Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  
share
email
print
font size
options
 
Activists display signs at the White House urging President Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel to lead efforts to cut greenhouse gases. The world climate conference is set for next month in Denmark.
ALEX WONG / Associated Press
Activists display signs at the White House urging President Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel to lead efforts to cut greenhouse gases. The world climate conference is set for next month in Denmark.
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Boycotts in U.S. and abroad signal climate-accord trouble

Africans stage a walkout in Spain. In D.C., GOP senators want more study, protest panel vote.

Boycotts on either side of the Atlantic yesterday showed just how difficult it will be to clinch an agreement on global warming next month.

At U.N. climate talks in Barcelona, Spain, African nations walked out of meetings to protest rich nations' reluctance to make substantial carbon-cutting commitments. In Washington, some conservative Republicans boycotted the start of committee debate on a bill to curb greenhouse gases, fearful of the cost to the U.S. economy.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, in a bid to support the Democratic-sponsored climate bill, told a rare joint session of Congress that "there is no time to lose" in tackling climate change.

But the lukewarm response to her comments on global warming - in contrast to the ovations she received at other times - underscored the skeptical mood in the United States about climate action, which would require a shift away from fossil fuels to wind and solar power, smaller cars, and - the Republicans argue - more expense to consumers.

GOP senators on the Environment and Public Works Committee shunned the planned start-up of voting on amendments to the bill. Only Sen. George V. Voinovich, (R., Ohio) showed up, for 15 minutes, to explain that Republicans demand a closer analysis of the bill's cost and impact on jobs.

African countries ended their boycott of meetings in Spain at U.N. climate talks, only after resetting the agenda to spend more time on complaints that industrial countries had set carbon-cutting targets too low for reducing global greenhouse-gas emissions.

The actions raise doubts on how much the 192-nation conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, will achieve during its Dec. 7-18 meeting, which is meant to adopt a treaty regulating carbon emissions that will shake economies around the globe.

The African revolt was largely symbolic, since it was clear industrial countries cannot alter their positions without high-level decisions by governments. But it was a signal that hard-liners would dominate talks by the developing countries at the Copenhagen forum.

The White House and Democratic leaders in Congress have essentially abandoned prospects of getting a climate bill to President Obama's desk before the Copenhagen meeting. But they hope a show of eventual progress in the Senate, along with the House having passed a bill and Obama's call for more fuel-efficient cars, will show the world the United States is taking climate change seriously.

Scientists say industrial countries should reduce emissions by 25 percent to 40 percent from 1990 levels by 2020, but the targets announced so far amount to far less than the minimum. The Africans say that new climate studies show the dangers are even greater than thought just a few years ago and that industrial nations should reduce emissions by at least 40 percent by 2020.

The U.S. delegation refuses to say what its figure will be until it gets a green light from Congress.

The Democratic bill that was to have gotten a hearing yesterday calls for cutting emissions from power plants and industrial facilities 20 percent by 2020 and 83 percent by midcentury. Polluters would be given pollution permits that they could trade among themselves to ease the economic effect of the transition from fossil fuels.

President Obama, after a day of meetings with the German leader and other European Union leaders, reiterated his determination to join an international climate regime. "The United States, Germany, and countries around the world, I think, are all beginning to recognize why it is so important that we work in common in order to stem the potential catastrophe that can result if we continue to see global warming continue unabated," he said.

The Copenhagen measure would succeed the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which called on 37 industrial countries to reduce heat-raising gas emissions by an average 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. It made no demands on developing countries such as India and China. The United States is the only country that has not signed on to the pact.

Comments   
Posted 07:27 AM, 11/04/2009
blackhawk90
The dirty little secret this article doesn't mention is the carbon credits that these African nations will receive and sell back to the U.S. industries. Free money for nothing. No wonder they are upset.
Posted 04:23 PM, 11/04/2009
bottomline
Also, many of the products created by our pollution benefit counties all over the world, including Africa. How many wealthy people in a poor country would do without air conditioning, television, automobiles etc. - none. As usual, population control and reduction is never on the table. Every person born represents a lifetime of pollution and a consumer of our dwindling natural resources. Why is this real fact of life never discussed by the people whom claim to be so concerned about the quality of life issues - politics as usual?
Posted 09:14 AM, 11/06/2009
roncee
Where does the rest of the world get the idea that the U.S. is a rich nation? That was true at one time but as a nation we are about three trillion dollars in debt now. I would hardly call a debtor nation rich, especially with a debt of such magnitude! I agree with blackhawk90; it's all about money or rather the transfer of it. How is allowing carbon emissions to continue as long as you pay for the privilege of doing it going to help anything? These poor nations continue their population explosions unabated, yet with every new birth there comes a being exhaling carbon dioxide into the atmosphere with each breath. I think this man-made climate change business is all a fraud anyway and people like Al Gore have positioned themselves to get filthy rich off it with this carbon cap and trade program they are touting. Mother Nature is going to do what Mother Nature is going to do and man be damned. Somehow the Ice Age melted without any help from mankind and I'm certain that one day there will be another Ice Age, also without any help from mankind. The earth's climate has been changing for millions of years and man comes along and starts keeping records for maybe a hundred years and suddenly we see warming trend and go bananas; get real!
3 comments
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Mount Airy


$95,900
6655 MCCALLUM ST #404
Rittenhouse Square


$1,350,000
2104 DELANCEY PL
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos