Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  

Education   

share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Pa. votes final-exam Keystone tests to get a diploma

HARRISBURG - After years of debate, Pennsylvania is going ahead with a plan to offer school districts state-approved final exams that students would have to take to get diplomas.

The controversial plan that received a 4-1 vote of approval from a state review board yesterday is sure to change the lives of thousands of public-school students and teachers.

Gone, for 11th graders at least, will be the PSSAs - the Pennsylvania System of State Assessment math, reading, and science tests that grew out of the No Child Left Behind law.

The new Keystone exams, to be phased in starting next school year, signal a major shift in control of education policy: The tests would come out of Harrisburg, not local districts. So would the suggested curriculum.

Critics warned yesterday that the plan would undermine local control, or even, as one NAACP leader put it, "hold children accountable" for a broken education system.

Use of the new exams as a graduation requirement is optional; each school board can vote on whether to make them a condition for a diploma. In participating districts, students would take the first Keystone exams in biology, Algebra I, and literature in the 2010-11 school year.

The number of final exams would expand, and by 2015, students now in seventh grade would need to pass six Keystone-covered courses to graduate.

The new subject tests will cost the state an estimated $176 million to develop and administer through 2014-15, including a related model curriculum and diagnostic tests to identify struggling students. The tests would cost $31 million to administer each year after that.

"This is a great day for Pennsylvania's kids," said Joseph Torsella, chairman of the state Board of Education, which proposed the new regulation. "We've now said we're going to hold ourselves responsible for giving kids what they need to succeed" in college and the workforce.

So far, 33 school district leaders, including those from Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Delaware County's Chester Upland, and Bucks County's Palisades, have endorsed the proposal.

About 70 school boards passed resolutions this year opposing the tests. They include Upper Darby, Central Bucks, Lower Merion, and Tredyffrin/Easttown.

Test supporters argue that tens of thousands of students now graduate without needed skills. This year, for example, in 132 of the state's 500 school districts, 50 percent or more of 11th graders failed the math or reading PSSA tests.

All students "ought to be able to pass a competency test that says they have learned all they need to learn in order to receive a meaningful diploma," said Arlene Ackerman, the Philadelphia district superintendent, in written testimony submitted yesterday to the state Independent Regulatory Review Commission. "Our children deserve no less."

The commission is a body appointed by the governor and legislative leaders to review proposed new state regulations. The plan is to take effect in the next few months, after a review by the state Attorney General's Office.

Pennsylvania thus joins 10 other states using state-approved final exams as a condition for graduation; 15 others, including New Jersey, also use state-approved exams, but those are general-knowledge tests and not tied to specific courses.

Keystone tests would eventually be developed for 10 math, English, science, and social-studies courses and would account for a third of a student's final grade.

The Keystones offer little wiggle room: Pupils scoring the equivalent of a D or an F would get a zero on the exam.

Algebra I, literature, and biology Keystones are also scheduled to replace the required PSSA exams for all high school students in 2012-13.

In districts using the Keystones as graduation requirements, students failing a test would get extra help and then retake parts they didn't pass. If they fail again, they could complete a special project to get more credit. Students could also pass equivalent Advanced Placement or International Baccalaureate tests to meet the requirements.

Some special-education students would not have to take the tests to graduate.

School districts opting not to use the Keystone tests for graduation would instead have to give students "local assessments" to make sure they had mastered the required subjects.

These could range from a locally developed test to using a "portfolio review" that evaluates a student's overall work in a course. All local assessments would be reviewed to ensure that they, too, live up to state standards.

Districts would incur extra costs for Keystone tutoring, and some would have to pay to develop alternative assessments if they do not use the Keystone exams.

Opposition remains strong from some school boards and legislators who say the proposal undermines local control and undercuts legislative authority. And some advocacy groups, including the Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, say they fear otherwise-qualified students who fail the tests will be denied diplomas.

Calling a diploma "the gateway to the economic landscape," Joan Duvall-Flynn, president of the NAACP's Media area chapter, told the state commission yesterday that the new tests would "hold children accountable for the failures of the system."

Lawrence Feinberg, a Haverford School District board member, told the commission that the state should take the funding for Keystone tests "and give it to the kids who need it - that's where the money should go."

The initial 2008 proposal from the state board of education was for a set of stand-alone subject tests, not final exams, that students would have to pass to graduate if not proficient on the PSSA or on an approved local assessment.

A storm of opposition ensued, with legislators passing a one-year moratorium on the proposal in July 2008. Torsella and the state education board eventually revised the proposal and won over key legislators and the Pennsylvania State Education Association, the state's largest teachers' union.


Contact staff writer Dan Hardy

at 610-313-8134 or at dhardy@phillynews.com.

Comments   
Posted 07:14 AM, 10/23/2009
gtown_teach
Good... about time we hold the students responsible.
Posted 07:47 AM, 10/23/2009
TeacherFun
Keystone Test = 20% graduation rate in Philly (If we are lucky), Gtown, this has nothing to do with holding students responsible. It is totally about holding teachers responsible (hence merit pay), while we do not control the most important variable (PARENTS). Wow, education in the US is a joke!
Posted 08:03 AM, 10/23/2009
gtown_teach
Listen, if your child doesn't not have an IEP, he/she must take the tests to graduate. I'm hoping that there's not a bunch of back-doors to this thing, because it will hold the students, and their parents accountable.
Posted 08:08 AM, 10/23/2009
dim-5
gtown- I agree. However, who will be creating this test? Harrisburg? Rendell?
Posted 09:06 AM, 10/23/2009
psyrus
Is this just another attempt to "lower the bar"?
Posted 09:43 AM, 10/23/2009
mindstorms
I would like to suggest that all the elected officials in Harrisburg be required to take the exam first. And of course since we are holding students responsible how about holding our elected officials responsible for the adequate funding of our schools. Time and time again it has been reported that Pennsylvania does not adequately fund schools compared to many other states.
Posted 12:19 PM, 10/23/2009
truthbetold
Everyone should have to take the test, Having an IEP is no excuse for not taking the test. A speech problem gets you an IEP, so if you mumble you get out of the test. GTOWN look at the hypocrisy of that rule. So special ed students who have THE MOST problems learning do not hat to prove they can pass a test to graduate. Thats the loophole
Posted 01:04 PM, 10/23/2009
gtown_teach
It will probably be another bar-lowering tactic, but at least the students have to pass it, or they won't get their diploma. At least some of the onus will be on the student and the parent.
Posted 03:10 PM, 10/23/2009
tvjournalist
gtown_teach, Why is the onus only on the student and the parent? What about the teachers? I had an Algebra teacher in 10th grade who, while a great guy, was a horrible teacher. I know because I tried to follow his instruction the whole year and still failed. The next year I got the same teacher to repeat the class. I TOTALLY ignored his teaching that year and just read the book. It got to the point where I was able to obtain my assignments before class started (he left his planner on the podium while he talked to students in the hall) and I finished not only the class work, but also the homework before he was even done teaching the class. I also was able to correct him when he made mistakes explaining the lesson on the chalkboard. I got all A's the second time around. I repeated this procedure when I got the same teacher again as a senior for "Survey of Academic Math" with the same result. I obviously didn't take more advanced math courses since I never developed an appreciation for math since it became my responsibility to figure it out for myself. I fortunately had an advantage many kids don't, a sufficiently high IQ and good reasoning and research abilities. So again, I ask what about holding teachers more accountable?
Posted 09:46 PM, 10/23/2009
gtown_teach
tvjournalist, what rock have you been living under? While your personal story is "tragic" and your Algebra teacher could have used some professional development; Teachers are now 1000% responsible for student achievement. We get observed constantly on our instruction, we get mandatory professional development at least once a month, and we certainly have to justify any failures with detailed documentation. I teach in a public school, and I went to this city's public school as a student. I have to say that instruction has improved drastically since I graduated. But, great instruction is only PART of the education puzzle. We desperately need more parental involvement, and we need to stop coddling our students in every situation. Every year, we have back to school night, and we have a report card conference at night. I get maybe three parents. Three parents each night. And, its always the parents of the good students. I have nothing to say to them except, your child is doing wonderfully in my class. When I call the parents of my problem students, I get answering machines, and the parents never call back. You know why? Its because there is no serious penalty for parents ignoring their child's education. The PSSA is a test that has no incentive for the student, yet holds the teachers and school completely responsible for the scores. If the student bombs the PSSA, there's no repercussion for the student, its just another B.S. test, and he or she just moves tot he next grade level. For us, its could be the difference of being marked as a failed school. So, please tell me again, why there shouldn't be more responsibility put on the students and parents in the educational process.
Posted 05:21 AM, 10/24/2009
Magistra
gtown-teach - I think there should be a compromise here. Standardized tests should be for diagnostic purposes only, the way they were when I taught. We learned for example which math skills were lacking and would concentrate on them the following year. If the test shows that children need more time mastering data collection and interpretation, then the schools should be supplied with all the materials needed to teach that skill and teachers observed doing the teaching with recommendations for improvement. That is the only justification for standardized testing...not merit pay or anything like it. For graduation purposes, I might not see a problem with exit exams geared to the curriculum....as long as every student is taught the same courses. Different high schools emphasize different tracks don't they? If the student has passed his yearly exams in his major, why impose another test on top of that....and who would be responsible for preparing them? They do not do exit exams in college. You make the grade in a course, you earn the credits. Students need to be held accountable from day one in every course they take in high school. Even high school teachers should be getting observed and have to show documentation of pass or fail. And teachers should not have to pay for materials out of their own pockets, which many do. Affluent schools have closets bulging with educational materials and poor urban schools are rationed. Fully fund education before anyone else is held accountable. I frankly think this test idea is just another way to milk the state for money.
Posted 09:39 AM, 10/24/2009
gtown_teach
Magistra, that's an ideal situation. We are not going to get away from standardized tests. Most professional occupations have some sort of standardized test to certify or qualify candidates for a position. Even teachers have to take standardized tests to be certified. I do think the state realizes that the PSSA doesn't accurately measure student progress because there's no real incentive for students to really prepare for, and pass the test. Then we have principals, and teachers that game the PSSA, and I'm sure the state wants to do away with that hogwash. I honestly think if the state wants to hold teachers responsible for instruction, and students responsible for learning; Passing an exit exam would be a compromise. I agree, not a perfect one, but at least if a student wants a diploma he/she would have to work for it.
Posted 06:31 PM, 10/24/2009
dim-5
tvjournalist - blah, blah, blah...
Posted 10:06 AM, 10/25/2009
Magistra
gtown_teach I guess I am wondering what is to be tested at that point. There are so many different majors that stress different skill sets. There are already kids taking AP courses, while others are in ISOL classes of other special ed courses. How do you give a test to that range of abilities and skills that accurately measures what is appropriate for graduation. I think that final exams for each year in each major is appropriate and could be generated by a state curriculum office. But how do you generate a fair exam of 4 years work to children with diverse learning paths?
Posted 10:01 PM, 10/25/2009
Drama Llama
Everyone is ignoring the obvious, high stakes testing is very profitable. It is a billion dollar industry and has very little to do with holding children accountable.
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Fairmount/Spring Garden


$499,999
2128 BRANDYWINE ST
Selbyville


$259,990
Barklay Estates
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos