Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Ted Nugent: Rock star, gun advocate and secret weapon for the Democrats

“Angry at the state of world affairs Angry at the fools that just don't care This is guaranteed to go nowhere Even like a dog, that's been abused I will never ever lose With the spirit of the wild inside of me I got the spirit of the wild runnin' free I got the spirit of the wild inside of me, Yea!” - Ted Nugent (Spirit of the Wild, 1995)

61 comments

Ted Nugent: Rock star, gun advocate and secret weapon for the Democrats

POSTED: Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 5:57 PM

“Angry at the state of world affairs
Angry at the fools that just don't care
This is guaranteed to go nowhere
Even like a dog, that's been abused
I will never ever lose

With the spirit of the wild inside of me
I got the spirit of the wild runnin' free
I got the spirit of the wild inside of me, Yea!”

- Ted Nugent (Spirit of the Wild, 1995)

At 7 p.m. tonight, rock star/gun rights advocate Ted Nugent will be attending President Obama's State of the Union speech. Immediately afterwards, he plans to hold a press conference to comment, according to his host, Texas Rep. Steve Stockman.

Last year, Nugent made headlines when he said in this video, “If Barack Obama becomes the president in November, again, I will be either be dead or in jail by this time next year.”

That incendiary statement led to a visit by the Secret Service the following week in which both Nugent and the Secret Service acknowledged that the issue had been resolved and that there had been no direct threat of violence toward Obama.

Chalk up one for free speech and one for proper investigation of intent.

Fast forward to tonight. Very quickly, a very serious State of the Union address is developing the potential to become a circus. On an evening in which we will honor a Sandy Hook elementary school teacher and a heroic police officer from the Sikh temple shooting, Ted Nugent’s presence will create an unnecessary distraction.

“This is the path that the NRA has taken since Sandy Hook. They don’t want to talk about guns. Instead, they’ve chosen to arm guards in schools, talk about violent video games and focus on mentally ill people,” said Shira Goodman, Executive Director of CeaseFirePA, a gun-control advocacy group in Pennsylvania.

Denise Clay, a Philadelphia-based political analyst, doesn’t believe that Nugent should be attending tonight’s affair, as she considered Nugent’s comment a threat. “One of the things the First Amendment doesn't guarantee is the right to threaten the President. He's [Nugent] done it at least once. The Dixie Chicks didn't physically threaten President Bush, and they didn't get a SOTU invite.”

But Jon Mirowitz, an attorney who teaches gun law at the PA Bar Institute, supports Nugent’s attendance. “Why shouldn’t he be there? He’s an invited guest. Why shouldn’t he be there?” Mirowitz, who also serves as the Philadelphia GOP’s 42nd ward leader, said he became a gun rights advocate in the 1960s after he was mugged on the George Washington Bridge (which connects northern Manhattan and Fort Lee, NJ). “Absolute [gun] bans have been ruled unconstitutional,” Mirowitz emphasized when asked about Nugent.

To me, a solid gun rights supporter, the problem is not Nugent – it’s Rep. Stockman. When you are a Congressman, you should have the common sense and good manners to choose an appropriate guest to represent your agenda. This move showed neither one. Instead, Stockman has turned tonight’s event into a media circus, where the TV cameras will be giving Stockman and Nugent all the attention their egos desire.

Instead of Nugent, there are plenty of intelligent choices Stockman could have made. How about loyal gun rights advocate Tom Selleck, which was recommended by Clay. Or a legitimate sportsman from Texas, as Goodman suggested.

I’ve got a better idea. How about calling in sick, Rep. Stockman, and taking your guest with you? Staying out of the limelight after threatening to impeach President Obama might be your wisest choice. In a time in which Republicans are still licking their wounds from November’s presidential defeat, the last thing the fatigued American voters want to hear about is another impeachment fiasco.


61 comments
Comments  (61)
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:13 PM, 02/12/2013
    LoL, leave it to Democrats to try and misdirect attention away from the failing economy.

    Per recent FBI statistics, modern rifles (aka "assault weapons" to our less informed brethren) account for less than 0.012% of all gun crime(1). Further that since 2007, "long guns", which includes "assault rifles", account for a decreasing amount of incidents across the country(2), while at the same time, "in 2011, there were 173 MORE murders committed with hammers and clubs than there were with guns(3).

    The FBI statistics concludes that people are more likely to be killed or assaulted with a hammer or clubs then they are an "assault weapon". Ironically, the number of crimes involving guns has decreased since the expiration of Clinton's "assault weapons ban".

    Now that we have established "gun crime" is not a prevailing issue in the US and that new gun laws only hinder law abiding citizens from legally owning a gun and/or legally defending themselves from the criminal or mentally ill, lets look at the economy and security. Under the Democrats over 6 yrs control of Govt:

    1) National Debt has exceeded $16 TRILLION (Obama alone over $6 TRILLION)
    2) Unemployment is over 14% (u6)
    3) China has surpassed the US as the worlds largest trader
    4) US has used drones to assassinate US citizens
    5) Under the draconian Dodd Frank Act, small biz. cannot find funding outside of SBA
    6) First assassination of a US Ambassador in over 30 yrs
    7) First downgrade of US debt...EVER
    8) NO reductions in spending exposing the dollar to the possibility of losing "World Reserve" status
    9) Assault on Bill of Rights every day....

    (1) - http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-11
    (2) - http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/united-states
    (3) - http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/01/03/fbi-hammers-clubs-kill-more-people-than-rifles-shotguns/
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:30 PM, 02/12/2013
    You lost the election, get over it as apparently you have gotten over Sandy Hook.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 6:51 PM, 02/12/2013
    Cuddles, get over yourself... the rest of us who support and defend the Bill of Rights already have.

    BTW, as tragic as Sandy Hook was, that event and 1000 like it, are an insufficient justifications to interfere with the very Amendment that virtually ALL the Founding Fathers collectively agreed with.

    To believe otherwise is a maleficent display of extreme arrogance and ignorance on the part of small minded myopic people like you.

    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:04 PM, 02/12/2013
    Saw an interview where both Justices Breyer and Scalia were together. They disagreed on whether the Constitution was a "living document"...I'll leave you to guess who supported "life".

    When this sacred peice of paper went into effect there was a "final compromise" and a mistake that wasn't corrected until the 1920's.

    The founding fathers though did place a phrase into the first sentence: "In Order to Form a More Perfect Union"

    Sandy Hook will no longer be a more perfect union.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:11 PM, 02/12/2013
    Once again, Cuddles has nothing by innuendo and jargon.

    In 2008, over 1,000,000.00 children were voluntarily aborted...where's your outrage there?(1)

    Right, hypocrite.

    (1) - http://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:06 PM, 02/12/2013
    As I've stated before, you've become a tired, broken record professor.

    Your pretentious comments have become predictable, drab and frankly unoriginal. You post the same FBI statistics, comparing hammers/clubs to guns over and over again yet you still don't get it.

    At this point, it's become spam and warrants no more responses.
    daxtremesolja
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:13 PM, 02/12/2013
    Dax - And these facts will keep reappearing until people like you are no longer publishing false data and information to confuse those who may not know.

    Get used to it...we are prepared for a long drawn out battle to ensure reason and liberty are not threatened by ignorance and misinformation for the likes of you.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:17 PM, 02/12/2013
    Yes, the long drawn out "battle" will end in November of 2014.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:21 PM, 02/12/2013
    Guess we'll see. If Democrats truly want a second civil war, they're on the right path to get it.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:31 PM, 02/12/2013
    Threatening violence when cornered with a more perfect union.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:34 PM, 02/12/2013
    Glad to see you're not willing to defend the Constitution.

    Thank goodness you weren't alive in 1776, you clearly would have been one of the loyalists to the crown.

    Coward.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:42 PM, 02/12/2013
    GOP: Guns Over People

    2014
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:45 PM, 02/12/2013
    Demoncrats - Enslaving a nation, one minion at a time.
    Professor1982
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 7:51 PM, 02/12/2013
    ...To promote the general welfare.
  • 0 like this / 0 don't   •   Posted 8:00 PM, 02/12/2013
    Right...under Democrats, MORE AND MORE people are on General Welfare...slaves to the government dole!

    Thanks for proving my point.
    Professor1982


View comments: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5
About this blog
John Featherman is a contributor at Philly.com and writes about politics and consumer-related issues. Reach John at john@featherman.com.

John Featherman
Blog archives: