Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH  
share
email
print
font size
options
 
READER FEEDBACK
Post a comment


Harry Gross: Once and for all: Load or no-load funds

Dear Harry: I remember you speaking at a seminar year ago where you said that load funds do not perform any better than no-load funds.

My stockbroker told me last week that you must have been getting paid by one of the no-load fund groups or their association. He told me that if you were right, load funds would have disappeared long ago.

What's the real story here, Harry? Were you paid for promoting no-load funds?

Do you still believe that no-loads are at least equal?

What Harry says: First of all, I have never offered to appear at a financial seminar for compensation. Where there was an honorarium, it was donated to the Red Cross or some other worthy charity.

I am still firmly convinced that my position is correct.

Load funds are sold by brokers, so commissions have to be paid. That's the major incentive for brokers to sell funds. Otherwise, they would concentrate on stocks, which do yield a commission.

To go one step further, Russell Kinnel (of Morningstar), in his bookFund Spy, even makes the case for no-load funds with the lowest cost ratios, saying that "the savvy investor should look for low-cost funds with sound fundamentals. Simply doing that will double or triple your chances of success and greatly reduce your chances of dramatic underperformance."

There you have it.

Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are sold like stocks so the commissions are paid, resulting in a situation similar to load funds.

Write Harry Gross c/o the Daily News, 400 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19130. Harry urges all his readers to give blood - contact the American Red Cross at 800-GIVE LIFE.

Comments   
Posted 09:48 AM, 10/27/2009
phillygoat
Here's how I put it. If someone believes active managers are worth the load and greater annual expense ratio they should really put their money where their mind is and keep 100% of their investments (or at least 100% of their equity asset allocation) with that manager and fund. If they start shopping positions around, unless one is a deliberate and well-informed asset category slicer-and-dicer (which is possible, for example a portfolio of low-ER US and Europe indexes supplemented with low-overlap active-managed specific specialty asset funds such as REITs and BRIC emerging market stocks, etc), they may find they've approximated the total stock market for 5% front end load and 2% annual ER when they could have had an index fund tracking "the total stock market" for no load and 0.2% per year. Naive investors think they have achieved diversification buying several active managed funds (and the paid brokers don't discourage this!). If the investor actually has diversification, they are paying a ton of money for it upfront and per year than they needed to and the total portfolio will do worse year over year. If they don't achieve diversification, why bother with multiple funds? Also, Harry's bit about ETF commission being like a load is technically correct but bologna on magnitude: Yes, a $9.95 discount brokerage trading commission a load, but on a $10,000 position, that's a 0.10% load on the front and the back. In comparison, the load on $10,000 of a class A mutual fund is going to be $500 not $20. If you are buying $1000 or $2000, go with the fund and not the ETF as the $9.95 is a 1% load.
Posted 08:39 PM, 10/27/2009
briancpa
How can load funds still be around? Easy - people are sold bad investments everyday since they do not know any better. (Whole Life Insurance anyone?)
Posted 03:20 PM, 11/02/2009
GreenOrangeRedBlueBlood
"My stockbroker told me last week that you must have been getting paid by one of the no-load fund groups or their association. He told me that if you were right, load funds would have disappeared long ago." Yeah, and if No Doc mortgages were found to have a high rate of default no lender would offer them, right? That's the kind of thinking that's taken the whole Financial Industry to the brink. Meanwhile, the working man who dutifully puts his pre-tax deductions into his 401(k) can plan on working until he's dead, even if he lives to be 90+. All of these so called financial wizards should be quite warm for eternity!!
3 comments
  • Top Jobs
  • Top Homes
  • Top Cars
 
SEARCH JOBS
Germantown


$315,000
110 W JOHNSON ST
Southwark


$357,000
716 FULTON ST
SEARCH CARS

Buy Inquirer, Daily News & Philly merchandise here including:

 
Books
 
Movies
 
Page Reprints
 
Photo Licensing
 
Photos