Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  
share
email
print
reprint
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Prez weighs Afghanistan troop count

WASHINGTON - President Obama is considering sending large numbers of additional U.S. forces to Afghanistan next year but fewer than his war commander, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, prefers, U.S. officials said.

Such a narrowed military mission would escalate American forces to accomplish the commander's broadest goals, protecting Afghan cities and key infrastructure. But the option's scaled-down troop numbers likely would cut back on McChrystal's most ambitious objectives, amounting to what one official described as "McChrystal Light."

Under the pared-down option, McChrystal would be given fewer forces than the 40,000 additional troops he has asked for atop the current U.S. force of 68,000, officials said yesterday.

Senior White House officials stressed, however, that the president has not settled on any new troop numbers and continues to debate other strategic approaches to the eight-year-old Afghanistan war. The officials say Obama has not yet firmly settled on any option.

Obama is likely to hold off on making a decision until after Afghanistan's presidential runoff election on Nov. 7, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said yesterday in Pakistan.

"I would imagine that he will be coming to a decision sometime after the Afghan election is finally resolved," Clinton told a group of Pakistani journalists during an interview in Lahore.

Two officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because Obama has not announced his decision, said the troop numbers under the narrowed scenario probably would be lower than McChrystal's preference, at least at the outset. The officials did not divulge exact numbers.

Comments   
Posted 10:00 AM, 11/01/2009
rudytbone
Articles like this drive me nuts. Adequately staffing the effort in Afghanistan is not a political decision, it is a national security decision. Floating out articles like this, and then doing polls is not leadership. We had enough of that during the Clinton era and see where that got us with Al Queda. There will always be someone who will like your decision, even if it is the right decision. Please remember, Wars do not end, they are won or lost.
Posted 10:22 AM, 11/01/2009
rudytbone
Correction: Articles like this drive me nuts. Adequately staffing the effort in Afghanistan is not a political decision, it is a national security decision. Floating out articles like this, and then doing polls is not leadership. We had enough of that during the Clinton era and see where that got us with Al Queda. There will always be someone who will NOT like your decision, even if it is the right decision. Please remember, Wars do not end, they are won or lost.
Posted 09:31 PM, 11/01/2009
lefty
Obama has turned McChrystal's initiative into an embarrassing fiasco. Secretary Clinton SHOULD NOT be affirming that the prez will wait until after the Afghan elections to announce a decision. It's nothing more than a lame excuse for biding time. Obama is playing the American public like an illusionist. The opposition candidate, Abdullah-Abdullah, has already been bought off by the Obama administration: to believe otherwise,is to believe that Abdullah's abdication is due to a sudden realization that the elections would be rigged in favor of Karzai. Of course it will be rigged. Here at home, we have dead folks that vote, so why the expectation that this forelorn, foresaken region- which looks more like a moonscape- be honest and forthright. It's a land of tribal warlords and chieftans, incapable of establishing a unified, democratic form of government. That's why our government would prefer a known quantity to one who's unknown. Every banana republic we ever supported was controlled by a corrupt demagogue who danced to our music. We've been there, done that. To expect anything else would be equivalent to believing Penn and Teller perform miracles. Answer? Declare victory and pull up stakes before the American public wakes up and figures out that there really isn't a strategy or a plan, just a shell game that we can't win.
3 comments
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Royersford


$143,900
1003 FOXMEADOW DR
Old City/Society Hill


$725,000
337 S 6TH ST
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos