Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  

Opinion   

share
email
print
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Commentary

Teachers are made, not born

Educators need better training and on-the-job support. Too many are not prepared.

Every new teacher wants to believe four years of college and a degree in education are sufficient preparation for the tough job of teaching. In reality, new teachers need better training and support on the job to succeed, especially in urban districts such as Philadelphia's.

The Philadelphia Federation of Teachers is trying to bridge the gap between new teachers' theoretical knowledge and the demands of urban classrooms by offering its own professional development. The union developed an intensive induction program, Strong Beginnings, which provided 500 new teachers last summer with courses on classroom management, effective instruction, working with parents and communities, and more. Strong Beginnings instructors continue to support new teachers during the school year.

The union also offers courses taught by experienced teachers on classroom management, effective reading and math instruction, working with disruptive students, and more. We do not believe great teachers are born; rather, they are carefully, systematically cultivated through rigorous recruitment, preparation, induction, and continuous professional development.

For a decade, teachers have called on colleges and universities to strengthen teacher preparation. In 2000, the American Federation of Teachers issued a comprehensive report on the subject, recommending higher entry standards for teacher education programs, a greater focus on teaching techniques, a required major in the subject a student will teach, strengthened student-teaching programs, high standards for graduation, licensing and alternative-licensing programs, and improved teacher induction and mentoring.

Yet today, too many new teachers are underprepared and overwhelmed. New-teacher support is a crucial issue in the School District of Philadelphia, which hired 1,400 teachers and 200 counselors last summer and gave them their assignments without providing the support they'll need to be successful.

This is a costly mistake. American schools spend $7 billion a year on teacher recruitment, according to the National Commission on Teaching and America's Future, "draining resources, diminishing teaching quality, and undermining our ability to close the student achievement gap." In Philadelphia, the cost to recruit and train each teacher is roughly $17,000 - money and talent we cannot afford to waste. But the commission found that only 30 percent of the teachers the district hired in 1999 were still teaching in the city in 2005.

Every new teacher needs a comprehensive, coherent, and sustained new-teacher induction program and, more important, an on-site coach. Coaches work with new teachers on a sustained basis to improve their instructional skills in ways that raise student achievement, says recruitment expert Harry Wong.

Improving schools and closing the achievement gap requires stable, experienced teachers committed to their students and to the profession. We have to raise the standards for those entering and graduating from teacher education programs, and provide teachers with the support, resources, and respect they need to become successful career educators.

Retaining great teachers requires universities, school districts, and unions to work together to create lifelong learning opportunities that foster excellence among teachers and students.

 


Jerry T. Jordan is president of the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers.

Comments   
Posted 03:55 AM, 11/11/2009
camtheman
The teachers unions are one of the main problems in the public education system. They reward mediocrity and make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent teachers. Get unions out of education!
Posted 07:29 AM, 11/11/2009
theothersteveyoung
No matter how good the teacher, until our educational system recognizes that kids learn in different ways and different speeds, we will continue to hemorrhage student failure. Until we are willing to build curriculums around students instead of expecting them to develop through uniform standards and methods they don’t care about or understand, we’ll lose as many kids as we graduate. Until we learn what the student knows we cannot know how he can learn. The cost of more singular, project based learning is far less than the price society pays for its failure to ignite a student’s interest during the formative years. Steve Young www.greatfailure.com
Posted 07:36 AM, 11/11/2009
Magistra
camtheman, generalities such as yours are really non starters. Is there one thing in this essay with which you disagree and why? The union has always pushed for strong teacher preparation ...to avoid the hiring of incompetent teachers in the first place. The upgrading of admissions standards to education schools is a union idea and it is working. What is wrong with supporting rookie teachers as they take on inner city classrooms? Have you investigated the requirements for teacher certification in Pennsylvania? Go ahead, look it up. Have you investigated the requirements for KEEPING that certificate? Go ahead. Look it up. When you have done your homework, then get back and make comments.
Posted 07:48 AM, 11/11/2009
Magistra
steveyoung, good points. You are describing the standards of child centered teaching that the PDE has decided apply to every competent teacher: teach for understanding; apply real world connections; encourage critical and creative thinking; engage children in active learning; prepare lessons that are coherent and continuous; reflect and adjust. Those practices do not happen overnight but take years of undergraduate and graduate preparation plus experience and mentoring. They do not come with amateur teacher prep like Teach for America which is a business. They do not happen with test directed curriculum. Yes, teachers must be aware of how children learn and apply those techniques that work best with every child. One size does not fit all.
Posted 08:01 AM, 11/11/2009
aliveandwell
camtheman, I dare say that those who protest so loudly against unions are not fortunate enough to be protected by one. The PFT is the teachers' best friend and Dr. Ackerman's worst enemy, as it should be. If not for the union, teachers would be scrubbing school toilets and doing lunch duty instead of preparing to teach classes. The union protects teachers from the likes of Ackerman and others like her who hold teachers accountable for everything and parents and students accountable for nothing.
Posted 08:13 AM, 11/11/2009
legend1
3 EXCELLENT new teachers in my school (I am an 11 year veteran)and all 3 have made it clear they will not be there once they got a job in another district. It's always the case. The good ones do not want to deal with all of the extra BS and feel like they are being set up to fail.
Posted 08:31 AM, 11/11/2009
kitiara
Right on aliveandwell. I would have left the district 2 years ago if the union did not step and provide me with the support that the School District did not feel was necessary.
Posted 08:55 AM, 11/11/2009
TeachersRock
Aliveand well...I cold not agree more! Kitiara..I am glad they were able to help you. Teaching is a process that has to be developed over time. I considered myself a great teacher, but I would not have said that my first few years! It takes time and appropriate professional development to enhance a teacher's abilities. It is not an easy job nor for the weak teaching anywhere, but especially in urban districts. The public really has no clue what teachers endure on a daily basis. If you know a Philadelphia teacher ask them to share some experiences and I am sure they will overflow with stories you never thought possible. Are there teachers who should be exited from the profession? Absolutely! Is the union aware of that? I am sure they are! But the union is not the enemy, we want conditions that make learning possible and the SDP is known for putting up road blocks to that! If suspensions levels are high principals feel pressure not to suspend so , if a child threatens to kill someone they are back in class tomorrow. Those are the real problems with this district! 33 children in a class....need I say more. The union is an EASY scapegoat, but so not the problem at all!
Posted 08:57 AM, 11/11/2009
tcorabi
I agree with legend1 whole heartedly. I know several new teachers over the last 2 years who have left the School District of Philadelphia for lower paying Charter Schools, 2 new teachers who left for completly new professions and at least 3 new teachers this school year who have also stated they will be leaving the District as soon as something better comes along. I am committed to the City of Philadelphia's children but something needs to be so that the teachers are able to use various authentic, real world applicable assignments in school where meaningful content can also be presented to the students in learning styles that suit them instead of forcing them to confirm to activities that basically translate into test prep. The real ways to keep new teachers and for that matter, the real ways to improve education overall is to hold students and parents accounatable for the lack of effort, lack of work, lack of support and continual disruptive, dis-respectful behavior. Administration and Teachers along with support staff should all be on the same team trying to help the students of the District but nothing will matter until the students and parents are held accountable. If the students came to school ready to learn, at least ready to follow simple directions and give their very best effort, then new teachers would have a much easier job and be more willing to stay in the District. ALL students would achieve But...this may be a fantasy.
Posted 09:40 AM, 11/11/2009
legend1
For example, some of the new teachers at my school were flat out lied to. One was told they were teaching 3rd grade, only to find out they were a "floating" reading prep teacher. Anyone with experience knows what those "floating" prep positions are like. Kid is a great new teacher, but is now completely frustrated because he was lied to and given the worst schedule of classes in the school. It really isn't brain surgery that if you treat professionals with respect and solid compensation, they will want to stay.
Posted 11:00 AM, 11/11/2009
Jame
Only schools with five or more new teachers are allocated a "New Teacher Coach" in Philadelphia, which leaves most new teachers without any support. Of the lucky ones assigned that "New Teacher Coach," they may enjoy one, two, maybe three brief visits over the year, as the NTCs are also overwhelmed. The new teachers' real mentors will be any veteran teacher who, seeing them struggle, reaches out to them. This happens quite a lot, but there are no guarantees. The Literacy Intern program Paul Vallas disbanded several years ago was an excellent way to ensure the training of skilled teachers. It would be most worthwhile to bring it back, rather than abandon our newest colleagues to the ineffective "sink or swim" method of acquiring job experience.
Posted 01:18 PM, 11/11/2009
legend1
I was a Literacy Intern in 1999. Here I am 11 years later and I want to still teach in Philadelphia. It was a great program and it needs to be revisited.
Posted 02:57 PM, 11/11/2009
Magistra
All these comments by experienced teachers affirm that new teachers respond well to supportive situations. They need more than the sink or swim approach..of course.
Posted 05:56 PM, 11/11/2009
pointguard
a new district teacher gets a lot of advice from the "experienced" teachers: don't break up fights, don't wake up sleeping students, don't do anything that you don't get paid for. new teachers do take less pay to work at a charter school because they often find a more professional, colaberative environment. management is more supportive in charters and everyone is on the same page. that's why they perform beter than district schools. the union should make it a priority to make sure that nonperformers are sent on to their next careers and that top performers are rewarded for their merit. the performance based phillies are considering dumping cole hamels. if they were the district, they'd still have mitch williams.
Posted 11:09 PM, 11/11/2009
gtown_teach
pointguard, are you serious? You obviously never taught in any school, and have no idea what you're talking about. Charter schools do not require teachers to be highly qualified, and have an exemption for hiring so many teachers that do not have the correct certifications to teach in those subjects. Also, Charters simply remove students that are behavioral problems, or are academic problems. Public schools do not have the luxury of removing any students from the school (unless they bring a gun to school). Oh, and about merit pay, take a look at the Chicago public schools how Duncan messed up that district. Now Duncan is trying to "rescue" the CPD by offering them Federal stimulus money if they go to merit pay programs and such. He's a fraud, and his agenda is to simply destroy unions in education. Merit pay would make teaching a transient profession, and nobody would ever stay long enough to get results. Sure, merit pay might look good on paper, but there are way too many holes in the system to be fair.
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Southwark


$699,900
810 S MILDRED ST
West Philadelphia


$89,900
21 N 59TH ST
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos