Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  

Opinion   

share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
City taxpayers pay 20 percent more than the median for Sheriff John D. Green´s office.
City taxpayers pay 20 percent more than the median for Sheriff John D. Green's office.
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Editorial: Pretty offices, all in a row

Why should taxpayers in Philadelphia pay top dollar to carry out routine government functions such as running sheriff's sales, conducting elections, and filing deeds and other court papers?

The price tags for these functions are inflated, in part, because they're handled by four independent row offices headed by six elected officials.

So these row offices - sheriff, city commissioners, clerk of quarter sessions, and register of wills - are a vestige of City Hall days- gone-by that Philadelphia can afford no longer.

That's the compelling conclusion of a report from the city's fiscal oversight agency. The study, by the Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperation Authority (PICA), bolsters the case for getting rid of the offices - a move that could save taxpayers millions now spent propping up political and patronage fiefdoms.

In March, the government watchdog group Committee of Seventy issued its own call for eliminating the six elected posts and consolidating the functions under the city's mayor.

Mayor Nutter also is considering the move as part of what he has pledged will be "a complete restructuring and reform" of municipal operations - all the more urgent now, given the latest budget woes.

While each of the row offices has come under attack in recent years for various shortcomings, the PICA study for the first time quantifies the potential savings from scrapping what Seventy calls "six obscure and patronage-laden . . . elected positions."

PICA found that the spending by the four offices was above the median cost for the 14 other most populous Pennsylvania counties.

City taxpayers pay a premium that runs 20 percent higher for Sheriff John D. Green's office, more than 50 percent higher for Clerk of Quarter Sessions Vivian T. Miller's office, nearly double at the three-member elections agency under its chair, City Commissioner Margaret Tartaglione, and double for Register of Wills Ronald R. Donatucci's office.

By eliminating the elected posts and moving their functions to city agencies or the courts, PICA says, the city could save up to $15 million a year if costs were brought in line with the median spending.

In addition to citing the costs, PICA officials note that the row offices currently operate largely under the radar, with too little accountability.

Even as Seventy credits Donatucci with a customer-friendly approach - and the elections board made the trouble-free conversion to new voting machines - as a group, the row offices often come under fire.

Sheriff Green's tongue-in-cheek motto - fake it 'til you make it - has seemed an all-too-realistic description of his stewardship when audits rapped his internal controls on handling money. Ditto for Miller in the clerk's office.

For their part, the city commissioners recently have been faulted for overpaying election workers and personnel policies. And the register of wills' all-patronage operation "reinforces the stereotype of patronage and corruption," according to PICA.

What PICA recommends hardly qualifies as a radical reform; Allegheny County voters made the move four years ago. The state's second-largest county saves about $1.2 million a year after eliminating several offices.

In Philadelphia, the only plausible explanation for retaining these row offices would be that city leaders want to remain stuck in the past - and they're happy to stick taxpayers with the bill.

Comments   
Posted 08:48 AM, 11/09/2009
joedog
Green has been a character that his officers should be chasing down.
Posted 10:13 AM, 11/09/2009
Ben Dover
put the question on the ballot this april, stop the waist of taxpayers money now. next up should be city council. eliminate the 10 not at-large members and there is another $10 million taxpayers dollars saved per year. why are 17 people needed on city council at a cost to taxpayers of over $18 million per year? between the elimination of 4 row offices and reduction of city council members, there is a savings of $25 million taxpayers dollars per year.
Posted 01:30 PM, 11/09/2009
joseph shay stivala
Some people never question what appears in print. PICA said that the row offices offices spend more than the 14 other most populous Pennsylvania counties. Philadelphia is the ONLY Class "A" city in the Commonwealth. NATURALLY our costs and population are greater. It is very fashionable right now to attack the row offices. But doing away with them eliminates representative government. Plus it is a power grab placing maybe $8B in budget and contracts under a SINGLE person.
Posted 01:40 PM, 11/09/2009
joseph shay stivala
It is interesting to note that we know (and the Inquirer knows) the names of the row office holders. A constituent can call them to pet- ition the government for redress of grievances as set forth in the US Constitution. Who is the nameless, faceless person that wrote the editorial(?). Did they hold themselves out to be elected by the peo- ple of our city or possible suburban retreat? Should we wipe out all elected offices and ask Vladamir Putin to be City Manager? Yet only two blogs were inspired by the nameless writer. They won't post this.
Posted 01:42 PM, 11/09/2009
citylumberjack
Joseph, what the PICA report stated was that the row offices spend more PER CAPITA SERVED. That is a relatable statistic, and while the woes of Philly may be different than Scranton or Erie, the row offices are definitely way too full of underachieving underqualified patronage positions perpetuated by the political machines and the unstated desire of many Philadelphians that a job to get paid to do nothing is desirable. That's the real crux of the matter - the complete lack of values. Too many City workers - row offices or not - are just too darn happy to sit and do nothing while collecting their paycheck. (I know, I work with some.) While I agree that patronage jobs should be completely eliminated, workplace rules for all City employees should be more performance-based, or you get the door!
Posted 04:01 PM, 11/09/2009
pj katauskas
Why in the world do the offices of Sheriff, Clerk of Quarter Sessions, Register of Wills, City Commissioners, which do administrative and clerical functions, need to be "representative?" It's just more patronage for the party in power, D, of course. Which will explain why those offices will be there forever.
6 comments
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Rittenhouse Square


$349,900
2200-28 ARCH ST #816
Center City


$487,900
1101 LOCUST ST #3G
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos