Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  
share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Beyond the Spin: Hope didn't heal the divide

A year after Obama's election, America's racial rifts are deep and persistent.

When Barack Obama was elected president, 70 percent of Americans were convinced that race relations would improve as a result. A year later, however, optimism about solving race problems in the United States has dropped to where it was nearly 50 years ago, according to a recent Gallup Poll.

The Oct. 29 poll asked respondents: "Do you think that relations between blacks and whites will always be a problem for the United States, or that a solution will be worked out?" Gallup reported, "Responses to this long-standing trend today are almost exactly where they were in December 1963, when Gallup first asked the question. Fifty-five percent of Americans in 1963 were hopeful that a solution to the race-relations problem would eventually be worked out. Now, some 46 years later, the 'hopeful' percentage is an almost identical 56 percent."

Maybe that's why Obama titled one of his books The Audacity of Hope. Americans were never more hopeful about race relations than when Obama, the son of a white woman from Kansas and a black man from Kenya, was elected president. A USA Today/Gallup poll on Nov. 5, 2008 - one day after the election - found that 67 percent of Americans felt a solution to problems between blacks and whites would eventually be worked out.

A year later, that figure has shrunk by 11 percentage points.

In the 2008 poll, 70 percent of those questioned said they expected race relations to improve as a result of Obama's election; 28 percent said they expected race relations to get a lot better, and 42 percent expected things to get a little better. Another 17 percent said they expected race relations to remain unchanged, and 10 percent expected them to worsen.

On the campaign trail, Obama audaciously raised hopes that he could help close the racial divide. In his Philadelphia speech on race, he said "race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now." He continued, "Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naive as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy - particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own."

As it turns out, far from moving beyond our divisions, America remains a sharply divided country even as it grows more diverse.

Obama has for the most part studiously avoided directly addressing race during his time in office. The chief exception was a comment he made on a confrontation between Henry Louis Gates Jr., a black Harvard professor, and James Crowley, a white Cambridge, Mass., police sergeant. At a prime-time news conference, Obama accused Crowley of "acting stupidly" in arresting the professor for disorderly conduct after the two exchanged words when Crowley went to Gates' home to investigate a possible break-in.

Obama later softened his language and invited Crowley and Gates to meet with him over beers at the White House. The president said, "My hope is that as a consequence of this event, this ends up being what's called a teachable moment."

But nothing was ever taught by Obama or anyone else. In fact, blacks and whites were sharply divided over the incident. A Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 30 percent of African Americans faulted Sgt. Crowley, and only 4 percent blamed Professor Gates. Among whites, it was the opposite: 32 percent said Gates was more at fault, while 7 percent said Crowley was.

Race came up again when former President Jimmy Carter told NBC News, "I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man." Press secretary Robert Gibbs quickly distanced the White House from the comment, saying Obama "does not believe that the criticism comes based on the color of his skin."

Despite such unequivocal statements, conservative commentators such as Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck have repeatedly tried to paint the president into a racial corner. Criticizing Obama's appointment of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, Limbaugh said Obama is the "greatest living example of a reverse racist, and now he's appointed one." Beck accused the biracial president of being a "racist" who has "a deep-seated hatred for white people and the white culture."

Fortunately, the improvement of race relations does not hinge on the attitudes of those on the fringes, left or right - or on President Obama, for that matter. His election a year ago did not usher in an era of racial harmony. It looks as if that's something we'll have to accomplish ourselves.


George Curry can be reached at gcurry@phillynews.com.
Comments   
Posted 08:45 AM, 11/06/2009
tr88
Mr Curry, where do you think Obama's spiritual mentor of 20 years is on the political spectrum?
Posted 09:36 AM, 11/06/2009
lefty
We all recall what led to Obama's Philadelphia lecture on race relations. The "divide?" Many Americans are as concerned as ever about entitlements. For those who are ready to conclude that its because we have a president of color, remember the percentage of 70% predicting better race relations less than one year ago. Why? Maybe the newer, 57%, is indicative of dissatisfaction: a realization that entitlements are being forced fed by empowered, ultra-liberal Democrat congressmen and women. If you need an example, turn to Pelosi and Reid's push for a vote on their healthcare bill this weekend, in time for Meet the Press.
Posted 09:44 AM, 11/06/2009
tr88
Any black people responsible for the racial divide?
Posted 12:14 PM, 11/06/2009
philly68
I applaud George Curry for this opinion piece. It is not about partisan politics (aka tribalism), but rather simple observations supported by facts. I applaud him for his subtelty. He had the integrity to point out several times that President Obama is bi-racial. He is not black. He is not white. Similarly, the issue of race relations is not as easy to identify and discuss as some people, both black and white, would have us believe. After all, who are the experts? I certainly have never heard of one. No, the issue of race relations is challenging because of many factors, but two that are prevalent are hatred and ignorance. Some whites have a hatred for blacks. Some blacks have a hatred for whites. These people are not just uneducated. They are also in schools and boards and they spread their hate. Like Obama, the hatred could be described as "bi racial." Until we admit to hate on both sides against other, improvement will never, ever happen in our life time.
Posted 01:29 PM, 11/06/2009
Sam D
There sure are, tr88. Those uppity people who took a holiday cruise from Africa to the American South, and then had the audacity to get free food and lodging in return for a little bit of work in the cotton fields; the ones who were refused the right to vote; the ones who got themselves lynched; the ones who were discriminated against by the Philly school system (suit finally settled just a couple of months ago) and by the splitting of Philly into two sections by the road/bridge system along with provisions in the GI Bill for housing that you had to stick with your own kind; the ones who got redlined for housing by banks; the ones discriminated against by the US Dept of Agriculture; and so on. It's clearly their fault! We white folks had nothing to do with it.
Posted 01:46 PM, 11/06/2009
tr88
So Sam, your answer is no blacks are responsible or can ever be responsible for the racial divide no matter what. A free pass for how long? Thanks for that teachable moment. Things will never get better - the sin can never be forgiven. Ever. All of those things you mention are a disgrace. Evolve.
Posted 02:11 PM, 11/06/2009
lefty
philly68>>> The three experts on race relations that immediately come to mind are the reverends' Jackson, Sharton and Wright! Sam D>>>many of those "holiday cruises"" where booked by slave trade Africans that sold their brethren to the highest bidders. But isn't it time to purge yourself of all this insidious guilt that plagues you? We elected an African American as president. Without the assistance DESCENDENTS of slave traders, President Obama would not have been elected! If he makes good on most elements of pre-election rhetoric, he'll be re-elected, don't you agree?
Posted 02:12 PM, 11/06/2009
longshanks
The right loves the racial divide, they cling to the 1800s like a mother trying to take a toy away from a child.
Posted 02:12 PM, 11/06/2009
lefty
philly68>>> The three experts on race relations that immediately come to mind are the reverends' Jackson, Sharton and Wright! Sam D>>>many of those "holiday cruises"" where booked by slave trade Africans that sold their brethren to the highest bidders. But isn't it time to purge yourself of all this insidious guilt that plagues you? We elected an African American as president. Without the assistance of DESCENDENTS of slave traders, President Obama would not have been elected! If he makes good on most elements of pre-election rhetoric, he'll be re-elected, don't you agree?
Posted 02:28 PM, 11/06/2009
tr88
The left is quite satisfied with things just the way they are. Keep voting the same way generation after generation after generation because look how good things have gotten for blacks. It can never be their fault for anything, no need to change a thing eh Longshanks? 2 out of 3 black kids in the inner city doesn't graduate from high school. Blacks kill as many blacks year after year than were killed in 60 years of lynchings but lynchings is still the problem although there aren't but a handful of people alive who ever knew anyone who was lynched. Blacks have been given the greatest opportunity that anyone in the world could have, to be born in this country yet many seem stuck along with many white liberals with their obsession with victimhood to take advantage of it. I think liberals would rather keep the inner cities that they've built exactly as they are than to ever admit they have been miserably wrong. Enjoy.
Posted 03:17 PM, 11/06/2009
Phil Checchia
TR88... well said. Racial Harmony in United States will be achieved when the black population achieve equal status. That wont happen until they wean themselves from the people who have TAKEN CARE of them since the 1940's, the Democrats. They still live in drug and crime infested neighborhoods. But blacks are incredibly naive when they vote. They listen to people who dont have their best interest at heart. Those people live a nice life, but tell the average black to stay the course, support the Democratic slavemaster, dont vote for school vouchers, dont support the enterprise zones, vilianize the police. In other words, stay put, dont better yourself and take what is given to you. It's sad. And shame on the educated white liberal who knows this is happening, but close their eyes so that they recieve whatever it is from the democrats, infanticide, the green cause, appeasement. Democrats controll the cities where this is happening and they are not about to fix this. Because once you get a nice job, you want all the trappings, good schools, safe neighborhood, hence you are no longer on the plantation. Can only hope blacks pay heed to people who really care about them.
Posted 03:58 PM, 11/06/2009
Sam D
No, tr88, that's not my answer. Take a course in logic, will you? Do you think everybody stating a case assumes that EVERYONE fits that case? I know you misuse that little stratagem often. Use a little sense this time: As seen by my examples, by far the largest amount of race vitriol throughout history has come from the whites, not the blacks. Hence the vast majority of the racial divide comes from whites, not blacks. Of course some blacks are racist, just as some whites aren't racist. However, one wants to check out the preponderance of the evidence, doesn't one?
Posted 04:20 PM, 11/06/2009
STEPHEN1988
Racial harmony can not be achieved as long as we embrace political bigotry. Political strategists under the guise of “polling,” divide, stereotype and silhouette us by; age, sex, race, religion, ethnic origin, where we live geographically, by our professions, by our income levels, whether we are single or married, are we homeowners or renters, even what kind of cars we drive. And no one gets offended when they do this? They stereotype and refer to us as "the White vote, the Black vote, the Latino vote, the Gay vote, the Jewish vote, the Catholic vote, the Evangelist vote," why do we allow them to typecast and profile us like this? And this isn’t political racism? Is there any wonder WHY we don’t think of ourselves as one people when our elected leaders don’t view us as ONE! Where is the outrage from those who espouse that we are all equal – we are, except when we can be divided by politicians pandering for our votes!
Posted 04:27 PM, 11/06/2009
tr88
OK sam, I'd be interested in knowing which if any Black Leaders, or Politician you think are part of the racial divide. I'd be interested in knowing what you think of the Liberal orthodoxy when it comes to race and social policy and how you think the results have been.
Posted 07:09 PM, 11/06/2009
philly68
STEPHEN1988: You make a great point regarding "political bigotry." The polling you identify truly engages in institutional profiling. The result is racial and ethnic division. I think your observation is very consistent with the analysis by the writer, Geroge Curry. Please consider writing your point in a letter to the editor.
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
West Chester


$889,900
104 WINDRIDGE DR
Old City/Society Hill


$2,250,000
210 W WASHINGTON SQ #12NE
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos