Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  
share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Annette John-Hall: Mix 'n' match with cornrows

At most, it's a bemusing story that you figure would have a short shelf life.

White cop wears cornrows. Suffers reprimand and is relegated to desk duty. Complies and cuts hair. Goes back on the street.

Admittedly, once I understood he wasn't mocking black people, I couldn't help but smile at the image of Officer Thomas Strain sporting 'rows. Kind of makes you wonder what he's jamming on the police radio. A little Jay-Z? Maybe some Maxwell? Robin Thicke, for sure.

Seriously, though, given the racial friction that continues in the Philadelphia Police Department - Domelights, racist fliers, an officer mouthing about black people, to name a few incidents - the fact that Officer Strain flipped the script and aligned his appearance with his black brothers and sisters in blue is refreshingly intriguing.

And, flipping the script some more, he filed a discrimination complaint last month with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, hoping to bring some sensitivity training to the department and, yes, some political correctness.

The suit alleges that the Police Department and Strain's supervisor, Inspector Aaron Horne, who is African American, violated the state Human Relations Act by discriminating against Strain because he's white.

But the complaint also claims that Horne retaliated against Strain because Strain is engaged to marry an African American woman and Horne disapproved.

"What happened to him was potentially race discrimination and potentially retaliation for [Strain] expressing some degree of ethnicity that is not his," says Thomas Holland, Strain's attorney. "The question is, did [Horne] reprimand him because of his cornrows or because of his interracial relationship?"

Did I mention that Strain's fiancée is a Philadelphia cop, too?

(Through a spokesman, Police Commissioner Charles H. Ramsey declined to comment, citing the pending lawsuit. Horne was not made available for comment.)

I don't even want to imagine what kind of soap opera is playing out here.

But this case, with its unorthodox casting, challenges us to think in a more nuanced way about our attitudes on race and culture.

If the complaint turns out to be true, it makes us ask whether a black cop - or any black person, for that matter - gets to police black culture.

And makes us wonder if for some folks, "crossing over" romantically still means that you've crossed some kind of forbidden line socially.

Crossing over

If I pop in blue contact lenses or dye my hair blond, am I co-opting white culture?

By the same token, if a white woman comes home from vacation in the Caribbean sporting beaded braids, is she impinging on black culture?

"Nobody controls culture," argues Charles A. Gallagher, a professor of sociology at La Salle University. "Cultural expression around skin color is purchasable. Anybody can mix and match. It's about self-expression."

It could be, Gallagher guessed, that Strain may be more in tune to black culture because of his fiancée's race.

Cornrows or no, by all accounts Strain is a good cop, the guy you'd want to go into battle with. A Marine who served in Iraq, Strain joined the department in 2004 and works the 35th District in North Philly.

Department policy requires officers' hair to be "clean, properly trimmed, and combed." Nowhere does the policy ban cornrows, which is probably why plenty of African American officers wear them.

Judging from his photo, Officer Strain's braids were neat - trust me, his fiancée wouldn't let him go out of the house with his braids unkept, as we say - and trimmed short enough that he could wear his uniform hat.

Nevertheless, according to the complaint, Horne ordered Strain to cut his hair because his cornrows looked unprofessional.

The lawsuit also holds the entire Police Department liable because "it failed to adequately prevent and/or remedy the discrimination."

I had plenty of questions for Strain and his fiancée, but both turned down requests.

But here's one thing I do know. There was a time, not long ago, when African Americans weren't allowed any form of cultural expression in the workplace. I remember when black television anchors weren't allowed to wear braids.

We've fought long and hard for our culture just to be acknowledged and not judged.

And now, a police officer expressing himself - totally within his department's guidelines - gets punished for it because he's white?

C'mon now. This is 2009.


Contact Annette John-Hall at 215-854-4986 or ajohnhall@phillynews.com.
Comments   
Posted 10:03 AM, 11/13/2009
john 16
If it was a white inspector trying to enforce the same rules on a black cop you can beleive the racist guardian civic league would be out protesting with the NAACP. It seems that inspector horne is a little sensitive about the black female cop being with a white man, annette john-hall do a little leg work and get the real dirt on inspector horne he acts like the rooster in the hen house at broad and champlost (35th district)
Posted 10:46 AM, 11/13/2009
jsksss
Good article, but the 35th police district is located at Broad & Champlost which is not North Philly. I find it interesting that some Phila reporters & tv news broadcasters don't know or take the time to learn the layout of the city they are reporting on. When this happens I feel that "news people" live outside the city & really don't care about Phila. A lttle more research would make reporters more creditable.
Posted 10:52 AM, 11/13/2009
lefty
If there is no grooming restriction regarding cornrows, then Horne is wrong and will ultimately be overruled. What position have the Guardian League and FOP taken? Did Strain first approach the FOP before filing suit through the PHRC? Did FOP recommend he pursue it through the Commission? Did Strain entirely avoid the FOP in order to make a point? These are legitimate questions that go unanswered in this column.
Posted 01:20 PM, 11/13/2009
John Street Ruined Our City
YOU'RE NOTHING BUT A POMPOUS RACIST!!!!!!!! HOW ARE YOU STILL WRITING FOR THIS PAPER???????
Posted 01:47 PM, 11/13/2009
puddydawg
My point is where was the outrage. This paper ran one or two articles and did not allow posting on those. I know because I remember it. Even now the only reason Hall is writing is because of the African American fiancee angle. She isn't writing because of the officers rights were violated, she is doing so because she feels that is is a black issue of the white/black relationship. If that wasn't there you wold not have heard boo out of her. Were was the Civil Liberties union et al. didn't here nothing from them.
Posted 09:12 PM, 11/13/2009
MizzBlue
Jonh 16 you got it right! Lefty your from the FOP so stop it. The current FOP wasn't and isn't going to do anything. They are the worst. My partner needed them and they turned their backs...They try to smooze you over by saying. "Wait until we get them to arbitration." They only help people they like. Cops are leaving at and alarming rate because of the current administration. I don't like Ramsey, but don't blame everything on him. Johnson created those monsters. (Horne) The Commish needs to sit back for a minute and look and not listen and he'll see who the snakes (Horne) are. Johnson promoted all of them. They were no good then and Ramsey needs to start disciplining and firing from the top dowm instead of the bottom up! I bet the cops will start working and morale would shoot the roof! Strain is a hero in my book...
Posted 10:17 PM, 11/13/2009
john 16
the blacks have the guardian civic league, the white police need a vocal and active association to combat the BLACK ADMINISTRATION, the BLACK COMMISSIONER and tne BLACK COMMAND stucture that is overly influenced by the BLACK GUARDIAN CIVIC LEAGUE. Until the white police join in numbers and get organized they will be disparatly harassed and disciplined
Posted 10:38 PM, 11/13/2009
donnybrook
i'm white. corn rows look 100% silly on white people. so do locks. c'mon people.
Posted 01:47 AM, 11/14/2009
AnnetteFun
I'm white too, and I resent Ms. John-Hall acting like we're all hicks when it comes to music. The officer is "for sure" going to like Robin Thicke -- why, because he's white? Reverse discrimination! What if I said Ms. J-H listened to "a little Eminem, maybe some Lady GaGa, FOR SURE Luther Vandross"....how would THAT sound?
Posted 11:17 AM, 11/14/2009
lefty
MizzBlue>>> "Lefty your (you're) from the FOP." One, I'm not! Two, you failed to read my post. I'm ASKING if Officer Strain pursued other avenues PRIOR to going to the PHRC. Can it be assumed by your rant that he did? What about my asking if he approached the Guardian League? Is it a possibility that Strain does- or can- be a member? Is these unreasonable questions? If it's worth anything in your twisted, biased marble of a mind, my posting is the least one-sided or biased. It attempted to express my concern that Ms. John-Hall didn't ask all the appropriate questions. Does that clear up your confusion.(lol)
Posted 01:56 PM, 11/15/2009
MizzBlue
As I stated (Lefty)those questions are not worth asking because whether he did or did not; he wasn't going to get any help from them. If you had a mind, you would know that the Guardian Civic League and the Fraternal Order of Police DO NOT handle discrimination issues. Officer Strain followed the proper procedure by filing a complaint with the PHRC. [His] issue is an EEOC issue. Though the Inspector broke contract policies by not allowing him to patrol. The [reason] was discriminatory! So the FOP & Guardian Civic League can speak out against it, but they are not the governing authorities over the matter. The FOP had the right to make sure the officer was put back to patrol, because his hair was NOT in violation of the policy! Did that answer [your] question why this reporter who probably already knew what I just told you didn't include this in this column? I cannot see why people are verbally assaulting her for writing about something that was wrong. It does not matter when it was written; it's great that the incident is not being swept away...Continue to write on! As we can all see I might have had a typo, which [LEFTY]SAW but you are not the sharpest KNIFE in the drawer! [RIGHT?]
Posted 09:50 PM, 11/16/2009
lefty
MizzBlue>>>> Your prejudice jauntices any objectivity. Columnists write for all readers, not only the choir. But, then, that depends on what the columnist hopes to elicit from readers that aren't given adequate info. I stated my not knowing the policies and procedures for filing a complaint by the officer. My opening comment began with: IF THERE ARE NO GROOMING RESTRICTIONS AGAINST CORNROWS, THEN HORNE IS WRONG AND WILL ULTIMATELY BE OVERRULED! Unfortunately, you have an axe to gring and choose to see things as BLACK and WHITE. I sense thatit has something to do with a disdain for the FOP. If you wear "blue," per your nom de plume, you set a poor example. If your bi--hness is representative of the drama now going on, it's understandable how it's a racial issue whch may have begun with a Black inspector issuing an edict against a White officer, based on a bias, but it has now become a cause celebre for hate mongerers such as you.
Posted 09:55 PM, 11/16/2009
lefty
MizzBlue>>>> Your prejudice jauntices any objectivity. Columnists write for all readers, not only the choir. But, then, that depends on what the columnist hopes to elicit from readers that aren't given adequate info. I stated my not knowing the policies and procedures for filing a complaint by the officer. My opening comment began with: IF THERE ARE NO GROOMING RESTRICTIONS AGAINST CORNROWS, THEN HORNE IS WRONG AND WILL ULTIMATELY BE OVERRULED! Unfortunately, you have an axe to gring and choose to see things as BLACK and WHITE. I sense thatit has something to do with a disdain for the FOP. If you wear "blue," per your nom de plume, you set a poor example. If your bi--hness is representative of the drama now going on, it's understandable how it's a racial issue, whch may have begun with a Black inspector issuing an edict against a White officer, based on a bias, but it has now become a cause celebre for hate mongerers such as you. Is this what Ms. John-Hall had in mind when she penned the column?
Posted 10:47 PM, 11/16/2009
Ben9
Annette John-Hall, I know what you mean about whites with cornrows. When I see a black woman with hair that's bleached, straightened, etc., my knee-jerk reaction is to suspect she's "mocking" white people. We need to stick to our own "kind", right??? Or isn't that what you meant? If not, please explain the difference.
14 comments
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Rittenhouse Square


$3,600,000
2316 DELANCEY PL
Fairmount/Spring Garden


$599,000
644 N SYDENHAM ST
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos