an increasing number of layoffs, a massive foreclosure crisis, a gallon of gas is well over $4, food prices are up drastically, Freddie and Fannie are poised to crash and burn, and the Dow has hit a 2 year low, with no let up in sight. Throw in a couple costly wars. Let the good times roll! I have an idea for McCain's campaign slogan: "We're not Calcutta!"
Posted by yobill626 01:24 PM, 07/11/2008
Up until now, McCain has bragged about his having Phil Gramm as an advisor. Unfortunately for McCain, Gramm has shown himself to be woefully out of touch with most Americans. Gramm is firmly ensconced in the top end of the economic food chain, & unlike most Americans, doesn't live month to month. People having jobs isn't our problem --- the sharp rising costs of necessities not being matched by rising wages is. I don't think people have as much of an issue with Gramm making comments in an inarticulate way as much they do with the nasty, condescending attitude he presented with those comments. With all the recent focus on McCain's lack of understanding of the economy, its been McCain who initially had been referencing Phil Gramm's involvement in his campaign. Ooops John, apparently you're harboring an elitist!
Posted by yobill626 01:27 PM, 07/11/2008
p-diddy: "We're not Calcutta!". Hilarious!
Posted by Rauol Duke 01:41 PM, 07/11/2008
We know who the Whiners are; they are Phil Gramm's people, his fellow conservatives. Just look at the average conservative post, we need to serve cheese with them. Here are some of their whines, THE MEDIA IS LIBERAL whine, and even though these comments take second place Jesse Jackson comments. THEY NEVER REPORT THE GOOD THINGS IN IRAQ whine, even though they never report how we are paying off the Iraqis to not kill each other and we never report that 4,000,000 Iraqis are refugees and the Iraqis effectually segregated their country into three factions. The WE MUST DRILL MORE TO END THE OIL CRISIS whine, when our oil companies do not pump as much as then can and will not pump more even if we left them drill more holes. I could go on and on but I have a life, as for you conservatives, get a life or get some cheese to go with your whines.
Posted by phlcynic 01:51 PM, 07/11/2008
jmc, when my retirement account in one quarter loses more than I put in, that's not "perception" - I see it in black and white (should be red). All I can say is, my account soared during the Clinton years, and now it's tanking during Bush Jr, just like Bush Sr. I'm voting my pocket again this time - Democratic across the board.
Posted by frankg962 02:10 PM, 07/11/2008
I wonder if jmc and the rest of the McCain/Gramm apologists are adherents to the "power of positive intention" as espoused by Oprah and in that book, "The Secret?" All I have to do is click my heels together and repeat, there is no recession, gas is $1.35, there is no recession. Give me a break, it's not preception it's reality. What universe do you people live in?
Posted by tom - wilmington, de 02:24 PM, 07/11/2008
Mental recession....there have been 650 stories with the word recession in them just on the Philly.com site since the beginning of 2008. Now, take that with the fact we are not in a recession (as per the definition of the term), and the fact that in numerous polls people say they are better off financially than before, but view their neighbors as being worse off, and you get a "mental recession". But I guess many on this site know more than someone with a PHD in Economics as Gramm. To the genius who talked about unemployment, let's see. The average unemployment rate for the period 1993-2000 (a robust period of economic growth according to many on this site), the average unemployment rate was 5.2%, for the period 2001-2007, the average rate was 4.54% (with the inherited real recession from 2000 and the aftermath of 9/11). As for good things from Iraq being reported, what I read is about how Afghanistan is going to pot, very little about Iraq. Did anybody on this site see anywhere in the Inqy a story about Iraq now meeting most of their benchmarks? How about any mention about Obama's vote on the FISA bill the other day....did anybody read about it here? No? Imagine that. Drill for oil? Nah, I'll just wait 25-30 years for alternative energy instead of 10 or so for domestic oil. Better to ask other countries to pump more than to go and get it ourselves. As for McCain's vote, ED is a medical condition, and I'll agree they should cover birth control for women as soon as they cover condoms for men.
Posted by bon 02:39 PM, 07/11/2008
phlcynic: Bill Clinton and John McCain are both pro-trade. Obama is a protectionist. He will undo any of the good Clinton did. If you are assuming Obama will be the second coming of Clinton you will be very disappointed. ----- yobill626: McCain and Gramm are long-time friends. McCain will still proudly cite Gramm as an adviser (the man is a brilliant economist). Gramm is not a McCain spokesman, though, for obvious reasons.
Posted by danl 02:47 PM, 07/11/2008
Tom- there are medical reasons to take birth control. They include: severe cramps, irregular periods, lower occurence of uterine cancer, and control of ovarian cysts.
About Dick Polman

Cited by the Columbia Journalism Review as one of the nation's top political reporters, and lauded by the ABC News political website as "one of the finest political journalists of his generation," Dick Polman is a national political columnist at the Philadelphia Inquirer. He is on the full-time faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, as "writer in residence." Dick has been a frequent guest on C-Span, MSNBC, CNN, NPR and the BBC. He covered the 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 presidential campaigns.

ARCHIVES

All commentaries posted before April 18, 2008, can be accessed at www.dickpolman.blogspot.com.