Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  

Opinion   

share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Editorial: No desire for streetcars

A plan to restore trolley service along East Market Street to link Center City with the Delaware River waterfront seems problematic on several fronts.

Beyond the danger of snarling downtown traffic, the surface line would duplicate service provided by buses and the Market-Frankford subway.

Another big-picture concern is that any plan to run trolleys up and over I-95 would saddle the waterfront for decades with the ugly, existing scissor ramps leading down to Columbus Boulevard.

Straddling I-95 with a new rail bridge might also deter city officials from pursuing a better solution for the highway: to bury or cover it. As long as I-95 stands as a barrier to Center City, it will complicate and possibly stymie efforts to create the thriving waterfront envisioned by Mayor Nutter and city planners.

There are other problems as well: The projected ridership is low. As such, the project fails to qualify for federal funding. At an estimated cost of $500 million, a big question is where will the money come from?

Delaware River Port Authority officials are banking on the city's congressional delegation to change the funding formula in Washington in order to qualify for federal funds. That's not a slam dunk.

For now, DRPA is moving forward with its plan, announced last week, to use Market Street as the Center City link to the waterfront. The next stage is a two-year process during which DRPA staff plan to do preliminary engineering and environmental studies.

In the first stage, trolleys would run along tracks in the middle of Columbus Boulevard from Pier 70 north to Girard Avenue, linking two casinos planned for the waterfront. It is hoped that the project will be more than a casino run.

Any trolley service should be part of the master plan for the waterfront that's being developed by the Delaware River Waterfront Corporation. The design of the route into Center City should be coordinated with that planning effort. If that means delaying the rail line, then bus service could be used in the interim.

It would make more sense for riders to reach Second Street on the El, then transfer to the waterfront line - preferably underground. That would meet the goal set by Nutter's transportation deputy, Rina Cutler, to tie in the new line with the main transit system.

To his credit, DRPA chief John Matheussen says his agency will look at using the subway line along Market Street. Since there's no federal money yet for this project, there's ample time to get the design right.

Comments   
Posted 09:43 AM, 11/02/2009
NotADoneDeal
Rendell is petrified that any casino that opens in Philly will do even worse than the Pittsburgh casino; hence the proposed trolley. It won't work. Any casino that opens will go under.
Posted 11:01 AM, 11/02/2009
dreinterests
how about the bouelvard extension that woudl have qualified for federal funds?
Posted 12:45 PM, 11/02/2009
crboyle1
The city's transit priorites are way out of line. A Broad Street Line extension would be smarter, or even a waterfront trolley that connects better with other transit, or serves an corridor that isn't
Posted 01:37 PM, 11/02/2009
intelliwoman
Nothing they can do will improve the transit in this city anyway. Its one of the most expensive in the country, the service is horrible,many of the trains were bought from other transit agencies that had them on the trash heap, the stations are filthy and unsafe, nothing ever runs even close to on time, you have to wait 30-40 minutes during rush hour for service on a major line, the employees have no idea wht customer service is, and the prices are so outrageous because the union has a stranglehold over them. They need to scrap the system and start over.
Posted 02:26 PM, 11/02/2009
nobodycares
"Yeah, it won't work"...just look at the River Line in New Jersey. That's not working either. Dummies in Philly leadership...and those Septa bus drivers are so courteous...
Posted 04:45 PM, 11/02/2009
Catch22
We can all count on one thing. Those patronage nitwits at the DRPA will take us for a ride.
Posted 07:43 PM, 11/02/2009
turkytom
intelliwoman, I disagree, SEPTA has it's warts, but it's among the top transit systems in the country, in both cost and service. Are there better?? Sure, and far worse as well. Overall, I feel lucky. I use it everyday for my commute, and have few complaints.
Posted 10:08 PM, 11/02/2009
Ben9
turkeytom: you are so right. intelliwoman: SEPTA has exactly one train it bought used, for an express on the Paoli line to free up other equipment (necessary because more and more people are using Regional Rail) while it waits for new trains to be delivered shortly. Yeah, some of the stations need cleaning (and some parts of the concourse are owned by the city) but as for "nothing ever runs even close to on time"--get real. You lose credibility when you grossly exaggerate. Frequency is mostly based on ridership, and that's why they print schedules. If SEPTA were run like a business, as everyone keeps saying it should, there would be a LOT less service.
8 comments
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Rittenhouse Square


$389,000
1728 CHESTNUT ST #1
Center City


$998,000
1111 LOCUST ST #11B
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos