Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  
share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
Cole Hamels´ disappointing season led to speculation.
Cole Hamels' disappointing season led to speculation.
READER FEEDBACK
Should the Phillies entertain trading Cole Hamels?
Yes
No
Will Cole Hamels return to his 2008 form next season?
RELATED STORIES
Photos: Past Phillies Gold Glove winners
 
High Cheese: Do the Phillies have enough offense?
 
Jim Salisbury: Amaro denies Hamels trade speculation
 
Bill Conlin: Time for the DH in the National League
 
You Talkin' to Me: A run at Halladay?
 
GMs opt against expanding replay
 
Amaro denies Hamels trade speculation
 
Buy Phillies jerseys, playoff t-shirts, hats, and more
 
Purchase Phillies playoff photos & reprints
Photos: 2009 Phillies
 
Relive the memories: Coverage of the World Series run


On Baseball

Amaro denies Hamels trade speculation

CHICAGO - The rumored trade of Cole Hamels to somewhere for something has gotten back to Phillies general manager Ruben Amaro Jr.

In short: It's not happening.

"We have no thoughts of trading Cole Hamels," Amaro said at baseball's general managers meetings yesterday. "I don't know where those rumors are coming from, but that's exactly what they are. Cole Hamels is our pitcher and we're keeping him, and I'm glad to have him."

Amaro envisions Hamels bouncing back from this year's disappointing season and being a top-of-the-rotation twin with Cliff Lee next season.

As for adding Toronto's Roy Halladay in a trade, Amaro predictably shot down speculation that it could happen, even though industry sources say the Phils are keeping tabs on the pitcher's availability and could be a player for his services as what figures to be a long off-season auction unfolds.

Halladay is due to make $15.75 million in 2010. The Phils paid $137 million in salary and bonuses in 2009 and are expected to have a payroll in that neighborhood again in 2010. Halladay might be too expensive, unless a payroll exception were made.

"We already have two top-of-the-rotation guys," Amaro said. "Our payroll is not a bottomless pit. There are limits. If I can't put together a championship-caliber club at $140 million, then that's my fault. I haven't gotten the budget numbers yet. I know we shouldn't expect to be much different than we were last year."

Money was a hot topic in the lobby of the O'Hare Hilton during the meetings yesterday. While some general managers wrestle with payroll restrictions, agent Scott Boras is painting a picture of an industry awash in money thanks to revenues of $6.5 billion.

In talking about the salary arbitration system that some in baseball management detest, Boras invoked Lee's name. The agent mentioned the $9 million that Lee will make next year in a deal that was signed in a year when the pitcher would have been eligible for arbitration. In a free-agent system, Boras said, Lee would be worth "three times" that amount. Lee will be a free agent after the 2010 season. The Phillies may try to keep him off the market and negotiate an extension before then. Lee's agent, Darek Braunecker, may send Boras a thank-you note for that remark.

Amaro was asked about the possibility of negotiating an extension with Lee this winter.

"If we end up negotiating with Lee sometime this winter, you won't know about it," he said.

Amaro's immediate focus is on improving the bullpen, finding a third baseman to take over for Pedro Feliz, and strengthening the bench. Amaro said the team was about to begin negotiating with Chan Ho Park, who will be seeking a multiyear deal after recording a 2.52 ERA in 38 games as a reliever for the Phils last season. Park still hopes to sign with a club that will let him work as a starter, so that could hurt the Phillies' chances. He had a 7.29 ERA in seven starts for the Phils last season.

Amaro said he talked about a trade for a third baseman - Boston could move Mike Lowell, and San Diego might deal Kevin Kouzmanoff - but he still thinks that position will be filled with a free agent. The candidates are many and include Chone Figgins, Adrian Beltre, Mark DeRosa, Miguel Tejada and Placido Polanco. Figgins and Beltre are looking for big paydays, and that could affect the Phils' interest because Amaro said he does not believe that the team would sign a player to a contract similar to the three-year, $31.5 million deal that Raul Ibanez got last winter. Nonetheless, the Phillies did speak with Boras about Beltre.

Teams cannot talk contract specifics - money and length - with free agents until Nov. 20. Amaro said he would have a clearer picture about which free agents are most viable for the Phils after that date. He also said he would like to "pool our resources and go with pitching."

The off-season is still in its infancy. Boras called November "the greeting-card month," adding that deals can be struck all the way to February. So, as Amaro prepares to leave the meetings today, there is plenty of time to get things done.

Notes. Former Phillie Kevin Sefcik, who lives in the Chicago area, stopped by the meetings yesterday to talk with club officials about the possibility of becoming a minor-league manager. Phillies officials reached out to Sefcik. . . . Amaro said that pitcher Jamie Moyer likely will have cartilage in a knee cleaned up. . . . He also said the team was not pursuing free-agent pitcher John Lackey. . . . There was only little talk about instant replay during yesterday's sessions and no talk of increasing its use beyond disputed boundary calls. "I don't believe in expanding it," Amaro said. "It's fine the way it is."

 


Contact staff writer Jim Salisbury at 215-854-4983 or jsalisbury@phillynews.com.

 

Comments   
Posted 03:37 AM, 11/11/2009
buddyspitz
"Lee's agent, Darek Braunecker, may send Boras a thank-you note for that remark." On the contrary, Boras is implicitly telling Lee he thinks he's worth more than any number anyone could possibly speculate and he can get it for him. Glad to see Mr. Boras plying his trade. The ultimate agent slime that gives nothing back to the game he supposedly loves.
Posted 04:42 AM, 11/11/2009
b-house
Scott Boras=All that is wrong with baseball
Posted 05:27 AM, 11/11/2009
sillybilly
As much as I lost faith in Cole the past season, trading him could be a blunder that haunts us for decades. Or Not!
Posted 06:02 AM, 11/11/2009
Morty Seinfeld
No. Hamels will be fine.
Posted 06:51 AM, 11/11/2009
garcia7
Not for Halladay. Send him and Brown to the Dodgers for Kershaw, Koa and Eithier. Roll the dice, this is like Wise for Carlton. Bring up Taylor next year to replace Stairs and backup Ibenez and Howard. Go with Pedro until Drabek is ready. This frees up Werth to be moved for a reliever, util. inf. and backup catcher.
Posted 07:14 AM, 11/11/2009
MikeP
A guy has a good but not great season one year after being thte World Series MVP and we're talking about trading him? I have an idea where the trade rumor came from. The Mets front office. Of course, the idiot Phily press prints the rumor because they can't come up with a story. Why does the DN/Inquirer keep these lousy writers on staff? Can we trade them?
Posted 07:17 AM, 11/11/2009
Chuck From Blue Bell
one word. NO
Posted 07:23 AM, 11/11/2009
gmr18901
No Way, No how. Hamels will be fine. he's a great pitcher. It wasn't his best year as a pitcher while having his best year becoming a father. He'll come back strong next year. We certainly don't want to have to hit against him someday. Wasn't Mariano Rivera a Phillie?
Posted 07:39 AM, 11/11/2009
unknownblogger
Only if it is a straight up trade for Halladay. Nothing else. Both are very good pitchers, but Hamels has some baggage (of course halladay may also, but never heard of any). Other than that keep hamels.
Posted 07:40 AM, 11/11/2009
willy33
People need to learn to use stats better. All of Hamels's luck-influenced stats (ERA, W-L, etc), the so-called "bubblegum card stats" were bad this year. But his non luck-influenced ones, that sabremetric-loving baseball fans understand, such as his line drive rate, strike/ball rate, etc were very consistent with 2008. He had good luck in 2008 (with what balls fell in vs got gobbled up) and very very bad luck in 2009. The law of averages show that he will be just fine in 2010. Trade him if it's a good deal, but don't take 60 cents on the dollar.
Posted 07:42 AM, 11/11/2009
wooderice
Ridiculous.
Posted 07:49 AM, 11/11/2009
lgeagles
Hamels is part of the core...he needs to stay!
Posted 07:51 AM, 11/11/2009
VermontPhilsFan
Definitely keep Cole. He will straighten out. Keep Happy Pete, too. Halladay would mess up the payroll big time plus we'd loose prospects and maybe Happ. And yes, Michael Taylor is ready to be brought into the outfield mix. I so hate the DH, but can you imagine putting Taylor in the outfield and DHing Ibanez?
Posted 08:02 AM, 11/11/2009
jim715
take a look at guys like Verlander and Cliff Lee, who take steps backwards and then big steps forward..it happens with pitchers..obviously, Cliff needs a good off season, development of another pitch, and he needs to toughen himself mentally and have better composure on the mound this coming season.... but you cant trade him.. by the way, dodgers arent trading kershaw and anything, and you want to trade 35-99 Werth for a set up guy and leave carlos ruiz as our top righthnaded hitter? nice work, garcia 7
Posted 08:02 AM, 11/11/2009
PhillyHouse JayDuce
Hamels should be untouchable. As for Boras, it's funny how people complain that this country is going down the road of socialism, but rip a guy like Boras who is the epitome of capitalism. I think Boras is just doing his job. What people fail to realize is that the owners have the money. Boras is just shaking the "money tree." I'd want Boras representing me.
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Center City


$1,325,000
1111 LOCUST ST #10E
East Falls


$325,000
3343-45 CONRAD ST ##401
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos