Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  
share
email
print
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Harry Gross: He's angry for NOT listening to Harry

Dear Harry: I hate you! For many years you have warned people against adjustable-rate mortgages. Unfortunately, my wife and I ignored your advice. We went for one with optional payments. That's right. We saw a house that we both fell in love with, and we went way overboard. With the lowest possible payment well beneath our ability to pay at that time, we bought a house with a $250,000 mortgage. We have been paying $200 a month less than the interest. The result is that we now have a mortgage which is about $260,000. Early next year the payments will rise to almost twice what we're paying now in order to amortize the principal and pay the interest. There is just no way we can afford to pay that. This is especially so because I am no longer getting overtime at my job. The bank refused to modify the terms of the mortgage. This fiasco was partly their fault because they really sold us on this "new" mortgage idea. Why did you have to be right? What can we do now?

What Harry says: It was easy to be right. You went for a deal that I would only recommend in very, very rare occasions. It was mortgages with interest-only payments that helped get us into trouble with the Great Depression. You did not indicate whether your home is worth more than the current principal. If it is, you have a shot at refinancing, as long as you have a good credit score. If not, try once more with the bank's chief lending officer. If that fails, you will lose the house at foreclosure. At that point, you will have to consider what you've already paid as rent, and hope that the bank doesn't come after you for the remaining amount due after the foreclosure sale. Being right doesn't always bring pleasure.

Write Harry Gross c/o the Daily News, 400 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19130. Harry urges all his readers to give blood: Contact the American Red Cross at 800-GIVE LIFE.

Comments   
Posted 08:49 AM, 11/03/2009
CCC
"This fiasco was partly their fault because they really sold us on this "new" mortgage idea." No, it was entirely YOUR fault. They didn't hold a gun to your head to make you accept. Grow some and accept total blame for your current position. Sell the house at a loss if you have to, but sell it before they foreclose and your credit is damaged for at least a decade.
Posted 08:51 AM, 11/03/2009
brian stewart
DOES THE WORD MORON COME INTO PLAY HERE.
Posted 11:46 AM, 11/03/2009
fedupphilly
A prime example of the housing crisis. This LW new full and well they could not afford the house period. If they were able to afford the home they would not have had to take ARM. Also why would you buy a house based on overtime. LW you have no one to blame but yourself.
3 comments
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Center City


$1,399,900
1111 LOCUST ST #9B
Lincoln University


$274,900
160 WHITE DOE DR
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos