Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  

Opinion   

share
email
print
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


No more Charleenis

THE STORY of Charleeni Ferreira's death is jolting and horrifying, but all too familiar: Parental abuse undetected for years. Siren calls of suspicion from school nurses who were then mistrusted. A child too terrified or traumatized to reveal that her life was a private hell.

Contrast the tragedy of Charleeni's death with another case of alleged child abuse that recently came to my attention.

Last month, a 4-year-old boy was found wandering his street at night. The mother explained that she'd put her child to bed, then left the house to visit friends on the block. She thought the boy was sound asleep, when he'd actually awakened and walked out the front door.

Both the mother and the maternal grandfather said they knew the neighbor who'd found the child and reported the incident.

Were they furious at their neighbor for reporting them? Were they insulted that someone they knew suspected them of child abuse?

Absolutely not.

They were gratified.

"Too many children fall through the cracks," the grandfather said. "We have to look out for each other."

The judge and social workers agreed that the young mother needed support and education, but that her children were safe and well.

In my 30 years of work with children, I'd never heard such a refreshing response. This family recognized what others often forget: The child-protection system is in place to help, not harm. If we are to be a community that prevents child abuse and neglect, we must embrace both the responsibility of reporting and the opportunity to respond well.

Charleeni was 10 years old when she died, and had been known to Philadelphia child-welfare and medical authorities for at least three years. Charleeni declined to tell investigators about her horrible experiences, and her parents reportedly presented inconsistent stories and failed to return for medical follow-ups.

While the physically or sexually abusive parent generally wants neither scrutiny nor intervention, the abused child often wants to tell but can't find the way, or the heart. We must continue to improve our investigative approach, sharing information more efficiently. We need state-of-the-art forensic interviewing of all child victims, in a safe place where children can disclose out of the presence of their caregivers.

More money isn't necessarily the answer, as much as wise spending. Pennsylvania spends more than most states on child welfare services. But our investment in prevention of abuse and neglect remains low and the programming spotty.

The Pennsylvania Children's Trust Fund, which supports proven abuse-prevention practices for at-risk populations, had to suspend grantmaking this year for lack of funds. Advocates failed again to win legislative support in Harrisburg for increased investment in primary prevention in early childhood.

We're not likely to ever know all the facts in Charleeni's encounter with the child-welfare system due to confidentiality restrictions. A state children's ombudsman, recommended in 2002 by a task force of the General Assembly, would investigate citizen complaints and tell the community that the system's problems will be studied openly and resolved satisfactorily. Yet the initiative has met opposition from those who want to keep that door closed.

IN 1909, Theodore Roosevelt held the first White House summit on children. Though 100 years have passed, we still have far to go to ensure the health, safety and well-being of our kids. The rate of child abuse and neglect deaths in the U.S. is much higher than in other rich democracies, including Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United Kingdom.

Child fatalities are the canary in the coal mine of the community's approach to child safety and well-being. A report just out from the Every Child Matters Education Fund shows that more than 10,000 children in the U.S. died from family abuse and neglect from 2001 to 2007. Forty-six Pennsylvania children died from abuse in 2007, the most in at least five years.

We can, and must, change the story of Charleeni - and every other child at risk.

Frank P. Cervone is executive director of the Support Center for Child Advocates. He can be reached at fcervone@advokid.org.

Comments   
Posted 07:25 AM, 11/11/2009
Magistra
This is about breaking the cycle of ignorance and poverty. It is about stressing education not only for children but their parents. I won't tell you how or where, but for the first time in my life I read a suicide note from an 8 year old child. She was articulate enough to call for help before she did anything.....or maybe before anything was done to her. What possible nightmare could a child experience that would prompt her to wish she had never been born? Yes, she is now in counseling and lots of people are looking out for her. But it all goes back to breaking the cycle. No more babies having babies. No more dropouts. No more homelessness and joblessness. No more tragedies.
Posted 02:50 PM, 11/11/2009
NCCPR
Part 1 of 2: I have no doubt Mr. Cervone means well-but his commentary illustrates everything wrong with child welfare in Philadelphia. Whether a child winds up torn from parents forever in a case like the one Cervone describes is a crapshoot. It depends on which caseworker shows up at the door, what mood she’s in – and what was on the front page that day. It's quite possible that this child was spared from needless foster care only *because* the mother and grandfather were humble and contrite – or knew how to act like it. Had they become furious, a perfectly normal if misplaced reaction, their child might well be trapped in foster care right now. In some cases of young children seen wandering the street at night calling DHS is, literally, the right call, but this it would have been better for the neighbor – who knew the mother and grandfather – to take the child in himself or herself until they got home. In addition to avoiding the risk of needless foster care, that would have given DHS workers more time to find the next child in real danger. Cervone neglects to mention the real reason Philadelphia doesn’t spend enough on prevention: DHS wastes huge amounts of money taking away children at the highest rate of America’s big cities – by far. Yet, obviously, that hasn’t prevented headline-making tragedies. Cities that take proportionately far fewer children do better at keeping children safe. The ombudsman idea promotes secrecy, not openness. It just lets one more person into the closed club of “professionals” while continuing to shut out the rest of us. There won’t be real accountability until all court hearings in these cases are open to press and public – as they are in Pittsburgh, for example – until most records are open, and until agencies are free to comment on individual cases, as they can in some other states. We all have to be the ombudsman. Richard Wexler Executive Director National Coalition for Child Protection Reform www.nccpr.org
Posted 05:36 PM, 11/11/2009
nebulus
hear, hear to both FC and RW. Both are correct. Reviews of child fatalities have been mandated since at least 2003. ALL 67 counties have been conducting these reviews and PA DPW has been compiling the data on these fatalities. Where are the county reports? Where is the state report (the 2008 Annual Child Abuse report is not enough)? PA legislators were supposed to be preparing appropriate legislation to clarify public distribution of edited/redacted fatality reports, something that I and others believe is already legal, but this has not occurred and nothing has changed. Pennsylvania's and Philadelphia's child welfare system is not going to change unless there is clear and CONSISTENT leadership and advocacy. The state ombudsperson if there is ever to be a one could not serve this purpose because they are part of the "good ol' DPW" network and would be serving more at the pleasure of their state legislators then the pleasure of their actual constituency (children and families). The press needs to taking an active role in maintaining pressure for open courts and open documents (Barbara White Stack from the Jpournalism Center on Children and Families is an example>> www.journalismcenter.org/resource/dependency-courts/appeal-open-courts).
Posted 08:20 PM, 11/11/2009
NCCPR
Part 2 of 2 Even completely open fatality reviews are not enough. Child abuse fatalities are the worst form of tragedy – but they actually tell us nothing about the overall ability of a system to keep children safe – for a reason for which we all should be grateful. Let us thank God that there are sufficiently few of them that the numbers can rise or fall due to random chance – like whether the ambulance gets to the hospital in time, or whether a drunken killer with a gun has good aim - and the failings in these cases may be totally unrepresentative of the worst problems at DHS. Of course we should study what went wrong when a child dies. But we shouldn’t kid ourselves about what we’ll learn. The way to know why an agency typically fails is to look at a random sample of typical cases – and make those results fully public. But if we did that we’d see how often the system errs in both directions, leaving some children in danger, even as others are taken from homes that are safe or could be made safe if children got the right kinds of help. Some people prefer the distorted picture that comes from limiting reviews to fatalities. The very fact that Cervone would cite the Every Child Matters report – a document that is intellectually dishonest to its core – should disqualify him from this debate. (For our detailed critique of this report, see our Child Welfare Blog here: http://bit.ly/34qb8x) But he is right about one point: He’s been at this for 30 years. And for much of that time he has been the single most influential figure in Philadelphia child welfare. DHS commissioners and mayors come and go, but Frank Cervone is always there. Given that he’s had enormous influence over the system, and given that the system is such a mess, maybe it’s time to look for people with a better track record. Richard Wexler Executive Director National Coalition for Child Protection Reform www.nccpr.org
Posted 12:10 PM, 11/12/2009
nebulus
NCCPR: I agree that completely open fatality reviews are not enough for all the reasons you cite. The failures or missteps in a single case should not be an indictment of an entire agency. However, they should be, especially the most egregious, a driving force behind more in-depth case reviews that should be random AND, if not unannounced, preceded by only the shortest of courtesy notices. The reviews should be accompanied by teamings to review content and actions and results/outcomes (perhaps like the Federal CFSR). These reviews need to be frequent but NOT punitive and results made public and need to have a real investment by leadership and not just political considerations (i.e., it looks good to the public and reads well in the press). But I do have one question of you Mr Wexler. How much of your discrediting Mr Cervone is related to his public difference to your view on these issues?
Posted 12:46 PM, 11/12/2009
nebulus
Censorship? Richard Wexler provided part 2 of his response at 8:20PM last night. His response took issue with my entry and was critical of Mr. Cervone for relying on a inaccurate report (Every Child Matters) and being his own institution. I responded this morning at 11:30 and now find that both Mr Wexler's entry and mine no longer appear on this site.
Posted 08:17 PM, 11/13/2009
NCCPR
First the good news: Our posts are back up. I’ve had trouble posting to this site (I first tried posting this comment yesterday); my guess is any appearances and disappearances are due to technical problems. Concerning your question: Mr. Cervone and I do indeed strongly and publicly disagree. One look at his group’s website makes that clear. Five case histories are offered to demonstrate the value of his organization – not one of them involves preventing a child from being placed in foster care or successfully reuniting a family. What are the odds that, in all of Philadelphia, there is not one child who could use one of Mr. Cervone’s “advocates” in order to be helped in those ways? But it’s Mr. Cervone’s view that has actually been carried out, dominating policymaking in Philadelphia child welfare for decades, as can be seen in Philadelphia’s obscenely high rate of child removal. It’s not I that have discredited Mr. Cervone’s approach – it’s the Philadelphia child welfare system itself. Richard Wexler Executive Director National Coalition for Child Protection Reform www.nccpr.org
7 comments
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Southwark


$299,000
614 Federal St
Roxborough


$294,900
523 HERMITAGE ST
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos