- A Phila. effort to counter the departed Dad Vail
- CityCenter raises stakes on the Vegas Strip
- Killer of Officer Chuck Cassidy sentenced to die
- Appeals Court: School district can ban Christmas carols
- N.J. won't enforce flu-shot mandate
- Get started collecting your family stories
- Tragic mystery: How did John Lewis become a killer?
- Nepal begins a ritual in blood
- Claims against Phila. VA up to $58 million
- Boxer's death ruled accidental
- Obama taps Penn's Gutmann to lead bioethics panel
- Body of missing N.J. fisherman found in N.C.
- Your life, by personal historians
- Comcast's holiday show is a breakout in 3-D
- Pottsgrove students mourn classmates killed in crash
- Beach repairs at risk in restrictive Shore towns
- Wyeths' work up for auction
- Dan Gross: Sports talker opening comedy club
- Fallen boxer's organs will give life to others
- Sports Authority, Nintendo team up to sell Wii Fit as fitness equipment
- Holiday train shows take Obama homes on board
- 23-year coma victim talking, or no?
- Boat owner's body found
- John Lewis was unlike many killers, but in prison he'll slip into a familiar pattern
- Officer Cassidy's killer sentenced to die; defendant asks forgiveness, is rebuffed by widow
- Parade taking a new route
- Boxer dies in Blue Horizon bout
- Camden again ranks worst on crime list
- Gunshot victim Brinkley renews NFL quest
- Shooter cop was investigated for multiple citizen complaints
RELATED STORIES
City shackled in efforts to reclaim homes, but plan for a land bank offers hope
PORT RICHMOND community leaders have the city's Department of Licenses & Inspections on speed dial.
They know Water Department clerks by name after regularly calling to report broken pipes in the rickety rental houses in their neighborhood.
They e-mail lists of abandoned properties to City Council.
Community leaders want the city to force real-estate mogul Robert N. Coyle Sr. and other alleged slumlords to maintain their rental houses and adhere to city laws.
It should be simple. It isn't.
L&I can cite slumlords for housing-code violations. The court can slap them with fines. If slumlords don't fix the homes, L&I can board them up, at a cost of $850, but a boarded-up house attracts squatters and drug dealers.
L&I can also demolish ramshackle houses deemed dangerous. But the procedure is costly - $17,000 a house on average - and time consuming.
Beyond that, there's not much more L&I can do, said Commissioner Fran Burns.
The Redevelopment Authority could seize the city's roughly 40,000 vacant or abandoned properties through eminent domain, but the authority would have to pay the owner and have a clear plan for the property.
The city Law Department can obtain tax-delinquent properties through the courts and take the homes to sheriff's sale.
But there's little incentive to do so, said state Rep. John Taylor, R-Philadelphia.
"There's no incentive for the city from a financial point of view to take these properties on because they wait until they are absolutely worthless," Taylor said. "The city just doesn't move on them."
But Taylor, who represents Port Richmond, believes he has a solution.
He's sponsored a bill under which local governments could establish a land bank to acquire, manage and develop abandoned or blighted properties. The land bank, not outside investors, would have first dibs on any homes up for sheriff's sale.
The city Law Department, working with the Redevelopment Authority and the land bank, would move more quickly to foreclose on tax-delinquent properties, said RDA Executive Director Terry Gillen.
That wouldn't address the problem of homes in violation of the city's safety and health codes, if they were not tax delinquent, but it would be a partial solution.
The land bank, governed by a board of community members, would give dilapidated homes with little or no value to developers for free. In exchange, developers would pledge to rehab the homes and sell them to single families. The city would benefit financially once people live in the homes and pay property taxes. The community would benefit once eyesores were rehabbed.
The land bank would sell - and hopefully profit from - properties that have value.
The city would determine how to fund the land bank, which Taylor concedes would be costly at the onset.
"I frankly don't have all the answers," Taylor said. But, he added, the city can't afford to do nothing.
Taylor said he expects the Land Banks Authorities Act to pass sometime next year.
