Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  

Opinion   

share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
A 175-foot tall drilling rig in Lycoming County is looking for natural gas.
MICHAEL S. WIRTZ / Staff Photographer
A 175-foot tall drilling rig in Lycoming County is looking for natural gas.
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Editorial: Shale game

A boom in natural gas drilling in Pennsylvania will ease energy demands and boost the state economy. But there's reason to be concerned that environmental regulators won't be able to keep up with this new gold rush.

Natural gas deposits trapped miles underground in bedrock called the Marcellus Shale in the northeastern United States could hold enough to supply the entire country for 15 years.

A relatively new drilling technique enables natural gas operators to extract the gas from the shale beds. Known as hydraulic fracturing or "fracking," the process pumps up to four million gallons of water mixed with sand and chemicals into the ground at high pressure to break apart the rock and release the gas.

Fracking is used safely in most oil and gas operations, but it does contain risks, including well and stream pollution from the salty water that returns to the surface.

These concerns led New York's regulators to conduct an environmental-impact statement on Marcellus drilling, issuing an 800-page scientific analysis and calling for public comment.

New York's proposal lays out buffer zones for drilling near water supplies, requires drillers to disclose the chemical composition of their fracking fluids, and sets guidelines for fluid disposal.

Pennsylvania has no specific laws on Marcellus drilling, relying instead on updating older drilling rules. The Department of Environmental Protection has hired more inspectors and centralized the permit process. But a more comprehensive overhaul, with citizen input, is needed.

Drilling permits are flying out of DEP's doors. Through Sept. 30, 1,340 Marcellus permits were issued and 385 wells drilled - more than double the number from last year. And the just-completed state budget requires the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources to raise $60 million by leasing up to 10,000 more acres of public forest land to drillers in the next year, a goal driven by a revenue grab rather than environmental stewardship.

Despite the drilling boom and accompanying environmental risks, Gov. Rendell unwisely backed off his own proposal to impose a severance tax on gas production. Senate Republicans oppose it, but it's a more sensible, long-term way to raise money for environmental protection than leasing state forest land.

Meanwhile, DEP took a significant budget cut this year - 27 percent. DEP Secretary John Hanger says federal aid and increased fees paid by drillers make up a larger share of DEP's budget, so the cuts will not affect oil and gas inspection and enforcement. Nevertheless, DEP is planning layoffs and cuts, not a comforting formula for enhanced environmental protection overall.

DEP last week revoked three permits for drilling sites in northern Pennsylvania after the Chesapeake Bay Foundation challenged them for containing technical flaws. CBF lawyer Matt Royer has accused DEP of creating a "fast-track, rubber-stamp permit review process." Is he right?

The state's deposits of natural gas hold great promise. But a more comprehensive environmental plan is needed to ensure this drilling is done right.

 

Comments   
Posted 07:08 AM, 11/02/2009
meteo30
You want a good comparison of the NY DEC and PA DEP programs? Compare the number of PHDs and technical analysis positions on staff to provide environmental assessments.
Posted 08:27 AM, 11/02/2009
bill at
The liberal motto: See something...tax it. Twice, if possible.
Posted 09:13 AM, 11/02/2009
Ben Dover
the state needs to tax these companies for the free gas that they are drilling for and these companies should be required to have escrow accounts for any damage that the enviroment sustains.
Posted 09:28 AM, 11/02/2009
akh
Ben, How the heck is the gas "free"? The companies have to pay for permits, pay the surface owner for damages, and pay the mineral rights owners for access. Adding "special taxes is a sure way to slow activity and keep us from using our own domestic reserves. I am all for the DEP adding the people they need to adequately analyze and examine the proposed drilling, but giving the typically uninformed or misinformed public a seat at the table is a mistake.
Posted 09:28 AM, 11/02/2009
akh
Ben, How the heck is the gas "free"? The companies have to pay for permits, pay the surface owner for damages, and pay the mineral rights owners for access. Adding "special taxes is a sure way to slow activity and keep us from using our own domestic reserves. I am all for the DEP adding the people they need to adequately analyze and examine the proposed drilling, but giving the typically uninformed or misinformed public a seat at the table is a mistake.
Posted 10:46 AM, 11/02/2009
Eric
Protect the forest and wildlife. Go slow.
Posted 12:32 PM, 11/02/2009
drhoagie
A comprehensive plan needs to be done right know to determine how much of a financial impact federal and state regulators cost the private sector. If it is more than $1, we need to ax them all so progress can be made.
Posted 06:35 AM, 11/03/2009
drklassen
akh: Do you seriously believe they will pay *anyone* for any damage they do?! They have teams of lawyers on retention whose only job is to make sure that never happens---how many land owners have the time and money to fight a corporation in the courts? And bill at: the conservative motto seems to be: you're on your own, good luck!
Posted 10:53 AM, 11/03/2009
obviousman#1
drklassen, you are correct that could be a GOP motto and there is nothing wrong with it. We should be on our own.
9 comments
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Bala-Cynwyd


$492,600
Corinthian
West Philadelphia


$57,300
5146 RENO ST
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos