Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  

share
email
print
font size
options
 
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has confessed to a role in attacks.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has confessed to a role in attacks.
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


N.Y. trial ordered for 9/11 detainees

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four others will face federal trial just blocks from ground zero.

WASHINGTON - Attorney General Eric Holder, rejecting concerns about security, announced yesterday that confessed 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four alleged underlings will face a federal court trial in New York just blocks from the scene of the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history.

Holder said he had elected to forgo military trials and instead to proceed with the first U.S. criminal prosecution of figures alleged to have been directly involved in the suicide hijacking plot eight years ago that targeted the World Trade Center and the Pentagon because of his full confidence in a "successful outcome."

He said he expected to ask for the death penalty.

Americans, especially families of the 2,872 people who were killed on Sept. 11, 2001, "deserve the opportunity to see the alleged plotters of those attacks held accountable in court, an opportunity that has been too long delayed," he told reporters.

The case will force the court to confront a host of tough issues, including rough treatment of detainees, intelligence disclosures, and the potential spectacle of terrorists disrupting proceedings. U.S. civilian courts prohibit evidence obtained through coercion, and a number of detainees were questioned using harsh methods some call torture.

Civil rights groups hailed the decision; Republican critics and others decried it. Administration officials said the decision was a "significant step" toward fulfilling President Obama's campaign promise to close the detention center at the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

"The transfer of these cases is a huge victory for restoring due process and the rule of law, as well as repairing America's international standing," said Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the ACLU.

Congressional Republicans accused the Obama administration of returning to a pre-Sept. 11 mentality of responding to terrorism as if it were criminal activity rather than a war on the United States.

House Republican leader John A. Boehner of Ohio said the possibility that the accused terrorists "could be found not guilty due to some legal technicality just blocks from ground zero should give every American pause."

Pentagon and Justice Department officials said privately that in the unlikely event of an acquittal, authorities would have the ability not to release a defendant into the U.S. population.

Family members of Sept. 11 victims also were divided.

"We have a president who doesn't know we're at war," said Debra Burlingame, whose brother, Charles Burlingame, was the pilot of the hijacked plane that crashed into the Pentagon. She said she was sickened by "the prospect of these barbarians being turned into victims by their attorneys."

Valerie Lucznikowska, whose nephew died at the World Trade Center, said she wouldn't care if the suspects sounded off in court - as long as the victims' families got to see them put on trial.

"What are words? It was a horrible thing to have 3,000 people killed," she said.

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said he spoke to Holder and supported holding the trials in his city.

Holder said he had decided that five other Guantanamo detainees would stand trial before military commissions, including Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, who is accused of orchestrating the October 2007 attack on the USS Cole in Yemen that killed 17 U.S. sailors and injured 39 others.

"To the extent that there are political consequences, I'll just have to take my lumps," he said.

He said he decided to bring Mohammed and the other four before a civilian court rather than a military commission because of the nature of the undisclosed evidence against them, because the 9/11 victims were mostly civilians, and because the attacks took place on U.S. soil.

"I will say that I have access to information that has not been publicly released that gives me great confidence that we will be successful in federal court," he said.

He said a grand jury indictment soon would be returned against Mohammed, who has admitted to spearheading the planning; Ramzi Binalshibh; Waleed bin Attash; Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi; and Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali.

All five have been held for years at Guantanamo Bay.

Asked about the decision at a Tokyo news conference, Obama said: "I am absolutely convinced that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will be subject to the most exacting demands of justice."

Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, praised Holder's decision, saying that federal courts have proved "time and time again" they're "capable of trying high-profile terrorism and national security cases."

Kirk Lippold, former commander of the USS Cole, who is now a senior military fellow at Military Families United, praised the decision to refer for military trials alleged mastermind Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri and four others suspected of attacking the ship.

"It is certainly a step in the right direction for the Obama administration to at last recognize the value and legitimacy of military commissions in dealing with the remaining . . . detainees," he said.

The Justice Department later said the four defendants, in addition to Nashiri, who are to be tried before military commissions are Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Haza al-Darbi, Noor Uthman Mohammed, Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud al-Qosi and Omar Ahmed Khadr.


This article includes information from the Associated Press and Washington Post.

Comments   
Posted 09:07 AM, 11/14/2009
Kaiser Sosa
Another great idea from the community agitator from the cesspool of Chicago. Are people starting to understand that this man is an idiot?
Posted 09:26 AM, 11/14/2009
GetEmGood
Why are those on the right so afraid of this? Aren't we the Home of The Brave? We've prosecuted many terrorists here, all successfully. This is by far the right thing to do. Man up, wussies!!!
Posted 09:47 AM, 11/14/2009
lefty
Ten Moh****ds to be tried: five by a civilian court and five by a military commission. Why? Because "Eric the Holder," Purveyor General of the United States, "...has full confidence in a 'successful outcome.'" Yikes, he's predicting an outcome! You bet, a circus outcome, muddled by islamic fundenmentalist babble. Worse, will be the world stage (oop, forum) for the rest of America haters, including European relativists desirous of anything that indicts and embarrasses the United States. They'll be out in large numbers on "Mumia Blvd" celebrating our stupidity. Unfortunately, the Obama administration's foolhardy decision will not assuage France or Spain, nor the muslim populations around the globe, Moon and Mars. Arab media will still demonize America, including those who coddle. They'll laugh as they ponder why America's leaders would grant civilian status to renegade terrorists. Muslims will celebrate their heroes by professing to Allahu that they will double their efforts to conceive more soldiers of Islam. All this, while the majority of Americans remember this pending embarrment when they go to the polls. As for Michael Bloomberg who supports having the moh****ds being tried in NY, well he's busy printing up "FREE MOH****D" T-shirts for NY street vendors.
Posted 10:22 AM, 11/14/2009
blackhawk90
Why the nice picture of KSM? Is the Inquirer playing politically correct by not showing the hairy, beardless pig in a T shirt?
Posted 11:27 AM, 11/14/2009
RonaReagan
As a dumb, ignorant conservative I need one of our liberal breathren to enlighten on the luminescent brilliance of Obama. First, what happens if KSM is found innocent on a technicality that wouldn't apply in a military tribunal? What good from a criminal trial could outweigh that disaterous scenario? If Holder has such great confidence of a successful outcome, is the opinion about the United States of the 3rd world and France, which liberals care sooo much about, really going to change? Aren't they going to view the outcome as preordained? Finally, if I'm not mistaken the 9/11 attacks included the Pentagon. Isn't that the headquarters of the U.S. military? How is that different from attacking a U.S. warship? Did somebody turn the Pentagon into condos in 2000? One caveat before responding, your answers must contain logic.
Posted 11:32 AM, 11/14/2009
mike l
Wussie righties hiding under the bed again. "Please don't bring them here! They scare us!" kaiser, this is a great idea by our president. To show the worls that we are the greatest country on earth and fear nothing (well, at least those not conservative). Despite what the hypocritical repubs say, this is not a war. This was an attack not brought about by a nation. We tried the original WTC bombers in civil court. How come they didn't cry then? We've sent charles manson, john gotti, nicky scarfo, timothy mcveigh, etc., etc. to jail after civil trials. These mass killers either died there or are still incarcerated. So why do conservatives want to reduce this country to a bunch of namby-pamby cowards, their level I guess. If you don't like our laws, go to putin's russia or Iran or N. Korea as you seem to favor their laws more than ours. Why do conservatives hate America?
Posted 11:32 AM, 11/14/2009
mike l
Wussie righties hiding under the bed again. "Please don't bring them here! They scare us!" kaiser, this is a great idea by our president. To show the worls that we are the greatest country on earth and fear nothing (well, at least those not conservative). Despite what the hypocritical repubs say, this is not a war. This was an attack not brought about by a nation. We tried the original WTC bombers in civil court. How come they didn't cry then? We've sent charles manson, john gotti, nicky scarfo, timothy mcveigh, etc., etc. to jail after civil trials. These mass killers either died there or are still incarcerated. So why do conservatives want to reduce this country to a bunch of namby-pamby cowards, their level I guess. If you don't like our laws, go to putin's russia or Iran or N. Korea as you seem to favor their laws more than ours. Why do conservatives hate America?
Posted 12:19 PM, 11/14/2009
2012 ~ Ron Paul
They found Bin Laden?...oh no wait I forgot, he's just a myth. We Americans are easily convinced of non-sence.
Posted 01:16 PM, 11/14/2009
Tomme
1
Posted 01:24 PM, 11/14/2009
Tomme
Mike I...Have you ever watched the movie "The Wizard of Oz"? You remind me so much of the Scarecrow character. Like him, it appears that you are also missing a brain. You compare domestic criminals like Gotti and Manson to foreign terrorists captured in a war zone in Afganistan. Do you know the diference between an apple and an orange? It's hurtful to think that we could have had a decisive, accomplished person as president like Hillary Clinton, and instead elected this glorified, community organizer, flim-flam man.
Posted 02:08 PM, 11/14/2009
lefty
GetEmGood>>>> You certainly don't live up to your macho nom de plume. Nevertheless, I'll try a third time to get my reply to you and Mikey. It's not a fear of a civilian trial that irks Americans, it's the notoriety that it will produce. Now keep in mind, I'm not concerned with liberals' attitudes, nor do I fret over whether Khalid is executed. You see, he expects to go to the gallows. It's the circus-like atmosphere and the worldwide exposure that this warrior of Islam and his cohorts are going to receive. He bragged to all that he was the master draftsman of 9/11 proving what, his desire to be found innocent? Nah, I don't think so. I do think that he wants to be able to reach all(most) of the non-terrorist fundementalists that what he did, he did for his god and his people. Again he has outsmarted the brightest of the bright by getting our pandering AG, Eric Holder, to declare that thes five animals receive the same rights provided to AMERICAN CITIZENS. Of course, we already know that Holder is begotten to Obama, who's begotten to ??? What's more interesting is how the very people who demanded that Bush recognize these murderers as military combatants instead of "detainees," now oppose their being tried in a more restricted military setting. Talk about misdirected logic. But why? Why do liberals favor the civil milieu over the military one? My theory is that they can punish GWB by vicariously getting it off with a trial where innuendo and twisted logic prevail. So, go out and by your popcorn, but leave one hand free for you know what!
Posted 02:46 PM, 11/14/2009
Tomme
lefty...Well stated.
Posted 02:52 PM, 11/14/2009
2012 ~ Ron Paul
The terrorist guy in that picture looks like a Jim Henson muppet...with a name like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who can make any sence about terrorists? Nobody will ever invade this country. EVER. Terrorism is an excuse to keep feeding the military idustral complex and other business interests have commercially benefited from warfare. Read "War is a Racket." by my hero Smedley Butler from West Chester, PA.
Posted 04:14 PM, 11/14/2009
SilverCTS
Obama and Holder should be prosecuted for treason.
Posted 08:50 PM, 11/14/2009
lefty
Ron Paul>>> Don't let appearances fool you! You're obviously a conspiracy freak wanting to discount these Islamic fanatics as frauds. I recall some of our young studs in Nam discounting how a good number of Viet Cong, no taller than one of Snow White's dwarves and wearing black pajamas with "flip-flps"could possibly build miles of sophisticated and intricate tunnels that housed hundreds of other pajama wearers. Their bamboo traps and hidden explosive devices succeeded in taking many American lives and lots of GI body parts. War may be a "Racket" but that doesn't take anything away from those who carry out what the "racketeers" require of them.
15 comments
Latest Stories in this Section
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Southwark


$550,000
131 BAINBRIDGE ST
Wynnewood


$925,000
1101 INDIAN CREEK RD
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos